PLCY 399
Jiacheng Wu
Professor Vasu Ramanujam
FTR CASE 25: EMBRAER: SHAKING UP THE AIRCRAFT MANUFACTURING MARKET
1. Describe the competitive position of each of the major firms in the aircraft manufacturing industry. Which segments are they pursuing? What is their business-level strategy?
These have four major firms (Boeing, Airbus, Embraer, and Bombardier) in the aircraft manufacturing industry. They are separated from two parts. Boeing and Airbus hold most volume of commercial jet deals in the markets. They have a lot of competitive advantages in this market. Embraer and Bombardier pay their attention to in the regional jet market. They are dominant in this market.
I think the segment they are pursuing is expanding their business to everywhere
…show more content…
like military and commercial market. Embraer and Bombardier pursue to get some market share from Boeing and Airbus in order to increase their profits. The business-level strategies of these four firms are different. Boeing pays more attention to creation. I think Boeing wants to use most modern creation to provide service with best quality. Airbus pays attention to improve its productivity in order to increase its sale volume. Based on Embraer’s and Bombardier’s sales volume in lower level than Boeing’s and Airbus’s, these two companies’ strategies are keeping the balance between creation and productivity. 2. What value and cost drivers have enabled Embraer (a relatively new firm from an emerging market) to grow rapidly and compete against established firms from the U.S., Europe, and Canada? At first, obviously, Embraer provides high quality service to their customers.
Embraer decreases the cost of their customers when customers need after-sale service. At the same time, Embraer also improves its products in order attract more customers fall in love with Embraer like increase leg space and head space in order to make people who take flight feel more comfortable. In addition, Embraer decrease some big parts of costs which will help Embraer have more currency to improve their service. Especially, the 70-120 seats airplane fulfill the gap in the market that the other companies do not pay too much attention to this type of airplane. Embraer get a lot of profits in this area.
3. Use Porter’s diamond of national competitiveness to analyze potential reasons why Embraer has emerged as a successful competitor from Brazil. What should Brazil do to strengthen its national competitiveness in this industry in the future?
In my opinion, I think Embraer should keep every part in its supply chain and value chain much closer than before. Embraer should promise that can get good support from their supplier and its customers will not lose because Embraer’s fault. At the same time, Embraer should protect the core knowledge in order to keep competitive advantages in Brazil and increase the salary of important staff in the firm. Of course, Embraer should try to keeping improve the quality of its products and services.
4. To what degree might airplanes be considered a “global” product that requires minimal local adaptation? Where is adaptation
necessary? In my mind, I think airplane is most global product in our world. Because airplane should keep flying between different countries, this situation requirement the aircraft manufacturing companies to follow the standard of every country without any problems. Based on this situation, I think Embraer is not only a Brazilin company but also is an international company. I think Embraer should keep the main competitive advantages and most market share in local in order to get enough supports from local area. 5. What strategy would you recommend that Embraer pursue over the next three to five years? What do you see as a potential long-term vision for this company? I think there has three strategies Embraer can pursue over the next three to five years. 1. Embraer should try to keep their service in high level and try to improve it in order to attract customers to choose Embraer. 2 keep creating. Innovation and creation will help Embraer keep the competitive advantages in the market. 3. Trying to find out new points which are not noticed by other companies.
In determining the competitive intensity and attractiveness of the market, Porter’s five forces is a framework that would help analyze the manufacturing industry of Lincoln Electric and observe the external and internal environmental factors that influence business strategy development for companies within the industry. The five forces are assumed to determine competitive power in a business situation in which these five forces are Supplier Power, Bargaining Power, Competitive Rivalry, Threat of Substitution, and Threat of New Entry.
For the government to overcome deficiencies efficiently in the sectors of industry, the private sector must have an active involvement in capital investment and creation of services. Brazil’s potential in a global market is set back by inefficiencies in infrastructure that turn away private investment.
It has stayed relevant to the market through its propelled philosophy of relationships to generate profits in the business. Since its establishment in Monroe, Louisiana the once tiny airline has stretched to greater heights serving in 6 continents. It has also established a distinguishable name among its competitors with a reputation of leading customer services. However, even as an established venture, the company needs to maximize its profits in order to stay in business and expand in to new territories beyond its conquered boundaries. A strategic analysis was carried out by our team to establish the company’s current situation. A SWOT analysis was performed to come up with three referenced, strategic alternatives. This alternatives are meant to act as a strategic guidance to the company in order to enhance growth. The strategic recommendation provided will improve and enable the business to cope with the competitors while the implementation of the strategy section will outline the way to go about achieving these alternatives in the business setting. Lastly, we put up a discussion on the evaluation procedures and necessary controls for the
The first initiative that they were able to gain in competitive advantage was the reduction of costs. They have been able to use an online system where consumers can reserve tickets avoiding which avoids using travel agents. Having this systems reduces costs for the company as well because they do not have to hire nearly as many as employees. Along with buying tickets, JetBlue has been able to use other systems to reduce costs which helps them with the maintenance of their planes and organizing information that involves every aspect of their business ranging from their planes to their employees and consumers. The second initiative that JetBlue uses is the creating of new services. By creating their new online services and systems they are able to gain competitive advantage because it allows easier and less expensive accessibility to their services. Not only have they created new services but they are able to differentiate these services from their competitors because of the easiness and quality of the services that they do provide. They not only focus on making their services the best but also the highest level of customer service that they can offer which other airlines struggle to do. Other competitors have realized that JetBlue is beating them in many aspects in the business that they have needed to adjust what they are doing to catch up. Even with the jumps in technology use with the other companies, JetBlue has still been able to enhance their services to continue to gain competitive
...leader. Certainly, it has to take into account the implications of completion from both the direct and the indirect competitors. That is why EasyJet centers on the cost management strategy and the differentiation strategy (Hanlon, 2007). Through an analysis of EasyJet Airplane company strategies and performance, it is clear that they are ambitious and strive for the best. They not only survive in an industry that is intensely competitive, as shown through the analysis by Porter's Five Forces, but also succeed in terms of offering their customers the best that they have to offer in terms of value for money. The advantage this airline gains over its oligopolistic competitors stems from flexible ticketing and complete access to all primary routes. However, in keeping airline industry, there is room for improvement and growth as the analysis using Ansoff Matrix reveals.
