Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Individuality and group conformity
Individuality and group conformity
Individuality and group conformity
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Prominent from the very beginning of the novel, Roark’s relationships with others and his own obstinate conduct in individualism, make him easily identifiable as Rand’s depiction of a perfect man. In his interactions, he impeccably balances between Rand’s ideals of not being concerned with man in any primary manner, and still keeping the value of human life by loving only those with self sufficient egos (636). With Steve Mallory, Roark chose Mallory to be his sculptor for no other reason than liking his work (338); when Roark first confessed his love to Dominique, he let her go because taking her at that moment would make Dominique lose herself (388); and Roark even encouraged Wynand to not sell himself or the Banner over. Roark’s unique form …show more content…
of love further develops the individualism within his friends. However, while helping them and being there for them, Roark still puts into practice what is written in “The Ethic of Emergencies”: that “...he does not sacrifice himself to [his friends] needs”. Roark’s first and primary concern is himself, and being true to his own ego. Despite being expelled from Stanton because of his complete disregard of fashionable architecture, Roark designed and built the way he wanted, and continued to do so throughout his career. In the Stoddard Temple, Roark erected a building that glorified the man’s soul, and proudly advocated for it, even though he was sued for it. Because he built the temple for himself, seeing it erected was enough for Roark, and he was fine when other architects changed it. With the same mindset in designing the Cortlandt Housing Project, Roark had no shame in blowing up the government-funded housing facilities when he saw that his design had been perverted and compromised by the other architects. Since he was building for himself and desire to develop a solution for cheap housing, he did not care about all the people the cheap housing could help; The housing project was corrupted before it was fully constructed, and that was enough reason to destroy it. The steadfast loyalty to his ego that Roark displays, sharply contrasts with the desires of the world and the so called “second handers”- selfless people who live dependent on other people. The second handers give up their own desires, opinions, individuality, and ego, to appear appealing to the those around them. They stand like blades of grass in a typhoon; all bending to the will of others in a never-ending cycle of slavery. This type of selflessness, “permits no concept of a self-respecting, self supporting man,” and as Rand illustrates through the character of Peter Keating, it does not lead to a happy ending. Keating spends his life, from graduating from Stanton to being an architect in the workforce, trying to please others. He is introduced in the novel as a top graduate from his school, and having a decision between working for a well-known architecture firm, or getting a painting scholarship; instead of making the choice himself, Keating asked for advice from Roark and his mother, and ultimately follows his mother’s advice of accepting the job offer. From that moment on, we see Keating repeatedly disregard himself in his own decisions, and focus on improving his social position in his career. It began with something as simple as Keating being pleasing to those in authority. Then it started to escalate; to Keating borrowing and claiming ownership of Roark’s designs, to blackmailing and assisting in a man’s stroke, to abandoning the women he loves, and then later, basically selling his wife for a commission. In each of these actions, Keating betrayed his ego. He was born mediocre and without real talent, but wanted to be thought of as great (633). His desire for this prestige created his dependency on others’ opinions, leading him to down the path of doom; the path of losing one’s self. By the time Keating is middle-aged, it is too late for him to change his second-hander ways, and he fully acknowledges that he is, indeed, a parasite of society (601). The life of Peter Keating demonstrates how arduous keeping your soul and being independent can be for even when Keating attempted to stand for himself, he was overpowered by those around him. Him being unsure in his own resolve and jealous of those with true talent, led him in a failed attempt find assurance in a contorted form of Altruism. As quoted from For the New Intellectual, this form of Altruism, “...was the device by which dependence and suffering were perpetrated on mankind,”. For those who accepted this form of selflessness do not give or sacrificed for the sake of helping others, but covertly use the actions of giving to appear as kind and selfless people to those around them; without realizing that in doing so was what was causing them to lose their self. Ellsworth Toohey, a spurious humanitarian, is a perpetuator of this altruism; while he appears kind and brilliant, furtively, he uses his influence on the public to control people in order to further his goal: a world of complete obedience and unity (667).
In his job as an art critic, Toohey advocates for the importance of the collective and the evil of the individual. By posing as a mentor, he destroys individuals’ self worth, and manipulates those like Peter Keating into giving up their ego and following the accepted standards of the masses- the standards that he, himself, is directly determining. Despite Toohey being the ruler over the second-handers, his actions are, arguably, the most reliant upon others than anyone else in the novel. Notably, in his unusually authentic speech to Keating, Toohey’s scheme of killing aspiration, integrity, and the core values of man is for the sake of collectivism. But in doing so, he creates a circumstance where he cannot function or achieve any purpose without others.
