Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The scarlet letter crucible
The crucible and the scarlet letter
The crucible and the scarlet letter
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
When considering two works of highly influential literature, it is important to consider how the texts are similar or different. When it comes to classical literature, there are often more similarities than one might think. This is evidenced by the abundant similarities in Hawthorne’s The Scarlet Letter and Miller’s The Crucible. Despite these many similarities, there are still many differences. The two works of The Scarlet Letter and The Crucible are both highly similar; however, they also bear many differences. One common theme of The Crucible and The Scarlet Letter is the idea of adultery. In both texts, an adulterous character plays a major role in the story’s plot. In The Crucible, John Proctor’s affair with Abigail Williams is where …show more content…
the main conflict originates. Everything Abigail does can be traced back to her jealousy of John’s wife. Abigail’s blatant dislike for Elizabeth Proctor is evidenced by her angry outburst, in which she says, “She is blackening my name in the village! She is telling lies about me! She is a cold, sniveling woman, and you bend to her!” (Crucible 1140, 10) In The Scarlet Letter, all of the citizens have a similar reaction to Hester Prynne’s infidelity. "If thou feelest it to be for thy soul's peace, and that thy earthly punishment will thereby be made more effectual to salvation, I charge thee to speak out the name of thy fellow-sinner and fellow-sufferer!” (Scarlet Letter, 64) These religious groups clearly have very strong feelings about adultery. According to psychologist Michael W. Austin, adultery is wrong in any sense. He says, “First, adultery involves breaking a promise, in fact, one of the most serious promises we make.” Another similar idea within the texts is that of sin. In The Scarlet Letter, “Thus the young and pure would be taught to look at her, with the scarlet letter flaming on her breast,—at her, the child of honorable parents,—at her, the mother of a babe, that would hereafter be a woman, —at her, who had once been innocent, —as the figure, the body, the reality of sin.” (The Scarlet Letter, 72) Similarly, the citizens in The Crucible react to sin in the same way, as Reverend Parris says, “You will confess yourself or I will take you out and whip you to your death…” (Crucible 1154, 37) In both texts, sin is taken very seriously, punishable even by death. A similar opinion is had by David Branon, “Yet we must understand that if we continue to sin knowingly, we are in effect turning our back on Jesus and His pain.” This reveals that these opinions are still held by some people today. One final similarity is that of mass hysteria. In The Crucible, this theme is prominent throughout. When Proctor begins to panic about the possible conviction of his wife, he becomes involved in this whirlwind of emotion, “Make your peace with it! Now Hell and Heaven grapple on our backs, and all our old pretense is ripped away—make your peace!” (The Crucible 1181, 12). Proctor quickly becomes very emotional, threatening Mary Warren. This theme appears within The Scarlett Letter as well. “‘What choice had you?’ asked Roger Chillingworth. ‘My finger, pointed at this man, would have hurled him from his pulpit into a dungeon, —thence, peradventure, to the gallows!’” (The Scarlet Letter, 154) Rather than have reason, Chillingworth chooses to jump straight to accusation and threats. Mass hysteria can be described in many ways, “Mass hysteria is characterized by the rapid spread of conversion disorder, a condition involving the appearance of bodily complaints for which there is no organic basis.” It becomes clear through this definition that mass hysteria is certainly present in both of these texts. Along with these similarities, there must also be differences, which include the difference between an affair of love and an affair of lust.
In The Crucible, it is clear that John Proctor did not feel love for Abigail. Proctor states, after Abigail insists he speak to her out of love, “Abby, I may think of you softly from time to time. But I will cut off my hand before I’ll reach for you again. Wipe it out of mind. We never touched, Abby.” With such a weighty statement, Proctor confirms that his affair with Abigail was merely due to his own lust and weakness. However, in The Scarlet Letter, Hester finds herself in love with the object of her affair. Rather than simply using Dimmesdale for physical romance, Hester also develops a strong love for him, “‘Thou shalt forgive me!’ cried Hester, flinging herself on the fallen leaves beside him. ‘Let God punish! Thou shalt forgive!’” (The Scarlet Letter, 175) Clearly, Hester seeks Dimmesdale’s approval desperately, as one does only for those they truly care for. Hester feels a true love, unlike Abigail’s lust, which causes her view to be distorted. Judith Orloff puts it best, saying, “…lust is fueled by idealization and projection--you see what you hope someone will be or need them to be--rather than seeing the real person, flaws and
