In the nonfiction story "Desiderata," by Elizabeth McCracken, the central idea is that the value and importance of something may change due to time, circumstances, or when regarded by different people. McCrackin mentions some anecdotes throughout the selection. In one, she says that she has letters that have informed her of things she wished she didn't know, such as one of her grandmother’s sisters wanting to sue the widow of their brother. She states that she knows they were quarrelsome people, yet the action still comes across as merely petty. In contrast, she says there are letters that can “break your heart.” An example of a letter like this was one that her aunt had written regarding her bad and degrading health. Mccrackin knew from the …show more content…
“It was one of the most beautiful love letters i’ve ever read,” stated McCrackin. It showed her a side of her grandfather that she never would have imagined. The fact that she talks about letters of this type, letters that can break your heart, with so much passion shows the great importance she finds in certain similar things tied to her family’s past. In the beginning of this writing, McCracken states the fact that Desiderata are “the items you need for an archive to make it useful.” “Useful, not complete,” she says. Later on in the piece, she asked herself if the love letter from her grandfather, in which she had recently uncovered, was more of a desideratum for her or for her father. Her father had the collection of love letters written by McCracken's grandparents. Because of this, and her father's mild reaction to the letter, it can be stated that that single letter was merely a piece working to make his collection more complete. She then goes on to say she needs and desires this letter, which by definition is the meaning of a desideratum. An observation made by the author was of the contents written by her grandmother on a simple piece of
There is one letter in particular. which shows how important this correspondence is to her. I hate you. you do not write back nor be my Pen Friend I think you are the Ice Queen instead of a king.
...s, and why he writes them at all. Instead of judging him, she tries to understand and fix it her own way, and it affects how he sees his writing:
What idea does the author develop regarding how an important event can change your perspective? In the short story, “The First Day” by Edward P. Jones is about a little girl view on the people during her first day. Her mother prepare her gave her an unusually breakfast and clothes for her new school Seaton Elementary all the way down New Jersey Avenue. At the school Walker-Jones, a key event happens to her. She learns of an essential fact of her mother pervious past of her life and on how she acts. The daughter sees that the mother does not seem to like the teacher of her daughter new classroom. A significant event can changes how you use to see people from your old understanding into another completely different understanding of how you view them before.
The narrator’s insecurities unfold when it takes him almost five pages just to demonstrate how close the friendship is between his wife and Robert. It is as though he is justifying his irrational behavior or perhaps questioning if his wife could be secretly in love with Robert. The narrator assumes this because his wife only writes poems if something really important happens to her. He recalls that his wife never forgot that instant when Robert "touched his fingers to every part of her face...
Recently, I have read both a Raisin in the Sun and To Kill a Mockingbird, both considered literary classics. They share a number of similar themes and character that face similar situations. Ultimately, they have extremely different plots, but address the same issues; some that were common around the time they were published, and some that carry relevance into current times. What I wish to bring to light in this essay is that in both novels, there are many characters that lives’ hit a shatter-point in the course of the story. This shatter-point is where the characters’ lives are irrevocably changed, sometimes for the better, sometimes for the worse. What I’m going to explore is how these characters cope with the emotional fallout of what the aforementioned shatter-point left in its wake.
She writes a letter to husband, almost instructing him on what to do after her death. Unlike other demure housewives of her time, she acknowledges the risk birthing her child brings by saying, “And when thy loss shall be repaid with gains / Look to my little babes, my dear remains” (107). Bradstreet also approaches a taboo subject by acknowledging that her husband might remarry. Bradstreet does not tread lightly on this subject either by writing, “And if thou love thyself, or loved’st me, / These o protect from step Dames injury” (107). In this poem, Bradstreet faces the possibility of not only the loss of her life but the loss of her husband’s love. Bradstreet challenges Puritan beliefs by showing that she will still be concerned with her earthly life after her
that the main character will not realize the fallacies of his ways until he has
The narrator in “The Yellow Wallpaper” knows she is sick, but the men in her life do not think she is seriously ill. Her husband, John, and her brother are both physicians of high standing, so she does not know what to do when they diagnose her as being perfectly healthy. Even though she does not agree with their remedies, she has no say over them. She admits with discomfort, “So I take phosphates or phosphites-whichever it is, and tonics, and journeys, and airs, and exercise, and am absolutely forbidden to “work” until I am well again”(Gilman 956). Although she would know if she was sick and what would make her feel better than anyone else, she is forced to go along with her husband’s elaborate plan for her path to recovery.