As the antagonist of The Fountainhead, Toohey plays the opposing role against Roark. For everything Roark symbolizes and stands for, Toohey embodies the exact opposite. While Roark is independent, individualistic, self sufficient, and values the greatness of man, Toohey is dependent, selfless, a parasite, and enshires the mediocre. To maintain his control and power, Toohey tries to
de Toohey tries to destroy those with greatness and talent, like Henry Cameron, Steve Mallory, and indubitably, Howard Roark. Nevertheless, aligned with Rand’s beliefs, by the end of the novel Roark is happy, Toohey has failed, and Keating is alone is miserable.The outcomes of these main characters shows what Rand believes to be true: in the fight for our souls, those who stand strong against the currents of society will win, and those who conform will be left worthless.
The concept of what is "individuality" and what is not has plagued and delighted man since the dawn of time. “All the Pretty Horses” by Cormac McCarthy adds 302 more pages to the pile of all the works that have been on the quest to define individualism. In this novel, McCarthy takes us through four faces of the key character’s life, John Grady, to portray the idea of illusory individualism. He contends that John Grady is simply a product of a society in contrast to his (Grady) notion of free will. Simply put: Grady has no alternatives but an obligation to conform to society. McCarthy uses him to create the platform in which to comment on oppression of individuality, expectation of conformity to the values of the society and the fact that the concept of individualism is a myth.
Throughout the text Keating connects with people on a personal level through his word choice and tone. This connection with his audience allows him to further develop belonging, and evoke a greater emotional response in his audience. This word choice and tone can be seen in the lines, “We took the traditional lands and smashed the traditional way of life. We brought the diseases. The alcohol. We committed the murders. We practiced discrimination and exclusion. It was our ignorance and our prejudice.”
This itself alludes to America’s extreme response to communism during the Cold War era, under the influence of Senator Joe McCarthy. Similar to the paranoia that characterized the McCarthy era, Orwell’s dystopian society was expected to betray their friends, family and co-workers for the benefit of the state and themselves. This is made explicitly evident during Winston’s visit to the cafe, in which the telescreen sang; “Under the spreading chestnut tree/ I sold you and you sold me…”Foreshadowing Winston’s eventual betrayal of Maria in order to save himself, and his conformity to the party. Furthermore, the notion that “nothing was your own except the few cubic centimetres in your skull” becomes ironic as the novel develops in which the criminalisation of unorthodox ideologies leads to the punishment of “thoughtcrime”, and the eventual “vaporisation” of dissidents. This itself alludes to the ‘great purges’ that took place under the terror that characterized Joseph Stalin’s reign. Likewise, the inherent fear of eccentricity amongst the oppressed citizens of “Airstrip one” is highlighted by the nature of “facecrime” in which the presence of an improper expression or any suggestion of abnormality could be punished. Thus, through Orwell 's effective use of allusion and characterisation, contextual audiences are provided with a didactic warning regarding the nature of a totalitarian reign, in which a “hideous ecstasy of fear” influences society’s
Power, the perception of superiority over another human, is the source of many conflicts between people. Feeling inferior causes people to act beyond their normal personality. John Knowles strongly demonstrates this point in his work, A Separate Peace. In the relationship between Finny and Gene, Gene sets himself up to be inferior in the balance of power which motivates him to act irrationally to take power back from Finny.
...es of individuals can be used to explore a broader social wrong, in this case the injustice of a totalitarian government. Both authors use their protagonists to depict how a dictatorial state can destroy all sense of individuality, Orwell by presenting Winston in his fight against “The Party” and Niccol by depicting Vincent in his battle against society. Both authors also use individuals, who must isolate themselves in order to survive to expose how an unjust authoritative government can manufacture isolation. Orwell and Niccol also present conflicting views on the possibility of individual rebellion in an oppressive society, reflected by the success of Vincent and failure of Winston. In their prophetic dystopian texts both George Orwell and Andrew Niccol use the experiences of their protagonists to explore the broad social wrong of a totalitarian government.
Consider McMurphy and Mr. Keating, both characters are very similar in a multitude of ways. Neither of them is in charge as they are both under their respective antagonist, either being Nurse Ratched or Principle Nolan. However throughout the progression of each plot, they both teach and inspire either the patients or the students to become individuals. McMurphy gave the patients the ability to seize back the power from Nurse Ratched through showing them the way how, and teaching the patients that they are their own person and have their own rights. Mr. Keating teaches the students how to be outside the box, as shown when in class he strays from the regular methods of teaching and shows the students a truly out-of-the-box concept about life, “Carpe Diem.” Towards the final moments of the plot, both characters achieve a full commitment to their cause that eventuates in self-sacrifice. McMurphy is lobotomized and Mr. Keating is fired from Welton Academy. However similarly in both plots, after both characters sacrifices themselves they pass on what they have learned and allowed others to beat their struggle for independence. Chief leaves the institution and the students stand up against Principle Nolan with what they believe in. Weir and Kesey use these characters to inspire and support those who struggle for independence and use their characterization as a technique to do so.
reflects upon the theme of the novel. As it highlights the fact that if people in the society
...ay, as a mere foil to the characters she likes. She did not turn him into an idiot, which would be her way with many of the villains in her next novel, Atlas Shrugged. In The Fountainhead, Rand knows that the intensity of a long-protracted conflict needs a strong antagonistic force, a force whose influence can be felt on many levels. Roark is the active and effective embodiment of an individualist system of values; Toohey is the active and, in almost every case, the effective embodiment of a collectivist system of values that engages Roark's values at every point.
