Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essays on first amendment rights
First amendment analysis
1st amendment
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essays on first amendment rights
Parvathi Reddi
History 7B: Section 121
Professor Einhorn
14 April 2014
Emma Goldman Rough Draft
America, in the early twentieth century, was centered on the Progressive Era. This was a period of unrest and reform. Monopolies continued in spite of the Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890. Social problems flourished in the U.S. During the 1910s labor unions continued to grow as the middle classes became more and more unhappy. Unsafe working conditions were underscored by the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory fire in which hundreds of female workers were killed. The plight of the Negro worsened, all while women finally received the right to vote through the ratification of the nineteenth amendment. Although this was a turbulent time in America, it was also a time to remember. During this time period, Emma Goldman devoted all of her attention to the cause of upholding the first amendment clause of freedom of speech. The right to free speech is one of the most fundamental American guarantees. However, defining the limits of free speech has never been an easy task.
Freedom of expression was a cause Emma Goldman championed throughout her adult life. She was outraged that in the United States, "a country which guaranteed free speech, officers armed with long clubs should invade an orderly assembly” (UC Berkeley). During the early 1900’s, Emma Goldman focused her attention on upholding the first amendment right to free speech during a turbulent time. President McKinley’s assignation the early 1900’s resulted in a decrease in free speech. Repression was heightened when the Espionage and Sedition Acts of 1917 and 1918 were passed. These acts ultimately resulted in long prison terms for those who protested United States entry into the First World ...
... middle of paper ...
...acter and removed her from her martyr pedestal and placed her in with the common man.
Emma Goldman’s Free Speech Fights served to not only emphasize the problems with the time period, but also served to illustrate her true character. Censorship and repression were large themes of the century. Goldman worked hard to attain equality through speech rallies and demonstrations, despite the charged hatred that she was met with. Nevertheless, Goldman was not the immortalized martyr that she is portrayed as. Through the time period, even she felt censored. She felt as if she could not speak her mind in regards to her emotions. Thus she liberated herself emotionally through her letter writing to her closest confidants. But Goldman’s struggle to uphold the first amendment begs the question: if this country is built on the foundation of equality, then how free really is free?
After the success of antislavery movement in the early nineteenth century, activist women in the United States took another step toward claiming themselves a voice in politics. They were known as the suffragists. It took those women a lot of efforts and some decades to seek for the ratification of the Nineteenth Amendment. In her essay “The Next Generation of Suffragists: Harriot Stanton Blatch and Grassroots Politics,” Ellen Carol Dubois notes some hardships American suffragists faced in order to achieve the passage of the Nineteenth Amendment. Along with that essay, the film Iron-Jawed Angels somehow helps to paint a vivid image of the obstacles in the fight for women’s suffrage. In the essay “Gender at Work: The Sexual Division of Labor during World War II,” Ruth Milkman highlights the segregation between men and women at works during wartime some decades after the success of women suffrage movement. Similarly, women in the Glamour Girls of 1943 were segregated by men that they could only do the jobs temporarily and would not able to go back to work once the war over. In other words, many American women did help to claim themselves a voice by voting and giving hands in World War II but they were not fully great enough to change the public eyes about women.
From the opening sentence of the essay, “We are free to be you, me, stupid, and dead”, Roger Rosenblatt hones in on a very potent and controversial topic. He notes the fundamental truth that although humans will regularly shield themselves with the omnipresent first amendment, seldom do we enjoy having the privilege we so readily abuse be used against us.
Goldman followed and spoke of Most’s beliefs at many different rallies. It was not until an elderly man challenged Goldman with this question, “What are the men of my age to do while we wait for a day that we will never live to see?” (Chalberg 40), that Goldman started thinking for herself. When she spoke to Most about her doing her own thinking, Most would hear nothing of it. Most’s reaction caused Goldman to leave his anarchist fold for a future that she was one hundred percent in control over.
In an expressive voice, Ms. Angelou paints a memorable picture of a small black community anticipating graduation day fifty-five years ago. She describes the children as trembling "visibly with anticipation" and the teachers being "respectful of the now quiet and aging seniors." Although it is autobiographical, an omniscient voice in the first six paragraphs describes how "they" - the black children in Stamps - felt and acted before the omniscient voice changes to a limited omniscient narration in the seventh paragraph. Her eloquent voice skillfully builds the tension as she demonstrates bigotry destroying innocence.
While the women’s suffrage movement was none violent and mainly carried out by organized meetings, lobbying congressman, and picketing protests, the women that participated in it could do nothing to stop the violence of their oppressors from coming to them. In January 1917, the National Women’s Party, led by suffragists Alice Paul and Lucy Burns, began to picket, six days a week, in front of the white house for their right to vote. At first largely ignored, they became under frequent attack with no help from the police. Then starting th...