One of the seductive factors of William Faulkner’s society in “A Rose for Emily” is the traditional and adamant mental attitude of the main character in the novel. Miss Emily Grierson was stern in her ways and refused to accept change. She was known to be a hereditary obligation to the town. When the next generation and modern ideas came into progress she creates dissatisfaction by not paying her taxes. For many years and through the time of her death she would receive a tax notice every December and it would be returned by the post office a week later unclaimed. When the town got free postal delivery, Miss Emily was opposed to the new idea. She herself did not allow them to fasten the metal numbers above her door and attach a mail box to it. She has no tolerance when it comes to modern ideas. Depression and anguish increased within her causing major conflicts after her father’s death. Being left alone and without any close family to seek support from, she dwelled in disbelief. As custom from the town all the ladies prepared to call at the house and offer condolence and aid, but Miss Emily met them at the door with no trace of grief on her face. She told them that her father was not dead. For three days she was inclined to disbelieve and what had happened while minister and doctors tried to persuade her to let them dispose of the body.
She calls him "old lecher/old liar", which means when he was alive the father often made empty promises of false hope about mending everything, but the family could no longer wait for him (Clifton 9, 10). She wishes that her father was rich, so he would have money to pay the mother when she asks for his salary on Friday; he would be able to repay the mother all she deserved being his wife. The impatient tone is still there, but it is more mellow. Rather than expecting her father to cough up the money like before, she now wishes that he has the money. This is the turning point. In addition, the daughter explains how her father has grew up in the same circumstances, "son of a needy father,/the father of a needy son" (Clifton 12,13). She admits that her father "gave … all he had" even though it was not much (Clifton
Throughout the letter, Amai Zenzele compares herself to others including her daughter, her sister, her husband, and others she grew up around. She communicates a sense of falling short of others at times. There are questions that Zenzele asks that would have never occurred to Amai Zenzele to ask let alone answer. Her husband and Zenzele debate these kinds of issues while Amai Zenzele enjoys watching from the side, avoiding being asked to contribute. She compares herself to her sister and her active imagination, something that grows into something
"A Rose for Emily" by William Faulkner is a story about the life of an old woman. The narrator reveals the main events of her life, such as the death of her father, the disappearance of her lover, and the events surrounding her death, and the thoughts of the townspeople on Emily and her life as heard from the gossipy people of the town. One theme -- or central idea -- of the story is how narrow-minded attitudes can cause others to withdraw. Emily is one of the people who withdraw because of narrow-mindedness. The attitudes regarding sexism, racism, and class depicted in "A Rose for Emily" are narrow-minded.
Growing up we make connections with certain people we encounter. These connections range from parents, relatives, or someone we highly admire, and whether we realize it or not these people impact our lives and how we view the world. In William Faulkner’s “A Rose for Emily”, Emily, the main character would be a great example for Freud’s psychoanalytic theory; the theory refers to the definition of personality organization and the dynamics of personality development that guide the psychoanalytic. One of the basic tenets of psychoanalytic is human attitude, mannerism, experience, and thought which is largely influenced by irrational drives. Emily was in love with her father, she used her sweetheart as her father replacement, and she wanted to keep her sweethearts body.
The excerpt, spanning just a few deeply meaningful sentences in chapter 28 ,the final chapter, of Beloved, reads as follows:
She hides her actions and attempt to justify them until she is expose by the letter from the paper regarding her novel entry. She is ignorant to her unrealistic judgements about Cecilia and Robert and attempts to fix the problem when she made it worse. She realizes her mistake when the letter questions the conflict of her novel and she witnesses her attempt to hide the true horror behind her decision. While she attempts at hiding her problem in the draft, she made it more noticeable to the paper and drain the luster of the plot. Her realization of her ignorance honor the lovers’ romance and made her strive to atone her former