Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Summary of cultural relativism
Summary of cultural relativism
Summary of cultural relativism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Summary of cultural relativism
1. Anthropology has existed almost as long as humanity itself. Over the years, many anthropologists have study vastly diverse civilizations and from their research formulated different theories about humanity. A major principle in anthropology is cultural relativism. Cultural relativism is knowing that humans have the freedom to obtain a certain degree of “understanding” or “empathy” with the foreign norms and tastes of other countries, and lifestyles. When anthropologists exhibit cultural relativism they are choosing to embrace the fact that each culture obtains its own values and practices, and should not make value judgments about cultural differences, but merely make observations and record those observations.
2. In the film, Emerald Forest, cultural relativism can be seen portrayed through the action of the protagonists immersing themselves into a different culture. An example of this was presented in the scene where Bill Markham went back to the forest to help save the women of the “Invisible People”. Due to the fact that Bill was concerned for the safety of these women it is apparent that he understood the importance of the women in the “Invisible Peoples” way of life. In the act of saving them, he came to realize that he grew to care for not only the women, but all that came with the
…show more content…
Joh Dunbar was not asked to take on the lifestyle of a Lakota Indian. The scene when John moved into a hut that was provided for him by the tribe, that was the moment he knew he wanted to completely take on the life of Lakota warrior and leave his life behind to be forgotten. He realized the strength the tribe exhibited in protecting their legacy. They had just as much courage and pride as the U.S. military had, and I honestly believe that is what John was intrigued with the most. They were a people, a people worth existing and they were going to fight any foreigners that
John Dunbar was stationed at a small abandoned fort located in the Great Plains where he was to monitor the activity of wildlife and Indians. He first encountered the Indians attempting to steal his horse while he was bathing, and then later again that evening. But gradually over time he had meetings with the Indians where they tried to learn ways to communicate with each other. After countless gatherings and a successful buffalo hunt John is accepted into the Indian tribe. He learns that the Indians are more caring and dedicated to their family than the whites he called friends. Eventually he lives with Indians after marrying "Stands with a Fist," a white woman taken in by the tribe when she was very young.
Cultural relativism is powerful and unique, ascertaining and appreciating people cultural. Cultural relativism is unique but can be hard to understand, upsetting the views, morals, and outlines of culture from the standpoint of that civilization. When analyzing the hominid culture, it provides the luxury of understanding their philosophy from their viewpoint. Taking in another culture without being basis can be daunting. Anthropologist deliberated cultures by exploiting two methods, the emic perspective, and etic perspective.
Lieutenant John Dunbar went through several drastic changes to become Dances With Wolves. In his short time with the Indians, he turned enemies into friends and foreign customs into his own. His view of the Sioux changes more severe than he does. No longer does he view them as savages without order, but now he sees them as a civilized group with more heart than anyone he has met before. His experiences with the Sioux help to open his eyes and change him into a man he never was and never thought he’d be.
Throughout this movie you see portrayed reluctance by all parties. John Dunbar, who is played by Kevin Costner, is reluctant to meet the Sioux for fear of getting killed. He believes in the view that all Indians are bad and they are going to kill him. His view is drastically changed as the movie goes along. You notice this particularly when he goes hunting for buffalo with the Indians. He sees the whole tribe getting excited about the prospect of food for the winter. And then when the buff...
Anthropology is the study of the development of humankind within their different cultures. When one looks inside a culture, they can see the true aspects and meanings behind a societies behavior and traits. By following the principle that is cultural relativism, one can also determine that no culture truly surpasses another culture, and that each society has key differences that are important to its culture and location. This is a method that can also be seen in many intriguing films from this semester, one in particular being The Emerald Forest. Throughout this essay, this film will be analyzed around one character who greatly represents what it means to truly immerse oneself into a different culture to gain a new perspective, and many key terms in anthropology will be explored through 4 different films from the semester.
After analyzing cultural relativism over the semester, I have come to the conclusion that cultural relativism under anthropological analysis defines every single culture with some aspect of worth as viewed by an individual within that society. Franz Boas, termed the “Father of American Anthropology”, first introduced the concept of cultural relativism. He wanted people to understand the way certain cultures conditioned people to interact with the world around them, which created a necessity to understand the culture being studied. In my words, cultural relativism is the concept that cultures should be viewed from the people among that culture. When studied by anthropologists, cultural relativism is employed to give all cultures an equal
At first, he believes that his people have to be loyal to the government in order for them to get what they want. He then discovers that the government has not been working with the reservations to get them their needs. He next sees journalists make up stories that only serve to increase stressful relations. As a doctor on a reservation, he witnesses the casualties of the Battle of Wounded Knee and places much of the blame on whites. Still, life on a reservation is not all bad. In Rez Life, David Treuer depicts this by saying "There is beauty in Indian life, as well as meaning and a long history of interaction. We love our reservation." (pg.6) In the last page, Eastman states that he is "for development along social and spiritual lines, rather than those of commerce, nationalism, or material efficiency." He retains the spiritual identity that he had when he was a teenager.
