Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
An essay on school safety
An essay on school safety
An essay on school safety
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: An essay on school safety
Enforcing discipline in the classroom can be a difficult task for educators, especially when working with students with disabilities. While students with disabilities do need to be disciplined, it is important they are not being punished for something directly caused by their disability. Unfortunately, this can lead to confusion with what to do when a student with a disability acts out. IDEA does not restrict disciplining students with disabilities. In fact, according to the National Association of School Psychologists’ assistant executive director, Kevin Dwyer (1997), “There is nothing in IDEA that restricts schools from disciplining children with disabilities. In fact, some would say that, by not addressing these dangerous behaviors, the …show more content…
Educators, staff, parents, and students all have a right to be familiar with a school’s code of conduct. Students retain information differently, some can learn and understand expectations by observation and many others have to learn by personal experience. Dwyer (1997) believes, “Parents of children with disabilities should be given the opportunity to discuss the discipline code when it is a concern for their child and to be partners in finding effective ways of assisting in maintaining the code and its intent.” (p. 3) If a behavior may be caused directly by a student’s disability, then managing behavior can be adapted as an IEP …show more content…
It is not decided by the "ability of the child to determine right from wrong." Under IDEA, a manifestation determination must include an analysis of the child 's program as well as the child 's physical, cognitive, developmental, mental and emotional challenges. The child’s behavior may be considered unrelated to the disability if the disability did not impair the child’s understanding of the impact of the serious consequences of the behavior and if the disability did not impair the ability of the child to control the behavior. (p. 7)
When a behavior is determined to be a manifestation of the disability, a child cannot be expelled from the school because of the behavior in question. If a behavior is dangerous, such as violating school policies with weapons, a placement that is secure is necessary. However, an IEP, FBA, and a BIP all will be necessary to help prevent the behavior from reoccurring. (Trent,
General education high school teacher, Michael Withers, failed to comply with his student’s Individual Education Plan (IEP). D.D. Doe’s IEP required tests to be read orally. Despite knowledge of this IEP and being instructed to follow the IEP by the superintendent, school principal, special education director, and special education teacher, Withers still refused to make the accommodations for D.D.’s handicapping condition. As a result, D.D. failed the history class. His parents filed charges against Withers, arguing that D.D was not afforded the right to a Free and Appropriate Public Education (FAPE) promised to all students by the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). They also filed a claim for injuctive relief against the Taylor County Board of Education to enforce the laws that protect handicapped students.
The proposed expulsions and suspensions from their disability behaviors deprived them of their right to a free and appropriate public education in accordance to the EHA. The Judge ordered the school district from making other disciplinary acts other than a two-to-five-day suspension against any disabled child for disability-related behaviors and ensured that the “stay-put” provision would be in place and no student would be removed. This went to the Ninth-Circuit appeal where the previous decision was affirmed and modified to allow up to a ten-day suspension.
Graziano’s article over the handling of his son’s disability in the classroom also involves issues that relate to teachers detecting signs of mental illness in the classrooms, how teachers identify a behavioral troubled child, and training school counselors on the Section 504 policy that are all happening in the world today. Realizing these issues can help parents with giving their child the best out of their education and can also help teachers understand the importance of their relationship with students. Everyone should have the opportunity for a brighter future and having a learning disability should not be the end of the road for any student.
In this case, the IEP requirements of the child Frank Evans were not met by the school and the district. The reading and the facts provided in the case show that the district did not have any IEP for the child prepared at the beginning of the school session (Wrightslaw - Caselaw - Evans v. Rhinebeck (S.D. NY 1996), n.d.). The IDEA states that the IEP has to be prepared in a meeting where the child’s parents, a qualified spokesperson from the concerned school, the child’s teacher and when possible the child himself. With the consensus of the people mentioned here a detailed document about the assessment of the child’s educational needs and an action plan to meet the same is devised. Frank Evans was within his legal rights under IDEA to have an IEP for himself which was not provided and hence severely undermined the child’s performance levels in the school (FindLaw's the United States Supreme Court case and opinions,
Parents have the right to be included in placement decisions, IEP developments, and evaluations. Schools should collaborate and communicate consistently with family members due to the fact they know their child better than anyone else and can be a powerful resource, as well as an advocate, for their development and education (American Foundation for the Blind, 2015). Furthermore, information regarding a student’s disability is highly confidential. IDEA clarifies that such information may be shared with only individuals who are working directly with the student (Friend, 2014).
Whether it was in school, the classroom or the home environment students with disabilities may exhibit various behavioral problems. Occasionally, these behaviors are hostile, aggressive, and disruptive and may impede learning for the ones who display such behaviors as well as others. It often a challenge to deliver a lesson or maintain control of the class due to the fact that teacher may not have sufficient knowledge on how to manage these types of behaviors. In “When the Chips are Down” Richard Lavoie give helpful advice that emphasizes on dealing with behavioral issues in a successful manner and also how these problems can be anticipated before they start.
