Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ernest hemingway impact on american literature
Literary devices english 3
Hemingway writing styles
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Hemingway believed that “a writer’s job is to tell the truth…” (Baker 1). He strived to achieve this goal in all of his writing and did so through the application of various writing techniques to employ the “iceberg principle”. The most significant way Hemingway utilizes the iceberg principle is through the use of literary devices. In order to begin to deconstruct his writing and understand Hemingway’s purpose and meaning, one must have a vast knowledge of how he manipulates his words to shield the meaning amidst symbols, language, dialogue, rhetoric and many other devices. In In Our Time, Hemingway crafts the text to reveal purpose and meaning in each individual story by using countless literary elements, including diction, syntax, …show more content…
and imagery. Hemingway uses diction to reveal purpose and meaning; diction is often used to develop style through the elucidation of an author’s tone and point of view. His intelligent word choice is imperative, as words not only convey tone but can also construe author’s bias, something Hemingway attempted to avoid in order to remain truthful. One of the ways Hemingway avoided bias was with “…restricted choice of adjectives, and the heavy load of subjective implication carried by such uncertain mono-syllables as ‘fine’ and ‘nice’” (Levin 9). Therefore, his writing becomes more subjective, and it is up to each reader’s interpretation. He regarded “the adjective as a luxury, decorative more often than functional…” (Levin 10). Hemingway’s removal of all excessive adjectives was “…neither teeming undergrowth nor its verbal equivalent” (Baker 3). Across all of Hemingway’s work, “…adjectives are not colorful and his verbs are not particularly energetic” (Levin 11). Because he “eliminate[d] every superfluous word” (Kansas City Star 1), Hemingway had to ensure the words he did use were free of any connotation that might influence the opinion of the reader. Hemingway wanted the reader to make their own assumptions and use their imagination to create the story, so it was important that he employ a neutral tone through words with simple denotations that have black and white definitions. Syntax is arguably Hemingway’s most valuable asset in revealing purpose and meaning.
The way in which he crafts the structure of his writing --which varies with each story-- helps to illustrate meaning in the subtlest way possible. Variation of sentence structure helps to enhance his style. In “Soldier’s Home”, Hemingway’s sentences are longer; composed of more clauses, and are all very similar to emphasize the repetitiveness and dullness of Krebs’ live after the war. In “The Doctor and the Doctor’s Wife”, however, he uses many declarative sentences in order to reveal the tension and unhappiness rife within the relationship. Another way Hemingway uses syntax to his advantage is through juxtaposition. Levin writes that what Hemingway “…lacks in structure he makes up in sequence and carefully ordering visual impressions as he sets them down and ironically juxtaposing the various items on his list and inventories” (Levin 12). By positioning two situations, characters, or settings side by side in a sentence, it highlights their differences and brings to light the hidden meaning in Hemingway’s works. He also frequently employs “sequence of motion and fact”, which is “…where the expletive takes the place of the observer and his observations are registered one by one. Hence, for the reader…’you…feel that all that happened to you” (Levin 11). This method is important in how Hemingway crafts the text because it helps the reader to be able to relate to the story and sympathize with …show more content…
the characters. He also puts emphasis on the nouns, connecting them through conjunctions, in order to explain how an event happened, which, combined with his elimination of excessive adjectives, explains to the reader how something happened simply, in order to help them understand and make their own inferences on the story. Polysyndeton is another form of syntax Hemingway uses. As previously described, he uses many conjunctions in order to connect nouns, and this excessive use almost makes up for the scarcity of adjectives. His use of basic words is how he coaxes the reader to discover the true meaning of his writing, by using colloquial language that is easier for the reader to comprehend. Hemingway uses imagery, which is often synonymous with symbolism, to explain hidden meaning within In Our Time.
