Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Social media communication
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Do you think the most essential skill in political theater is Artifice? You’re probably wondering what the word ‘artifice’ means correct? It means by having a clever trick that you use on someone that is lower than you; power wise. Political Leaders deal with money & have to make deals with others in order to gain more for themselves & to the ones that are higher than them. In order to make those kinds of deals, artifice has to be used. In any way they want to; as long as business is rolling along. Artifice shouldn’t be used in political theater for lots of reasons, but it has its reasons. “Those who have not mastered the art of entertainment, who fail to create a narrative or do not have one fashioned for them by their handlers, are ignored.“ …show more content…
In the passage of “Empire of Illusion” by Chris Hedges, he discusses how political leaders use artifice with citizens.
Artifice is a big deal in the political theater. It has been used all the time and not just in business. A political leader has one job; attract others and do business. It is what they do and what they are made for. “Political leaders, who use the tools of mass propaganda to create a sense of faux intimacy with citizens, no longer need to be competent, sincere, or honest.” Mass propaganda continues to be used on a daily base throughout the world. Chris Hedges use the term “artifice” to make it seem a bit more interesting and bigger. Meaning, he used that word because not everyone smart enough like myself could know what the word means and would make us question ourselves what it means. He makes a bold statement towards political leaders using artifice when making deals. There are lots of ways of how leaders communicate with citizens, but is there artifice? Is there artifice in order to get what you want from the
other? Chris Hedges mentions that the ones, political leaders, who create a more personal narrative towards the citizen succeed the most. They pass the ones who failed at what they do or what they are supposed to do. “The consistency and emotional appeal of the story are paramount.” That goes to the ones who aren’t good at what is called ARTIFICE. When you are working with someone during business, it is your job to convince the citizen into marketing or joining in with them. It is your job to tell a story about whatever you are dealing with/about and it is your job to use as much as artifice as you can to get the citizen to barge. When you are telling a story, Chris Hedges says explains how there are different types of narratives; reality, emotional or consistency and creativity. Having the reality of a narrative has nothing to do with what you want from the other person. Having an emotional narrative doesn’t do any good. Having a fake narrative does some real good for you. You succeed the most than the others and win the most too. To the ones who don’t achieve that kind, they are called the “unreal” as Chris Hedges mentioned. So what is it going to be readers? Are you going to deny about how bad or wrong artifice is used in the real world? In beloved conclusion, Chris Hedges made direct points of Artifice. The ones who succeed in deception are the best. The ones who don’t strive for that, become the unreal as it was mentioned earlier. It is a clever trick someone uses against someone to capture their attention and lure them in without knowing what the bad side is. In the end, we all have different opinions towards political leaders using artifice right? There is no right or wrong answer to that to be honest.
The art of artifice compels the idea of false intimacy between a leader and his or her people. This essential skill acts like a play to distract its audience from the reality behind government authority. All a country wants is a leader that can talk the talk and walk the walk, even if they are faking it. In Empire of Illusion by Chris Hedges, the author exemplifies the importance of artifice in political theater and consumer culture since “Those who are best at deception succeed.” Artifice masks the true intentions of political leaders, whether it’s Napoleon’s domination over Europe, Hitler’s rise to power, or Donald Trump’s proposal against illegal immigration.
Within his novel The Wars, Timothy Findley, deconstructs the concept of friend and enemy. Jacques Derrida, the founder of deconstruction stated, “Deconstruction takes place, it is an event that does not await the deliberation, consciousness or organization of a subject, or even of modernity. It deconstructs it-self. It can be deconstructed.” (Mapp, 781). Jacques Derrida believed deconstruction happens on its own, and therefore one does not need to consciously deconstruct a text, as it is an unconscious process that one need not deliberate. In the text The Wars, Findley makes the assumption that one’s enemy is their closest friend. Oxford Dictionaries defines the term “enemy”, as a person who is actively opposed or hostile to someone or something. Within a war the concept of friend and enemy is certainly evident; soldiers are deployed from all around the world fighting alongside their country and their allies, this being their “friends”, to ultimately defeat the “enemy”. In the text, the protagonist, Robert Ross and his men are commanded by Captain Leather to set up gun beds close to the German lines. While setting up, Robert Ross and his men are unmasked by the Germans, and after luckily surviving a gas attack, Robert Ross and his men encounter a German sniper sent to watch and kill them, who instead, ended up risking his own life to free them all. “He could have killed them all. Surely that had been his intention. But he’d relented. Why” (Findley, 131)? Robert Ross realizes that the German soldier had a rifle beside him the entire time, which he could of used to kill them all, but did not. As an enemy of Ross and his men, this young German soldier should have, being inimical to these soldiers, shot and killed them as he intended....
Richard Gunderman asks the question, "Isn 't there something inherently wrong with lying, and “in his article” Is Lying Bad for Us?" Similarly, Stephanie Ericsson states, "Sure I lie, but it doesn 't hurt anything. Or does it?" in her essay, "The Ways We Lie.” Both Gunderman and Ericsson hold strong opinions in regards to lying and they appeal to their audience by incorporating personal experiences as well as references to answer the questions that so many long to confirm.
