Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The essay of epiphany
Essay on the epiphany theme
Essays on symbolism in literature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In various works of fiction, there are characters who symbolize the ignorant people within our society. Within our society there are people who fail to try to understand those different things, and we even have people who believe they are “good” while ignorantly and inevitably having their own flaws. In both Cathedral, by Raymond Carver, and A Good Man Is Hard to Find, by Flannery O’Connor, the central characters are forced to deal with circumstances that change their beliefs about themselves and others. The perspective and symbolism of these two authors point to the danger of ignorance. In Cathedral, there are two main characters. There is an unnamed narrator, and a blind man named Robert. Raymond Carver details two polarizing …show more content…
characters: the blind man is a likeable man and therefore is a sympathetic character, while the unnamed narrator is an unlikeable man who initially seems ablest and racist. This unnamed character symbolizes our society that fails to understand the things and people that are different. In the beginning, lines like “A blind man in my house was not something I look forward to” (Carver 84) and “Beulah! That’s a name for a colored woman” (87), reveal two character flaws in the narrator. In A Good Man Is Hard to Find, there is a family of five people: a father named Bailey, an unnamed mother, a son named John Wesley, a daughter named June Star, and an unnamed grandmother. Unlike Cathedral, none of these family members would be considered sympathetic characters, due to their obnoxious personalities. The main character in this story is the grandmother, who is the most ignorant of the family. She possesses various flaws like manipulation and obsession with image. When she retells the story of Mr. Teagarden, a man trying to court her in her past, it is clear that her idea of a “good man” is based on superficial qualities like wealth, appearance, and presents. And at the beginning of the story, she tries to manipulate the family by telling them that a criminal, called the Misfit, was in the area she did not want to vacation. Although these two novels are about two seemingly different things, both detail the ignorance, hypocrisy, and naivety of characters who believe they are good or fail to see the wrong in their ways. In both of these short stories, the authors use various literary tools to reveal their perspectives.
In Cathedral, there are various symbols. One example of symbolism is blindness, which can be symbolized as not seeing the truth. The blind man also alludes to the blind prophet in Oedipus, who ironically knows all of the answers to Oedipus’s questions and sees the truth. Just like the blind prophet, Robert helps the narrator understand more about himself. Another symbol is a cathedral. The unnamed character helps Robert understand what a cathedral is by first describing it, and then drawing it while Robert holds his hand. In this story, cathedrals represent that amazement you see when you walk into one and look up. This amazement is similar to an epiphany, which is why Carver titled this story “Cathedral.” Symbolism is not very obvious in A Good Man Is Hard To Find. However, O’Connor uses motifs like the phrase “A good man is hard to find.” O’Connor constantly references to these better times where people (specifically men) were more qualified than the people today. She is clearly using satire to highlight the grandmother’s irony in wanting a man who is adequate for her, when she is so flawed and so ignorant …show more content…
herself. In both of these stories, the main characters experience epiphanies.
In Cathedrals, the narrator starts his journey to enlightenment once the blind man enters the house. The first step towards the narrator’s understanding is when he learns that Robert smokes. The narrator believed in a misconception that blind people did not smoke because they are unable to see the smoke. However this was disproved when Robert smoked his cigarette. This caused the narrator to feel more connected to the blind man, because even though Robert was different, they both had a similarity. The second step, that shows the narrator’s change in perspective, occurred when they ate dinner. This scene alludes to The Last Supper, because of the wine, bread, and prayer. This also shows that the narrator’s disposition is slowly transfiguring. The final step towards the narrator’s epiphany is when Robert asks him to explain what a cathedral is. After the narrator draws the cathedral on the paper, Robert tells him to close his eyes. This act forces the narrator to experience what Robert experiences every day. The narrator not only sympathizes with Robert for the first time, but he truly understands that being different is not bad. In A Good Man Is Hard to Find, the grandmother experiences an epiphany as well. While she is trying to explain to the Misfit that he actually is a good man, she realizes the flaws that she possesses. At the end of the story the grandmother cries out, “‘why, you’re one of my
