Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact of socio economic status on student performance
Socioeconomic status and academic performance
Impact of socio economic status on student performance
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Educational achievement is one of the most important factors of a students’ academic journey. Education as a form of secondary socialisation teaches students, the basic norms and values of society and assists in developing their individual identity. In many cases there are contributing issues that not only hinder, but can dramatically affect a child’s educational achievement and development; but also impacts negatively on their childhood experience. These contributing factors consist of a person’s class, their gender and/or their race and ethnicity; which no child has the ability to change at such a young and impressionable age. The issue of race, ethnicity and gender are essentially a part of a person’s genetic design, which is biologically determined and cannot be changed easily. When a child is born they have no control over the social environment they are born into, it is only in later life that they may have the opportunity to develop and gain a greater chance of social mobility within society. The problematic attributes of gender, social class and race/ethnicity, regarding educational achievement and attainments, are a combination of environmental (social constructivism) and biological design (essentialism). This essay will critique how a child can be labelled and/or stereotyped depending on their individual identity construction, including their social class, gender and/or race and ethnicity, which may lead to problematic issues within their personal educational achievement.
Within society today, race, ethnicity, social class and gender, including sexual orientation; collectively help to define and construct who we are as individuals within society. Burr (1995) states that social constructivism emphasises the importanc...
... middle of paper ...
...osition in society and secondary education quality”. The pie chart represents that students from middle class backgrounds, have the highest expectations to go to university, whereas students from work class backgrounds, have lower expectations to further their education; thus suggesting that financial constraints and lack of self-belief are to blame. Also the impact of class inequality is apparent within these results because that are supporting the concept that the higher your class statys is the greater the chance of furthering your education.
Factors that could impact an individual’s progression into a higher educational institution could be the quality of their education. There are many middle class families sending their children to private schools, thus providing them with greater opportunities to achieve success and power, through this elite education.
Some people may believe that education all over the United States is equal. These people also believe that all students no matter their location, socioeconomic status, and race have the same access and quality of education, but ultimately they are wrong. Throughout history, there has been a huge educational disparity between the wealthy and marginalized communities. The academic essay “Social Class and the Hidden Curriculum of Work” by Jean Anyon, an American critical thinker and researcher in education, conveys that depending on the different economic backgrounds students have, they will be taught in a specific way. He reveals that the lower economic background a child has then the lower quality their education will be and the higher their economic background is the higher quality their education is. Anyon’s theory of a social ladder is extremely useful because it sheds light on the
The novel “Women Without class” by Julie Bettie, is a society in which the cultural you come from and the identity that was chosen for you defines who you are. How does cultural and identity illustrate who we are or will become? Julie Bettie demonstrates how class is based on color, ethnicity, gender and sexuality. The author describes this by researching her work on high school girls at a Central Valley high school. In Bettie’s novel she reveals different cliques that are associated within the group which are Las Chicas, Skaters, Hicks, Preps, and lastly Cholas and Cholos. The author also explains how race and ethnicity correspondence on how academically well these students do. I will be arguing how Julie Bettie connects her theories of inequality and culture capital to Pierre Bourdieu, Kimberle Crenshaw, Karl Marx and Engels but also how her research explains inequality among students based on cultural capital and identity.
I feel the author is attempting to convey that class means everything when it comes to education. Mantsios lists several references and charts that show what the odds would be if you were low, middle, or high class to attend a university and what level of education you might obtain.
Obtaining higher education is regarded as the ultimate symbol of status in the United States (US). Access to a college education in this country is seen as an expression of academic excellence and can provide access to unlimited possibilities. In the US, Ivy Leagues are considered the elite and represent the most powerful ideogram of educational opportunity. According to the National Center for Education Statistics [NCES] (2012), from 1999–2000 to 2009–10, the percentages of both master's and doctor's degrees earned by females increased from 1999–2000 to 2009–10 from 58 to 60 percent and from 45 to 52 percent. The NCES report (2012), found that in 2009-10, of the 10.3 percent Black students who earned Bachelor degrees; 65.9 percent were women. Of the 12.5% of Black students who earned Master’s degree in 2009-10, 71.1 percent were women; and of the 7.4 percent of Black students who earned doctoral level degrees (this includes most degrees previously regarded as first-professional, i.e. M.D., D.D.S., and law degrees), 65.2 percent were women (NCES, 2012)...
In her article she points out how social class has become the main gateway to opportunity in America. The widening academic divide means that kids who grow up poor will most likely stay poor and the kids who grow up rich will most likely stay rich. About fifty years ago the main concern about getting a good education relied on your race but now it's about your social class. Researchers are starting to believe that children who come from higher income families tend to do better in school and get higher test scores.
