Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: E-waste conclusion
Nowadays, electronic goods become popular and important in our society. To serve the consumers, the productions of electronic goods dramatically increase. The world produces over 40 million tons of electronic goods per year, such as, phones, televisions, computers, laptops. There is a large amount of electronic wastes (e-wastes) go to the landfill every year (Honorine, 2010). Therefore, at this moment, electronic wastes become a serious problem in the world. They are a global issue, especially, in developed countries. Electronic wastes affect the economic, the environment and the political. First of all, the status of e-waste will be analyzed and discuss. Next, e-wastes influence the economy and the political. Third, e-wastes affect the environment …show more content…
In America, human throws 100 millions phones every year. According to the EPA report, over 112,000 are rejected per day in USA. Moreover, there are 20 millions televisions go to the trash every year. However, there are only 13% of e-wastes can be recycled in the right way (Levin, n.d.). In addition, in 2014, the electronic wastes were higher than ever. There was 41.8 million tons of e-waste in 2014, such as, televisions, washing machines, vacuum and other electrical goods. The electronic wastes have increased 39.8 million from 2013 to 2014. According to the worldwide report, the e-wastes in last year were equal to 14,300 miles long when 1.15 million heavy trucks made a line (McCarthy, 2015). Thus, e-wastes are the important issue in the …show more content…
E-wastes are including many dangerous chemicals, such as, cadmium, beryllium, and mercury. Therefore, when we disposal the e-waste in the wrong way, these toxics have a high risk of air pollution, soil contamination and absorb into the water. For instance, in Guiyu villages (China), has the highest dioxin in the world, which can cause cancer. In the villages, seven out of ten children have a numerous lead in their body because of the water is polluted (Levin, 2010). Furthermore, according to Lincoln University (New Zealand), these toxic from e-waste can come through the “soil-crop-food-pathway”. These toxics are not able to disintegrate, they exist in the environment for the long time and the risk of exposure will be increased (McAllister, n.d.). Moreover, in several countries, to provide the family income; some people need to work with the e-waste every day (Honorine, 2010). Thus, e-wastes are not only the economical problem. They are also affect the environment and human
Even though electronic waste contributes one percent of waste as discussed earlier, it poses a significant threat to the environment. “RCRA does not, however, cover electronic waste except CRTs, nor does it regulate electronic devices donated for educational or charitable reuse.” The RCRA should implement rules to govern e-waste because e-waste not only affects lives in the United States, It affects everyone globally. E-waste typically finds its ways out of the United States and ends up in developing countries like
Leonard created: “a collection of short, animated films that detail the complicated relationships between humans, their stuff, and the environment,” While, On the other hand, Caroll’s “High Tech Trash” was published in National Geographic, and mainly focuses on the “typically unseen, portion of the life cycle”(Leonard 50; Caroll 78). “The Story of Stuff: Electronics,” was originally a short film created by Leonard; however, Leonard published the film’s transcript into an essay type format, which in return gives her essay a more relaxed feel, due to the brevity and style of her content. Although Leonard adds numerous paragraphs entitled “notes” at the end of her essay, the organization of her content is very loose and covers a broad spectrum of the e-waste affair. In contrast, Caroll’s essay is a much longer, more in depth essay into the last portion of the e-waste life cycle, which is when our outdated technology ends up in toxic dumps of foreign countries. By Caroll focusing the majority of his essay on a single aspects e-waste, and the structure he uses to interpret his message, his essay may appeal to a smaller group of people.
Statistically, US alone is the leading country in the volume of high-tech trash with 30 kilograms per person and 9.4 million metric tons of e-waste per year. Followed by ...
The environmental performance of numerous tech companies has been evaluated and since Apple has grown over time, it has received more attention. There has been a frequent campaign against Apple by different environmental organisations such as Greenpeace requesting for the elimination of hardware components that are non-recyclable hardware components, a comprehensive plan that would make the products of Apple not end up in the waste and the removal of toxins from iPhone hardware (Apple Inc. 2016). As much as such campaigns affect the operations of Apple Inc., they are good since they help in the conservation of the environment thus having a good impact on the
Electronic waste, or any waste for that matter is an inevitable part of an economic system where the destruction of an ecosystem is the primarily source of resources that are used to create the product. The waste that occurs from this process has to be disposed of in some way and more often than not, it is disposed of carelessly with out consideration to the affect it would have on the environment or the very people that create and let capitalism live on, “The political economy approach also defers progress on environmental issues to a pint after economic ones are solved” (Robbins et al. 2010, 114). And if this continues there may be no place left for the excess waste created by capitalism.
It is inevitable to deny that we are currently living in a world where technology plays a prominent part of our lives, and that this technology is ever-quickly transforming. Like all marketable consumer products, electronic products are continuously improved, altered, and designed to appeal to targeted consumers. Many of us are familiar with the struggle of having to catch up to current trends of consumer electronic devices. The useful lives of these products are relatively short, and in a year or two, it is almost expected that a new product with more capabilities and enhanced features will be in the market that would replace the old one. This ineffective process may be blamed on the all too Western mindset that better, newer things will essentially make us happier. As a society, we cause a stir every time a new i-Phone hits the market. Whether the rapid consumption and disposal cycle is driven by consumer demand or producer planned obsolescence does not matter; it is safe to assume that this mindset is going to be difficult to change. What should change – quickly – is the management of these e-waste disposals, the lack of awareness and concern among ill-informed consumers about how to safely discard of their electronic products to undermine how the significant amounts of electronic waste will directly impact the environment and human health.