Specifically in In Our Time, Hemingway uses imagery to reveal meaning, such as in “The End of Something”, when Hemingway writes “The one-story bunk houses, the eating house, the company store, the mill offices, and the big mill itself stood deserted in the acres of sawdust that covered the swampy meadow by the shore of the bay. Ten years later there was nothing of the mill left except the broken white limestone of its foundation…” (Hemingway 31), and this deserted town he describes serves as a symbol of Nick and Marjorie’s relationship, which was once full of life and happiness, but now there is nothing left. This comparison reveals Hemingway’s purpose in illustrating his belief that human relationships are complicated and often do not work out. This theme of failing human relationships is prevalent across many stories in In Our Time, including “The Doctor and the Doctor’s Wife”, in which Hemingway illustrates their rocky relationship through his description of the wife’s belongings that includes an excessive number of pronouns, for example, “She was a Christian Scientist. Her Bible, her copy of Science and Health and her Quarterly were on a table beside her bed in the darkened room” (Hemingway 26). This distinction between his and her belongings reveals the lack of intimacy and connection between the couple. Hemingway also wrote about strained relationships in
“Cat in the Rain”. The cat, struggling to stay dry amidst the pouring rain, represents what the woman so desperately wants in life. When she goes out to get the cat, however, it is not there. Later the maid brings her a cat, saying “the padrone asked me to bring this for the Signora” (Hemingway 94). This symbolizes how her husband did not give her her greatest desires, but another man could. Hemingway’s style is incredibly individualistic. He has a unique style that stands alone amongst other authors. He used specific words and sentence structure to elicit from the desired response from the reader. Understanding the literary elements in the stories is key in beginning to uncover the true meaning and purpose of Hemingway’s writing. His goal was to “...by the power of the written word to make you hear, to make you feel-- it is, before all, to make you see” (Baker 20) the truth through simplistic syntax, colloquial diction, and descriptive imagery. Ultimately, Hemingway’s standard style was to write in a way that employed basic language and syntax and imagery in order to give the reader the “...liberty to insert his own uniqueness-- as many or as few as his imagination may supply’ (Baker 4) so that through this, the reader can discover the truth relative to his work-- something that is different to every individual.
When people think of the military, they often think about the time they spend over in another country, hoping they make it back alive. No one has ever considered the possibility that they may have died inside. Soldiers are reborn through war, often seeing through the eyes of someone else. In “Soldier’s home” by Ernest Hemingway, the author illustrates how a person who has been through war can change dramatically if enough time has passed. This story tells of a man named Harold (nick name: Krebs) who joined the marines and has finally come back after two years. Krebs is a lost man who feels it’s too complicated to adjust to the normal way of living and is pressured by his parents.
It is this tendency of writing that has brought Hemingway admiration as well as criticism, but it is clear that the author knew what he was doing when he himself commented on his aim. I always try to write on the principle of the iceberg. There is seven-eight of it underwater for every part that shows. Everything you know you can estimate and it only strengthens your iceberg (cited in Moritz 1968, 168). One observation that can be made on Hemingway’s narrative technique, as shown in his short stories, is his clipped, spare style, which aims to produce a sense of objectivity through highly selected details.
Is there a pattern for life? Maybe not, but in Ernest Hemingway’s short story “A Soldier’s Home”, the main character Harold Krebs finds that he needs to live his life through a series of patterns. In this story, the series of patterns associated to Krebs results in an explanation of his character’s desire for an uncomplicated life. The series of patterns can be found through Krebs’s involvement in college, the Marines, and even in his personal relationships.
It was Ernest Hemingway’s belief that “for a true writer each book should be a new beginning where he tries again for something that is beyond attainment” (Nobel Prize Speech). This means that each time someone puts pen to paper, he should strive for such realness that it seems unreal. Rhetoric, or use of language, is the most critical aspect of writing. This is because a skilled use of rhetoric not only allows the writer to convey his ideas to an audience, but also manipulate the way the audience perceives them. Hemingway is extremely well-known for his use of rhetoric, which includes his figurative language, syntax, and other types of literary devices. Hemingway uses syntax, figurative language, and the placement of his stories and chapters
Meter, M. An Analysis of the Writing Style of Ernest Hemingway. Texas: Texas College of Arts and Industries, 2003.