In this article Bruce Miroff explains what a presidential spectacle is and how it relates to the government of the United States and its presidents. A spectacle is a kind of symbolic event, one in which particular details stand for broader and deeper meanings. At spectacle also presents intriguing and often dominating characters not in static poses but through actions that establish their public identities. A spectacle does not permit the audience to interrupt the action and redirect its meaning. The most distinctive characteristic of a spectacle is that the actions that constitute it are meaningful not for what they achieve but for what they signify. What is important is that they be understandable and impressive to the spectators. The mass
Words can have a profound, meaningful impact that may alter, shift, and even end lives. In “Create Dangerously”, Edwidge Danticat reveals how words crafted her reality and identity as a woman who lived through a dictatorship. “Create Dangerously” is a nonfiction essay and memoir that focuses on the impact of literature not only in dire times, but in everyday life. Through the use of detail, allusions, and vivid recounting of the past in her writing, Danticat reveals importance and valor of creating art in times where art is a death sentence, and how this belief shaped her identity.
Kenneth Burke suggested rhetoric could be analyzed using five elements, act, scene, agent, agency, and purpose. Two of these five elements stand out from the rest as most crucial to the speaker’s rhetoric during the impeachment crisis (Nichols 1963). Agency and purpose were the most important facets of James Carville’s rhetoric. Carville’s purpose was to rally support for President Clinton while advancing his carrier and benefiting financially. The agencies he used to accomplish his purpose were several concise complaints against Independent Councilor, Kennith Starr, his aggressive rhetorical assault against Starr, Carville’s image, and the media which Carville used to bring his message to the American public.
Journalist Jon Krakauer reassembles the fact of life of a young man who leaves his family and society to find true himself. Krakauer intends to reveal Christopher McCandless’s character and nature by interacting people who influenced him. The more people were attached to him, get to know more about him in depth; those who know him from outside often refered him as careless. In the book Into the Wild Krakauer presents McCandless as modest and caring person whereas other may see him as thoughtless.
What makes artifice such an essential skill? In the excerpt from Empire of Illusion by Chris Hedges, it is argued that “the most essential skill… is artifice.” Artifice, the act of deceiving people, can be very useful when you want more power or popularity in the world. Many widely known people use artifice to stay rich, popular, and in power. However, artifice isn’t so essential that everybody needs to be a faker in order to succeed.
“By making college unaffordable and student loans unbearable, we risk deterring our best and brightest from pursuing higher education and securing a good-paying job.” -Mark Pocan
Ralph Ellison published the book ’Invisible Man’ at Random House in 1952 (Wright, Richard, Michel & and Claude 3). One time he fell sick and he decided to take some time away from work in order to recover. During this time, Ralph developed an inspiration to write a collection which later became the “Invisible Man’. In the book, the narrator starts off by saying that he is invisible, a form that is not physical, but it is a refusal of others to recognize his presence. Further, the narrator says that owing to his invisibility, he has had to keep off from the world to live underground, eventually vandalizing power from the Monopolated Light & Power Company (Wright et.al 117). However, the narrator realizes his importance despite his individuality complex, thus he decides to uphold his distinctiveness without sacrificing his dependability to the society. Finally, the narrator feels ready to leave his hiding place and face the world.
In the book, Propaganda, author Edward L Bernays, who is nephew of Sigmund Freud, transcends the public relation industry. This short, 13-part instructional manual delves deep into the intricacies and usage of propaganda. Bernays claims that the public is in a constant state of manipulation. He argues that in order for a society to be highly functioning and stable, public opinion must be manipulated and swayed. While I find his claims disturbing, it was refreshing to read something so blunt. Bernays’ use of psychological techniques to work the mechanics of public opinion truly classifies him as the “father of public relations.”
Are they telling us the whole truth? In this passage from the Empire of Illusion by Chris Hedges, he states “the most essential skill...is artifice.”Artifice is the action of tricking others for your benefit. This action is commonly used in the political world. They use the work of propaganda. It is information that is biased and used for political reasons from a person's own perspective. I agree with Hedges’ statement because most political leaders show what the public wants to see or hear, but I believe it is not ethical in the world we live in. Political leaders almost always tend to have money so that gives them an advantage and an easy way to hide what they don’t want the public to know about themselves. It as an effortless way of hiding their true identity. Artifice is potentially something that is going to keep happening now and in the
Vision is a term that has various definitions that can be used to describe the word in numerous different circumstances. In the Invisible Man, Ralph Emerson uses the definition meaning to uses the senses to see physical objects as well as things that are not present but that are perceived with experiences. Throughout the Invisible Man, the narrator illustrates with words his journey towards accepting who he really is and how he came to the conclusion that he is not the man he believed himself to be. In his hero’s journey, the narrator experiences numerous eye-opening emotions and struggles which help shape him into the man he ends up seeing himself as by the novel’s conclusion. The most recurring theme in the novel is the motif of vision,
George Orwell once said, “In a time of universal deceit - telling the truth is a revolutionary act. War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength. Big Brother is watching you”. This quote by Orwell describes his novel 1984 and conspiracies that question the government today. Orwell talks about a “Big Brother” in his novel, a higher power that manipulates the government and society into believing what they want the people to think. Does this higher power exist in society today? This question haunts many people in society today, others have never questioned or thought about how the government operates. Believing that everything that happens in the world whether its war, terrorism, struggles in the economy, and many
The movie A Beautiful Mind, directed by Ron Howard, tells the story of Nobel Prize winner, and mathematician, John Nash’s struggle with schizophrenia. The audience is taken through Nash’s life from the moment his hallucinations started to the moment they became out of control. He was forced to learn to live with his illness and learn to control it with the help of Alicia. Throughout the movie the audience learns Nash’s roommate Charles is just a hallucination, and then we learn that most of what the audience has seen from Nash’s perspective is just a hallucination. Nash had a way of working with numbers and he never let his disease get in the way of him doing math. Throughout the movie the audience is shown how impactful and inspirational John Nash was on many people even though he had a huge obstacle to overcome.