Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ill effects of European imperialism on Africa
Ill effects of European imperialism on Africa
Impacts of European imperialism in Africa
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Ill effects of European imperialism on Africa
Africa’s majority of unique aspects such as their variety of cultures was eliminated by the Europeans, who sought a homogenous continent that was able to be molded into to the power and stability of their own. They utilized force to turn the african population into machines that would follow them in creating a prosperous region through religion and resources. Although short term effect were prominent in early African society, the long term effects are what shaped Africa into the poverty-stricken continent it is today. The European colonization of Africa exhibited overall negative effects, including unstable political conditions and massive human rights violations. European colonization of Africa resulted in a corrupt political state in most …show more content…
The French imposed an early way of governmental forum that has influenced leader’s king-like attribute throughout Togo’s history. The earliest form of dictatorship began when “an unsupervised general election was held in 1958 and won by Sylvanus Olympio” (HISTORY 2). Four political parties in Togo existed simultaneously during this time period, although only one of these truly benefited from the ruling of Sylvanus Olympio. This was his own party, the Unite Togolaise. The biased view of Olympio resulted is a dissolution of the remaining three parties, who fled to get away from views that opposed their own. A prominent effect of the corrupt political situation was a forceful opposition from the non-commissioned officers of the French army who were dissatisfied with the way they were treated. During the rule of Olympus he modified several aspects of the government, one of which was discharging these officers from the French army. The discharge caused an uprising fueled by the hatred towards Sylvus Olympus who “On January 13, 1963,... was assassinated in an uprising of army non-commissioned officers” (HISTORY 3). Although this heinous act rid Togo of a ferocious leader, it brought upon the country a political condition almost as …show more content…
The Europeans viewed Africans as less than people, almost as if they were only animals that could be used to help them create an army of slaves. The downgrading of African life can be observed in the book Things Fall Apart on several occasions, as Europeans invade and inflict their own way of living. The Ibo tribe is turned inside out as even the most respected men of the village are disdained by the European people. The extreme violation of human rights reaches its climax when the District Commissioner takes the leaders of Umuofia prisoner, forcing them to pay a fine. Their inhumane treatment is evident when a man “Shaved off all the hair on the men’s head...they were not given any water to drink”(Achebe 195). Although the commissioner orders the men to be treated with respect, the opposite occurs. The men are treated as caged animals who have no way to escape or even gain access to basic needs like food, water, and a sanitized area. Their only way to leave is to pay a fine that will ultimately send the image that the Europeans have gained complete control over the African tribe. Lastly, the violation of human rights can be seen in Sudan, when the British forced the North and the South to become one country against their will. The merging of both areas was a huge mistake because “the...people were so different,
Prior to the arrival of European traders, the continent of Africa had developed sophisticated society as it demonstrated its ability to maintain advanced civilizations, withhold three major empires, and gain wealth through trade. Although European traders did advance organized society in Africa, it would be false to say that prior to their arrival Africa was underdeveloped.
By 1885, little to no independent countries existed throughtout the whole African continent. This was due to the imperialism done by strong European countries. Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Portugal, Belgium, and Spain are to blame. There are many possible contributing factors as to why the European countries decided to completely carve up Africa, split it up, imperialize the whole of the continent. Because of the need for resources Africa could supply, the European desire for power, and the European's reaction to the White Man's burden, they took control of almost every square mile in Africa through imperialization.
Prior to the 19th century, the Europeans traded mainly for African slaves. It turns out they were not immune towards certain diseases and therefore had an increasing risk of becoming sick. For years to come this continued, but not much land was conquered. Eventually, conference between only the Europeans was held to divide up the land appropriately, and the scramble for Africa began. The driving forces behind European imperialism in Africa were expanding empires, helping natives, and natural resources.
The results of European colonialism shows that the aim of colonialism is to exploit the human and economic resources of an area to benefit the colonizing nation. As a result, the nation that is colonized is affected negatively. In reality, how Europe really affected Africa as a whole is much
Europe, in the late 1800’s, was starting for a land grab in the African continent. Around 1878, most of Africa was unexplored, but by 1914, most of Africa, with the lucky exception of Liberia and Ethiopia, was carved up between European powers. There were countless motivations that spurred the European powers to carve Africa, like economical, political, and socio–cultural, and there were countless attitudes towards this expansion into Africa, some of approval and some of condemnation.
When the Age of Imperialism began in 1875, it effected Africa in many ways. Nowhere was the competition for colonies more intense than in Africa. Europeans went after North and South Africa splitting up the continent. Egypt and Sudan were taken over by Britain to obtain the Suez Canal. Imperialism helped to develop Africa’s economy and turned it into a continent of colonies.
