Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The role of religion and science in society
The effects of religion on society
The effects of religion on society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The role of religion and science in society
E.O. Wilson should be read in Contemporary Great Books
Edward O. Wilson is a living scientist who has written and coauthored a number of books about insects, especially ants— his favorite field of study. He is influential in creating the broad field of sociobiology and is the well-known author of a number of books which have garnered wide appeal among specialists and the general public: Sociobiology: The New Synthesis, On Human Nature, Biophilia, Promethean Fire, The Diversity of Life, The Future of Life, Consilience, and The Meaning of Human Existence. The goals of his works are both scientific and philosophical. Wilson was raised in Alabama as a fundamentalist Southern Baptist. As a teenager, he went through a conversion experience at a
…show more content…
On the very first page of his book, Sociobiology: The New Synthesis (1975), he argues that ethical philosophers severely lack credibility and must take the evolved nature of human minds into account: [Our understanding of good and evil] was evolved by natural selection. That simple biological statement must be pursued to explain ethics and ethical philosophers… at all depths” (Wilson 1975, p. 3). One of Wilson’s goals is to prove that scientific materialism is superior to religion and that it can provide a better code of ethics. In On Human Nature (1978), he explains that he wants to provide a solution to what he perceives as religion’s pervasive and erroneous domination of social life (Wilson 1978, p. 142). He asserts that the moral code found in the Bible is arbitrary and causes needless guilt and suffering among the human populace. Wilson desires to analyze religion from a sociobiological perspective, believing that an explanation of religion in terms of evolutionary biology would give scientific materialism a final victory over religion: “If religion… can be systematically analyzed and explained as a product of the brain’s evolution, its power as an external source of morality will be gone forever” (Wilson 1978, p. 201). Wilson is not only interested in examining human nature and human values, but also he’s also interested in prescribing values for mankind. In Sociobiology he suggests that “a genetically accurate and hence completely fair code of ethics must wait for further contributions of evolutionary sociobiology” (Wilson 1975, p. 144). In On Human Nature, he argues that “the principal task of human biology is to identify and to measure the constraints that influence the decisions of ethical philosophers and everyone else, and to infer their significance through neurophysiological and phylogenetic reconstructions of the mind… in
Science can give us as good a moral code as any religion. Or so Daniel Dennett claims in his book, Darwin's Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life. Dennett provides the tools to explain human morality, and inadvertently leads the way to the conclusion (which he does not share) that science can clarify how human morality came about, but not serve as a substitute or model for moral codes, religious and secular alike.
Moral Philosophy as Applied Science by Ruse and Wilson Ruse and Wilson in "Moral Philosophy as Applied Science" give the example of brother-sister incest avoidance as being an ethical code motivated by an epigenetic rule that confers an adaptive advantage on those who avoid intercourse with their siblings. In this discussion, Ruse and Wilson argue that moral laws disallowing incest are redundant relics of mankind's evolutionary history that provide nothing to mankind but explanations of a hard-wired evolutionary trait (179). I reject this argument. While Ruse and Wilson are undoubtedly correct in believing that mankind's capacity for moral reasoning is a result of natural selection pressure and that most ancient moral laws have an evolutionary basis, I believe that describing the genesis of moral reasoning in this way provides no information about the content of our moral beliefs now. While our capacity for moral reasoning may have evolved for the purpose of informing our otherwise unjustifiable acts with a sense of objective certitude, it is not hard to imagine that this capacity, once evolved, would be capable of much more than simply rubber stamping mankind's collective genetic predisposition.
At the age of seventeen, Kilpatrick went to Mercer University (his father’s Alma Mater) and was a top performer in ancient languages and mathematics. During his junior year, Kilpatrick came across a book titled The Origin of Species, which made a significant impact on his professional, as well as personal life. “The more I read it the more I believed it and in the end I accepted it fully. This meant a complete reorganization, a complete rejection of my previous religious training and philosophy” (Beyer, 1997, pg. 2). Kilpatrick strongly felt that his acceptance of Darwin’s theory on Origin of Species meant a rejection of his religion as a Christian and a strained relationship with his family. He noted that this turn of events, made him not believe in life after death and brought to an end the strong worship he had for God. Though, this discovery of “modern evolution” caused him to lose religious beliefs, Kilpatrick maintained his moral values (Beyer, 1997).
“Organic Wisdom, or Why Should a Fly Eat Its Mother from Inside.” Ever Since Darwin. New York, New York and London, England: W.W. Norton & Company, 1977.
Singer’s argument is certainly persuasive. However, his argument only goes so far as to say that speciesism is arbitrary and we should replace one arbitrary measure with another – that of sentience. I think that more needs to be done to show why sentience, not any other quality, should be the defining characteristic for moral consideration.
