E. Rettberg Nursery Rhyme

536 Words2 Pages

In “Nonsense Verse”, E. Rettberg considers the scope, classification, dynamics, characteristics, and audience of nonsense verse. Rettberg notes that the audience of nonsense is not necessarily children, but most would confidently assume that the audience of nursery rhymes are children. However, the “Nursery Rhymes” entry’s investigation into the sources of traditional nursery rhymes reveal that sources even derived from tavern songs, barrack-room refrains, street ballads, monger cries, and mummers’ plays, blurring the lines between children and adult audience. In turn, this entry asserts that lullabies are true nursery rhymes, but this declaration is soon debunked in the “Lullaby” entry. Paragraph five of “Lullaby” describes William Blake’s cradle songs as “sophisticated explorations of the innocence of infancy and the ensnaring chains of adult sexuality.” This statement unsettles the exclusively children audience of lullabies by indicating that Blake’s cradle songs contain elements for both adults and children. Within the statement, I noticed two interesting phrases: “innocence of infancy” and “ensnaring chains of adult sexuality.” The phrases oppose each other: infancy versus adulthood and innocence versus sexuality. They also …show more content…

Innocence and infancy also both derive from French and Latin; the words actually rhyme in French, Italian, Spanish, and Portuguese, thereby explaining the close resemblance of their sounds. The absence of hard consonants also augments the tranquil mood and creates an approximate euphony even without long vowels. These sound devices concretizes and extracts the sense of peacefulness concealed in the words’ abstract concepts. Therefore, when one reads aloud “innocence of infancy”, one can imagine a blissful infant in a pure, serene

Open Document