all.” Another difference seen is the behavior of women in the text. Within The Scarlet Letter, the women (with the exception of Hester) are much more silent than the women of The Crucible. When speaking to Hester, Dimmesdale gives her this piece of so-called advice, “‘Heaven hath granted thee an open ignominy, that thereby thou mayest work out an open triumph over the evil within thee, and the sorrow without. Take heed how thou deniest to him—who, perchance, hath not the courage to grasp it for himself—the bitter, but wholesome, cup that is now presented to thy lips!’” (The Scarlet Letter, 63) Here, it is seen that women were not given a proper chance to testify in the court. However in The Crucible, the women’s testimonies were the main source of conflict. In one of Abigail’s numerous testimonies she says, “She sends her spirit on me in church; she makes me laugh at prayer!” (The Crucible, 1154, 19) While this could be written off as a simple distraction, the men of the court take this young woman’s words as fact. A final difference in the two texts is the prominence of the court. In Hawthorne’s work, the court is seen only a few times. However in Miller’s work, the court is an extremely common setting. For example, one of the only scenes in which the court is seen in The Scarlet Letter is when she is confronted by Chillingworth, “‘Foolish woman!’ responded the physician, half coldly, half soothingly, ‘What should ail me, to harm this misbegotten and miserable babe?’” (The Scarlet Letter 67) Revealed here is the harshness of the court in Hawthorne’s work. In one of the many court appearances in Miller’s The Crucible, the girls of the court pretend to be taunted by Mary Warren’s spirit, Abigail even cries out, “She’s going to come down! She’s walking the beam!” (The Crucible 1211, 8) This serves to show the reader that the court in this text was often a mad house, a place where people went to be convicted, often of crimes they did not commit. Even when others said the trials were unjust, it went unnoticed. “Though the respected minister Cotton Mather had warned of the dubious value of spectral evidence (or testimony about dreams and visions), his concerns went largely unheeded during the Salem witch trials.” In conclusion, it is clear that these texts complement each other well. They revolve around the same ideas and themes, making them easily comparable. It is also interesting, however, to analyze how the works contrast as well. As a whole, a study of the two texts can only enrich the understanding of both. Therefore, a better appreciation of both pieces can be achieved.
The protagonists In both the play The Crucible, and the movie “None without Sin” ultimately emerged from their own nightmares without sin. Both Terry and John Proctor had to endure challenges and had to complete correct course of action, however both characters differ in comparison to the screenwriter Dalton Trumbo’s quote.
“I say I say, God is dead!” This quote was stated by John Proctor, a character from The Crucible, when he was accused of witchcraft by Mary Warren. John Proctor is a hardworking person, but he is a sinner too, he had an affair, he does not go to church because he hates Reverend Parris. John and I have a few personality traits in common, in that we are both hardworking men, we sinned a few times, but at the end we are honest.
In John Proctor’s sudden confession of committing adultery, Miller used strong ethos and pathos to help further his agenda. He used disinterest, a rhetorical ethos device, to show that he reluctantly confessed for the greater good. By casting away his reputation, he made a personal sacrifice to show that his revelation helped the people of Salem more than it helped him. Throughout the play, Proctor concealed his disloyalty to his wife from the public; however, he finally came to terms with his sin to save Elizabeth and other innocent people from the trials. John used a rhetorical tool called the reluctant conclusion during his confession, which is blatant by the uneasiness/hesitancy he displayed. John Proctor lost his credibility and appeared
The Crucible by Arthur Miller is set in Salem in a Puritan community. John Proctor, Elizabeth Proctor, Reverend Hale, Reverend Paris, and Abigail are the main characters. The book is about witchcraft or what the town thinks is witchcraft. John Proctor is the tragic hero because he is loving, loyal, authoritative, but his tragic flaw is his temper.
John Proctor plays the leading role in The Crucible by Arthur Miller. He was persistent, honest, and full of integrity. He was simply, a man with pride. A wise woman once said, "Do what you feel in your heart to be right--for you'll be criticized anyway. You'll be damned if you do, and damned if you don't." (Eleanor Roosevelt). Proctor was the protagonist of the dramatic piece of literature.
Arthur Miller’s The Crucible and Nathanial Hawthorne’s The Scarlet Letter share remarkable parallels not only in their examination of early Puritan America, but also in the dilemma of the two main male characters, John Proctor and Arthur Dimmesdale. Both these men had sinful relations with another member of the town, and must deal with the adversity that resulted from their sin. Although both John Proctor and Reverend Dimmesdale become hypocrites in their society, Proctor overcomes his sin and is able to redeem himself, while Dimmesdale’s pride and untimely death prevent him from fully experiencing redemption.
Early on in the play, the reader comes to understand that John Proctor has had an affair with Abigail Williams while she was working in his home. Abigail believed that if she got rid of Elizabeth Proctor, then John Proctor would become her own. John Proctor had an affair with Abigail, but for him it was just lust, while Abigail believed it to be true love. She told John Proctor that she loved him, and once she destroys Elizabeth, they would be free to love one another. John is horrified at this, but can do nothing to convince Abigail that he is not in love with her. Because of Abigail's twisted plot to secure John for herself, Elizabeth is arrested. John Proctor has to wrestle with the decision of what to do. He knows that he has sinned; yet he does not want to hurt his beloved wife. This is partly why he is willing to die. He knows he has already sinned.