E-waste is affecting our environment due to the amount of technology we throw away daily, such as the chemicals from these devices gets into the air we breathe. When we look at the topic about environmental justice, we can see how this is shown by events like the Flint Water Crisis. Which is a concurrent event in Flint, Michigan that has affected many due to there being no clean drinking water because of lead poisoning from pipes. Another example is how there are not that many local fresh food markets in America and other world countries which have kept people away from the healthy food causing the rate of obesity to skyrocket. Although these are only a few situations of environmental crisis, I would like to get into how our phones could be
According to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), American’s produced at least 1600 pounds of municipal solid waste (MSW) in fiscal year 2005 and more than 54 percent of the wastes disposed in landfills the amount of 140 million tons of waste. This amount of waste has potential to produce toxic gases, CO2, Methane, greenhouse gas (GHG), metals volatile organic compounds (VOCs), semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs), and toxic poisonous soup called leachate along hundreds of other contaminants. By using dump and old landfills, these pollutants became serious hazards to the environment, air quality, ozone layer, soil contamination, ground water and human resource. On the other hand, there are many opportunities to take advantage of municipal solid waste (MSW) by constructing Mod...
Improper practices of waste disposal occur on a daily basis leading to sickness, pollution, and chemical exposure. These daily disposals of hazardous waste have led to pollution and the endangerment of sanitation workers, wild life and the rest of the population. A part of the problem is many people dispose of these common household items without even knowing they are doing is wrong and detrimental to themselves and their surroundings. Many consumers just simply toss their items in the garba...
Today, everyone is out buying the newest gadgets from phones to computers. While leaving the last generation behind for the dump. Technology keeps everyone up to date and can even make life seem so much easier. Although, as humans produce more advanced technology, the average person wants to upgrade to the latest gadget and are left to get rid of their old gadgets. Not many people think about what happens to devices after they are gone. But what does happen? Is it bad to get rid of gadgets via landfills and is there a better way to throw them out? Even though there are ways to reduce technology waste, when tossing out gadgets, they produce chemicals and some may be toxic, the chemicals are bad for the environment, and the toxins can even
Have you ever imagined that Earth is no longer available due to pollution? As shown in Wall-E, people recognize that wastes can lead Earth to be unavailable for all lives because of toxic gas from wastes. In each day, tons of wastes are create, and they are disposed with vary disposal methods. Unfortunately, current disposal methods have limitations; landfill and incineration create harmful chemicals that pollute Earth. Even if people live only with necessity of life, wastes are still created and they needed to be disposed. Even though current waste disposal methods solve problems caused by wastes, they create another problem while disposing wastes. When disposing waste with current methods, wastes seem to be disappear, but they are remain in different form still polluting Earth in many ways like air, ground and water pollutions. To resolve addressed problem, the best way is to make no wastes, but it is impossible unless people can live without necessity of life. The other method is to improve waste disposal methods. There are some companies that try to prevent pollutions caused while disposing wastes. These companies try to develop safer waste disposal methods. Waste Management (WM) is the most famous companies among these eco-friendly companies, and WM shows some possible solutions for improving waste disposal methods. In addition, this article will analyze, critique and suggest improvements of Waste Management's three ways to dispose several types of waste: improving current recycling, renewable energy from Landfill gas (LFG), and waste conversion.
There are many reasons to recycle. It conserves natural resources, saves energy, and reduces the number of landfills and the amount of methane emitted from landfills. Although many citizens choose to recycle, Americans generated 250 million tons of trash and recycled or composted only 83 million tons of material in 2008, a mere third of the generated amount (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2008). Given the increased amount of trash generated in the United States, the fact that two-thirds of our nation's waste is cloggin...
Solid waste pollution will always be an issue as long as human population increases everyday .solid waste is not only cause by household only, the industries as well have hand on environment pollution. And due to improper disposal system solid waste end up on the road. Solid waste have a huge effect on human life and can also cause death in animals as well, as people clean their houses everyday litter their trash everywhere this problem will not stop. But the most dangerous waste are those coming from the industries, because those waste end up in stream, rivers where it poisonous and have bad impact on the marine life. Industrial waste are the source of toxic metal and hazardous waste that effect soil characteristic and productivity of soil when dumped in ground. And the problem lies where some of the waste do not decompose. These solid waste are hazardous, Pesticides poisonous which is not health and life threatening to both humans and animals. People are very much aware of recycling to reduce pollution yet they still fail in doing so. Silt build in freshwater water ecosystems, caused by the unnecessarily agricultural activities smothers aquatic organisms. To reduce solid waste they should be recycled in such a way that do not harm the both the environment, water, air and human health. There are animals such as
In our everyday lives there are things that need to be put into consideration. These things are very important because they help us to be able to manage our resources and also our environments. One of the things we need to put in place is the issue of recycling of waste. But before I proceed I would like to define what recycling and waste means. According to oxford dictionary recycling is to convert waste into reusable material . Oxford dictionary defined waste as the deliberately dispose of surplus stock. This put together can help improve a developing area such as Bauchi Street. This unwanted materials can be processed and changed into now product. Further in this easy I will be talking about, how recycling of waste can develop Bauchi street.
Solid waste can be classified as all waste materials except hazardous waste, liquid waste and atmospheric emissions (Liu & Liptak, 2000). The world consumption of non- renewable sources of energy as raw materials are predominantly getting depleted and on the contrary waste produced is increasing massively, solid waste is one of the major problems faced by the world and the construction industry today. In New Zealand, construction and demolition waste produced constitutes a high percentage of the total solid waste produced in the country. The Ministry for Environment reports around 1 million tonnes of construction and demolition waste goes to landfills each year and about 40% of that originates from residential construction.