Edna Pontellier Diction

986 Words2 Pages

One primary component in forming the nation-wide perception of the 19th century as “dark ages” for feminist ideals was the continuation of a society dominated by men who persistently refused to grant their female counterparts the basic rights, respect, and opportunity to which they had been entitled for centuries. Many women of this time period violently opposed their subordinate status as domestic housewives, while others, such as female novelists, chose to express their inner fury by vicariously living out a form of rebellion towards these ideals through the fictional characters they imagined. Classic novelist Kate Chopin chose the latter path in fabricating the complex character of Edna Pontellier – a young married woman drowning in the …show more content…

The author’s argument founded on this basis is readily evident as she conveys: “The parrot and the mockingbird were the property of Madame Lebrun, and they had the right to make all the noise they wished. Mr. Pontellier had the privilege of quitting their society when they ceased to be entertaining.”(?) Chopin’s subtle use of legal diction such as “property” and “right” when describing “the parrot and the mockingbird”, coupled with Mr. Pontellier’s suppression of these rights in his “privilege of quitting their society,” explicates the position of superiority men held over women’s speech in their ability to deem it “entertaining” enough to be heard. The author’s implication that women are objectified as the “property” of others patronizes and ultimately extinguishes their ability to be an active member of the economy or society and illustrates the domestic sphere into which Edna was born when she became a social ornament for Mr. Pontellier, as well as a mother unwillingly bound to her children. The contention that men hold an unspoken power over women’s so-called freedom of speech later is further compounded later in the novella by Chopin’s characterization of the parrot being the only one present “who possessed sufficient candor”, only to have Old Monsieur Farival “[insist] upon having the bird removed and consigned to regions of darkness.”(?) This line further verifies the author’s proposal that men possess the capability to deem women’s words “entertaining,” and therefore worthy of being heard, as well as patronize their innate “candor,” “[consigning]” them “to regions of darkness” in wake of recognizing their intellectual capacity. In addition, the author’s underlying message essentially exposes the corrupt hierarchy in which men are superior to women in

Open Document