Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Review of erikson's theory
Erikson's theory of psychosocial development
Paper Erikson's theory of psychosocial development
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Review of erikson's theory
Theoretical Framework Erik Erikson’s theory of psychological development is comprised of eight stages in which an individual's identity emerges and matures as they progress from one stage to another. Being the first psychologist to explain predictable stages of human development from childhood through adulthood, Erikson perfectly proves the importance of fully developing one stage before moving on to the next. His theory is based on fully developing the ego and being able to create your own identity based on social and cultural contributions. He defines identity as an individual's stable awareness of who he or she is and what he or she believes in. The basis of his theory is that at each stage, the individual will experience a psychological …show more content…
At this stage, the individual must make a contribution to society, and by doing so, acquire the basic sense of caring. In this stage. The individual establishes a life for themself and begin to develop a sense of being a part of a bigger picture. By doing so, they receive a sense of accomplishment and therefore care about their life and their achievements. Erikson suggests that in order to complete this stage, one must also have acquired fidelity and love in the previous stages in order to be …show more content…
The dilemma presented in this stage of Wills life was the friendship between himself and Sean and the relationship between himself and Skyler. At the beginning of this case study, when Will had not yet formed his identity, he was unable to completely share his life with Sean and Skyler. This is evident when he would sit in Sean’s office for weeks without saying anything and was not ready to go to California with Skyler when she proposed the idea or say “I love you” when she asked him to. This was because he was unable to completely share his life with the other person until he truly knew who he was as an individual (which is developed in the previous stage of Erikson’s theory). However, as he created and began to understand his own identity and goals in his life, he was able to acquire the basic strength of love, which pushed him to open himself up to both Sean and Skyler. This is evident when him and Sean shared a moment of friendship as Sean emotionally supports Will when he is crying in the office. This is also evident when Will goes to California to find Skyler. In both instances, Will uses love to overcome his dilemma which therefore allows him to create both a friendship and relationship. Instead of being isolated, Will chose to be intimate with both Sean and Skyler and was ready to fully share his life with them both. Will has demonstrated the understanding of choosing intimacy over
There is no such thing as the ‘perfect family.’ No one grows up with a flawless mother and faultless father in picture perfect house. For Will, from Fresh Prince of Bel Air, had an absent father and moved across the country to live with his wealthy uncle in one of the richest neighborhoods in Los Angeles to help straighten out his life. One day his father, Lou, decided to show up 14 years later, who was a little inept in expressing his feelings. While Lou demonstrates poor, ineffective communication skills, Uncle Phil has been nothing but a tower of support and strength for Will with competent communication.
The clinical disorders are mainly due to the abuse that was inflicted by his foster family which has led him to have a fear of facing other fear and being defensive as a mechanism to protect himself (Gubala, 2014). The lack of empathy from his family contributed to the stress disorder. Will can display his inferior complex in his relationships since he only befriends people of lower intellect than himself and he regards himself to be not good enough in his relationship with the protagonist. He believes that the abuse he received was his fault which is a sign of an unstable
But when Will interacts with the therapists, the good Will that others are obsessively trying to create is in reality still the bad Will, even though in the eyes of the alert audience the counselor is ethical and caring and trying to work with Will.
This paper will take a look at two developmental theories looking for similarities and differences. It will also look at how each theory does or does not incorporate explanations or allowances for populations that have been oppressed. The paper will also look at each stage of both theories looking for similarities and major differences and also their strengths and limitations.
In the novel "Something Wicked This Way Comes" by Ray Bradbury, Will is described, characterized by his behavior, and be his shift in attitude. This is shown through "bright, clear as drop of summer rain" (Bradbury, 6). Bradbury describes him this way to show that he has a positive and uncomplicated view on life. He does this by explaining that Will was the first one to answer lightening rod salesman right away instead of waiting and examining whether or not Will and Jim should talk to him. His behavior is characterized through "Will? Know what you are? A darn old dimwit Episcopal Baptist!" (29). This characterizes his behavior as always being the one who follows Jim and acts like Jim's conscience to keep him out of trouble. Bradbury does
..., the character is saved from the mean streets of Boston to pursue this talent and live a life with some knowledge of living it and not just memorizing it. With intervention of Limbaeu, Will meets Sean Mcguire and the two are connected through the geography that they were both raised. Sean brilliantly leads the young genius through the different avenues of feeling, that he is so blind too and there is a break though for Will, in that he can start to live outside of the book and truly see the big picture of life. This ?big picture? is merely learning how to love. Though Sean is a master at learning from books, he has little understanding on how things work in actual experience. Sean teaches him to understand what is an ideal and what is experience and therefore gives him the proper balance to survive in a world that had treated Sean so badly. The end of the story ends with Chuckie, not showing up to pick him up for work, which meant that he, in a way sacrificed himself to let his friend escape South Boston, and Will takes off to California to reunite with Sklark, whom he had pushed away. Sean gets a letter from Will saying ?thank you? and the resolution of the story is complete.
