Enlighenment

692 Words2 Pages

In both the Enlightenment and French Revolution there were many great ideas. In the Enlightenment there was Locke’s, Voltaire’s, and Montesquieu’s ideas. They were all great ideas about freedom, religion, and the 3 branches of government. Then in the French Revolution there was the Tennis Court Oath that had lots of great ideas also. But out of all of them Locke had the best ideas. Locke talked about freedom and equality which is mainly what the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution talks about. In Locke it says “Sect.95. MEN being, as has been said, by nature, all free, equal, and independent…” That is saying that all men should be equal and be their own person and not be ruled by any other person. They want to be independent. Then in the Declaration of Independence says “…all men are created equal…” That says a little bit of the same thing. The Declaration of Independence could have taken this from Locke’s ideas. They both talk about the same thing. The Declaration toke ideas from Locke because he said want he wanted and wasn’t scared to say it. An example of the Constitution using Locke’s ideas was “Amendment 1- Freedom of Religion, Press, Expression.” This is saying that they should have freedom to say what they want to say and be able to express their religion. So the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution used Locke’s ideas. The Tennis Court Oath was a great idea. But if the Oath didn’t happen something else would have happen eventually because they really wanted a change. The 3rd estate was being treated really unfair. They were the poorest people in the town and they had to pay all the taxes and the 1st and 2nd estate didn’t have to pay anything. When the 1st and 2nd estate had money to spare and the... ... middle of paper ... ...tarted losing the power. This was his idea on how to split up the power. Montesquieu says “When the legislative and executive powers are united in the same person, or in the same body of magistrates, there can be no liberty…” He is saying that if two branches are joined people can’t all have liberty. Although Montesquieu ideas were really important, someone would have came up with something. Whereas, Locke’s ideas were needed then to help the Declaration and the Constitution be where they are today. Why does this all matter? Well it matters because with none of this going on in history, the world wouldn’t be like what it is today. We don’t know what the world would be like. We could still be eating grass for all we know. If Locke didn’t come up with those ideas then the Declaration and the Constitution may be different. How would the world be today without history?

Open Document