babies. You’re one of my own children’” (O’Connor 388). She reaches her enlightenment right before she was shot. The grandmother realizes she needed to change her ways, just like the narrator does in Cathedrals. The circumstances in these two short stories were very different, and the results of the epiphanies were also very different. Although the fates of the grandmother and the unnamed narrator were completely different, they are both dynamic characters. In Cathedral, the unnamed narrator eventually understands the faults in his beliefs and the ending is left open ended by Carver. The narrator ironically learns from the blind man, who the narrator feels sorry for in the beginning. On the other hand, the grandmother in A Good Man Is Hard to Find reaches her enlightenment when it is too late. She finally understands her imperfections, but it is too late to change them. The authors of these two short stories show the different effects of ignorance on people. We can either realize what our flaws are and change them, or we will fail to understand our flaws until it is too late. Both of these authors detail the lives of people who had failed to understand their own flaws. The narrator in Cathedrals was able to learn from the very man he pitied. He learned about his ignorance from a man who cannot even see. The grandmother in A Good Man Is Hard to Find was forced to understand her own flaws under a crucial circumstance. This shows the opinions of these two authors: humans are depraved by nature. Even in these two very different works of literature, it is clear that we as humanity need to reach our own individual enlightenments to remove our ignorance
My own high school experience brought me one of my best friends who I hadn’t paid much attention to because she was in a different clique. I wouldn’t have even considered starting a friendship with her if I hadn’t gotten past my prejudiced ways and opened my mind. The story of “Cathedral” provides a very optimistic ending, which wouldn’t have been possible without the narrator’s initial negative traits. The blind man’s likeable character eventually helps the narrator to have a sort of epiphany in which he appears to leave behind his
These audiotapes represent a distinguished type of communication that requires no visual interaction, but an interface that involves understanding and empathy instead, something the narrator has not yet learned. At this point of the story the narrator believes that Robert could not have possibly fulfilled his now deceased wife’s, Beulah’s, aspirations as seen when he states, “I found myself thinking what a pitiful life this woman must have led,” (37). The narrator bases his reason solely on the fact that the man is blind, so how could he have ever interacted or contributed in their relationship. In reality, though, it is the narrator himself, who has not fully satisfied or even begun to fully appreciate his own wife. The audiotapes symbolize this absence of appreciation and reveals to the reader that the narrator has not even considered this “harmless chitchat,” (36) as he describes it, to be of importance to his own marriage. It is not until the end, when he finishes drawing the cathedral that he is capable of understanding what his wife and Robert share. The cathedral is the other major symbol in this story, since it is the pivotal turning point for when the narrator becomes a dynamic character. Without the cathedral the narrator would not have succumbed to his new acceptance of what it means to actually see someone or something. When the narrator says, “I didn’t feel like I was inside anything,” (46) this is the indication of that epiphany coming to him. Moments before, the narrator had just explained to Robert that he did not “believe in it [religion]. In anything,” (45) however, this insightful moment now contradicts that statement, supporting the notion that the narrator has advanced as a character. Furthermore, a cathedral, which is assumed to bring solace and a new light to those in pursuit of one, offered the
“Cathedral” consists of three individuals. The narrator is the main character, which the story revolves around. The wife of the narrator is the second character, who is the least relevant. The third character is the blind man, named Robert, who is a friend of the wife.
At first glance, one might assume Raymond Carver’s "Cathedral" illustrates the awakening of an insensitive and insulated husband to the world of a blind man. However, this literal awakening does not account for the fact that the husband awakens also to a world of religious insight, of which he has also been blind. The title and story structure are the first indicators of the importance of the religious thesis. It is also revealed when one examines the language and actions of the characters in the story. Finally, Carver’s previous and subsequent writings give an overall background for the argument that "Cathedral" has a significant religious import.
The narrator in Raymond Carver’s "Cathedral" is not a particularly sensitive man. I might describe him as self-centered, superficial, and egotistical. And while his actions certainly speak to these points, it is his misunderstanding of the people and the relationships presented to him in this story which show most clearly his tragic flaw: while Robert is physically blind, it is the narrator who cannot clearly see the world around him.
“Cathedral,” a short story written by Raymond Carver, presents an intriguing story of an ignorant man 's lesson. During this story, Carver 's working class characters are crushed by broken marriages, financial issues, and fulfilling jobs, but they are frequently unable to understand or communicate their own sufferings. However, the main story consists of the narrator, known as “Bub,” facing an internal conflict about a blind man named Robert staying the night in his home. Regardless of the fact that this blind man is his wife 's long time friend, the narrator cannot find himself comfortable with such an idea because of his extreme prejudices. Although, despite the narrator’s conflict he finds himself connecting to Robert on a more personal
In Raymond Carver's "Cathedral," the husband's view of blind men is changed when he encounters his wife's long time friend, Robert. His narrow minded views and prejudice thoughts of one stereotype are altered by a single experience he has with Robert. The husband is changed when he thinks he personally sees the blind man's world. Somehow, the blind man breaks through all of the husband's jealousy, incompetence for discernment, and prejudgments in a single moment of understanding.
