Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Factor contributing to juvenile delinquency
Factor contributing to juvenile delinquency
Factor contributing to juvenile delinquency
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Factor contributing to juvenile delinquency
Every person is equal in front of the law. The justice has to be the same regardless to a person’s economic status or influence. The famous Greek philosopher, “Aristotle”, once stated, “At his best, man is the noblest of all animals; separated from law and justice he is the worst”. Crimes have a significant impact on today’s society. The crime rate is increasing in a greater pace among the teenagers. According to the recent survey, the teenagers commit 20% of the total crimes. The high crime rate among the teenagers is due to several reasons involving a person’s family condition, no proper parental supervision, community experience and the environment he grew up. In the present scenario, a person’s economic status can make the justice flexible …show more content…
It can be clearly noted that, Edel Gonzalez was just 16 years when he got indulged in this illegal activity. A minor receiving such a sentence happens only in The United States of America and it is very sad to hear that, he is one among 330 people in California, who had received this sentence at that age. His suppressing childhood and no proper parental supervision is also one of the reasons for being involved in such a brutal activity. Edel Gonzalez was completely drunk and went along with two other adults for stealing a car. One among the adults shot and killed the driver whose car they were trying to steal. Although Edel was not directly responsible for the murder, he was sentenced to a life in prison without a parole. Even though, Edel did not perform the shooting, he was convicted of murder for being part of the incident. He was just a minor when he got indulged in stealing, but still he got the same punishment as the other two adults. When Elizabeth Calvin addressed Edel at the age of 38, …show more content…
Ethan Couch and his friends drank beer by stealing from the local Walmart before the crash. Actually, the legal blood alcohol level for someone with legal drinking age while driving is 0.08. But, Ethan was driving with a blood alcohol level of 0.24, which is three times the legal limit for any individual with legal drinking age. Although Ethan Couch was directly responsible for killing four people, he was not convicted of murder. Ethan couch have a good economic status in society and has a good support of wealthier parents, who don’t set restrictions on him. Ethan Couch’s attorneys claim that he cannot be responsible for the death of four people. Couch’s attorneys named his condition as “affluenza”. Affluenza is a psychological sickness supposedly affecting wealthy young people and its symptoms include lack of motivation, feelings of guilt, and a sense of isolation. Ethan Couch was just sentenced to 10 years’ probation for killing four people in June 2013. In addition to that, he was also allowed to enter an alcohol treatment facility. Here, the law A13 did not come into effect, which was applied in the case of Edel Gonzalez for the role he played in attempting to steal a car. Justice has to be the same
sentenced to spend the rest of his life in prison. The case against him was largely
The tragic case of Larry and Brandon is a compelling story. It is a reality that stunned the city of Oxnard California when a 14-year-old boy named Brandon McInerney fatally shot a fellow classmate, Larry King, twice in the back of the head. The incident occurred in a computer lab where Brandon ran off after committing the crime. As a result of his actions Brandon McInerney was tried as an adult and was sentenced to 21 years in prison with no chance of parole. He will be released at the age of 39. Now the underlying question is was Brandon’s sentence a just resolution or should he have received more or less years in prison. The truth is that I believe Brandon’s verdict was a fair and just punishment, however I don’t believe that he should have been tried as an adult. There’s no question about it what Brandon did was horrible. He killed a kid in cold blood and ran off after doing it. He knows what he did and now he has to suffer the consequences. But Brandon was only 14 years old when this had taken place.
The age of a criminal should not have an effect over the sentencing of the defendant. Adrian Jerry Gonzalez was charged with murder when he raped and killed an 8-year-old named Madison Middleton in a California beach town. In her article "California teenager, 15, charged in killing of 8-year-old girl appears in court", Nina Golgowski speaks about the charges Adrian jerry Gonzalez had to face and why he was facing those charges. Nina Golgowski states, "Once inside, he tied her up, sexually assaulted and killed her.." She also goes on to say, " The charges could send Gonzalez to prison in life." Gonzalez
Is it possible for a six-year-old boy to successfully seek asylum in the United Sates against his father’s wishes? This is the main point of exploration in the April 21, 2000 article (off the wire) that appeared in The Plain Dealer. The article relates, “to be granted asylum, people must show that they were persecuted or had a legitimate fear of persecution in their home country because of race, religion, nationality, membership in a social group or political opinions.” According to the article, the case has not reached a decision because of the debate over whether Elian Gonzalez has the right to seek asylum. For the time being, he is allowed to remain with his Miami relatives until the matter is resolved. There may be several levels of appeals and years of debate if the case is sent to an asylum hearing.
The purpose of the criminal law is to balance of rights for individuals in society to achieve justice. The criminal law is continually reforming in an attempt to achieve justice for young offenders, as it is an issue of the criminal law. This essay will examine the effectiveness of the criminal justice system in relation to young offenders therefore looking at various aspects of the juvenile justice system. The criminal justice system does provide some effective and relevant concessions for young offenders. However, due to its focus on incarceration and punishment rather than on preventative measures, the criminal justice system is effective to an extent
The individuals within our society have allowed we the people to assess and measure the level of focus and implementation of our justice system to remedy the modern day crime which conflict with the very existence of our social order. Enlightening us to the devices that will further, establish the order of our society, resides in our ability to observe the Individual’s rights for public order.
