Epicurus's Argument: The Problem Of Evil

259 Words1 Page
bulb-icon

Recommended: Does evil exist essay

To fully understand Epicurus’s argument, known as the problem of evil, we must first understand four basics statements about God. Firstly, God has unlimited power. Secondly, God has unlimited knowledge. Thirdly, God has unlimited love. Finally, evil exists. According to Epicurus, these statements are contradictory to each other; therefore, he presents the idea that God does not exist. The problem of evil has the following format.
First we must ask the question is God able to eradicate all evil. If no, then he is not omnipotent and thus there is no God. If yes, then we ask is God willing to eradicate all evil. If no, then God is not Omnibenevolent and thus there is no God. If yes, then we ask why does God allow evil to still be present in the

Show More
Related

  • J.L. Mackie's Evil and Omnipotence

    1664 Words  | 4 Pages

    The problem of evil is a deductive a priori argument who’s goal is to prove the non-existence of God. In addition to Mackie’s three main premises he also introduces some “quasi-logical” rules that give further evidence to his argument. First he presumes that a good thing will eliminate evil to the extent that it can and second, that omnipotence has no limits. From these two “additional premises,” it can be concluded that a completely good and omnipotent being will eliminate all possible evil. After establishing these added premises Mackie continues with his piece to list and negate several theistic responses to the argument.

    Read More

  • Q&A: The Three Principles of Epicurus and Lucretius

    2658 Words  | 6 Pages

    ‘By contrast slavery, poverty, wealth, freedom, war, peace, and all other things whose arrival and departure a thing’s nature survives intact, these it is our practice to call, quite properly, accidents’.

    Read More

  • John Hick And Richard Swinburne: The Problem Of Evil Argument

    1651 Words  | 4 Pages

    Throughout the world, most people believe in some type of god or gods, and the majority of them understand God as all-good, all-knowing (omniscient), and all-powerful (omnipotent). However, there is a major objection to the latter belief: the “problem of evil” (P.O.E.) argument. According to this theory, God’s existence is unlikely, if not illogical, because a good, omniscient, and omnipotent being would not allow unnecessary suffering, of which there are enormous amounts.

    Read More

  • Comparing God, Evil, And Suffering

    715 Words  | 2 Pages

    There is so much evil in the world such as: murder, child mortality, torture, rape, assault and more. So how can there be an all loving God if these things are constantly happening? In this paper, I will be arguing that there is in fact no such thing as an all loving and all powerful God due to Evil. When I think of an all-loving God, I think of God as someone who would never allow a child to be kidnapped, raped, tortured and killed. I think of God as someone who would not allow anything bad or evil to happen in this world.

    Read More

  • Descartes Leibniz Essay

    593 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Problem of Evil is the question that asks if God is perfectly benevolent, all-powerful, and all-knowing, then how can he allow evil to exist? Many philosophers have tried to answer this age-old question, often focusing on the intellect and the will. This essay will explore and compare the ways in which Descartes, Leibniz, and Berkeley each attempt to solve this dilemma.

    Read More

  • Epicurus Death Argument Analysis

    1169 Words  | 3 Pages

    Epicurus’s Death argument is very simple, and thus can be hard to refute. The basic premise is that is that no one feels any pain while they are dead, thus being dead is not a painful experience, so being dead is not bad for the one who is dead. My goal for this paper is to prove how those premises fails. In section 1 I will explain in greater detail Epicurus’s argument, in section 2 I will attack those arguments citing various theoretical examples, and in section 3 I will defend my attacks against potential rebuttals.

    Read More

  • The Problem Of Evil

    1315 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Problem of Evil assumes that all of these qualifications are true and valid. The Problem of Evil is as follows: 1. If God exists, then there is no evil. This assumes the opposite is true also; if evil exists, then there is no God. 2. Evil exists. Whether in the form of some other being, such a Satan, or the actions of other humans or living things, evil exists. People perform cruel, heinous, unnecessary actions. People murder other people. They kill animals; they lie, steal, and cheat. Evil is all around is. 3. Since evil exists, a PKM god does not

    Read More

  • Michael Tooley's Argument For The Existence Of God

    1649 Words  | 4 Pages

    Evil exists. No philosopher (and typically no other human) denies this. As well, any God that may or may not exist is omnipotent and omnibenevolent. Omnipotent being “all powerful” and omnibenevolent being “all good.” If He is not, then he probably would not have earned the status of “God.” So one who believes in God typically willingly admits that God obtains both of these qualities. So how could all three of these facts possibly be so at the same time. In other words, how can someone who has the power to do whatever He wants, who is also incapable of doing bad, allow evil to happen. How could He either create evil or stand by as evil happens, without interfering? The argument then goes, for

