Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Law vs morality sample essays
The relationship between law and morality
Law vs morality sample essays
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Law vs morality sample essays
What is the ultimate authority that dictates human behavior? In Trifles by Susan Glaspell, conflict arises when the two main characters must choose between submitting to legal authority, therefore condemning an acquaintance to prison, or following their own moral compass and essentially letting a murder go unpunished. The battle between one’s own morals and the law of the land is not a new concept though. It can also be witnessed quite clearly in the Greek tragedy Antigone by Sophocles. Antigone who is clearly the embodiment of moral authority in the play, defies her legal ruler and future father-in-law based on her own strictly held beliefs. In both plays, despite different circumstances and outcomes, the choice to follow one’s own definition
of morality rightfully prevails over obeying the established law. To understand why following a moral code despite legal consequences is the better choice in both plays, the reader must have an understanding of the society of the time. The circumstances in which the protagonists find themselves in Trifles, provide fundamental insight to the plight of women in the 1900’s. Once the setting is established, the reader is made aware of the type of man the dead John Wright was when Mr. Hale says, “I said to Harry that I didn’t know as what his wife wanted made much difference to John-” (Glaspell 1108), and again when Mrs. Hale states, “No, Wright wouldn’t like that bird –a thing that sang. She used to sing. He killed that, too” (Glaspell 1116). A hard seemingly uncaring man like John Wright is not uncommon in this time. As the play progresses the protagonists learn that after 30 years of marriage to this hard man, Minnie Foster is triggered by a single act, the killing of her pet canary, and strangles her husband in his sleep. Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peters make the decision to hide their revelation. She says, “Oh, I wish I’d come over here once in a while! That was a crime! That was a crime! Who’s going to punish that?” (Glaspell 1116) in regards to the killing of Minnie’s joyful spirit by John. He spent 30 years killing her slowly. Knowing all too well the hard life she had been sentenced to, Mrs. Hale cannot in good conscience condemn Minnie to prison.
In every story there is a main lesson to learn a kind of "Big idea" your supposed to get called the theme. A stories theme can be anything from a will to survive to a quest for power.In Sophocles' "Antigone" he revealed through conflict, characters, and setting that the central theme is that divine authority is more powerful than human authority.
All of the characters in this plot have to fight for something, and Haimon, Creon's son and Antigone's Fiance falls victim to their determination. Antigone buries her brother, which means Haimon has to face the fatality of his loves execution and Creon is the one to punish Antigone so Haimon feels his father couldn't care about anything but the way he is viewed as King.Haimon has a lot to contest for and uses the three appeals, pathos, logos and ethos to do this.His fiance Antigone breaks the king’s laws and therefore has to face the consequences. She is punished with death by the laws holder.This tragic sister welcomes death, as it is an honor for whom she encounters it for. But Haimon won’t accept this and knows that If anybody were to
Antigone, The Brave Antigone, a story written by Sophocles, is about a young woman, Antigone, choosing whether she will not bury her brother, Polyneices, to not break the law or disobey Creon’s law and bury him; however choosing to bury her brother does not derail her moral development. Kohlberg’s Theory of Moral Development is three levels consisting of two stages in each. Kohlberg’s Theory explains how a human’s mind morally develops.
basically serves as a building block to her being admirable. Certain examples through out the play
Antigone did the right thing by defileing Creon's strict orders on burying Polynices because the unalterable laws of the gods and our morals are higher than the blasphemous laws of man. Creon gave strict orders not to bury Polynices because he lead a rebellion, which turned to rout, in Thebes against Creon, their omnipotent king. Antigone could not bare to watch her brother become consumed by vultures' talons and dogs. Creon finds out that somebody buried Polynices' body and sent people out to get the person who preformed the burial. Antigone is guilty and although she is to be wed to Creon's son, Haemon. He sentences her to be put in a cave with food and water and let the gods decide what to do with her. He was warned by a blind profit not to do this, but he chooses to anyway, leaving him with a dead son, a dead wife, and self-imposed exile.
Additionally, Creon was certain that nobody would disobey him, as we see on page 10, and was shocked to hear that somebody buried Polynices, as he says; “What say you? What man dared to do it?” Creon truly believed that everyone would comply, which explains why the punishment is so harsh. However, when Antigone performed the unseen, how could he go back on his word and be looked at as dishonest and biased towards family members?
Both Antigone and Oedipus, written by Sophocles, use character’s opinions and approach to leadership to show Sophocles’ ideal leadership style for a king.
Antigone has defied the king's edict. However, the edict says that her brother, Polynices, cannot be given a proper burial. The reason given for this is that Polynices is a traitor. Antigone's uncle, Creon, the king, makes this edict after many events happen. Antigone says herself that she has experienced "no private shame, no public disgrace, nothing" that cannot be experienced (Antigone, p. 658).
Glorified overeating. Two words that together create the ultimate oxymoron, in a society obsessed with body image. Adam Richman, the host of the popular television program Man v. Food, is showing his viewers the sport in eating. Each episode this attractive and far from obese man eats a humanly impossible quantity of food. The feat quickly escalates into a spectacle, with chanting fans and opponents salted and deep-fried. The spectacle of overeating has been transformed into a sport and one celebrated by the media.
sense of loyalty leads to her simultaneous violation and observance to the duty of women
Socrates asks how can an organization, that by its very nature must act immorally (eg. Allow injustice) have moral authority? Since a political community must require its citizens to accept, unquestioningly, (at least at times) its basic assumptions and must demand obedience to its laws for the community to continue to survive and prosper, it must stifle individual humans in their pursuit of knowledge.
The notion of honor is prevalent throughout the Iliad and Antigone. Both texts demonstrate that honor is essential to Greek heroes because honor is the foundation of the society and family. Homer and Sophocles clearly show that honor guides people’s actions and responses and decides the fate of themselves and others. Both authors also place emphasis on the importance of proper burial because it is a strong indication of honor to the deceased and the deceased’s family. As can be seen in the Iliad and Antigone, the aim of every Greek hero is to gain everlasting honor because it ensures his place in the social memory of his society resounding even after death.
Hubris, the feeling of self-confident pride and superiority, is one of mankind’s many vices. Left unchecked, hubris can lead to strife, hardship, and unforeseen consequences. Hand-in-hand with hubris is its equally dark twin, nemesis: the desire to exact vengeance upon a foe, especially if they themselves are hubristic (Ronfeldt vii). In Sophocles’s “Antigone”, the evils of hubris and nemesis are a central theme. Both Creon and Antigone display hubris and nemesis by defying the laws of a power higher than themselves, while attempting to exact justice against each other for doing so. In the end, both suffer greatly for their transgressions.
Authority cannot exist without obedience. Society is built on this small, but important concept. Without authority and its required obedience, there would only be anarchy and chaos. But how much is too much, or too little? There is a fine line between following blindly and irrational refusal to obey those in a meaningful position of authority. Obedience to authority is a real and powerful force that should be understood and respected in order to handle each situation in the best possible manner.
Ordinary people are willing to go against their own decision of right and wrong to fulfill the request of an authoritative figure, even at the expense of their own moral judgment and sense of what is right and wrong. Using a variety of online resources including The Perils of Obedience by Stanley Milgram this paper attempts to prove this claim.