It is thus distressing to read in David Bernstein’s excellent book how anti-discrimination laws are being used to undermine civil liberties, such as the freedom of speech, in the very home of liberty itself. The US courts have in the past upheld freedom of speech, even where it might seem to encourage crime or subversion, but they have allowed anti-discrimination laws to over-rule freedom of speech. Once again the drive for equality is revealed as the greatest enemy of individual freedom.
“Anarchism recognizes the rights of the individual, or numbers of individuals, to arrange at all times for other forms of work, in harmony with their tastes and desires.”(Goldman, 56) An Anarchic state provides the ability of equality not only between gender, and class, but also between race and religion. Emma Goldman fought for political and social equality between men and women. In some aspects Goldman argued that when a decision is freely chosen then the outcome can be drastically different compared to a decision that has been forced upon the person. In Goldman’s essay’s she propagates that by getting rid of the state it would not create chaos, but would help create harmony.
Many people know Susan B. Anthony as ‘the women that dared to vote.’ Many women go to vote without knowing how important she was on that decision. She is one of the most recognized historical people fighting for Women Suffrage. She was an icon on Women’s Rights history. Women regardless of age, religion, social class, fought for one objective; the achievement to get the right to vote, the right to make their own decisions. She was part of this achievement. Susan B. Anthony was an American women hero.
Gloria Steinem, a renowned feminist activist and co-founder of the women’s rights publication Ms. Magazine, gives a commencement speech at Vassar College in Poughkeepsie, New York, on May 31, 1970. Steinem’s speech “Living The Revolution” is delivered to the graduating class of Vassar College, founded in 1865 as a liberal arts college for women and then became coeducational a year before the speech was delivered in 1969. The intent of this speech is to inform the listeners and to shed light on the fact that women are not treated equally to their white male counterparts, though society has been convinced otherwise and to argue that it is crucial for all minorities, and even white males, to be relieved of their “stereotypical” duties in order for balance to exist. Steinem executes her speech’s purpose by dividing it up into four parts to explain the four different “myths” put against women while using a few rhetorical strategies and logical, ethical, and emotional appeals.
The underpinning of his essay is that the First Amendment, freedom of speech and expression should be used to expand people’s minds with new or opposing ideas. “The strange beauty of American freedom is that it is ungovernable, that it always runs slightly ahead of human temperament” (Rosenblatt 484). He believes that free is how people’s minds are made to be and is their natural state of being and attempting to control people’s minds is
The fundamental purpose of the first amendment was to guarantee the maintenance of an effective system of free speech and expression. This calls for an examination of the various elements which are necessary to support such a system in a modem democratic society. Some of these elements found early articulation in the classic theory of free expression, as it developed over the course of centuries; others are the outgrowth of contemporary conditions. More specifically, it is necessary to analyze what it is that the first amendment attempts to maintain: the function of freedom of expression in a democratic society; what the practical difficulties are in maintaining such a system: the dynamic forces at work in any governmental attempt to restrict or regulate expression; and the role of law and legal institutions in developing and supporting freedom of expression. These three elements are the basic components of any comprehensive theory of the first amendment viewed as a guarantee of a system of free expression.
On December 15, 1791, the first amendment- along with the rest of the Bill of Rights- was passed by congress. Although the amendment allows verbal freedom to the citizens of America, many argue that it also comes with great risks.The possibility of both mental and physical harm to citizens through the practice of free speech should be taken into consideration. Limiting free speech has potentially saved lives by monitoring what a person can or can not say that could cause distress to the public (e.g.- yelling “bomb” on an airplane). Others argue that the limitation of free speech will hinder our progress as a nation, and could potentially lead to our downfall through governmental corruption. In a society where the freedom of speech is a reality, one must question the risks and limits of that right.
Hentoff, Nat. Free Speech for Me – But Not for Thee. New York: HarperCollins, 1992. Print
During discussions surrounding rights and freedom, the white women assumed one side of the debate and the black men the other. The double discrimination that characterized this epoch left black women positioned in the middle. This arrangement denied black women from reaping the benefits that were extended to either group—effectively excluding them from being a part of either group. Mary Eliza Church Terrell summarized this unique position eloquently during her address at the first National Association of Colored Women meeting (Brown, 39). She declared, “we refer to the fact that this is an association of colored women, because our peculiar status in this country at the present time seems to have demanded that we stand by ourselves” (Mary Eliza Church Terrell, 39). To pursue their rights and freedom, it was necessary, not only for black women to unite and fight together, but to advocate for the rights of all citizens of the United States of America.
Gearon, L. (2006). Freedom of expression and human rights: Historical, literary and political contexts. Brighton [u.a.: Sussex Academic.