Different theories have been developed which relate to this theme of moral decay throughout history, even several centuries after Hesiod's life. This idea of evolutionary decay seems to corroborate with the widely received, contemporary theory of evolution, or Darwinism, brought forth through the designs and beliefs of Charles Darwin in which he states that, in nature, only the fittest creatures will survive ...
Materialism may be defined as attention to or emphasis on material objects, needs or considerations, with a disinterest in or rejection of spiritual values.
As demonstrated in Henry David Thoreau’s passage from Economy, Wendell Berry’s from Waste, and John Kenneth Galbraith’s passage from The Dependence Effect, America’s overly advancing society thrusts ideas like materialism and the “love of buying” into the interior of every American’s mind. Even the American Dream, a fundamental notion to our nation, now unites all people of all cultures under materialism and greed. The highly capitalist American society distorts values such as the “quest for freedom” into a search for cash and the frontiers no longer exist. America’s increased production yields the increased wants of consumers and as Galbraith states, “One man’s consumption becomes his neighbor’s wish (479).” With this reckoning, the more wants satisfied, the more new ones born. Berry, on the other hand, more out rightly attacks America’s capitalist economy and the wastes it has produced when saying “The truth is that we Americans, all of us, have become a kind of human trash, living our lives in the midst of ubiquitous damned mess of which we are at once the victims and the perpetrators (485).” America’s corporate capitalism and consumerism culture undermines our well-being in that we deplete Earth's limited resources, produce excess waste, and indulge excessively in unnecessary luxuries that ultimately result in our unhappiness and financial downfall, while trapping us in an endless cycle of dependency.
The purpose of this academic piece is to critically discuss The Darwinist implication of the evolutionary psychological conception of human nature. Charles Darwin’s “natural selection” will be the main factor discussed as the theory of evolution was developed by him. Evolutionary psychology is the approach on human nature on the basis that human behavior is derived from biological factors and there are psychologists who claim that human behavior is not something one is born with but rather it is learned. According to Downes, S. M. (2010 fall edition) “Evolutionary psychology is one of the many biologically informed approaches to the study of human behavior”. This goes further to implicate that evolutionary psychology is virtually based on the claims of the human being a machine that can be programmed to do certain things and because it can be programmed it has systems in the body that allow such to happen for instance the nervous system which is the connection of the spinal cord and the brain and assists in voluntary and involuntary motor movements.
In “William Wilson”, Edgar Allan Poe teases his readers throughout the entirety of story with hints about its unexpectedly expected conclusion. Through figuratively-infused passages, Poe meticulously leads the reader to the front steps of the story’s ending without ever truly revealing the conclusion until the final sentences. Within those final sentences, the question of who the second William Wilson truly is, is answered, immediately transforming the story from a battle between two physical beings with both the same name and appearance into an internal battle staged within the mind of one man with conflicting desires. In order to create this dramatic and essential shift, Poe externalizes the protagonist’s internal struggle by blurring the
Wilson in “The Moral Sense,” describes the moral sense as a universal aspiration of human kind, the foundation of our societies. Throughout his book, Wilson delves into the reasoning behind his logical conclusion about universal principles. Machiavelli, Aristotle, and Wilson all have distinct views on society that are arguably defined either as modern or ancient in the way that they are written and researched. We are interconnected to other humans; we are all creature of self-interest who achieve our fundamental needs using the universal idea of community. This idea of universal need for a community is the foundation for Wilson’s writing, in which he argues that we are the product of culture and adaptation, yet even so, throughout every culture there is some form of the family institution and a socially connected structured society. We all have a consensus on what fairness is, however, the definition we used is widely varied in a multitude of individuals across different cultures.
We need a critique of moral values, the value of these values should itself, for once, be examined?. [What if] morality itself were to blame if man, as a species, never reached his highest potential power and splendour? [GM P 6]
Chapter one is a brief overview of how ants have been able to evolve over the years. It also explains how throughout different regions the ant takes over most of...
...rstanding and because they have been exploited as labels that create bias, especially so in the realm of education. There are other perceptions by which the associations of religion and personality can be viewed that are growing in popularity. One such considers both personality and religion from the evolutionary angle. This small body of research that has developed primarily in the last decade explains that religion is a byproduct of mechanisms that evolved for other purposes and is expressed because of interactions in the environment and other cognitive processes (Kirkpatrick, 1999). Whether the pendulum of popular theory swings from trait based research and Western ideals to biologically based research encompassing a combination of philosophies, we can conclude only that questions about the association of religion and personality will become increasingly complex.
In Chapter 28 of DeWitt’s book, Worldviews: An Introduction to the History and Philosophy of Science, DeWitt builds on his previous discussion of what the theory of evolution is and the historical developments that were discovered during that time, by introducing the implications that arise with the theory. The two main implications that are discussed in this chapter are implications due to religious beliefs and morality and ethics. However, these two particular implications are not the only ones that arise with the theory of evolution, in fact there are a lot of implications involved with this theory.