...he can control the ignorant society they must exist within. In order to control this society Toohey gains the support of both the masses and the influential, showing sympathy for common man and outcast’s plight, but offering absolution for the sin of decadence and privilege for the rich. Toohey also indebts those he makes key players in the complicated mechanism that is society, giving Keating and Cook success they could not have enjoyed without his assistance, all to further his social empire and sphere of influence. In all of these actions Toohey collects souls, the spirit of man, to unite him with his brothers against his oppressors and shepherd in a new world, more fair and kind than the one he suffers.
The Fountainhead is the story of a highly individualistic architect, Howard Roark, and his fight for integrity and individualism against the altruistic parasites and also against the non-heroes who do not believe the fight can be won - the fight of the individual against the non-entity called collectivism.
They were able to connect their suffering, their personal problems to a greater level. They could link the distal relations of power to their own immediate situations (Naimen, 7). By studying power and the control it can have over people, and by looking into the past, we can see how that type of control can lead to terrible outcomes for both small groups and society as a whole. We have come to know that every individual life, from one generation to the next, in society has lived it out within some historical sequence merely by the fact that people live, they contribute, no matter how minutely, to the shaping of their society and to the course of its history (Mills, N/A). So by making sure power is used in a way that does not interfere with this idea we can see when critical issues, which span throughout time, do not have to continue. They can in fact be stopped before having and wide ranging detrimental effects if we learn to understand how to use power through studying it over time.
There were no heroes on the psychiatric ward until McMurphy's arrival. McMurphy gave the patients courage to stand against a truncated concept of masculinity, such as Nurse Ratched. For example, Harding states, "No ones ever dared to come out and say it before, but there is not a man among us that does not think it. That doesn't feel just as you do about her, and the whole business feels it somewhere down deep in his sacred little soul." McMurphy did not only understand his friends/patients, but understood the enemy who portrayed evil, spite, and hatred. McMurphy is the only one who can stand against the Big Nurse's oppressive supreme power. Chief explains this by stating, "To beat her you don't have to whip her two out of three or three out of five, but every time you meet. As soon as you let down your guard, as sson as you loose once, she's won for good. And eventually we all got to lose. Nobody can help that." McMuprhy's struggle for hte patient's free will is a disruption to Nurse Ratched's social order. Though she holds down her guard she yet is incapable of controlling what McMurphy is incontrollable of , such as his friends well being, to the order of Nurse Ratched and the Combine.
Characters have played a large role in setting the theme of abusive power; they gain power over a group of individuals and misguide them. One obvious example from Lord Of the Flies was Jack. Towards the beginning of the novel, when the “elections” for the leader of the group took place Jack tried to get power. “‘I ought to be chief,’ said Jack with simple arrogance, ‘because I’m the chapter chorister and head boy. I can sing C sharp’” (Golding 22). After losing the election to Ralph, he became the head of the hunters. Here he abused the miniscule powers given to him over the small group of boys formerly known as the “choir”. Jack’s influence possibly corrupted the minds of the young boys and made them into cold blooded killers going from killing pigs for food to harming humans for enjoyment. “The circle moved round. Robert squealed in mock terror then in real pain… Jack had him by the hair and was brandishing his knife.” (Golding 114). The significance of this was that it was the first major point that lead to the collapse of society on the island. Jack thought that Ralph did not appreciate what he was doing for the group by gett...
In Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World, the author depicts a collective society in which everyone has the same values and beliefs. From a young age, the people in the World State’s civilization are conditioned to believe in their motto of “Community, Identity, Stability.” Through hypnopaedia, the citizens of the World State learn their morals, values, and beliefs, which stay with them as they age. However, like any society, there are outsiders who alienate themselves from the rest of the population because they have different values and beliefs. Unfortunately, being an outsider in the World State is not ideal, and therefore there are consequences as a result. One such outsider is John. Brought from the Savage Reservation, John is lead to conform to the beliefs of the World State, thus losing his individuality, which ultimately leads him to commit suicide. Through John and the World State populace as an example, Huxley uses his novel to emphasize his disapproval of conformity over individuality.
The Objectivism philosophy Ayn Rand projects throughout the course of The Fountainhead, through the use of Dominique Francon and Howard Roark's love for each other, and Dominique's concurrent act of marrying Peter Keating, is one that exists much like the buildings of Roark; beautiful in their appearance, functional in their application, and understood by only a small, enlightened portion of society.