Essay Of Mice And Men Differences Between The Book And Movie

1023 Words3 Pages

When turning a novel into a film there are bound to be changes made, some bigger than others. There are many reasons for alterations to be made but sometimes these changes have an effect on how the audience perceives the movie. The novella, Of Mice and Men by John Steinbeck, was turned into a film by Gary Sinise but, there were notable changes made to the film. Sinise’s decision to alter the scene in Crooks’ room results in a loss of character development, seen in characters Crooks, Curley's wife, and Candy. All three of these characters were strongly constructed in the novel and by leaving out this key scene in the film, the viewers are left with a lack of better understanding of these characters. In the film Crooks was barely an important …show more content…

Curley's wife is forced to live on this farm full of men with nobody to talk to. She had a dream of being in the movies but her mom wouldn't let her so she married Curley in spite of her. When she comes into Crooks’ room and hears about their plan to get out of there she's instantly jealous. “Whatta I care?... I tell ya I could of went with shows...An’ what am I doin’? Standin’ here talkin’ to a bunch of bindle stiffs…” (73) This scene was an important example of how insecure Curley's wife is, anyone that has better than her, she makes it a point to make sure everyone knows she could've had better. When Candy tells her to leave them alone she goes after Crooks just because he is black. “I could get you strung up on a tree so easy it ain't even funny.” (81) Curley's wife has this constant need to have more power than everyone else around her because of how Curley treats her. She's stuck in a powerless one-sided relationship so her first reaction to someone actually getting out of here is to shut it down. Without this scene in the movie, Curley's wife doesn't seem that trapped when in fact she is. In the novel, she seems like this hopeless girl looking for any sort of rescue and that's not the case in the …show more content…

He befriends George and Lennie almost instantly. Candy was one character that was not apart of the scene in Crooks’ room. In the novel Candy enters, looking for Lennie only to find him in a black man's room. At first, he is unsure how to act, saying he’s never been in Crooks’ room before but as soon as Curley's wife comes in he defends Crooks and Lennie. Curley's wife picks on Lennie, teasing him about beating Curley up until Candy steps in, “You let this guy alone. Don't you do no messing aroun’ with him. I'm gonna tell George what you says. George wont have you messin’ around with Lennie.” (88) By leaving this out in the film, the audience misses out on the bond between Lennie and Candy. Even after Curley's wife goes after Crooks, a man Candy has never talked to before, Candy tells her, “You better go on home now...” (81) Candy didn't have to say anything to Curley's wife but he still did because he realizes they all have to stick together when it comes to Curley's wife. It was unfortunate that Sinise decided to leave this scene out because it was a moment of allegiance between Candy and Crooks even though they never had a conversation before

Open Document