Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The threat of global warming
The threat of global warming
Threat of global warming
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The threat of global warming
The threat of global warming has never before been so real, as is being felt now. With the Inter-governmental Panel for Climate Change giving out dire warnings of climate change and pollution in the environment, there has come about a sizeable literature to understand the phenomenon and to cope with it. There has been an increase in concern worldwide as to the deterioration of environmental quality and its impact on human lives. In particular in the field of economics, there have been pertinent questions raised in order to understand the linkage between environmental pressure and economic activity. In what way does environmetal quality affect economic activity? And how does economic development lead to environmental degradation?
Against this backdrop, many theories have been put forth to understand the economics of the environment. One such pathbreaking theory is the Environmental Kuznets Curve, which traces the link in the pollution - income growth relationship. It posits an inverted-U shaped curve between various indicators of environmental degradation and income per-capita. [ Stern, D. (2004). The Rise and Fall of the Environmental Kuznets Curve. World Development Vol. 32, No. 8, pp. 1419–1439, 200. www.elsevier.com/locate/worlddev
] The idea emerged during the 1990s with Grossman and Kruger, who carried out empirical studies as they tried to understand the environmental impacts of the North Atlantic Free-Trade Agreement. [ Grossman, G.M., Krueger, A.B., 1991. Environmental impacts of the North American Free Trade Agreement. NBER. Working paper 3914.] They found that, as economic growth increases initially there is an increase in environmental degradation but as economic growth continues in the later stages, environmental d...
... middle of paper ...
...da Dinda *
]
However, any economic activity makes use of natural resources. The use of natural resources also implies the production of waste. Using model 1 quadratic equations results in cases where regression levels allows for levels of indicators to become zero or negative. This is not appropriate as it does not reflect the use of natural resources and goes in contradiction to the laws of thermodynamics. In order to correct this the EKC model equation was revised by inserting a logarithmic dependent variable.[ Stern, D. (2004). The Rise and Fall of the Environmental Kuznets Curve. World Development Vol. 32, No. 8, pp. 1419–1439, 200. www.elsevier.com/locate/worlddev] The standard EKC regression model is: ln (E/P) = ai + b1 ln (GDP/P) it +b2 ln (GDP/P)2it + b3 ln (GDP/P)3it + b4zit + cit where E is emissions, P is population, and ln indicates natural logarithms.
"North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA)." Encyclopædia Britannica. Encyclopædia Britannica Online. Encyclopædia Britannica Inc., 2011. Web. 23 Nov. 2011. .
Stern, DI 2004, 'The rise and fall of the environmental Kuznets Curve', World Development, vol. 32 no. 8, pp 1419-1439, Elsevier, Maryland, USA.
Reliance on major non-renewable resources has had, and continues to have detrimental effects on the environment. These resources found in the earth are mined and drilled so that people around the world can benefit from their use. For example, the majority of Americans, and most of the world’s population, uses gasoline to fuel their vehicles in order to commute back and forth from one place to another and gas to heat the homes in which they spend the bulk of their time. With the world’s population consistently growing, the amount of vehicles on the roadways increases therefore causing the amount of fuel being used to increase. The same goes for planes and ships that transport people greater distances, whether it be from Virginia to California, or the United States to China. The carbon emissions released pose a threat to the global climate (“Fossil”). Not only does the emission of fossil fuels hinder earth’s atmosphere, but the availability of the non-renewable resources used daily is also shrinking. Though the United States may not be greatly affected by the environmental dangers, other countries continuously struggle with locating drinkable water, maintaining consistent levels of agricultural produce and...
After the failed International Trade Organization, Rodrik discusses the Bretton Woods Agreement, the transition from the General Agreement on Tariffs and T...
One of the most important factors that is not presently acknowledged when calculating well-being the affects of pollution and natural resource depletion. The land is the most basic foundation for virtually every good produced and needless to say, once it has been stripped of its raw materials, the consequences will resound globally. Damage to our environment adversely affects each aspect of well-being: health, happiness and prosperity. We cannot hope to be healthy without clean air and water, nor can we hope to be prosperous without the materials needed to make goods. And we most certainly cannot hope to be happy when everything around us is sick, stagnant and useless. Unfortunately, GDP actually considers the activities which create pollution as gains to well-being.
