Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The quest for the doll's house
Theme of materialism in a doll's house
A doll' s house essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The quest for the doll's house
Wealth can come in a variety of different ways. Whether it is financial wealth, or emotional wealth, it can deeply affect a person’s character and way of thinking and living in general. Money and wealth affect the Helmers in Henrik Ibsen’s A Doll’s House by robbing the two characters of their moral and emotional values. This is shown through Nora and how she talks about her life, and it is shown through Torvald’s character. Nora is greatly affected by wealth throughout the course of the play. Looking at the first act of the play when Nora confesses she borrowed money and forged her father’s signature, she falsely leads Mrs. Linde to believe she has a secret admirer that gave her the money. Because of the forged signature, and the raise in income …show more content…
Torvald is soon to receive, Nora begins to believe that she is superior to Mrs. Linde, who does not have a stable source of income. When Nora feels superior, she tends to over exaggerate certain details, such as her alleged secret admirer. She even says, “When anyone is as attractive as I am,” (pg. 13) which further displays her ignorance, implying that she could have many men offering her the money with ease. Another example of an effect wealth has had on Nora is when Krogstad tell her he is going to tell Torvald everything about the forged signature if she does not ensure that he can keep his job. All she cares about from this point on in the play is that she keeps herself protected. Throughout the entire play, she only cares about her own reputation, not the reputation of her entire family which will be affected by Krogstad’s letter. She further proves this at the very end of the play when she leaves Torvald. She has the desire to protect her own dignity, and she does not care about the rest of her family. Wealth has affected Nora in a very negative way, and she becomes shallow and ignorant. Compared to Mrs. Linde, who has lived a harder life with no wealth, this makes her look very bad. Mrs. Linde is kind, sensible, and rather forgiving and trustworthy, while Nora is unlike her in many different ways. With this new feeling of being “better off” in a sense, Nora ironically becomes emotionally and morally bankrupt, as she goes to all lengths to protect herself from the negative consequences that will fall upon her because of the forged signature. Although wealth does not affect Torvald as much as it does Nora, it is still prevalent throughout the play.
Torvald begins to treat Nora differently after he gets his promotion, as he knows he will need to control her as he believes she is a “spendthrift,” and will put them in financial trouble if she continues to spend like she currently is. But, meanwhile Nora has already put them in financial trouble, and put their whole lives in trouble by forging her father’s signature. When Nora leaves at the end of the play, Torvald wishes for her to stay the night and he still cares about her as she leaves, whereas she does not. This shows that wealth has not affected Torvald in the same ways that it has affected Nora. Although they are not affected in the same ways, there are some similarities as they both seem very shallow and ignorant. The first thing Torvald says when he sees the two cards from Doctor Rank in his mailbox is, “It looks as if he were announcing his own death.” (pg. 61) Although he does not know any better, and he does not know that is exactly what Doctor Rank was doing, it is an extremely shallow thing to say as death is not a subject to be lightly joked about. Wealth affects the way Torvald treats, controls and converses with Nora, and it affects his reasoning and thought
processes. Wealth affects the Helmers greatly throughout the length of the play. Torvald and Nora become extremely distant, and they are essentially emotionless, ignorant and bankrupt of any moral values they may have once had. Nora becomes extremely obtuse, and she believes she is superior to those who are not as well off as her and her husband plan to be with his promotion. Although Torvald is a bit more reasonable than Nora, he becomes shallow and only cares about doing his job well and salvaging his marriage with Nora as she leaves at the end of the play. But the two have come to their end, and they will have to live in a further emotionless world separately. Because of Torvald’s promotion and the signature that Nora forged, the two lose their moral and emotional qualities and this comes to tear them apart in the end.
In Act I, it seems evident that Nora does not understand the actual value of money but she has an infatuation with luxuries such as expensive Christmas gifts and she justifies this by buying less expensive clothes, which she has confided in Mrs. Linde, her friend. Helmer, immediately labels his wife as a “little spendthrift” (Ibsen, 660). She seems to think that money can be easily borrowed and paid back.
At the beginning of the story Nora is very happy, and everything with her family is going great. Nora responds in joy when Torvald brings up all the extra money that he will bring to the family with his new job. But as the story goes on Nora says she is not just a “silly girl” as Torvald says she is. Torvald does not agree that she understands all the business details referring to debt that she incurred to take out a loan to preserve Torvald’s health. She thinks that if she knows all these things about business that she will think that Torvald will see her as an intelligent person that knows more than just being a wife. But the fact that she is willing to break the law just to show her courage for Torvalds health.
Due to women having no rights if one tried to get a credit car or load they needed their husband or father to sign their name for her to receive one. This is outdated idea is clearly depicted in the play through Nora forging her father’s signature to get a loan without her father or husband’s permission. She is forced to hide the loan from her husband because he believes if you take a loan you lose a piece of your freedom.
5. Ford, Karen. "Social contrains and painful growth in A Doll's House". Expanded Academic ASAP. Methodist College , Fayetteville , NC . 30 Octuber 2005
The woman in this play is a very happy mother, who does not objectify to be a stay home wife, her life is happy and although she was faced by many obstacles before, like incurring into debt to save her husband’s life, she is a happy woman as long as she possesses the love of her children and husband. Life for Nora seems as calm as it could possibly be, but soon after the promotion of her husband and the imminent consequences such promotion will bring to Krogstad, bring a new set of complication to her life. Soon her past mistakes come to haunt her. She committed forgery, by signing in place of her deceased father, which of course is taken as leverage by Krogstad, the owner of the note she signed, in order for him to conserve his
A grandiose sense of importance and uniqueness can be argued for Nora in the beginning of the play when she reunites with a friend she hasn’t seen in many years. Instead of allowing the friend to talk Nora rhapsodizes about her ideal life with her husband and children all while knowing about the hardship her friend has faced in recent years (Ibsen, 1731). Although this is a selfish thing to do to a friend; Nora is a secretive person afraid of allowing people to get close enough to see under the mask she wears every
Once Nora reveals her deceptive act to Mrs. Linde, we begin to see Nora’s character in a whole new light. One that is much more mature and determined than previously thought. It isn’t until Mrs. Linde accuses Nora of not knowing her hard day’s work that she finally reveals her greatest secret. It is through their common experience of sacrifice that unites them and brings them closer together again. As we reach the end of act one, we begin to see Nora struggle with her new problem of guilt.
