Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effectiveness of corporal punishment
What is corporal punishment and its effect
Corporal punishment as a means of discipline
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effectiveness of corporal punishment
The use of corporal punishment should not be permissible throughout the United States and in most other countries around the world as historical ways are changing. The definition states this kind of act as whipping, caning, spanking, or beating of another person. In Bastard Out of Carolina the beating of Bone by her stepfather Glen shows that although some people agree that these beating should not take place, they still continue. Bone’s aunts’ and uncles’ do not condone the violence, while her mother lets it continue because of her love for Glen. The controversial subject discusses that this punishment justifies some acts, as the other side points out that it is an invasion of human rights. If the legal system does not protect it’s people …show more content…
The belief that corporal punishment should be banned is sensible in order to protect the wellbeing of children, as well to do justice onto those who do not recognize the mental and physical damage it does to their victims. The safety of children is a very important issue and it is directly related to the novel Bastard Out of Carolina. In the book Bone struggles with the strength to tell others around her about the abuse that she experiences from her step-father Glen. When children experience physical punishment from adults, it is inexcusable in court. If the idea of making corporal punishment okay were to become sensible in guardians’ eyes, there would be many cases that would allow some innocent children to be abused by who they depend on. A summary from the Encyclopedia of Motherhood states, “Nearly half of all physical abuse victims are 7 years old or younger” (Child Abuse from Encyclopedia of Motherhood 1). The thought of a 7 year old girl defending herself for something that she did not know was in the wrong goes to show that the physical …show more content…
Human rights are described in the Encyclopedia of Human Rights as laws “that requires that everyone be treated as a human being, possessing inherent human dignity. This dignity requires respect for the physical and psychological well-being of persons” (Corporal Punishment 1). In Allison’s novel, there is a lot of violence that goes on not only between Glen and Bone, but also Glen and the Boatwright family. After finding Bone with bumps and bruises on her legs from being harassed by Glen, the Boatwright brothers decide that the need to “teach Glen a lesson”. While Rayene and Anney are comforting Bone, she states that “We listened to the noises from the porch. Those thuds were Daddy Glen hitting the wall. Those grunts were his. Those curses were my uncles’” (Allison 247). Even in this case, I do not believe that a violent punishment makes the most sense for grown men. The beating of another person and violating their rights as a human will make no positive effect in the mind. There is revenge to a certain degree and that revenge should be served worse than what is expected. By the Boatwright brothers beating Glen up, he knew it was going to happen. If they would have used alternative methods such as telling the police, they may have not only saved Bone from being abused again, but prevented Anney from
In a final analysis of the pros and cons of Corporal punishment, it seems that the present penal system until further studies on the alternative are conclusive, should remain in effect. Corporal punishment does provide some insight, although presents too many risks and negative possibilities at this time.
The idea of physical punishment has been visible throughout our nation’s history. The 30’s, 40’, 50’s all encouraged the use of strong physical discipline towards children, it wasn’t until the 60’s and 70’s that this idea became taboo. “Many of us in the room had been smacked, whipped, or beaten as children...
In “Bring Back Flogging” Jeff Jacoby, a columnist for the Boston Globe, presents the use of corporal punishment as an alternative to the current system of imprisonment. Published in February of 1997, the article states that flogging would be a more effective means of punishment than jail. He insists it would be less expensive and serve as a deterrent to first time offenders. Jacoby’s thoughts on prison reform are legitimate, but his reasoning behind the use of corporal punishment is flawed. He fails to provide reasonable support for his argument which leaves the reader guessing as to the seriousness of his claim.
With this in mind, many writers have contended that we revisit corporal punishment. These authors include Peter Moskos and Jeff Jacoby. In their works, they both argue for the reintroduction of corporal punishment, i.e. flogging, in society. Within the contents of Peter Moskos’ book, In Defense of Flogging, the author proposes an alternative
There is a point raised by the author on the article “Spanking children isn’t abusing them” that children in residential schools had horrible and often fatal beatings (2015). Furthermore, while reading “Corporal punishment by parents and associated child behaviors and experiences: A meta-analytic and theoretical review” Gershoff asserts, “Behaviors that do not result in significant physical injury (e.g., spank, slap) are considered corporal punishment, whereas behav- iors that risk injury (e.g., punching, kicking, burning) are consid- ered physical abuse. ” (2002) As it was stated on the previous point, reasonable force has its limits, and limits the parent and care givers to discipline the child without degrading them or causing physical or psychological harm.
