Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The contemporary study of possible genetic roots of criminality is but one aspect of the larger debate ove
What is the relationship between heredity and environment in personality development
Personality and environmental factors
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The contemporary study of possible genetic roots of criminality is but one aspect of the larger debate ove
An individual’s "genetic" characteristics are essential, which lays down a fundamental framework guided by propensities of specific courses of action. It is a theory that someone may be born with the genetic characteristic for criminal traits passed down from generation than average intelligence; however, the findings that criminality appears in generations of families does not prove that criminality is inherited or is the product of a hereditary defect. (Jones, 2005) I think all parents teach good morals and attitudes to their children; therefore, I believe the environment has a tremendous role in how criminality trait would be expressed. I believe the environmental and social factors cause or influence deviant behavior. According to Richard L. Dugdale, he conducted a study in 1875 that imposed that individuals who grow up in an environment where criminal activities occurred tend to produce habits which may become hereditary. (Bohm & Vogel, 2011) If people are considered rationalist who believes in freewill and rationally choose to commit crimes, and their crimes are evidence of their rational choices how can a theory say that genetically people inherited criminal traits? "Modern bio-criminologists explore how biological factors, in conjunction with environmental factors, lead to the development of certain traits …show more content…
that are linked to antisocial behavior" (Bohm & Vogel, 2011, p. 42). Our society is built on peer pressures, association, and environmental risk factors during childhood development that of socialization or the way a child is ‘taught’ how to act, which refers to the period of childhood development when children learn the rules and values of their society. (Genetic and Environmental, 2000) In my opinion, when people are around others that do not display moral ethics which contribute to biological factors to human behavior; the individual is subject to adopt antisocial behaviors such as aggression, crime, violence, and delinquency. Some individual's behavior is found to have a genetic link; however, this does not mean the behavior is inevitable or unalterable. (Bohm & Vogel, 2011) For example, a juvenile joins a gang; yet, neither mother nor father has ever been in a gang, and everyone knows that gang activity is associated with the criminal activity; therefore, the juvenile's environment had more influence than parental guidance. The behavior and parental influence will always impact a child’s life. Researchers have identified family risk factors as poverty, education, parenting practices, and family structure as an environmental issue for criminal activity. (Jones, 2005) Criminal behavior is a product of a complex interaction between biology and environment or social conditions; therefore, what is inherited is not criminal behavior; instead, it’s the way a person responds to their environment. (Bohm & Vogel, 2011) Another prime example would be when an individual is incarcerated he or she may go inside prison as a small-time offender; however, he or she when returning to society after a prison environment may become a more hardened criminal. Back when our ancestor had houses filled with children eight or more there were enough children in the homes to play among one another; however, generations have changed, whereas children are born to drug and alcohol addictive parents so; therefore, the children are left raising themselves, and they’re a product of their own environment. This is why I believe a person predisposition of their criminal behavior is learned and defined as crime depends on an individual’s environment or social up bring. (References) Bohm, R.M., & Vogel, B.
L., (2011). A Primer on Crime & Delinquency (3rd Ed.). Belmont, CA Wadsworth Cengage Learning. p. 42. Retrieved November 29, 2017, from https://www.betheluniversityonline.net/cps/default.aspx?SectionID=5980&tabid= Genetic and Environmental (2000). Sociological and Environmental Factors of Criminal Behavior. Retrieved November 29, 2017, from https://www1.udel.edu/chem/C465/senior/fall00/GeneticTesting/enviro.htm Jones, C. M. (2005). Genetic and Environmental Influences on Criminal Behavior: Rochester Institute of Technology. Retrieved November 29, 2017, from
http://www.personalityresearch.org/papers/jones.html
Wilson, Jim. Criminal Genes. Popular Science. Pars International Corp. New York, NY. November 12, 2002. http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/research/1282176.html
Nature vs. nurture has been one of the oldest and most debated topics among psychologists over the years. This concept discusses whether a child is born into this world with their developmental work cut out for them or if a child is a “blank slate” and their experiences are what shape them into who they are. Over the years and plenty of research, psychologists have all mostly come to agree that it’s a little bit of both. Children are both born with some genetic predispositions while other aspects of the child’s development are strongly influenced by their surrounding environment. This plays into the criminal justice system when discussing where criminal behavior stems from. Is a criminal’s anti-social behavior just part of their DNA or is it a result of their upbringing? The answer to this question is not definite. Looking at research a strong argument can be made that criminals developed their anti-social patterns through the atmosphere in which they were raise, not their DNA.
Nature and nurture are no longer a debate; we see the two working together in concert to produce a genuine expression of the individual. The personalities and habits humans acquire in their lives is as much a biological evolution as it is a social or cultural acclimatization. While some people still have the argument that it is nature or it is nurture many people have come to the realization that is has to be both. Both nature and nurture developed who we are and what we become. So the question would remain which one influences us more on if we become a criminal. In that it is meant people that live outside the acceptable social norms of that society that may involve punishment or rehabilitation. The impression that people become criminals due to their inheritable factor has not been a popular idea amongst criminologist and has incited anger amongst a lot of them. There have been amazing findings in the fields of genetics that have encouraged a biological evaluation in other social sciences. This has also steered to the appearance of a criminology sub-field called Biocriminology.