An important element of the film is the way that it sets us up to respect John Dunbar, for the qualities that he has. One of these qualities is bravery. In the beginning of the film, Dunbar is shown in a battle and he decides to get on a horse and ride across the front lines of his enemies fearlessly looking into the very faces of those whom are supposed to be his greatest enemies. This seems to be a foreshadow of the first meeting of Dunbar with the Sioux Indians, because like in the opening scene, he is unafraid to look into the face of a man who would usually be considered his enemy.
Cultural Relativism is a moral theory which states that due to the vastly differing cultural norms held by people across the globe, morality cannot be judged objectively, and must instead be judged subjectively through the lense of an individuals own cultural norms. Because it is obvious that there are many different beliefs that are held by people around the world, cultural relativism can easily be seen as answer to the question of how to accurately and fairly judge the cultural morality of others, by not doing so at all. However Cultural Relativism is a lazy way to avoid the difficult task of evaluating one’s own values and weighing them against the values of other cultures. Many Cultural Relativist might abstain from making moral judgments about other cultures based on an assumed lack of understanding of other cultures, but I would argue that they do no favors to the cultures of others by assuming them to be so firmly ‘other’ that they would be unable to comprehend their moral decisions. Cultural Relativism as a moral theory fails to allow for critical thoughts on the nature of morality and encourages the stagnation
A competing idea, cultural relativism, is a process of understanding other cultures on their own terms, rather than judging according to one’s own culture. “understanding one’s own culture and other cultures can lead to more effective action across cultures” (251) This is often the perspective of social scientists who work with people and is the result of the work of anthropologist Franz Boas. Cultural relativism helps us to understand that there is not "one right way" to approach many of the aspects of daily living. It is important to try to employ cultural relativism because it helps see the society objectivity, encourages respect, creates learning opportunities that could make humanity stronger, a system of niche expertise, eliminates the concept of separate, but equal.
In explaining Cultural Relativism, it is useful to compare and contrast it with Ethical Relativism. Cultural Relativism is a theory about morality focused on the concept that matters of custom and ethics are not universal in nature but rather are culture specific. Each culture evolves its own unique moral code, separate and apart from any other. Ethical Relativism is also a theory of morality with a view of ethics similarly engaged in understanding how morality comes to be culturally defined. However, the formulation is quite different in that from a wide range of human habits, individual opinions drive the culture toward distinguishing normal “good” habits from abnormal “bad” habits. The takeaway is that both theories share the guiding principle that morality is bounded by culture or society.
Ethnocentrism and cultural relativism are two contrasting terms that are displayed by different people all over the world. Simply put, ethnocentrism is defined as “judging other groups from the perspective of one’s own cultural point of view.” Cultural relativism, on the other hand, is defined as “the view that all beliefs are equally valid and that truth itself is relative, depending on the situation, environment, and individual.” Each of these ideas has found its way into the minds of people worldwide. The difficult part is attempting to understand why an individual portrays one or the other. It is a question that anthropologists have been asking themselves for years.
The practices of many cultures are varied from one another, considering we live in a diverse environment. For example, some cultures may be viewed as similar in comparison while others may have significant differences. The concept of Cultural Relativism can be best viewed as our ideas, morals, and decisions being dependent on the individual itself and how we have been culturally influenced. This leads to many conflict in where it prompts us to believe there is no objectivity when it comes to morality. Some questions pertaining to Cultural Relativism may consists of, “Are there universal truths of morality?” “Can we judge
One cannot generalize or predict all human behaviors, thought processes, morals, and customs. Because human nature is dominated by different types of cultures and societies in various parts of the world, this can often lead to misunderstanding which ultimately leads to the illusion of cultural superiority, and in most cases this can lead to genocide - the systematic murder or annihilation of a group of people or culture. Anthropology is the study of humans, our immediate ancestors and their cultural environments this study stems from the science of holism - the study of the human condition. Culture is crucial in determining the state of the human condition, as the cultures are traditions and customs that are learned throughout an individual
Cultural anthropology known as the comparative study of human societies and cultures and their development. Cultural anthropology is also known as the study of human cultures, their beliefs, practices, values, ideas, technologies, economies and other domains of social and cognitive organization. Cultural anthropology studies how human cultures are shaped or shape the world around them and it focus a lot on the differences between every person. Human societies has been culturally involved throughout generations because of human development and advanced. The goal of a cultural anthropology is to teach us about another culture by collecting data about how the world economy and political practices effect the new culture that is being studied. However, cultural anthropology has gave us a understanding of world affairs and world problems, the way to interpret the meaning of social actions by putting them in as much context as possible, and a deeper insight of humankind-at all times, in all places and of yourself as part of a culture.