Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Literature as a reflection of society
Literature as a reflection of society
Literature And Society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In general, most people sometimes think about what is the morality and humanity. Also, they would think about how they can struggle to keep their humanity when someone or something torment them. If people are faced with that kind of situation, they should decide to struggle for keeping their humanity or not such as the main characters of movies. The short stories, “Escape from Spiderhead” by George Saunders and “The Sloan Men” by David Nickle, talk about how characters respond to their situation for their humanity. While both Jeff of “Escape from Spiderhead” and Mrs. Sloan of “The Sloan Men” are victimized by monsters that torment them, but they both struggle to keep their humanity.
First, both Jeff of “Escape from Spiderhead” and Mrs. Sloan
…show more content…
Sloan of “The Sloan Men” start to struggle to keep their humanity after getting out of their confusions. In the story, “Escape from Spiderhead”, Jeff tries to defy to his doctor’s, Abnesti, order because Jeff just doesn’t want to do immoral behavior. Thus, Abnesti said, “Being good in small ways is easy … Doing the huge good things, that’s harder” (Saunders) for letting Jeff to incite doing immoral experiments. However, Jeff never say “acknowledge” to Abnesti because it is only the way that he can do for keeping his humanity. Also, when Abnesti asks, “Is that because you love her?”(Saunders), Jeff answers to him that Jeff’s nonresponse is not only based on the love. In other words, Jeff’s humanity pursues morality, human rights, and the dignity of man, and it motivates to struggle to keep his humanity. However, in “The Sloan Men, Mrs. Sloan struggles in different way, and her motive of struggling is quite different with Jeff’s motive because her struggling for keeping her humanity is just based on her madness to herself. For instance, Jeff tries to keep his humanity from immoral experiment and others, but Mrs. Sloan struggles to keep her humanity from herself because she could not forgive herself to love inhuman creature, Mr. Sloan. Thus, she cuts her fingers, and she mentions that cutting finger was punishment to Judith. Furthermore, after Mrs. Sloan cuts her fingers, she could not stop her madness, thus, she changes …show more content…
Sloan of “The Sloan Men” choose destruction for to be free from keeping morality and humanity because they thought that their destructive behaviors are one the way to prove their humanity. However, Jeff and Mrs. Sloan choose different way of destructive behaviors. For instance, Jeff doesn’t want to participate immoral experiments. Thus, he thinks about how he can escape from (spiderhead) test room for keeping his humanity, and he tries to find any weapons or tool for escaping from test. However, Jeff could not find anything except Darkenfloxx™ because he thinks, “That was one way to leave” (Saunders). In other words, when Jeff choose Darkenfloxx™ for the escaping, it means same as he wants to be victimized for keeping his humanity through his death. Furthermore, Jeff’s decision shows how much he thinks his humanity is much more valuable than his coercive immoral life. However, in “The Sloan Men”, Mrs. Sloan responds quite different way with Jeff for keeping her humanity because she thinks that her love with monster is immoral behavior, but she wants to keep her love too. When Mrs. Sloan is victimized by monster, she cuts her fingers, gathers Mr. Sloan’s photos, and destroys Mr. Sloan’s cellar because she thinks that her behaviors would help to keep her humanity. Her thoughts and behaviors just fills herself with the madness. In other words, her struggling makes herself monster because her struggling is based on the selfishness.
Inside us all there is a deep dark fear this is what grabs us by the thresh hold of life. It controls the most important aspects of our lives. This is found within the deepest and darkest chasms of our souls. The very creature that wreaks havoc in our minds we cage and never confront we lock this beast away to afraid to overcome it. If the beast is not confronted it begins to contort and change who we are as a person and how we interact with others. Even the very decisions we make as a person to affect those around us and are loved ones to also suffer the consequences of our actions. Such as the crucible and how each person was warped into their own monster by greed.
A human being is a complicated entity of a contradictory nature where creative and destructive, virtuous and vicious are interwoven. Each of us has gone through various kinds of struggle at least once in a lifetime ranging from everyday discrepancies to worldwide catastrophes. There are always different causes and reasons that trigger these struggles, however, there is common ground for them as well: people are different, even though it is a truism no one seems to able to realize this statement from beyond the bounds of one’s self and reach out to approach the Other.