Trait theory views criminality as a product of abnormal biological or psychological traits. It is based on a mix between biological factors and environmental factors. Certain traits alone cannot determine criminality. We are born with certain traits and these traits along with certain environmental factors can cause criminality (Siegel, 2013). According to (Siegel, 2013), the study of sociobiology sparked interest in biological or genetic makeup as an explanation for crime and delinquency. The thought is that biological or genetic makeup controls human behavior, and if this is true, then it should also be responsible for determining whether a person chooses crime or conventional behavior. This theory is referred to as trait theory (Siegel, 2013). According to Siegel (2013), due to the fact that offenders are different, one cannot pinpoint causality to crime to just a single biological or psychological attribute. Trait theorist looks at personal traits like intelligence, personality, and chemical and genetic makeup; and environmental factors, such as family life, educational attainment, economic factors, and neighborhood conditions (Siegel, 2013). There are the Biosocial Trait theories an...
Juvenile delinquency is a problem these days, despite a recent drop in arrests. Roughly 2.5 million juveniles are arrested every year for different crimes in America. About 100,000 of those are violent crimes, however those statistics are slightly inaccurate since only half of juvenile crimes are reported (Juvenile Justice Basic Statistics, 2011). Creating interventions to assist at-risk youth means preventing them from starting on a path to crime is a priority. Juvenile justice system researchers and professionals must gain a better understanding of the contributing elements that cause delinquent behavior.
Finding strong evidence surrounding this topic could be significant to reducing crime rates and addressing the public health issue. What I have learn from research-based evidence and analyzing social and cultural theories, is that criminal behavior is multifaceted and is influenced by a range of determinants in which surrounds the nature versus nurture debate. I believe that nature and nurture both play significant roles to the making of a criminal.
In conclusion, offenders are who they are now by nurture. Although some factors of criminals with biological influences make them more likely to commit crime. However, it can clearly be seen that family and media plays a big role in influencing criminal behaviour in this era where it was proven that when violent acts are frequently observed or thought, it will increase the risk factor on normal people and even more on people with aggressive genes to commit a crime. Therefore, it can be clearly seen that the nurture of the offender outweighs their nature to commit deviant crimes.
Tuvblad, C., Grann, M., & Lichtenstein, P. (2006). Heritability for adolescent antisocial behaviour differs with socioeconomic status: Gene-environment interaction. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47, 734-743. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2005.01552.x
They also explore the myths about the connection between genetic factors and criminal behavior. The first myth they looked at was “Identifying the Role of Genetics in Criminal Behavior Implies That There Is a “Crime Gene.”” This myth is dismissed because of the unlikelihood that that a single gene is responsible for criminal behavior. The second myth they look at is “Attributing Crime to Genetic Factors is Deterministic.” This myth is also easily dismissed because of the fact that just because someone has a predisposition to a certain behavior doesn’t mean that the person will take on that behavior.
... 86). Hence why I believe that criminal behaviour is influenced by mixture of a persons social background, life chances and pathology
There are more contemporary biological theories that have since developed. However, most are still nearly impossible to prove true; for example, the genetic theory of crime in fraternal and identical twins. This study is supposed to provide evidence that those who are born with the same genetically heritable trait are more prone to crime than fraternal twins or siblings because of the ...
Bartol, A. M., & Bartol, C. R. (2011). Criminal behavior: A psychological approach (9th ed).
TANNENBAUN, B, (2007),Profs link criminal behaviour to genetics [online] , Available at: http://thedp.com/index.php/article/2007/11/profs_link_criminal_behavior_to_genetics [accessed 16th October 2011].
Criminality constitutes strategic mannerisms characterized by apathy to misery inflicted on others, egocentricity and depressed self-control. Habitual criminal behaviour seeks to satisfy the offender’s desires for material prestige, power or pleasurable feelings regardless to damage inflicted to victim or society. Such behaviors extend mistrust, fuel prejudice, and largely corrupt social cohesion. Biological, psychological and environmental attributes are thought to heavily influence antisocial and criminal behaviour. Numerous studies have proven that active emulation, genetic predispositions and psychosocial labeling are all complementary to development and expressions of criminal behaviour. There has historically been a myriad of theories that attempt to explain criminal behaviour through different perspectives, all which constitute intricate paradigms that play a role in expressio...
I now know that criminology prefer to highlight the correlations between crimes’ social climates and criminals’ psychological states of mind. While some argues that criminal behavior is a result of individuals’ association with criminal peers, other claims that crime is a reflection of an individual’s genetic disadvantages. I have come to learn that there are no universally agreed formulas on decoding crimes and criminal behaviors. What we have, however, is a manual full of academic opinions and subjective views that have emerged alongside of the development of criminology. At the same time, the volume of conflicting perspectives that I have stumble upon in studying criminology reminded me again that the success of our current assessment models has yet to be determined. Thus, the study of criminology is an appropriate practice that will further prepare me to conduct meaningful research on legal studies and to provide accurate and in-depth findings in the near