Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Socio economic status and academic achievement
Socio economic status and academic achievement
Correlation between socioeconomic status and academic performance
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Socio economic status and academic achievement
Education and the Inequalities of Place
Summary:
Roscigno et al (2006) talk about spatial inequalities in educational achievement and attainment in this article. Local conditions shape family and school resources. Therefore, the availability of family and school resources vary in rural areas, inner city, and suburban areas. Disparity in resources influences educational investment at the family and school levels. At the result, achievement and attainment are different in those places. More family and school resources we see, higher achievement and attainment we have. Therefore, students in suburban areas achieve higher education and attain higher educational level because they have more family and school resources. In contrast, deficits in family and school resources in rural and inner city produce low achievement and attainment.
Authors mention that family socioeconomic background affects students’ achievement and attainment. They remind us students with higher socioeconomic background end up with higher achievement/attainment because their parents may invest higher amount of time and money in theme. Because of the high rate of poverty in inner city and rural areas, parents in these places do not invest enough amount of money and time in their children as their counterparts do in the suburban areas. Therefore, low achievement and attainment in inner city and rural areas are expected. Family structure is also affected by local economic opportunity through family economic distress and unemployment. The high rate of single parent is seen in inner city, non-marital childbearing and family dissolution increase in rural areas. It is proven that students with single parent or step-parent families do not do schooling well ...
... middle of paper ...
...and its effects on educational outcomes last week. For example, Zhou (2003) talks about existing public facilities in these places such as the library, park, and other recreation facilities. He mentioned that these public facilities may reduce the inequality in education.
Commentary:
The authors indicate that “parental involvement, however, has no direct impact on achievement, but does reduce the likelihood of dropping out.” Lareau (1987) mentions that “Increasing parental participation in education has become a priority for educators, who believe it promotes educational achievement.” Between these different perspectives about parental involvement, one of them should be right. I do believe that parental involvement increases achievement because it is kind of encouragement and it helps students to achieve now in order to have a better life in the future.
Savage Inequalities, written by Jonathan Kozol, shows his two-year investigation into the neighborhoods and schools of the privileged and disadvantaged. Kozol shows disparities in educational expenditures between suburban and urban schools. He also shows how this matter affects children that have few or no books at all and are located in bad neighborhoods. You can draw conclusions about the urban schools in comparison to the suburban ones and it would be completely correct. The differences between a quality education and different races are analyzed. Kozol even goes as far as suggesting that suburban schools have better use for their money because the children's futures are more secure in a suburban setting. He thinks that each child should receive as much as they need in order to be equal with everyone else. If children in Detroit have greater needs than a student in Ann Arbor, then the students in Detroit should receive a greater amount of money.
The parents as the role models for their children that means many children will do what their parents mostly do, hence, is really important that the parents teaching their child. However, the research find out that the parents with higher socioeconomic states are more involved in their kids’ schooling (Chu et all, 1996) The reason seems obvious to me due to the importance of parents’ education, if the parents having more school, than parents could be like a ‘coach’ for their kids, that parents could guide the road of succeed. Also, the parents with higher education might provide a favorable environment since is easier to get a steady job with higher education. According to Kean, (2005), the parents with higher education have positive influence on children’s outcome, cause the majority of parents who are very educated might influence their kids though beliefs and behaviors, that will lead children and youth to a positive outcome (Kean, 2005).
The gap between the nation’s best and worst public schools continues to grow. Our country is based on freedom and equality for all, yet in practice and in the spectrum of education this is rarely the case. We do not even have to step further than our own city and its public school system, which many media outlets have labeled “dysfunctional” and “in shambles.” At the same time, Montgomery County, located just northwest of the District in suburban Maryland, stands as one of the top school systems in the country. Within each of these systems, there are schools that excel and there are schools that consistently measure below average. Money alone can not erase this gap. While increased spending may help, the real problem is often rooted in the complex issues of social, cultural, and economic differences. When combined with factors involving the school itself and the institution that supports it, we arrive at what has been widely known as the divide between the suburban and urban schools. Can anything actually be done to reverse this apparent trend of inequality or are the outside factors too powerful to change?
Sandy, J., & Duncan, K. (2010). Examining the achievement test score gap between urban and suburban students. Education Economics, 18(3), 297-315. doi:10.1080/09645290903465713
Inequalities in Education Funding inequalities have been an issue from past to present, especially in the low-income communities. In fact, students in urban areas with less funding have low attendance, score lower on standardized testing, and a low graduation rate. Also subjected to outdated textbooks, old dilapidated buildings, students in the inner cities need to compete with their suburban and wealthy counterparts for this reason funding inequalities must end and more money should be directed to these communities from federal, state, and local governments. Frank Johnson, a writer for the National Center for Education Statistics, “Disparities in Public School Spending.”