One of the reasons that King gives us on the interview, Why We Crave Horror Movies is that we crave horror movies because they make us feel normal. Like in “Amelia”, not everyone can say they had to fight a knife wielding doll with the spirit of a hunter in it. We feel normal because that problem isn’t relevant to our lives. Our daily problems and situations seem normal and simple compared to having a doll trying to kill you in your house. In Misery, it’s the same case. Paul is fighting to survive being in the home of a psychopathic fan’s home. Most of us aren’t famous, so we don’t have to deal with fan’s who are too passionate about us. The movie leaves us with the sense of relief that we aren’t famous and that that situation isn’t a possibility for us. Another reason that King gives us is that we crave that roller coaster of a ride that the plot is. For example, Amelia catches the doll with a blanket and tries to drown it, but it escapes, she tries to trap it in a suitcase, but it cuts a hole in the suitcase, she also tries to take away the knife, but it fights her to get the knife back. In the end, after she tried to kill it in the oven, she ends up possessed by the doll, calling her mom and saying “This is Amelia, mom. I 'm sorry I acted the way I did. I think we should spend the evening together... just the way we planned. It 's kind of late though. Why don 't you come by my place and we 'll go from here? No, I 'm all right! Good. I 'll be waiting for you” to lure her mother to her house. In “Amelia”, when we feel like the main character is winning she ends up losing. Then, in Misery, there are points in which we think that Paul is going to escape, but Annie is, intentionally or unintentionally, one step ahead. For example, Paul cheeks his painkillers and puts the powder in a envelope, so that when he has dinner with her he puts the powder in her drink, but she ends up spilling the
However, three ethical decisions that this learning will make after viewing the film is to always assist individual to the best of your ability, despite personal issues with loved ones or friends; next, always report crimes, no matter the consequence they may have; and last but not least, stand up for what’s right, even if it leads to misfortune. The pros of each of these decisions is peace within yourself. However, one of the cons is dealing with negative pressures. For example, when you report a crime, you may be summoned to court, and have to deal with the negative criticism.
Tragedy shows no discrimination and often strikes down on those undeserving of such turmoil. In Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, a creature more repulsive than one can imagine is brought to life by a young scientist. Although this creature is horrifying in sight, he is gentle by nature. Unfortunately, the softer side of the creature is repeatedly overlooked and the so called “monster” is driven to a breaking point. Even though the Creature committed many crimes, Mary Shelley’s Creature was the tragic hero of this story because of his efforts rescue the life of a young girl and helping destitute cottagers.
Alan Moore’s “Watchmen” focuses on several characters throughout the novel making the idea of a main character moot. However, one character can be described as the most influential to the plot of the graphic novel. Rorschach can be seen as such due to the fact that he narrates a large portion of the novel, and his heroic code that he follows. Not only does he influence the plot by those two reasons, but also by uniting the characters after a long silence. The Comedian is the only character that almost perfectly fits as the character with the most influence on the plot of “Watchmen.” The death of his character allows for the plot to be set in motion. He has not only has he shaped every other character in the novel, but the symbol that represents his character can be found throughout the graphic novel. Although Rorschach can be interpreted as the most influential character of “Watchmen,” The Comedian influenced more aspects of the plot than any other character of the graphic novel.
Relations between sympathy-empathy expressiveness and fiction have become a significant issue in the debate on the emotional responses to the film fiction. Due to their complexity many scholars found it useful to diagram them. With his essay, “Empathy and (Film) Fiction”, Alex Neill tries to develop new theory for analyzing the fiction and, especially, the emotional responses from the audience on it. The project of this essay is represented with an aim to show the audience the significant value of the emotional responses to the film fiction. From my point of view in the thesis of his project he asks a simple question: “Why does the (film) fiction evoke any emotions in the audience?”, further building the project in a very plain and clever way. Tracing the origins of this issue, he distinguishes between two types of emotional responses, sympathy and empathy, as separate concepts in order to understand the influence of both types of emotional responses to fiction. However, relying mostly on this unsupported discrepancy between two concepts and the influence of the “identification” concept, Neill finds himself unable to trace sympathy as a valuable response to fiction. This difficulty makes Neill argue throughout the better part of the text that empathy is the key emotional factor in the reaction to (film) fiction and that it is a more valuable type of emotional response for the audience.