The problem of dealing with juvenile justice has plagued are country for years, since the establishment of the first juvenile court in 1899. Prior to that development, delinquent juveniles had to be processed through the adult justic3e system which gave much harsher penalties. By 1945, separate juvenile courts existed in every single state. Similar to the adult system, all through most of the 20th century, the juvenile justice system was based upon a medical/rehabilitative representation. The new challenges of the juvenile court were to examine, analyze, and recommend treatment for offenders, not to deliver judgment fault or fix responsibility. The court ran under the policy of “parens patriae” that intended that the state would step in and act as a parent on behalf of a disobedient juvenile. Actions were informal and a juvenile court judge had a vast sum of discretion in the nature of juvenile cases, much like the discretion afforded judges in adult unlawful settings until the 1970s. In line with the early juvenile court’s attitude of shielding youth, juvenile offenders’ position was often in reformatories or instruction schools that were intended, in speculation, to keep them away from the terrible influences of society and to encourage self-control through accurate structure and very unsympathetic discipline. Opposing to the fundamental theory, all through the first part of the century, the places that housed juveniles were frequently unsafe and unhealthy places where the state warehoused delinquent, deserted, and deserted children for unclear periods. Ordinary tribulations included lack of medical care, therapy programs, and even sometimes food. Some very poor circumstances continue even today.
This paper will analyze the different theoretical issues pertaining to the modern juvenile court, determine their origin, and suggest a course of action for resolving these issues to the best extent possible. It is important to note, however, that the juvenile justice system alone cannot ever prevent all juvenile crime, respond perfectly to every situation or treat every suspect fairly. Furthermore, an effective antidote to modern juvenile crime would necessitate far broader action, addressing underlying social structure inequalities that breed poverty and social disorganization.
The overwhelming majority of juveniles are involved in impulsive or risky, even delinquent behaviors during their teenage years. However, the majority go on to become very productive citizens who do not commit crimes. In order for this to continue the government established the Youth Criminal Justice Act (YCJA) which gives young offenders a chance to better themselves, and. By doing so, the YCJA helps teach youth that their actions are unacceptable and the punishments imposed are lesser then an adult. Through the analysis of their unacceptable actions, lesser punishments and a better future, it is clear that YCJA is highly effective at giving youth a better chance in society.
In the film 15 to life: Kenneth’s story in the 2000’s a fifteen year old was charged with four consecutive life sentences without possibility of parole, his name was Kenneth Young. Young was charged with four accounts of armed robbery, and his partner who was twenty-four years old at the time was only charged with one life sentence. His partners name was Jacque Bethea, and he already had a criminal record before being convicted of armed robbery. While, Kenneth had no criminal history before the robberies had happened. According to Paolo Annino who is Kenneth’s lawyer, sometimes juveniles receive harsher punishments than adult in the justice system (Pequeneza, 2014). When the Supreme Court decided that they will no longer give children life sentences for anything less than murder, Kenneth got a chance to be resentenced after spending eleven years in prison (Pequeneza, 2014). Unfortunately, Kenneth wasn’t able to be released until 2030. During Young’s resentencing Kenneth and his lawyer added more information about his home
“Our youths now love luxury, they have bad manners, they have disrespect for authority, disrespect for older people…” Ancient Greek philosopher Socrates acknowledges the escalation of delinquency among youth in the early age’s .The rise of young offenders furthers the Canadian government to record juvenile offenders, in addition, devise an act to better control the epidemic of young delinquents. The topic of proposal is the effectiveness of the youth justice system in its response to crime. Firstly, in order to determine the effectiveness of the youth justice system, one must grasp the premise that is a delinquency, in particular a young delinquents.
In the book On Crimes and Punishments; the author; Cesare Beccaria talks about the justice system and the changes that he believes will make society better for all the citizens. In many of Cesare Beccaria’s statements he argues that to lower crimes, all citizens should be treated equally to have society properly function. Despite the changes that Cesare Beccaria made on equality, there is still a lot of hard work to be done to attain equality worldwide even to this day. Beccaria believes that certain aspects of the law have to change so that everyone could be treated the same even if they are of a different class divisions as well as if they have been accused of a given crime.
Ethan Couch, a 16 year old teenager, caused an accident that involved more than 14 people, killing four and injuring another. After the police arrived, Couch was then later taken to court, the court's decision left couch with 10 years of probation. In addition to couchs sentence he is to attend a rehab center due to his unstable condition of affluenza. Once Couch left the rehab center, he worked with his father in his place of business. This didn't last long for him and his mother fled to Mexico. After two weeks of searching, couch and his mother were found and taken into custody where they were immediately transported back to the United States. This would have never happened if the decision by the justice system had been harsher. Their initial
Guilty! As the gavel hits the sound block, everyone is amazed at the verdict. This teenage boy is sentenced to a life in prison without parole. As you read this in newspapers, magazines, and even online, what goes through your head? You may be thinking, “Why is this teen being tried as adult, he is just a kid?” While he is “just a kid”, and this is a widely held opinion, but it is not mine. Should minors who commit violent crimes be tried as adults? Absolutely. Just because minors are young they do have the ability to know what is right from wrong. Since these minors have committed the crime, they need to be held accountable. If a minor has acted as an adult, they need to be treated like adults. Lastly, minors need to know that their actions have consequences, no matter what age.
In conclusion, the development of the juvenile justice system resulted from social development and human needs. By modifying and integrating, the legal authorities have made the legal system more efficient and just for the young people, providing that necessary punishments are executed for the criminal acts while protections are given to the ordinary youth. It is believed that the stability of a society depends on a sound justice system.