Effects Of Gender Uniform And Gender Equality

1418 Words3 Pages

Uniforms promote gender inequality in various ways. The three main points that I will be focusing on are: the encouragement towards gender stereotypes, the controversial restrictions that girls undergo because of the compulsory use of skirts within most uniforms and the enforcement of gender binaries.
Firstly gender stereotypes are promoted due to the primary differences of male and female uniform requisites. Male uniforms consist of grey trousers, a white shirt black/brown leather shoes, green and white striped tie and a green pullover for students from year 6-11. And for IB students the only differences are the tie, which is navy blue with gold emblems of the coat of arms, and a navy blue blazer. As J. Craik stated in “Uniforms Exposed”
There are two different uniforms; one is for male students and the other one is for female students. However there are no unisex uniforms. Students that don’t define themselves as a certain gender are limited to identify themselves as either male or female, and are also being prevented from further exploration of gender identification. As Jan Hoffman (New York Times) explains in her article ‘Can A Boy Wear A Skirt To School?’ : “In recent years, a growing number of teenagers have been dressing to articulate — or confound — gender identity and sexual orientation. Certainly they have been confounding school officials, whose responses have ranged from indifference to applause to bans.” This suggest that students are being more open towards their gender identity and sexual orientation, yet further on this article Jan Hoffman states that there have been many cases of students being sent home due to ‘violations’ of the school’s dress codes. Such as a senior cross dresser being sent home because his wig was longer than the school expected a boys hair to be. This shows that in most schools dress codes and uniforms there are rules, which encourage conflicts due to gender expectations provided by the school and gender identity chosen by the
Male uniforms consist of grey trousers, a white shirt black/brown leather shoes, green and white striped tie and a green pullover for students from year 6-11. And for IB students the only differences are the tie, which is navy blue with gold emblems of the coat of arms, and a navy blue blazer. As J. Craik stated in “Uniforms Exposed” - “Uniforms are associated with the dress of a professional business man which gives boys at a young age the impression that masculinity is gained through business success.” This shows that the idea promoted by uniforms is that masculinity is only achieved when a male person becomes a businessman. These types of statements are portraying masculinity and gender roles in an unrealistic way. Uniforms and the message behind them can stimulate changes in student’s opinions of their preferred subjects because their views of masculinity and gender roles are being shaped due to these expectations promoted by uniforms. These false expectations can lead to disappointing outcomes to the ones being promoted to these types of stereotypes. Girls on the other hand are required to wear a skirt, which is often connoted with femininity. Yet skirts can be portrayed in a negative way towards girls. According to Alison Happel “Skirts are seen as a symbol of femininity because they restrict movement and force certain ways of sitting and playing”

More about Effects Of Gender Uniform And Gender Equality

Open Document