The controversy between vengefulness and compassion is one that many debate within society. Whether seen on the news or experienced in person, I myself along with the majority of people instinctively assess whether an offender committed a crime out of honesty or true malicious intent. Further, judges are professionally employed with the duty to decide the severity of a punishment depending on the offender’s overall character. Yet even with conclusive verdicts, these decisions almost always remain controversial. Similarly in Frankenstein by Mary Shelley, the question of “Who is the real Monster?” is a never-ending fierce debate, and one that particularly altered me through my experiences of Frankenfest.
. Compare and contrast how the protagonists of RAISE THE RED LANTERN and BLIND SHAFT struggle against a hostile and oppresive social structure. What are the moral costs of this struggle? In particular, how does it affect how the protagonist or protagonists treat other people?
The Crucible by Arthur Miller is a short film where cruelty functions as a crucial motivation and a major social factor. In the film there was a lot of cruelty going on and helped shape the theme. There were some cases in the film that cruelty showed characteristics of a victim or one of the characters. Cruelty was apart of puritan aspects and it revealed that John didn’t care what he had to go through to save his soul.
The monsters violent acts make him never to feel empathy or mutual love. Even though the
We all have cravings, be it for snacks or sweets, there is always something we desire. We crave horror in the same way. In Stephen King’s essay, “Why We Crave Horror Movies,” he argues that people need to watch horror films in order to release the negative emotions within us. King believes that people feel enjoyment while watching others be terrorized or killed in horror movies. King’s argument has elements that are both agreeable and disagreeable. On one hand he is acceptable when claiming we like the thrill and excitement that comes from watching horror movies; however, his views regarding that the fun comes from seeing others suffer cannot be agreed with because the human condition is not as immoral as he claims it to be.
The appeal of horror film is effective due to the traits of the human mind. Filmgoers of horror leave theaters with a positive train of thought, yet the negative nature of the content presented points to psychological factors which cause their enjoyment. Answers are found by looking at the psychological factors, how an individual processes emotional arousal, identifies with issues that they consider relevant, and perceives reality, help to explain why films presenting such horrific imagery excites many people. Many horror franchises create a level of violence and gore that is offensive to most, yet viewers continue to swarm theaters, making the horror film industry extremely profitable. Graphic horror cinema relies on shocking imagery as much as storytelling to create an effective type of entertainment. The subject matter, alone, does not provide enough attraction to bring back viewers. When looking at the psychological drivers behind the films, it can be seen that the composition addresses a level much deeper than the entertainment that makes horror
syndrome from the incredibles is a great example of a malicious villain because he killed every super hero and created a robot just so he could be the only hero. it shows how evil people can be. it shows what a person will do just to be in the stop light. i believe people are both with both evil and good and they have the power to choice weather they act civil or evil. god gave them the choice and opportunity to be good they just have to want it, and it shows how easily people can be persuaded to be cruel human being just because they want everyone looking at them. mans greatest drug is fame. the high will go away and the detox is a lot harder to come off of. man will want to become moral and civil again and he can because thats his choice
For our paper we’ve chosen to analyze the film, The Wild Child. The film helps to serve as a great example for multiple psychological phenomena and concepts pertaining to the material that we have learned throughout the course this quarter. Right from the opening scene of The Wild Child, the viewer is able to make note of the complexity that is the life of the young Victor; otherwise known as the wild child in this film. The viewer is able to view Victor’s lack of social awareness, his inability to cope in a way society deems fit when placed in a stressful situation, quintessentially he lacks the basic skill of language to voice his distressed thoughts. All of this can be analyzed from the opening situation in which he frightens a women picking