Elizabeth's Allusions In The Crucible '

1360 Words3 Pages

ACT V It is 1693 and it has been 4 months after the death of John Proctor. It’s a cold morning with clouds of warmth forming from Elizabeth Proctors mouth, a pregnant woman soon expecting. She sits in a grey and rotten prison cell, chained to the wall, waiting for something she knows nothing of. Two women sit in the corners of the cell, one raving mad, the other follows. Tituba and Sarah Good yell jumbled words, praising the devil between every sentence. Elizabeth sits silent and reluctant. Sarah Good, stares at the ceiling as if the devil reaches for her. Elizabeth feels an aching pain in her stomach like she has many times before and she reaches the ground. Elizabeth: On the floor If the child be born still… I cannot bear another loss Sarah …show more content…

Miller’s countless use of biblical allusions managed to capture puritan times perfectly. Puritans, needless to say, had a large affliction with religion, so Miller used allusions to the bible to emphasize the time period. One example is when Elizabeth, a Christian woman whose husband has committed adultery, is confronted with the means of Abigail Williams who used to be the other woman. Elizabeth mentions Abigail’s manipulation by alluding to the bible “Abigail brings the other girls into the court, and where she walks the crowd will part like the sea for Israel” (Miller 53). Elizabeth makes a reference to Moses, a key biblical figure, to make a point about Abigail. The use of biblical references helps create an identity for the characters as well. Everyone in the play has a different stance on religion and this stance is what sets them apart from each other. An example would be Proctor and his stance against Parris, the current minister of Salem, “I like it not that Mr. Parris should lay his hand upon my baby. I see no light of God in that man. I’ll not conceal it” (Miller 65). Proctor has not baptized all his sons for he believes that Parris does not have the light of god in him. Proctors beliefs make him almost an outcast and play a large role in defining his identity and part in the play. Along with the countless biblical allusions used within The Crucible there are many uses of syntax and diction that help the story. The syntax of the late 17th century was very different in comparison to the 20th so Miller has Proctor say “I have no witness and cannot prove it, except my word be taken” (Miller 73). The placement of words is not modern. Instead of “I did not witness it” Proctors was “I have no witness”. Instead of “take my word” Proctor says “my word be taken”. The structure of speech is

Open Document