Raymond Carver's "Cathedral" depicted the interaction between a narrow minded husband, with a limited understanding of the world around him, and a blind visitor, named Robert, that proved to be the catalyst that dramatically changed the husband's view on the world, while they went from being strangers to becoming friends. In the beginning of the story, the husband disliked the concept of his wife bringing her blind friend over to stay since he never had met a blind person before and did not understand it. However, as the story progresses, the husband, through interaction and observation, begins to dispel his fears and misconceptions of Robert and his blindness. With the help of Robert, the husband gains a revelation that changed his view and opened his eyes to the world.
Don’t judge a book by its cover. We have all heard this cliché at least once in our lifetime. But how many times have we ever followed through with this expression? The author Raymond Carver writes about an experience where a couple is visited by the wife’s acquaintance Robert, whose wife has recently passed. The fact that Robert is blind belittles him in the eyes of the narrator, causing tension and misjudgment. In “Cathedral”, Carver uses irony, point of view, and symbolism to show the difference between looking and truly seeing.
In Raymond Carver’s story, “Cathedral,” the story tells of how a close outside relationship can threaten a marriage by provoking insecurities, aggravating communication barriers, and creating feelings of invasion of privacy. The husband in the story is given the gift of seeing the cathedral through a blind man’s eyes. Although the title suggests that the story is about a cathedral, it is really about two men who come together and share a vision and realize it is he who is blind. As the story begins, the character of the husband has a negative personality. He lacks compassion, is narrow-minded, and is jealous of his wife’s friendship with a blind man named Robert.
The narrator in Raymond Carver's "Cathedral" has two fully functional eyes, in which he chooses never to use to their full potential. The eyes of the narrator are biased, insecure, jealous, and very limited in what they choose to see. This inability to see is made apparent when he is forced to meet and converse with a blind man. The narrator's perception of the world around him, and blurred vision, is resolved by a great irony in the story when Roger helps the narrator see past his prejudice outlook on life. The blind man teaches the narrator how to see.
Raymond Carver’s short story, “Cathedral,” portrays a story in which many in today’s society can relate. We are introduced from the first sentence of the story to a man that seems to be perturbed and agitated. As readers, we are initially unsure to the reasoning’s behind the man’s discomfort. The man, who seems to be a direct portrayal of Raymond Carver himself, shows his ignorance by stereotyping a blind man by the name of Robert, who has come to stay with he and his wife. From the very beginning, Carver shows his detest for Robert but over the course of the story eases into comfort with him and in the end is taught a lesson from the very one he despised.
Both “Cathedral” by Raymond Carver, and “A Good Man is Hard to Find” by Flannery O’Connor’s main characters come to a point of self-reflection. Both stories leave the imagination, about whether the characters have changed their perspectives on their surroundings or not, up to the reader. Although their realization at the end are the same, both stories differ in events that led up to the ending. In O’Connor’s short story, the main character is a religious and judgmental Catholic woman that led her family to their deaths. But in Carver’s short story, the main character is a stubborn, non-religious judgmental man that sees with his eyes and not his heart, meaning that he sees and accepts things as they are. Carver demonstrates vision more effectively
Flannery O’Connor and Raymond Carver wrote the short stories, “A Good Man is Hard to Find” and “The Cathedral,” which both showcase personas of conflictedness in two different time frames. Although one can draw many interpretations from these two stories, written in 1953 and 1983, respectively, one might refute many impracticalities associated with the nostalgic state of many of these characters, who possess characteristics that would be considered archaic and imbecilic. Racists and discriminatory viewpoints circumnavigate the minds of several characters, who can’t seem to come to terms with modern ideologues. The prevailing tendencies of these characters could very possibly cause some anguish to the readers, who would struggle to make sense of the ignorance displayed in these two stories. Many critics have suggested their own interpretations of the stories, and what they reveal to us about human nature.
The unnamed narrator of Raymond Carver’s “Cathedral” poses as an unreliable narrator for his unaccepting nature towards blind people along with his ignorant perception of many realities in his life that Carver presents for the reader to take into question. The narrator holds prejudice against Robert, a blind man whom the narrator’s wife worked with ten years earlier and eventually befriends. Unperceptive to many of the actualities in his own life, the narrator paints an inaccurate picture of Robert that he will soon find to be far from the truth.