Jacoby’s “Bring back Flogging” discusses use of corporal punishment in our nation's history and argues for its return in the place of some modern methods of punishment. Jacoby cites the cost of current punishment methods to taxpayers being too high, the public humiliation of flogging, the moral ethicacy of whipping over imprisonment, and to quote Jacoby the idea that “Crime is out of control” as reasons supporting his claim.
When describing a physical altercation between two adults, the term is assault and battery. Assault on an individual has more than immediate effects; the effects can last a lifetime in severe cases. In all fifty states, it is a crime to hit, strike or use corporal punishment in any deliberate manner towards any person over the age of eighteen. However, this law does not apply to physical force being used on minors. Spanking, whipping, and paddling are among a few common references to this form of punishment. Physically disciplining children has had many names over the years. No matter which term is used, corporal punishment has a negative impact on every party involved. It is a widely used, socially accepted method of discipline. “Approximately 94% of three and four-year old children have been spanked in the past year (Slade & Winssow 1321). Although spanking is a widespread practice, it is becoming more controversial. The negative effects of spanking greatly outweigh the benefits. Spanking is a socially tolerated view promoting abusive patterns, and has a negative psychological impact in teaching children that pain, fear, and confusion promote conformability.
The general acceptance, and sometimes support, of corporal punishment as a method of discipline is an aspect of the American culture (Barnett, Miller-Perrin, Perrin 61).
Another argument is similar to abuse; spanking. Many people believe that physical punishment of a child is not right and in a public institution, they have a right to get involved and try to stop what they see as violence against children. In fact, one Texas judge sentenced a mother to five years of probation after spanking her child, even though there is no law that strictly prohibits spanking. Despite the increasing mindset that spanking is ...
Summary In the memoir, Moab Is My Washpot, the author discussed how he viewed corporal punishment and how it evolved over the course of the years. He also explained how corporal punishment was seen differently in other parts of the world because some places see it as normal and others may see it as cruel to the children. “…the issue is so culturally loaded today as to be almost impossible to inspect.” Then he started to discuss his child hood memories when he received beatings from his teachers in school.
The physical abuse of children covers a wide range of actions from what some might term ‘justifiable chastisement’ such as slapping or spanning to the sort of actions which most would agree constitute deliberate, sadistic cruelty against children.
Contrary to popular belief, corporal punishment is still an accepted form of punishment in some countries. In these countries, many see this kind of punishment for children as normal, natural and harmless. Yet, human rights activists believe that it is damaging and must be stopped. For example, Gambian teachers are working to end corporal punishment. The Gambia Teachers' Union has been training teachers on alternative...
Many people have different views on this topic; some are "for" it, some are "against" it. The United Nations (UN) as a violation of basic human rights have condemned the national U.K. law. It says that some forms of corporal punishment are acceptable. However some parents have different perspectives on hitting their children.
Corporal punishment is defined as “an infliction of punishment to the body.” My primary reason for not approving corporal punishment would be that corporal punishment creates a negative reaction from the student’s perspective plus additional problems in the end. To discipline students in a way that will harm them into non-misbehavior is not the way to go. I claim that corporal punishment in public schools should not be permitted because it is barbaric, harmful, and in no way a method to solve personal problems.
In South Africa it is still legal for parents to make use of corporal punishment in order to discipline their children. The reason therefore is that a defence exists in South African common-law for parents when a claim based on assault is raised. This defence is known as reasonable disciplinary chastisement and it is seen as ‘n ground of justification. Physical assault, such as corporal chastisement is seen as unlawful. In the following discussion current legislation on the subject, world views and the interpretation of the Constitution will be examined to determine whether or not this defence has a future in South African law.