In the current economic times the development and growth of any economy has come to a near stop or at least to a drastic slow down. The face of the global economic environment has changed and many new countries are starting to change the way their country and the rest of the world does business. One such nation is Brazil, who has turned around their own economic troubles and is becoming one of the fastest growing economies in the world (World Factbook). Brazil has started developing its economy and using the opportunity to achieve a level of respect in the world.
Airbus and Boeing have developed similar capabilities, and an intense competition to be the number one in aviation. The market is a duopoly market, resulting in a low profit margin for both companies. There is slow industry growth in the aviation industry, and no clear market leader. The barrier to exit is high, which leads to intense rivalry between Airbus and Boeing.
The Five forces in the airline industry can be easily broken down, firstly the threat of new entrants. Over the last 10 years there has been a huge influx of new low cost companies in Europe such as “Easyjet”, or “Ryan Air” as the low cost niche slowly becomes more full we are seeing less and less entrants since the market has become saturated. The better an airlines brand image, such as British Airways being a recognised name and the use of frequent flier or airmiles schemes the less likely a new entrant with lower prices will be able to break into the market. Next we have Supplier and buyer power in the industry. In terms of the suppliers of aircraft the main two are Airbus and Boeing and so it may seem that this few suppliers would have a lot of power over the airlines, but intact it tends to just increase the competition between the suppliers as they fight for major contracts with the big airlines. The bargaining power of customers in the
Boeing/Airbus Case Analysis Competition in the Commercial Aircraft Business. With only a few large companies across the globe (Boeing, MD, and Airbus), the commercial aircraft industry essentially exhibits the qualities of an oligopolistic competition with intense rivalry. Here is an analysis of competition in the commercial aircraft business using Porter’s Five Forces. Figure 1: Porter’s Five Forces Applied to Aircraft Industry. Barrier to entry: - High barriers to entry, to a certain extent, help understand the risks involved in operating in the aircraft industry.
Brazil's economy has a lot of potential. Throughout Brazilian economic history, the government has had an economic policy based on import substitution and it was also trying to switch from agriculture to industry. To insentivate domestic industry, the government established protective tariffs and import quotas. Most of the enterprises were owned by State such as: steel, oil, infrastructure, and others. These firms also received subsidize "long-term credit expand." For these reasons it had been difficult to establish ventures in Brazil.
In 1990 Boeing was set to introduce the 777, the world’s largest and longest haul twin-bodied jet at the time. The 777 would serve the medium and long haul markets like the expanding Asian market. Boeing’s main competitors, Airbus Industries and McDonnell Douglas, had already announced plans to produce airliners that would compete directly with the 777. Analysts believed that the intense competition between the manufacturers would serve to depress prices for the airliners. Lower prices for aircraft would mean lower earnings.
Firms exist with the purpose of create and deliver economic value (Bensaco et al 2010, p. 365); therefore, business that create better economic value than its competitors will attain an advantage position in market place. Companies might try to improve its sales (profit) through domestic expansion, product diversification or by internationalisation; this report will focus on the reasons of espressamente Illy to expand internationally; additionally, its sources of competitive advantage and, the analysis of three markets in which company want to participate.
In a world of free trade, growing competition and accessibility to foreign markets, the need for methodical market analysis and assumptions is steadily rising in today’s business environment. It is just a normal way of thinking to primarily intent to eliminate the financial before entering a new and foreign market. This suggests that enterprises have to develop an overall strategy for their business in order to gain competitive advantage and consequently market share. With the words of Michael E. Porter, professor at Harvard University and leading authority on competitive strategy, this desirable market success is indirectly linked to the individual structure of a market. The unique structure of a single market influences the strategic behaviour and the development of a competitive strategy within a firm. The competitive strategy finally decides whether a company performs successfully on the market or not. Referring to this interpretation of business success, M. E. Porter established his five forces framework that enables directives to gather useful information about the business environment and the competitive forces in industries.
Several large scale, interrelated conditions have affected the airline industry over the past several years in such a manner that every carrier has had to respond in order to remain viable and competitive.
the author offers a theoretical framework, which outlines the underlining factors that contribute to national competitiveness. Michael Porter’s work was met with contrasted views. While some academics praised the model for its wealth of information and the convenient framework it generated (Greenway, 1993), many other academics in international business criticized the model for its theoretical flaws and lack of empirical evidence.