    Read More

  • Augustine and The Problem of Evil

    899 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the beginning, God created the world. He created the earth, air, stars, trees and mortal animals, heaven above, the angels, every spiritual being. God looked at these things and said that they were good. However, if all that God created was good, from where does un-good come? How did evil creep into the universal picture? In Book VII of his Confessions, St. Augustine reflects on the existence of evil and the theological problem it poses. For evil to exist, the Creator God must have granted it existence. This fundamentally contradicts the Christian confession that God is Good. Logically, this leads one to conclude evil does not exist in a created sense. Augustine arrives at the conclusion that evil itself is not a formal thing, but the result of corruption away from the Supreme Good. (Augustine, Confessions 7.12.1.) This shift in understanding offers a solution to the problem of evil, but is not fully defended within Augustine’s text. This essay will illustrate how Augustine’s solution might stand up to other arguments within the context of Christian theology.

    Read More

  • Leibniz: The Problem Of Evil

    708 Words  | 2 Pages

    The problem of evil has been a huge debate between atheists and theists. The problem of evil is how can evil occur in the world if God, a perfect being, created the world, and why do bad things happen to good people if God is in charge. Used to critique theism, the problem of evil questions God’s perfection and his existence. It questions God’s perfection by saying, “Whoever does not chose the best is lacking in power, or in knowledge, or in goodness” (Leibniz 89). This means that people do not think that God can be all powerful or perfect because they do not think that this world was the best possible choice. The problem of evil also critiques the question of God’s existence by saying, “If there is more evil than

    Read More

  • Solomon's Argument On The Problem Of Evil

    1474 Words  | 3 Pages

    The most famous argument against God’s existence is the problem of evil. God and religion is often a hot topic in society and many people often steer clear of bringing up the topic unless they are sure they will not get into a heated discussion about it. Information is extremely limited when it comes to trying to figure out the problem of evil. That being said; the problem of evil is defined by trying to argue that “if god is all-powerful (omnipotent), all-knowing (omniscient), and just, then how is it possible that there is so much unearned suffering and unpunished wickedness in the world?” (Solomon, et al.75). Theodicy argues that god exists and that he also allows evil in this world. Additionally, an excellent question is brought up upon

    Read More

  • The Co-Existence Of Evil In Voltaire's Candide

    550 Words  | 2 Pages

    The problem of evil is a concept that attributes the fact that because there is evil in the world an omnibenevolent, omniscient, and omnipotent God cannot exist. In brief, it makes the point that the co-existence of evil and such a God is improbable. It uses suffering and corruption as compelling evidence for the non-existence of a supreme being. On the grounds that the existence of an all-powerful, loving God and evil coexisting contradict each other, there really isn’t a reason to believe that God exists or that God is omnibenevolent, omniscient, and omnipotent.

    Read More

  • Understanding Epicurus's Argument

    302 Words  | 1 Pages

    Understanding Epicurus’s argument is not the difficult part of the ideological equation, the real problem lies in the idea that we will never be able to understand God’s intentions or motivations. This scapegoat allows Epicurus’s ideas to be ignored rather than refuted. The only way to combat these ideas for a person of faith, is to not truly address them at all. In fact, this argument is often the reason why people of faith start to falter in their beliefs. If one thinks hard enough about these questions instead of just brushing them off, the idea of an omnipotent being becomes hard to reconcile with reason.

    Read More

  • Essay Does The Fact Of Evil Count Against The Proposition That God Exist

    658 Words  | 2 Pages

    Evil can be seen and experienced in reality but god cannot be seen. Compared to god, evil is more specific. Besides, Evil itself can prove god is not all-good or god does not exist. Since god is believed as the highest degree of excellence and the greatest thing, god does not exist in reality. In the history, we can see a lot of great philosophers also felt confused about the relationship between god and evil. Some of them provide the theory of Deism, which changed the definition of god. It is a kind of compromise for evil and other things cannot be

    Read More

  • The Two Kinds of Evil According to Augustine

    1275 Words  | 3 Pages

    God is omniscient, omnipotent, and omnibenevolent, which makes us wonder what kind of morally sufficient reason justifies God to allow evil. We know that evil exists in our world, but so does God, so would God be the source of evil as well as good? We have established that God is the omnipotent and benevolent free creator of the world, but suffering and evil exist. Is God unable to prevent evil? If so, he would not be omnipotent. Is He able to prevent the evil in our world but unwilling? If this were then case then he wouldn’t be benevolent. A Persian thinker, Mani, suggested that the answer to this question was a kind of duality between the good and evil. This pluralistic view of the good and evil in our world would suggest that God is not omnipotent, which is why Augustine would reject Mani’s Manichaeism philosophy. Augustine later says that there are two kinds of evils: Moral evil, which would be the suffering from a result of the action of a rational being, and there is natural evil, which would be suffering that comes from physical events (i.e. natural disasters).

    Read More

More about Epicurus's Argument: The Problem Of Evil

Open Document