In the article “Prestige Panic” by Robert Samuelson is about parents pushing their children to apply and attend a prestigious school. According to Samuelson, parents force their children to get good grades in high school and get a high score in their ACT or SAT. This means that if children get high scores they would be able to enter a prestigious school. A big example that shows that parents push their children is when Samuelson mentions, that parents influence a lot in the decision of students in their academic choice. This indicates that college decision is more about parents than students. Samuelson explains, that selective school have the same education as less selective schools and that it depends of the student decision, if the student
Directly, individuals from higher social classes are more likely to have the means to attend more prestigious schools, and are therefore more likely to receive higher educations. Indirectly, individuals who benefit from such higher education are more likely to land prestigious jobs, and in turn, higher salaries. Just as education and social class are closely intertwined, stratification in education contributes to stratification in social class (boundless).
There are many social identities to take into consideration. It is not just race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, language and social class. There are also categories such as health, education level, and body type. With a surplus of social factors, it is easy to have a hidden prejudice toward certain social identities. It is critical to first acknowledge how institutional forms of prejudice will covertly affect a child’s educational experience. As you can imagine, overt prejudice, a term used to describe the explicit discrimination you see, is easier to spot and therefore avoid. But the covert/indirect prejudices are much easier to slip through the cracks of lessons and classroom materials. For example, having a selection of children’s books that showcase only white, slim, heterosexual family structure is an illustration of a way ...
Throughout the years, many aspects of the educational curriculum have been altered and modified as it relates to the material that is being taught within schools worldwide. Some of the changes are due to new laws that are being implemented and “raising the bar” for the education of the upcoming generations. But with all of the changes being made does it level the playing field or does it make it more competitive? Which brings up the questions, “How does social class effect the quality of education and does equal opportunity in education exist in America?” Social class affects the quality of one’s education through power, social status and equality within the educational system.
The first difference you see between the middle and working class in education is the selection of primary schools as for some it is the first time they are going to enter into the academic world. At this point the family as a whole are entering into “unfamiliar worlds” (Jackson and Marsden, 1966, page 99) in the process of selecting and applying for schools. The middle class aim is to have their children go to a successful school with a good Ofsted report just like the working class. However it is harder for the working class to get into these schools due to a range of factors. Some of these restricting factors are their knowledge of the system and economic status or wealth; they may not have the facilities for tra...
Coming into this course, I had little to no familiarity with the social construction theory and its relation to race, gender, and sexuality. Over the past eight weeks, my mind has opened up in many different ways. Now looking at race, gender, and sexuality as social constructions I have a great understanding as to how much society plays a role in shaping the lives of countless individuals. Looking back, I believe that my life has been heavily impacted by social construction, both within my family and also my peers. However, looking at things from a new perspective, I am confident that I now have more control over what societal factors I choose to let influence my life. If there is one thing that I have learned throughout this course, it is to be skeptical; don’t always “go with the flow”, it’s natural to question things. In the end, society always influences people as much as they allow it
Racism and ethnicity continue to affect the sector of education in most parts of the world. More often, it influences adults and children’s experiences in education at all levels and in various ways. These include professional employment, academic performance, parental involvement, social interactions, assessment issues, and curriculum development. Certainly, the terms racism and ethnicity identify as problematic and arise socially. Therefore, many people fail to recognize that racism is a perception about the color of the skin and traditions of a particular group of people. Racism and ethnicity exist in quite blatant and subtle forms. As such, racism and ethnicity usually lead to negative consequences for the group that does not belong to the dominant culture. The contemporary racism originated from various avenues, one of it being the society norms and upbringing. Indeed, as children grow, they exclusively rely on their parents or guardians to learn new things. Moreover, part of the upbringing involves teaching the children things about the society and the
...tudents in high-poverty schools. Indeed, low-income students given a chance to attend more-affluent schools performed more than half a year better, on average, than middle income students who attend high-poverty schools” (Kahlenberg, Middle Class Schools for All 2). From this data, it is clear to see that the type of school is what matters most, not income. Ones social income class should not be used to determine their intelligence, but to only advertise their yearly salary.
The aim of this study demonstrates the social identity theory in terms of increasing self esteem as well as emphasizing the effects of discrimination on personal traits. This study includes participants of the primary school who were segregated according to their eye color, a factor that they cannot change within themselves. Blue eyed people were told they were smart and more successful whilst brown eyed people were told they were stupid and untruthful. Because being told this, they had separate effects on people depending on what they were told. This study is another example of how SIT affects intergroup behavior. Although, some ethical considerations to take into a count Is that it may cause stress for the participants and make them feel insecure. Also, discrimination was evident so this links with issues related to the SIT.
Finally, it is a general opinion among many that academic performance is a manner of will and determination of an individual rather than their socioeconomic status. For instance, in schools of higher learning, there are a lot of students from richer backgrounds who do not perform well as compared to those perceived to be from poor backgrounds (Sacerdote, 2002). Research has shown that while socioeconomic status may influence the availability or access to learning materials, it is the student’s personal determination to excel that determines the kind of lifestyle they