The beginning of colonization also marks the beginning of decolonization. From the day the colonists start exploiting the colonized people and belittling the colonized people for the colonists' self-aggrandizement, the colonized ones have been prepared to use violence at any moment to end the colonists' exploitation (Fanon, 3).Decolonization is violent, there is a necessity for violence. This is a point that is repeated again and again throughout The Battle of Algiers and The Wretched of the Earth. Here, the focus will be on The Battle of Algiers to discuss the violence of
Introduction: The epoch of imperialism cannot be defined simply as a proliferation of inflated egos tied to the hardened opinions of nationalists, but also a multi-faceted global rivalry with roots of philosophies tainted with racism and social Darwinism. The technique of each imperialist was specific to the motivations and desires of each combative, predominantly Western power and subsequently impacted the success of each imperialist and its colonies. Driven by industrialization, Europeans are aware of the urgent need for raw materials and new markets to maintain a constant rate of expansion and wealth. Imperialism became a competition; in general, the European countries led with fervor while the non-Western regions deemed likely to be stepped on.
In terms of political changes, European imperialism negatively affected Africa. Firstly, European colonization created enormous conflict between colonists and the African people. African resistance to “The Scramble for Africa” lead to the instability of Africa’s political structure. There was ineffective resistance of the African people against the Europeans. In an attempt to regain their independence, Africans took up arms against their colonial masters as soon as they perceived them to be at a disadvantage. In southern Africa, in The Republic of Namibia, the Herero people rose against German rule in 1904, killing over 100 German settlers and traders. German commander, General von Trotha, retaliated with a war aimed simply at extermination. This resulted in the decline of 70% of the Herero population.1 Nowhere else was colonialism quite so brutal, but almost everywhere it tended towards unrestrained brutality as soon as it was challenged.2 Warfare created considerable unrest among African people. Afterwards, the people of Africa came to the realization that the consequences of resistance against European colonists could be devastating. As well, the Europeans demonstrated that they had the technology and resources to gain control. Secondly, colonial expansion changed the face of Africa’s political structure. The Berlin Conference of 1884-85, attended by 13 European nations and the USA, set the ground rules for partition of Africa. When the conferenc...
In order to analyze Boahen’s work as well as produce a coherent interpretation of his evidence, definitions for and connections between the terms in question are critical. Therefore, peaceful responses are defined as devoid of bloodshed and aggressive confrontation whereas violent reactions are defined as uprisings of a coalition or faction that involve open hostility. In the context of African resistance to colonialism, success is defined as the achievement of the party in question's objective as well as sustaining the attained goal in order for it to have a lasting positive impact on the country. These objectives typically fall into the two categories of state sovereignty and amity. While they are generally found to be the products of peaceful reactions, fatalities and destruction are by large the most notable outcomes of violent opposition. Moreover, this pattern observed from the results of the two types of responses is best understood when presented in terms of time periods: invasion and occupation.
Colonialism has plagued indigenous people worldwide and has spelled disaster for countless cultures, languages, and traditions. Over the past 500 years there have been different phases of colonization in Africa as well as other various parts of earth. There were many reasons behind exploration and colonization including economic and tactical reasons, religion, and prestige. Colonialism has shaped the contemporary understanding of individuals from Niger as well as other parts of Africa and other places too, like the Chambri and Tlingit people; mainly in economics. Because of the colonial past of so many cultures, numerous indigenous people today face many issues. Today colonialism is still active, known as Neocolonialism, which has devastating effects on global cultural groups.
August 5, 1960 marked the day that Burkina Faso, then French Upper Volta, gained full independence from its former governing power, France. The first president of this newly independent state was Maurice Yameogo, who was the leader of the Voltaic Democratic Union (Political Handbook of the World 2012). Under his supervision, a constitution was drafted, which stated that presidential elections were to be conducted by means of universal suffrage. Although the constitution laid the framework for a fair and balanced democratic government, Yameogo banned all other political parties other than his own, which was not well perceived by the public. He was also unable to resolve conflicts dealing with “student and labor dissatisfaction”, which ultimately led to the downfall of his presidency (Political Handbook of the World 2012). His regime lasted only a mere six years before large public strikes and demonstrations
The hour-long documentary directed by Robin Shuffield succinctly captures the largely ignored story of African revolutionary and former leader of the Burkina Faso, Thomas Sankara. The film covers the rise, governing style and eventual downfall of the charismatic army captain. There is a clear focus on his zeal to reform the Burkinabe society, minds and economy with methods that were clearly discredited by Western powers. This reflection on the documentary details the reforms Sankara implemented in his brief spell in charge of Burkina Faso and compares these reforms to Nigerian policies at the time. Sankara rose to power in 1983 in a widely supported coup d’état.
During the 19th century, Europe found a way to use Africa for its own growth and power. Using Africa for their resources, the Europeans colonized Africa without a second thought. European imperialism in Africa had a negative impact because of social disarray, cultural loss, and death it caused. As the Europeans started to invade Africa and split up the land, they paid no attention to the already existing natural boundaries. Over time, villages with different cultures had set these boundaries.
An overwhelming majority of African nations has reclaimed their independence from their European mother countries. This did not stop the Europeans from leaving a permanent mark on the continent however. European colonialism has shaped modern-day Africa, a considerable amount for the worse, but also some for the better. Including these positive and negative effects, colonialism has also touched much of Africa’s history and culture especially in recent years.