Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Methodology in teaching writing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Methodology in teaching writing
Compare-Contrast Essay There are a lot of animals in the world but two massive creatures are the rambunctious elephant and the mysterious colossal squid.We know about both of them their are two books that give you information about these two creatures “Elephants on the Savannah” and “A Colossal Catch.” Two different books with quit some similarities. Both books have pictures,informational facts, and the authors wanted the reader to learn something more about the animals.They were both about massive creatures,both of the animals are studied,both animals have adaptations that help them survive.They both give you information that you may not have known about these two marvelous animals. These are the similarities between “A Colossal Catch”
time of their works, they both had many similarities in the theme of their stories and their goals of writing the stories.
Catharine Sedgwick’s Hope Leslie, Stephen Gould’s Dinosaur in a Haystack, and Sebastian Junger’s The Perfect Storm all display similar characteristics, so that though they are seemingly unrelated, they can be compared. Mainly the comparisons exist through the imagery the authors use to weave the stories together, the structure of each book, the authority of each author, and the use of nature.
Both stories feature a very intelligent person trying to play God through the creation of life. Both of the creatures were subsequently mistreated by their maker and society as a whole. In both stories, the audience is left feeling greater sympathy for the monster than for the creator.
time of their works, they both had many similarities in the theme of their stories and their goals of writing the stories.
Elephants'." Studies in Short Fiction. 17.1 (Winter 1980): 75-77. Rpt. in Literature Resource Center. Detroit: Gale, 75-77. Literature Resource Center. Gale.
Gruen, Sara. Water for Elephants: a novel. Chapel Hill, North Carolina.: Algonquin Books, 2006. Print.
	T. Coraghessan Boyle’s "Greasy Lake" and "Big Game" are similarly structured but completely different short stories that explain the transitions of people from fake slaves of their image to genuine and realized individuals. If not portrayed in the stories, the development in the characters certainly escapes into the reader’s imagination and almost magically makes them the learned. The plot of the two stories is one of the strongest lines connecting them together by way of foundation, but at the same time it establishes completely different story lines that follow the same beat.
There are many creatures that live in the sea. The sperm whale being one of many creatures that has a huge impact on the ocean. They are very unique creators, who most people tend to forget about. The sperm whale created a huge conflict for the Essex, leaving the reading wondering what is going to end up happening. This book inspired the book Moby Dick.
First off, we have some similarities of the two genres. Over all the stories are very similar, the basic story line does not differ between the two stories. Another similarity is, in both stories the monsters in the end were truly themselves, they all turn against one another for one reason; illogical thoughts. The setting stays the same between the two genres along with many details. Also, most of the characters’ personalities and dialogue are the same, although sometimes this varies. Another similarity is that all the characters have the same reasoning for being thought of as monsters, such as, Ned Rosen/Mr. Goodman was accused of being a monster because he stargazes in the wee hours of the morning, and that was found very suspicious. There aren’t many drastic similarities in the two genres, however, there are many differences.
Throughout history, we have seen many animals that have lived on Earth and are no longer alive. However, there is a specific species such as the Megalodon, that though once thought to be extinct, has been speculated to still being alive today. Megalodon are gigantic sharks the size of a greyhound bus with teeth the size of the palm of your hand or maybe even bigger. The Megalodon went “extinct” due to the lack of prey because of major changes in the environment around them. The reason why there has been speculation is because in these recent years past there have been many sightings of sharks with the description of being huge in size.
A police officer in the British Raj, the supposedly 'unbreakable'; ruling force, was afraid. With his gun aimed at a elephant's head, he was faced with the decision to pull the trigger. That officer was George Orwell, and he writes about his experience in his short story, 'Shooting an Elephant';. To save face, he shrugged it off as his desire to 'avoid looking the fool'; (George Orwell, 283). In truth, the atmosphere of fear and pressure overwhelmed him. His inner struggle over the guilt of being involved in the subjugation of a people added to this strain, and he made a decision he would later regret enough to write this story.
Despite nearly three quarters of a century between their writings, the ideas these two magnificent authors had were similar in many ways. They both challenged science and society to their limits.
ii. Tennyson, A.L, ‘The Kraken’ in Muldoon, P. (ed.) (1997) The Faber Book of Beasts, London, Faber and Faber, p.139.
One way they are similar and different are there themes of the two stories. In the story “Being Prey” the stories theme is more of a specific theme to a specific situation. One reason this is true is because in the story Plum wood did not take notice of directions, and in turn she was harmed and wounded. One way she didn’t pay attention was when the guide had told her to not get out of the boat and she did it multiple times. Like when she said “I pulled over to tip water from the canoe”. So a possible theme for that story is “Be more meticulous to what you act upon because you never know the potential outcome “. Yes it’s possible, this could be directed in many situations but not the great amount that “A sound of Thunder” has. A possible theme for “A sound of Thunder” could be “In the present day you have no clue what the futures going to be like, so don’t do foolish things to make it worse”. And as you can tell I believe this theme applies to almost every situation and almost everybody. Don’t take that in the wrong way though, the stories themes are also very similar. They both could apply to almost all situations, weather they are hard or easy for example in the story “being Prey “if Eckels was to think of the two themes, he might not be in this senseless situation .Another possible way the two stories are similar and different in there conflicts. In the story “Being Prey” the conflict was when the main character, Plum wood could not get herself out of the crocodile’s death grasp. The conflict in “A sound of thunder “was when Eccles stepped on the butterfly. The conflicts are different because the crocodile had harmed the main character and in “A sound of thunder” the main character wounded the animal. That was one way they were different. Some way they are similar in the conflicts was the way they effected the future. In the end they both drastically
The basic ideas of the two novels are also similar. They have to do with rebellion against the so-called perfect new world and the sanctuary they find at the end. John the savage found peace by hanging himself. (It was hard to notice that, but I did. It made an excellent ending to the novel.)