“ I say- I say- God is dead!” Yells John Proctor as Danforth asks him if he will confess himself to hell. John Proctor lives in Salem, his wife has been accused of witchcraft by Abigail Williams who John Proctor had an affair with. A short while after Elizabeth is accused, John Proctor also gets accused by Mary Warren.
John Proctor: “God in heaven, what is John Proctor, what is John Proctor”. John is a man of strong moral beliefs, concerned only for the safety of his family and personal welfare. He cares of nothing for the beliefs of any of the other people in the town and what his supervisor which is the Reverend, thinks either. After trying to avoid involvement in the witch trials he is later prosecuted for witchery and sentenced to hang. John trys to avoid any involvement in the Salem witch trials. His reason for doing so is to protect his image because he is afraid he will be committed of adultery with Abigail Williams. Following these events he trys to save everyone’s lives by admitting to this horrible offense adultery and ends up losing the trial along with his life. He did have a chance to live but instead of signing away his name and his soul to keep his life, he wanted to die honorably with his friends not without a name, a soul, and with guilt. “John Proctors decision to die is reasonable and believable”. Reverend Parris, the Salem minister and Proctors immediate supervisor, which says “ there is either obedience or the church will burn like hell is burning.” “The church in theocratic Salem is identical with the state and the community and will surely crumble if unquestioning obedience falters in the least.” Proctor, on the other hand, “has come to regard his self as a king of fraud,” as long as he remains obedient to an authority which he cannot respect.
A tragic hero is a noble man who commits a fatal flaw. The hero’s downfall is a result of their choices which leads to a punishment that exceeds the crime. “The difference between Proctor and Willy Loman is enormous; the former is the rather typical tragic hero who is defiant to the end, the latter is trapped in submission and is living a lie” (McGill 4). John Proctor is one of the main characters in The Crucible. he is married to Elizabeth Proctor and they live in Salem. In Arthur Miller’s famous play, The Crucible, John Proctor represents a classic tragic hero because he is a well respected man of noble stature, he is conflicted because of his fatal flaw, and his downfall is a result of his own choices.
In The Crucible, John Proctor is considered the anti-hero. Honest and humble, Proctor is a good man, but one with a secret, fatal flaw. He has fallen for Abigail Williams leading to her jealousy of Elizabeth, Proctor’s wife. Once the trials begin, Proctor realizes that he can terminate Abigail’s accusations; however, he can only do so if ha admits hi own guilt. Proctor is a proud man who places great emphasis on his reputation and such an admission would ruin that. He eventually makes an attempt to name Abigail as a sham without revealing the crucial information. When this attempt fails, he finally breaks out with a confession, calling Abigail a “whore”...
The primary dramatic focus in the play The Crucible is the moral struggle of its protagonist, John Proctor. Certain characteristics of John Proctor's character and also the environment of the Puritanical Salem alleviated this problem for him. The main issues running through out the play are a series of dilemmas that John Proctor faces. The first and foremost of these is his guilt over his adulterous affair with Abigail Williams, the second his hesitation to testify against Abigail to bring out the truth and the third, his final decision to make the ultimate sacrifice.
Protagonists are like the tricksters of the jungle, the margays. Margays imitate baby monkeys, tinamous and agoutis. Then when the adults of the species go to investigate the cries, they are attacked by the margay. Protagonists may not devour their prey, but they are cunning and deceptive. On the outside they look like the hero of the story, but on the inside they are evil. This was supported by the books of prose, The Crucible by Arthur Miller and The Scarlet Letter written by Nathaniel Hawthorne. The Scarlet Letter took place before The Crucible, but in both of the settings the townspeople were religious worry warts who blamed witchcraft (a sin) for the their troubles. Both were Puritanical societies, meaning that enforcement of the laws was very strict, as sinning was generally taken very seriously back then. One sin that was found in both books was that of adultery. Adultery can be defined as essentially a sexual relationship between a married person and someone who is not their spouse. Adultery leads into the focus of this paper. John Proctor and Hester Prynne (the protagonists of The Crucible and The Scarlet Letter respectively) were bad influences because they were protagonists.
The Scarlet Letter and The Crucible both provide similarities about the characters within the Puritan community. Both books reveal similarities between Hester Prynne in The Scarlet Letter and John Proctor in The Crucible. Hester Prynne and John Proctor are not physically similar, but they are alike in some ways because their beliefs and emotions towards the Puritan law affect their reputation and determine the outcome of their future. Hester Prynne and John Proctor are not physically similar but both characters feel guilty for committing adultery, show integrity, they are courageous, and their deaths have left behind a legacy.
In The Crucible, by Arthur Miller, the madness of the Salem witch trials is explored in great detail. Arthur Miller was an American playwright, who was born in 1915. He grew up in a Jewish family in New York City. While attending the University of Michigan in the mid 1930’s, he began to characterize himself as a distinguished writer. His first plays were Honors at Dawn and No Villain. The Death of a Salesman, which he wrote in 1949, won him the Pulitzer Prize for literature.