Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ethical issues within the pharmaceutical industry
Importance of natural rights
An essay on the ethical challenges of the pharmaceutical industry
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Ethical issues within the pharmaceutical industry
Economic justice guides one in establishing economic institutions. Justice is the notion of giving someone what they are owed or deserved. In the catholic view, justice involves the promotion of human flourishing. The teaching acknowledges that justice is natural and everyone has a claim. In the liberal teaching, economic justice is simply giving profits to those who have earned it through goods and services. As a survival mechanism adapted since evolutionary times, humans have been accustomed to act in the best interest of one’s self. Although this concept of self-protection is innate in individuals, this self-interest mentality should not be practiced in pharmaceutical industries as workers should be obligated to care more for the common …show more content…
Negative freedom or obligations are imperative for every individual. They believe that individuals are only obligated to do two things: one, to not interfere with another individual’s autonomy and two, keep contracts and promises. Narveson uses a straightforward example, as he claims that “people have a right not to be attacked, but they have no right against me to be aided, and hence I do not act unjustly, or wrongly, if I fail to aid the needy” ( Narveson, 398). Anything else beyond these two criteria is not an obligation, but a choice (donating to charity). Narveson believes that poverty is a result of bad government, so the rich should not feel guilty for having wealth, and the poor should not expect anything from the rich. In an economic situation, it is only through trades and services should people receive what they deserve. “Production … is only promoted by justice in the sense that justice consists in not interfering with the various processes by which people improve their lots” (Narveson, …show more content…
The catholic social teaching identifies natural law, which acknowledges various goods that all can claim. “There is a substantive and objective good common to all, a good that we have a responsibility to pursue even if it conflicts with our individual choices”(DesJardins, 3). In other words, humans, as well as social institution, have an obligation to put others before self as it promotes a society that will enable common good. In order for humans and society to flourish, we as a whole should use the “incentive of profits to promote the efficient production and distribution of those goods and
Arguments about fairness and justice have been up for debate for centuries. "What do we deserve?", a question that has many individuals raising their brows to their efforts in their pursuit to achieve their goals. If it is said that we are all placed on an equal standard why are there individuals struggling to stay afloat? In Arora’s essay, he examines three forms of economic modals of social justices that question that idea of why the prosperous or the impecunious "deserve" their position or stature in life. Out of all of Arora's economic modals that he presents the Meritocratic System is the fairest because it gives everyone a fighting chance.
"In the past two decades or so, health care has been commercialized as never before, and professionalism in medicine seems to be giving way to entrepreneurialism," commented Arnold S. Relman, professor of medicine and social medicine at Harvard Medical School (Wekesser 66). This statement may have a great deal of bearing on reality. The tangled knot of insurers, physicians, drug companies, and hospitals that we call our health system is not as unselfish and focused on the patients' needs as people would like to think. Pharmaceutical companies are particularly ruthless, many of them spending millions of dollars per year to convince doctors to prescribe their drugs and to convince consumers that their specific brand of drug is needed in order to cure their ailments. For instance, they may present symptoms that are perfectly harmless, and lead potential citizens to believe that, because of these symptoms, they are "sick" and in need of medication.
In “What Do We Deserve?”, Arora takes a look at political philosophies and asks an important question, “How much of my good life do I really deserve?.” He brings up that argument that the contest of life is “rigged from the start” (Arora). How do one fix the contest so it's fair for everyone? Society can start by leveling the playing field to give everyone an equal chance, eliminating the idea of winner vs. loser, and encouraging and rewarding hard work and natural talents. Once the system is repaired, then we will see that those who make the effort and take advantage of their own gifts will succeed and be truly deserving of their earnings.
In America, it has become a battle to earn a high paying job to cope with the expenses of a typical American. It has become even more of a battle for some people to afford medical prescriptions to keep healthy. Health becomes a crucial issue when discussed among people. No matter what, at one point or another, everyone is going to stand as a victim of the pharmaceutical industry. The bottom line is Americans are paying excessive amounts of money for medical prescriptions. Health-Care spending in the U.S. rose a stunning 9.3% in 2002, which is the greatest increase for the past eleven years. (Steele 46) Many pharmaceutical companies are robbing their clients by charging extreme rates for their products.