He shows us that you do not need to be upper class to be as smart as someone in it. We like Will for his “I don’t care” attitude, and how he tells people in the upper class how it is. Will does some not-so-great things because of that attitude. Like when he told Professor Lambeau that the problems he was giving him were too easy, and they were problems Lambeau couldn’t even dream of solving. Will then proceeded to burn the problems because, well, he didn’t care. He wanted Lambeau to know that he was the smarter one in the relationship no matter their different classes. We like that Will did this because he stuck it to the upper class, and literally left the professor weeping over some math
Will is put into a more comfortable setting when Dr.Maguire takes him to the park so that way he sense their on the same level and that Dr.Maguire is not superior. Sybil on the other hand usually meets in Dr.Wilbergs office but alike Will the settings tend to change.Now some notable difference between the too aside from both cleary having different disorders. Sybils was traumitized when she was a young girl and was bearly learning what good and bad meant but she was abused by her schrizophrenic mother and her father clearly had little to do in her life so he let it proccedd.Will on the contrarer was abused as he was in his teen years which cause trauma to be percieved differently.Will was also abused by his foster family which cause some of the tenstion to devlope. Aside from these notable difference gender has in part to do with they way their character developed Sybil became shy and did not like contact she also was hurting on the inside which explains he coping mechanism since women tend to reach to pain by keeping it in so,internal pain. Will is a man, the way males cope is through pushing their pain outward, in Wills case he cusses fights, misbehaves and hangs out with the wrong crowd, it in part has to do with his gender.
(Erikson, 1980) Erikson’s psychosocial stages of development theory are in my opinion one of the best ways to look at Will Hunting’s changing personality and behaviour in the movie. Will’s avoidant and defensive personality is due to his abusive foster parents, he never received sympathy from his foster parents which made him accept the abuse as well as him becoming the abuser, as we see in the film when Will fights a former classmate that bullied him in kindergarten years ago. Another example of abuse is in the form of psychological abuse towards the marriage of Macguire and his deceased wife in which Will continually insults. Will seems to fluctuate stages throughout the movie, due to being an orphan and abuse from his foster parents he is fluctuating between the stages of basic trust vs. mistrust, and Initiative vs. guilt. Then when he meets Skylar (Minnie Driver) his development shifts to intimacy vs. isolation. (Erikson,
Eric Erikson was one of the most famous theorists of the twentieth century; he created many theories. One of the most talked about theories is his theory of psychosocial development. This is a theory that describes stages in which an individual should pass as they are going through life. His theory includes nine stages all together. The original theory only included eight stages but Erikson‘s wife found a ninth stage and published it after his death. The nine stages include: trust vs. mistrust, autonomy vs. shame and doubt, initiative vs. guilt, industry vs. inferiority, identity vs. identity confusion, intimacy vs. isolation, generativity vs. stagnation, integrity vs. despair, and hope and faith vs. despair (Crandell and Crandell, p.35-36)).
In this paper I will be focusing on Erikson’s Theory mainly about identity versus role confusion. Finding one’s identity is not always an easy task. Everyone at some point in his or her life has had, as Erikson puts it, an identity crisis. Everyone experiences different struggles that can have either a positive or negative impact on their identity. On my path to identity, I have reached identity achievement, which means I have explored and made commitments. I will also be focusing on two articles highlighting a fifth possible outcome regarding identity and looking at identity statuses as developmental trajectories.
In Will’s therapy sessions, Sean conveyed his empathy for Will. According to Myers, “Empathy is the Vicarious experience of another’s feelings; putting oneself in another’s shoes” (Myer, 2002, p.473). Since Sean demonstrated the ability to recognize Will 's indignity and fear, it helped subdue Will 's anxiety and promoted Will’s realistic connection with himself and others. In the Movie, Will recognizes the commonality with Sean allowing him to acknowledge the nurturing relationship that Sean offers. It appears that Sean was the surrogate caregiver that Will never had, satisfying the gaps of Will 's development. Sean 's experiences provided Will with a sense of belonging as Will was provided with insight as to how life should be in an unbroken/normal home. Since Will was never exposed to recognize real intimacy between a man and woman, Sean often shared his loved and experiences from his marriage. This allowed Will to reflect on the closeness of Sean’s marriage and the splendor found in trusting and loving others with all their
Erik Erikson was a researcher of the Psychodynamic perspective who lived through the years 1902 to 1994. He developed a theory that dealt with the stages of human development and was referred to as a Neo-Freudian. A Neo-Freudian are those “who have revised Sigmund Freud’s theory” (Massey, 1986). His theory argued that “both society and culture challenge and shape us” (Feldman, 2011). Erik Erikson’s theory of psychological development does not specify specific ages, so the age categories can only be guessed upon. It is my personal thought that this was a smart move due to different age milestones for different cultures. The essay titled Erik Erikson: Ages, stages, and stories argues that the stages “are organized into a system of polarities that tempt us to think about psychological dynamics in a form that is more binary than Erikson intended.” Each stage has a ‘resolution’ or goal. Each stage presents a “crisis or conflict that the individual must resolve” (Feldman, 2011, p.16)
Theorists have expanded our knowledge of psychology, influenced one another to broaden, and built upon each other’s theories to develop their own. One theorist who has built upon previous theorists was Erik Erikson. Erikson developed an eight-stage theory of identity and psychosocial development, which has countless strengths and weaknesses.
Relationships in our lives are one of the main reason that we function as human beings, this statement is portrayed in this text and the relationships that are formed between characters are important aspects of proving the statement. The relationship that will has with Marcus and then forms with Ellie help him develop as a character and also help him function as a human being.