The Web. 27 Nov. 2011. http://www.feem.it/Feem/Pub/Publications/WPapers/default.htm>. Nordhaus, William D. "Economic Aspects of Global Warming in a Post-Copenhagen Environment. "
Industrial evolution began and industrialized countries of the Global North started to emit greenhouse gases since 18th Century. According to the “IPCC Fourth Assessment report (2007)”, it states
The impact of the development on the environment and its resources should be understood in order to move forward towards a way to make the relationship between development, growth and the environment possible. From here the concept
Every day when looking out a window, people see a beautiful earth. The earth is intriguing, but hinges on a delicate balance. Many natural resources keep the grass green and the sky blue. Man has made quite an impression on our world, and has transformed the earth's resources into tools to make life easy. However, mans' manipulation on earth has become detrimental to the health of our planet and the safety of mankind. Through the use and production of resources such as oil and energy, man is gradually poisoning the earth. Pollution has become such a dilemma in society; there is no real control or a feasible solution to society's recklessness. Without complete change, our system will collapse. The earth will eventually retaliate with disaster, or corporate control of our economy will cause hysteria and depression. Evaluation of the consequences and repercussion of worldwide pollution, may give people a better idea of what the future holds.
Since 1997 after the first agreement in Kyoto, nations have taken very limited steps to reducing greenhouse gas emission. There are many reasons why greenhouse gasses have increased such as rainforest deforestation which is vital since trees absorb carbon dioxide. With fewer trees more carbon dioxide builds up in the atmosphere. Usage and burning of fossil fuel, releases greenhouse gases since it burns and emits carbon dioxide into the atmosphere or even population growth which contributes to the high supply and demand for food, livestock, land, energy and water. However it is up to leading nations to change their eco-footprints to eliminate the increasing greenhouse gas affect. Author William Nordhaus of Yale University conducted a study which examines alternative outcomes for emissions, clima...
In traditional opinions, environmental protection and economic growth are mutually contradictory. Economic growth is a high environmental cost, and protecting the environment will limit the economic growth. The reason of contradiction stems from the inappropriate understandings among development, economic growth and environmental protection. In fact, economic growth could have a harmonious relationship with environmental protection.
Tussie, D., & Aggio, C. (n.d.). Economic and social impacts of trade liberalization. Retrieved from http://www.unctad.info/upload/TAB/docs/TechCooperation/fullreport-version14nov-p106-119.pdf
Population growth can be positive for the World, in terms of both the economy and environment. As a country’s population grows, it can have significant positive implications on its economy as more people are in a position to buy goods and services, which in turn allows the economy to experience substantial growth. Following on from this idea ‘the more people on Earth, the larger are the markets for new innovations’ (Mulligan, 2009) so as a population grows there is a higher chance of more people existing who have the potential to be innovators who could develop technological solutions such as alternative energies or efficient means of food production. Population growth can also help with the environment as whilst ‘larger populations use up fossil fuels, they also stimulate the effective supply of fuels and substitutes’ (Kahn, 2005), so whilst larger populations use up more energy, they can also develop safer, renewable forms of energy which can help to protect the environment. This can occur because as technological advancements take place, resources such as oil and coal which can have ample negative effects on the environment, are pushed aside by innovators who want to develop new efficient ways in which to produce energy without having any lasting impacts on the
These differing emphases naturally point to fundamentally different solutions: slow population growth in less-developed nations or change destructive consumption and production patterns in the more-developed nations. This debate, however, assumes a one-step answer to the complex problems created by population pressures on the environment. Both population size and consumption influence environmental change and are among the many factors that need to be combined into credible policy debates.... ... middle of paper ... ...
This research paper is about climate change with the concept of sustainable development, meaning that it will approach the climate change problem with an economical way and try to solve it with the new growth theory. New growth theory argues that innovations, population growth, new technology, and creative destruction are connected to each other and that these connections will solve the climate change problem. The exponential technology growth, improved international private rights and improved use of human capital are some of those key terms what the theory is all about. The most important thing towards the solution is human capital. Improved human capital will lead to a better efficiency of industry and therefore improve the environmental friendliness. Government plays as an important role even though the regulations of market are set in minimum. Government’s job is to create a good business atmosphere with attractive incentives. These incentives and good private property rights will help to achieve this business atmosphere and new innovations will come out. The biggest barrier for plan is the theory itself. An example of this is the neoliberal revolution in Argentina during 1989-1999 when Carlos Menem was the president of the country. His neoliberal and market liberal politics, which are one of the corner stones of new growth theory, achieved big victories in the start of 90s but when the economy started to slow down and the unemployment exploded the problems doubled up. To avoid this kind of market overheating, corporate leaders and politicians had to be liable for their decisions. If those people manage to be liable for markets, the markets will repair themselves and also the pr...