Throughout the history of television, it has been evident that certain news stations have portrayed their news in a way that aligns itself with a certain viewpoint or political position. For example, today one can see how stations like Fox take a conservative stance on most issues while CNN takes a more liberal perspective on the same issues. Much of the influence that the media could have on people, especially during elections, was a cause of alarm for many people. This led to the creation of the Fairness Doctrine in 1949.
Commonsense justice and jury instructions are placed together to exemplify the informative and the response between the two; like the “analytic and beneficial”. Conjoining these two objectives, gives them “instructive potential for the law;” with the verdicts of not guilty, or hung juries, and jury nullification. These two objectives are “more likely the failure of jury instructions,” [slightly] than the “failings of jurors.”” (Norman J. Finkel, 2000).
Philosophy Public Affairs 32, no. 2 (1995). 4 (2004): 357-383. Singer, Peter; Miller, Richard "“What Duties Do People in Rich Countries Have to Relieve World Poverty”."
To sum up, justice is more profitable than injustice because it does not lead to true happiness, it gives way to possibility of punishment, and it creates a pattern of behavior which if universalized would lead to disaster.
If desert is based off of individual’s merit and hard work in society, then it would seem to follow that those who are incapable of contributing in such a way would, therefore, be deserving of nothing (Mills, 2004). This is a troubling conclusion indeed. Further, if justice truly is fairness, then it would seem only right that those who need more than others should be given more than others so as to function at a similar level of ease as the rest of society (Norman, 2001). Therefore, it would seem that desert could have no place in justice. However, an important rebuttal is a form of distributive justice known as social desert.
Liberal philosopher, John Rawls, has been credited as being one of the largest contributors to the field of social justice of the twentieth century. In his book `Justice as Fairness', Rawls describes his views on the issue of justice in a social sense and outlines the major features of his theory of justice. From his discussions on this topic, one could derive a legitimate assumption of how Rawls' would apply his views on justice to the question of how we should respond to poverty, this I have done in the final segment of my essay.
What Does It Mean to Have Justice in Our World? A famous quote I know says to, “stand up for what is right, even if you stand alone” by Suzy Kassem. I feel as though I don’t know much about justice other than the idea that it is a result of karma. I see karma as a reaction from the actions that you have performed, and justice is served as a result, even if the actions are positively or negatively viewed.
Tom Paine described the state as a “necessary evil”. It is necessary in that it establishes order and security and ensures that contracts are carried out. Yet, it is “evil” since it enforces collective will upon society, thus constraining individual freedom. Negative freedom also supports economic freedom.
Justice is in fact the most important system of our government. To some people justice is the punishment someone receives after being convicted of a crime; other people could think it means the difference between knowing right from wrong. In my opinion, along with dictionary.com, justice is best defined as the fair and equal treatment of people. This is not just used in the court of law however; my definition should be used in every aspect of human life, from work to school and beyond. But, for that to happen, I believe "fair and equal treatment" needs to be defined, and that means to treat people of any skin color, gender, age, sexual preference, or any other personal trait the same way.
Modern Catholic social teachings trace its beginnings to the writings of Pope Leo XIII. His insight on Christian philosophy, politics and the social order and applies to teachings in current injustices in the economic order. Leo XIII’s teachings were also critical participation in the developments of modern social and economic life. He rooted his social ethics in the supreme value of the human person and added that all political and social structures need to respect and respond to this primary and moral claim of human dignity. While the Church and the political community are autonomous and independent of each other in their own fields, the Church is “at once the sign and the safeguard of the transcendental dimension of the human person”.
He cites dirty work and job creation as one of the economic functions that poverty serves (Gans 278-279). Dirty work refers to menial jobs that are important in society, but can only be performed by people with no other life options. Some professions, such as policemen and charity organisations, benefit from the existence of the poor. The author notes that, as much as these institutions claim to be in existence for the goodness of all, they would have no purpose if the poor did not