In the emotional drama, A Doll House written by Henrik Ibsen, the pragmatic, yet caring character of Mrs.Linde is brought to life. Mrs.Linde has endured a hard knock life, having to care for her dying mother, young brothers, and be a devoted wife to a husband she did not love. Due to Mrs.Linde’s former struggles, when she stops by the Helmer’s house on Christmas Eve, searching for a job, Mrs. Linde cannot help but feel the couple’s life is cushioned from hardships, leaving her feeling superior due to her perspicacity of life. Being rich in life knowledge, Mrs.Linde uses her maturity to help others choose to be rich in experiences rather than in money.
(Mrs. Linde and Nora) express their feelings of pride and fulfillment in helping their significant others by sacrificing themselves. Nora’s character is made more obvious to us by Mrs. Linde’s actions. Not only did Nora open her mouth about saving her husband‘s life, but she did it with the utmost pride. Claiming to have raised all the money herself she soaks in her self-importance. In Act 1, Nora seems to thrive on the pride she gets from borrowing the money. I suppose that she is feeling useful for a change.
From the start of the play, we see that Nora’s entire focus is on money. “Won’t it be lovely to have stacks of money and not a care in the world” (703), Nora asks Mrs. Linde. Almost every conversation she has in the play is related to money in some way or another. When Torvald, her husband, asks her what she wants for Christmas, she tells him, “You could give me money, Torvald. . . . Then I could hang the bills in pretty glit paper on the Christmas tree. Wouldn’t that be fun” (699)? Her carefree way of handling money exasperates her husband. He wants to make her happy, but he isn’t able to give her what he doesn’t have. He doesn’t know about the loan, at first, and, to him and the audience, it appears that she is just throwing her money away hopelessly.
The Romantic movement of the nineteenth century in Europe involved those who wished to express their disapproval of industrialism. Romantics focus on individualism as well as images and ideas created by the imagination. Romantics are very centered around a certain beauty and power of nature as opposed to material objects. Romantics stay away from the more realistic part of life, this is greatly expressed in Romantic literature and art. Specifically, in Arthur Rimbaud’s “Ophelia” it is evident to see the fascination with nature as well as the individual. He states, “On the calm black wave where the stars sleep/ Floats white Ophelia like a great lily,/ Floats very slowly, lying in her long veils . . .”(891). Here there is evidence of a Romantic’s
sure the children don’t see it till it’s decorated this evening”(Ibsen 892). There is also a
Torvald expects Nora to agree with what he says and thinks, and commit her life to keeping the family happy by being a housewife. But Nora defies the roles that she is expected to have as being a wife, a woman, and a friend. As a wife, Nora spends Torvald’s money on macarons which are forbidden and attempts to earn her own money while going against what her husband tells her, because she wants to be an independent person with her own opinions. The trip to the south and borrowing money was all done by her, and in the end of the play Nora ultimately goes against the expectations set upon her by leaving the house to live on her own to gain knowledge and experience, but leaves behind her husband and children who she is responsible for taking care of. As a woman, she does not have the authority to disagree with her husband or try to influence his actions. Torvald says, “If it ever got around that the new manager had been talked over by his wife…” (Ibsen 42) showing that it would be a laughing matter if a woman had an idea, but Nora still makes many attempts to persuade her husband. As a friend, Nora is expected to know her role which is a listener and supporter for Mrs. Linde and just an acquaintance to Dr. Rank, but the relationship with Dr. Rank goes beyond what is acceptable. When Dr. Rank confesses his feelings for Nora she is very upset because they can no longer flirt with each other now that the feelings are real. Her role is to be a loyal wife to her husband, which she is, but Ibsen uses the flirtatious dialect between the two to show that there are mutual feelings and that confessing them brings the relationship beyond what is allowed. As Nora challenges all of these roles, she is gradually becoming more stressed and eventually breaks down and leaves her husband, which demonstrates the effect of the unrealistic expectations to uphold the roles of
As the play goes on, Nora seems to transform from her delicate little character into something much more. At the end of act one, Krogstad goes to Nora for the recollection of the money she had borrowed from him. "You don?t mean that you will tell my husband that I owe you money?" (21). Since Nora was wrong in doing so socially, she could not tell Torvald or anyone else about her problem. Not only would that affect their social standard but also Torvald's ego, which inevitably would happen anyway. After Krogstad threatens to expose Nora for forging her father's signature, she realizes that no matter what she does Torvald was going to know the truth. The flaw with...
Ibsen desires to challenge assumptions as well as rules of Norwegian life, and most importantly wants to depict society accurately, as he meticulously incorporates everyday life. Therefore, A Doll House represents a realistic drama due to the issues involving women, illnesses, and laws within the play, while conveying Ibsen’s desire for controversy and change in Norway’s society. A common woman in Norway, such as Nora, experiences a daily life of oppression, fear, and unjust authority, which exposes societal mistreatment. Society and Torvald Helmer force Nora to look pretty and happy, although “she laughs softly at herself while taking off her street things. Drawing a bag of macaroons from her pocket, she eats a couple, then steals over and listens at her husband’s door” (Ibsen I. 43), which portrays oppression.