The short stories “The Snows of Kilimanjaro” and “The Short Happy Life of Francis Mocomber” were both written by world renowned author Ernest Hemingway. The two stories are written completely unrelated to each other; however, both stories have vast similarities in the time and place in which they take place. Hemingway is a writer that is very methodical in his word choices. When reading these two stories a second time the reader finds considerable differences in the writing style the author uses in each story. To demonstrate, three sentences from each story will be compared and contrasted to show the differences in word usage, word connotation, and to find which story is written better. The initial pair of these sentences to be looked at are, “A fourth planed down, to run quick-legged and then waddle slowly toward the others,” from the short story “The Snows of Kilimanjaro,” and “On the far bank of the stream Macomber could see, above the trees, vultures circling and plummeting down,” from the story “The Short Happy Life of Francis Macomber.” The subsequent couple of sentences are “’You Bitch,’ he said,” from the “Snows of Kilimanjaro” and “’Why not let up on the bitchery just a little, Margot,’ Macomber said, cutting the eland steak and putting some mashed potato, gravy and carrot on the down-turned fork that tined through the piece of meat.” Finally, the third set of sentences are “She shot very well this good, rich bitch, this kindly destroyer of his talent,” from the story “Snows of Kilimanjaro” and “’That was a good shot,’ Wilson said,” from the story, “A Short Happy Life.”
Ernest Hemingway’s “iceberg theory” suggests that the writer include in the text only a small portion of what he knows, leaving about ninety percent of the content a mystery that grows beneath the surface of the writing. This type of writing lends itself naturally to a version of dream-interpretation, as this story structure mirrors the structure of the mind—the restrained, composed tip of the unconscious and the vast body of subconscious that is censored by the ego. Psychoanalyzing Hemingway’s fiction is double-sided—we must first analyze the manifest and latent contents that he probably intended, i.e., “This fishing trip will be a metaphor for a sexual act,” and then we must consider the manifest and latent content that he probably did not intend, but that arose from his own subconscious in the transference of writing, i.e., perhaps within thirty pages of intentionally masturbatory imagery, Hemingway was actually expressing his sexual repression rather than glorifying his manhood, as many literary critics in the past have claimed. Whether or not the manifest content is intentional, however, Hemingway’s precise and abundant revisions serve as a very effective tool for presenting strings of images and actions that are concrete and straightforward but not always fully developed, comparable to the strings of images in a dream. Through a sort of dream-interpretation, we uncover a new reading of Hemingway’s “Big Two-Hearted River” and we discover the techniques of dream-work, such as condensation and omission, enacted in art.
When a writer picks up their pen and paper, begins one of the most personal and cathartic experiences in their lives, and forms this creation, this seemingly incoherent sets of words and phrases that, read without any critical thinking, any form of analysis or reflexion, can be easily misconstrued as worthless or empty. When one reads an author’s work, in any shape or form, what floats off of the ink of the paper and implants itself in our minds is the author’s personality, their style. Reading any of the greats, many would be able to spot the minute details that separates each author from another; whether it be their use of dialogue, their complex descriptions, their syntax, or their tone. When reading an excerpt of Hemingway’s A Moveable Feast one could easily dissect the work, pick apart each significant moment from Hemingway’s life and analyze it in order to form their own idea of the author’s voice, of his identity. Ernest Hemingway’s writing immediately comes across as rather familiar in one sense. His vocabulary is not all that complicated, his layout is rather straightforward, and it is presented in a simplistic form. While he may meander into seemingly unnecessary detail, his work can be easily read. It is when one looks deeper into the work, examines the techniques Hemingway uses to create this comfortable aura surrounding his body of work, that one begins to lift much more complex thoughts and ideas. Hemingway’s tone is stark, unsympathetic, his details are precise and explored in depth, and he organizes his thoughts with clarity and focus. All of this is presented in A Moveable Feast with expertise every writer dreams to achieve. While Hemingway’s style may seem simplistic on the surface, what lies below is a layered...