One such policy is the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act, or IDEA; IDEA sets guidelines and standards for educational services. The services included under IDEA are eligibility tests, appropriate education, individual education plans (IEP), and least restrictive environments (LRE). IEPs are specialized and unique plans that cater to the child's individual needs. Meanwhile, LRE refers to the standard that the learning environment for disabled children is of equal quality and as similar to the classrooms of neurotypical individuals as possible (Santrock, 2017, pg.282). In addition, IDEA also enrolls children into early-intervention programs which helps students transition into appropriate programs. Furthermore, it also ensures that all special education teachers are qualified, and that students with disabilities are not disproportionately suspended or expelled from school in comparison to their neurotypical peers (The History of Special Education,
Yell, M. L., & Peterson, R. L. (1995). Disciplining students with disabilities and those at risk for
The Gaskin Settlement Agreement is an agreement between a group of families and advocacy organizations who filed a class action lawsuit against the Pennsylvania Department of Education (PDE) on behalf of a group of children with disabilities in 1994. This agreement does not change a student’s placement, program, or IEP in any manner. Only the IEP team has the authority to make modifications that will impact a student’s IEP. The main goal of this settlement is to make sure that IEP teams will determine if the goals in a student’s IEP may be implemented in a general education setting with supplementary aids and services prior to considering an environment that is more restrictive in nature. The elements of this case were designed to help increase the capacity of school districts to provide related services, SDI that is appropriate, supplementary aids and services, and supports to students who have disabilities that are placed in general education classrooms. The PDE lists many important elements of the Settlement Agreement to be aware of...
Functional behavior assessments are used by behavior analyst to determine the motivation for problem behaviors in clients with disabilities. With direct and indirect assessments of behavior, the behavior analyst can identify the target behavior and develop a hypothesis to test before then developing the behavior intervention plan. The accumulation of this knowledge to develop behavior intervention plans to change these behaviors is directed and regulated through the students individualized education plan as well as Individuals with Disabilities Act of 1997 (IDEA) (Drasgow, 2001). Although IDEA 1997 does not dictate, the exact steps of the functional behavior assessment but rather leaves this up to the individual education plan team.
National Dissemination Center For Children With Disabilities (2010). Applying Discipline Rules to Students with Disabilities. Retrieved from http://nichcy.org/SchoolsAndAdministrators/Pages/discipline.aspx
High Incidence disabilities are mild disabilities that affect most of the special education students in schools today. “Approximately 36 percent of all students with disabilities served under IDEA have specific learning disabilities.” (Turnbull, Turnbull, Wehmeyer & Shogren, 2016 p. 104)The three areas that fall under the title of a high incidence disabilities are learning disabilities, mild intellectual disabilities, and emotional/ behavioral disorders. Students with high incidence disabilities are taught and spend most of their time in the general education classroom. They are supported in the classroom with accommodations, modifications, paraprofessionals and related services to help them succeed. They may spend a portion of their day receiving support from a special education teacher, or another related service providers such as a speech pathologist, physical therapist, occupational therapist, or social worker outside of the classroom. It becomes apparent when students start school which ones have a high incidence disability. This is because when they start school educators begin to notice they are different from their peers sometimes socially, behaviorally, or they begin to struggle academically. They all share some similar traits such as a short attention span and lower academic skills in certain areas or subjects. They may also have difficulties with their behavior or social development. At that point they may be referred to for testing or an evaluation to see what might be going on with the student.
Response: The Council for Exceptional Children presented a code of ethics. The code that was presented indicated that professional should only apply methods and procedures that do not undermine the dignity or rights of the students. As the Council for Exceptional Children believe that every student should be treated with respect and with dignity. They affirm the need for a safe school environment but at the same time argue that the school should be a positive environment as well. Our text reads, “The policy argues that clear policies should be in place to support a school climate conductive to respect and dignity of all individuals.” (Shae, 2012, p.16)
In this article, Patrick Wall (2014) cited how teachers effortlessly tried to discipline Joseph—but it failed. However, this sparks a rather differences between the general educator to special educators. According to Anne M. Hocutt, she conducted some findings revealing the contrast between the two positions: General educators are far more concerns on whether or not they are capable of being discipline—education is often secondary. This lead to the stereotype among teachers that students with disabilities have “irrational behaviors” (1996). However, special educators on the other hand, are more patient, promote one-to-one instructions and have a better understanding with the students. Teachers have lower tolerance of special education students compare to students in general education (Hocutt 1996). Special educators are more likely to praise students, ignored any disruptive behaviors, provide more answers about themselves and the students (Hocutt 1996). Melissa Ferry offers feedback in usual, special education classroom tended to be smaller, children become individualized and more responsive to positive feedback (Ferry 2011). In fact, a study conducted by Kris Zorigian and Jennifer Job (2016) concluded positive behaviors interventions and support brings out the best out of students in special education differs little when compared to general courses – strengthen by another study that isolation
Students with disabilities are far too frequently isolated and separated from the education system (Johnson). They are often provided a diluted, inferior education and denied meaningful opportunities to learn. There are many education rights for children with disabilities to protect them from discrimination, giving them a chance for equal opportunity to learn what other students are expected to learn.... ... middle of paper ... ...