The public school funding system in the United States fails to uphold fairness as unequal funding results in an unequal distribution of resources into American classrooms. Local funding mostly consists of the commercial and residential property taxes that the local government collects to fund for the local school district. Therefore, the property wealth of a district often determines the quality of the region’s schools; thus, students who are born into a disadvantage situation don’t have the same equal opportunity to learn as those who are born into affluent families. When I was in elementary school I was on the receiving end of this inequitable system. I was part of this inequitable system, but it was working for my benefit not to my detriment. I live in a relatively wealthy school district, so I was able to get a good education and get into Chadwick in sixth grade. The educational hegemonic norm was the situation I was in, and the system makes it unfair for the people without the same situation as me or a less fortunate
Gamoran, Adam. "American Schooling and Educational Inequality: A Forecast for the 21st Century." American Sociological Assocation. JSTOR, 2001. Web. 11 Dec. 2013.
This institutional environment sets the parameters for a child’s learning experience and depending on the environment the school can either open or close doors that lead to academic achievement. Some factors such as school structure, composition and climate have an impact on the quality of education attained. Porter et al., recognizes that there is a very big gap between urban and rural children with respect to access to good and quality education and has placed rural children at a disadvantage. The disparities between the rural and urban areas are seen in terms of teacher distributions, poor infrastructures, teaching and learning materials and basic necessities just to name a few (395-400). Today, there are still students sitting under tress to learn; being exposed to the elements of nature which makes it difficult to teach or learn. The advantages of the urban education system far outweigh those of the rural. The city student is exposed to many social and environmental settings that makes his/her life far better than the rural student because the interaction he/she is exposed to contributes significantly to the depth of knowledge and academic performance. Rural schools are often characterized by inept teachers, poor classroom structures and inadequate resources. With the poor infrastructure, “students are negatively
There are many different factors that affect education. One such factor is, socioeconomic status. Children who attend school in a wealthier community receive a better education than those students in poor communities. In poor communities, student’s education is not only affected by a lack of resources, but also from teaching methods and philosophies. Urban and poor schools’ students do not receive as equal of an education as their more affluent and suburban counterparts do.
Socioeconomic status can be defined in terms of family wealth and assets as well as educational background. For this reason, many comparisons can be made between socioeconomic status and education. Furthermore, academic achievement and the level of education reached by an individual, is determined by socioeconomic status. Research has shown that environmental circumstances and family issues greatly influence a child's future because the impact of the socioeconomic status depends on the level to which an individual becomes successful in life. Research also shows that family conditions can impact a child’s education and their quality of life. For example, being raised in a high-economic culture increases the chances that a child will attend
Do children from wealthier economic environments have an advantage for a better education? Students with financial means have the option to benefit from resources such as tutors, advisors, and teaching centers to reinforce and broaden their educational knowledge and skills. These children are exposed to cultural events and educational experiences outside of school. Students who are less fortunate usually do not have equal opportunities beyond the school day or take advantage of available programs. Parents with little education themselves or language barriers are often too intimidated to get involved in their children’s education. These children rely solely on their classroom teachers to provide all of the necessary educational information and experiences. Many of theses students come from cultures where school does not matter as attendance is not mandatory. This creates a system that unfairly puts a group of students at a disadvantage with their peers in other districts. Consequently, it is biased to determine college acceptances based on a numerical grading system and standardized test scores. Although, the traditional numerical grading system is not an indicator of any student’s growth, it is more unfair for children in high-poverty
This paper explores the way social inequality affects schooling. In a classroom setting, one student can be treated unequally just because of their race, ethnic background or religion. Taking notes from Purcell- Gates and Boykin, A.W. & Noguera, P., the topics of ethnicity and the achievement gap will be discussed in the event that all students should be treated equal. Also bringing in the topic of the “No Child Left Behind Act” introduced by former president George W. Bush in 2001 and was signed into law in 2002. For a long time, social inequality places a negative effect on schools around the country. The common urban verse suburban educational battle has been going on for way to long and there is a fix that needs to be made.
To conclude, my research shows a clear link between parental involvement and children performing better in school. Children who's parents are involved in their education are showing better performance and are achieving higher grades. They also show better behaviour, more enthusiasm, ambition and higher levels of engagement. compared with children who's parent are not involved in their education. My research also shows that parental involvement has great benefits for both children and parents in many ways, so much so that the most effective schools are those who encouraged parents to be involved.
The family has a huge role in the achievement of students. Research and studies have been done on all aspects of families. Demographics include
My parents supported me in education in several subjects while I was in Elementary school. My mom always taught me the basics of the subjects I learned, and made me easier to organize the concepts of the classes. All the fundamentals in any subjects you learn when you are young is very significant after all for stepping up your skills. Parental engagement is really effective for children’s education for preparing their future, and also affects their life in certain ways. There are some significant effects of parents engaging with children’s education, such as their job career, and their behavior.