The story, A Soldiers Home, is about a man in conflict with the past and present events in his life. The young man’s name is Harold Krebs. He recently returned from World War 1 to find everything almost exactly the same as when he left. He moved back into his parents house, where he found the same car sitting in the same drive way. He also found the girls looking the same, except now they all had short hair. When he returned to his home town in Oklahoma the hysteria of the soldiers coming home was all over. The other soldiers had come home years before Krebs had so everyone was over the excitement. When he first returned home he didn’t want to talk about the war at all. Then, when he suddenly felt the urge and need to talk about it no one wanted to hear about it. When he returned all of the other soldiers had found their place in the community, but Harold needed more time to find his place. In the mean time he plays pool, “practiced on his clarinet, strolled down town, read, and went to bed.”(Hemingway, 186) When his mother pressures him to get out and get a girlfriend and job, he te...
The Iceberg Principle that Hemingway is so fond of, has already given rise to many discussions over the years. Giving away only a tip of it, Hemingway leaves us behind with a great amount of mystery in his stories.
Hemingway was very good at stating impressive amount of things in a one short sentence. “Hemingway’s mature style of writing short, declarative sentences developed at the Star”(Oliver 3). He acquired this skill from working at a Newspaper company. He uses minimal amount of words to make a powerful point. “Mr. and Mrs. Elliot tried very hard to have a baby” (1). This short sentence itself raises many questions and it states many things; the inability of the Mr. Elliot to satisfy his wife sexually or questioning Mr. Elliot sexual preference and as well as of Mrs. Elliot. “The liquor had all died out of him and left him alone” (171). This short line describes how lonely the character of Nick Adam feels and how sad he feels for the loss of her girl friend Marjorie. “‘Well, Doc,’ he said, ‘that’s a nice lot of timber you’ve stolen’” (7). This particular sentence has so much weight that it shakes th...
War is hell! Anyone who has ever experienced it will say they are not the same as before they left. There are many situations a person is put in where they are forced to make an instant life or death decision, either to save themselves or the lives of their fellow soldiers. The emotional scars of what is witnessed can last a lifetime and affect all aspects of a returning soldier’s life, to include family relationships and bonds with friendships and courtships. In Hemingway’s short story, “Soldiers Home”, and the subsequent Robert Young film adaptation of the same title, we see just such an emotionally scarred soldier returning home from the battlefields of WWI and how he interacts in his relationships back home.
The presence of a war is a burden not just for the countries fighting it but also for the soldiers and victims that experience it. The force of a war may change a person not just physically but emotionally. It can be a life changing event with drastic consequences. In Ernest Heming ways story “Soldier’s Home” the main character is in a state of shock when confronted with the challenge to resume his life previous to the war. War can be traumatizing for those who live through it, in Hemingway’s story the main character struggles with his mental state, now absent connect with his family, all while trying to move forward from the war.
Many writers try to fit as much description and “on the surface” detail as possible to make sure the reader understands the moral or point of the story. Unfortunately, if a story is written in a way in which there is no room for the reader to think deeply of the meaning behind the text, it is hard for a them to want to read a story more than once or twice. However, famous acclaimed writer Ernest Hemingway is known for doing the exact opposite of this and actually holding back a lot of information. This method of writing is what he calls, The Iceberg Theory. The iceberg Theory is the idea that the reader is able to see the minimal surface details of the story (above the water), but the symbolism,implication, and most of the information are absent from the page (below the water). Hemingway applies this minimalistic style of writing to this short story Hills Like White Elephants, a story
In novels or other literary works many authors write about things they dream about. Many write about what stories they have heard from fellow companions. None have written about such vivid, yet traumatic experiences as the twentieth century writer, Ernest Hemingway. That is why Hemingway's tend to concur to his real life experiences.