Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Pros and cons of positive reinforcement in the classroom
Compare and contrast negative reinforcement with positive reinforcement
Compare and contrast negative reinforcement with positive reinforcement
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
I feel like the text that had me thinking about myself would have to be Dweck's Brainology piece because of the way they say we should praise children and how I would normally praise them. Under the How Do Students Learn These Mindset on page 2 of 6 states, "Parents and schools decided that the most important thing for kids to have was self-esteem. If children felt good about themselves, people believed, they would be set for life." This is not true because they would develop a fixed mindset. Many people think that you could just hand self-esteem to children by telling them how smart and talented they are. At the bottom of page two declares, that the children who now work in the workforce with a fixed mindset cannot go through a day without receiving praise, rewards, and recognition. I feel like this is true because I see it happen a lot with some people who work at fast food places. These …show more content…
They praised the children in one group by their intelligence by telling them “Wow, that’s a really good score. You must be smart at this.” Then they praised the children in the other group for their effort saying, “Wow, that’s a really good score. You must have worked really hard.” The children that were praised for their intellectual capacity didn’t want to learn and when they were offered a challenging task they would benefit from; the majority chose an easier one to avoid making mistakes. Meanwhile, the children who were praised for their efforts wanted that task they could learn from. I find this very true because I work with children from 3rd grade and lower. I used to praise the children about how smart they were and when I didn’t they would look for me to continue to praise them. After reading Dweck’s Brainology piece, I started praising them for how hard they worked and the results were astonishing. They actually wanted to learn more and study
In Carol Dweck’s article titled, “Brainology” Dweck discusses the different mindsets that students have about intelligence. Some where taught that each person had a set amount of intelligence, while others were trained that intelligence is something they could develop and increase over time. in Dweck’s article she writes, “ It is a belief that intelligence can be developed that opens students to a love of learning, a belief in the power of effort and constrictive, determined reactions to setbacks” (Dweck pg. 2). Dweck is talking about a growth mind-set in which is how students perceive the growth of knowledge and that no one person is born with a certain amount of intelligence, it too can be trained and developed over time. By introducing Dweck’s ideas of a growth mind-set to students, students will enjoy learning and be less devastated by setbacks, because they know they can develop intelligence. Dweck also writes that students with a growth mind-set, “believe that intelligence is something that can be cultivated through effort and education. They
Self-esteem is confidence in one’s own worth or abilities or self-respect. Janie from Their Eyes Were Watching God by Zora Neal Hurston and Jefferson from A Lesson Before Dying by Ernest Gaines both struggle with establishing a positive self-esteem or a sense of self-worth. Both characters get so overwhelmed by the supremacy of someone or something around them that they doubt their own power, thus, creating a feeling of doubt for themselves and the voice that they have. In order to gain a sense of high self-esteem, a person must endure points of self-doubt.
Psychologist, Carol S. Dweck in her well researched essay, “Brainology” analyzes how praise impacts mindset and how a growth mindset leads to greater success. She supports this claim by comparing the two different mindsets and how praise can affect them. She then proceeds to show praise leads to a fixed mindset harming a person by changing their views on effort. Finally, she argues that praise changes how and what people value, which can
Commending students effort encourages them to challenge themselves. Some may argue that complimenting children for their intelligence has the same
“There is no elevator to success, you have to take the stairs,” was said by motivational speaker and American author Zig Ziglar. This relates to Carol S. Dweck’s article “Brainology” and Sherman Alexie’s essay “Superman and Me.” Ziglar, Dweck, and Alexie all feel that it isn’t easy for someone to become successful. It takes hard work, perseverance, and the want to learn and grow. In Dweck’s article, she stated that someone with a growth mindset would become more successful and knowledgeable than someone with a fixed mindset, which was demonstrated by Alexie in his essay, and by a personal experience of my own.
Meaning that when children grow up with praise such as “oh you must have been so smart to get an A on that test”, instead of “you must have worked really hard on that lesson”, children could take the praise to their intelligence the wrong way and think that since they are “smart” instead of their effort on a task which will cause them problems in the future and they might want to give up and quit. I have seen this first hand and this has actually happened to me before, so I know from experience that this could have a negative effect impact on a student not just students in elementary school but also adults who are going to college or young adults who are looking for a job. In contrast, some students love to get that kind of compliment but they would always end up expecting that so when I work with children I will be complimenting them on the effort they put into everything that they do. From now on, I will be praising children on their effort and not on their
The purpose of this story was to illustrate the importance of how people view themselves and their abilities.
Also, in Carol Dweck’s research article “Brainology”, she states the subtitle “Transforming Students’ Motivation to Learn”. She dishes mindsets and achievement, how do students learn these mindsets, and so on… … Dweck suggests, “Many students believe that intelligence is fixed, that each person has a certain amount, and that’s that. We call this a fixed mindset, and, as you will see, students with this mindset worry about how much of this fixed in intelligence they possess”. Many students believe that the challenge encountered in learning is a threat to their growth path. She put forward two different minds of the ideological study contrast, the finds showed that students studied with a growth mindset were more interested in learning and
As Dweck explains, children who are praised for their intelligence does not want to learn hence develop a fixed mindset. A fixed mindset is where people believe that their qualities such as talent and intelligence are essentially fixed traits. Such people would only concentrate on documenting their intelligence instead of looking for ways for developing the same. In addition, these people make the assumption that their intelligence would make them successful. On the other hand, a growth mindset is where people are aware that it is possible to develop their abilities through hard work and dedication. When I was in Grade 7, a teacher encouraged all students that they all had the ability to perform well in science. After the initial interaction, the teacher was aware that a certain percentage of the class performed way below average; yet, he did not water down their spirit. I remember the way he used to acknowledge even some insignificant improvement made in his tests by comments such as “You are making good progress so far”. Primarily, this teacher focused on the perseverance, strategies, and efforts the students put towards improvement as opposed to praising talent (Dweck 5). The result was that we changed our attitude and focused more on self-improvement.
There are two mindsets growth or fixed. She argues that there is only two mindsets growth or fixed, I agree because these two mindsets are the most common ones in students. This takes me back to Dweck, Carol S. “Brainology”: Transforming Students’ Motivation to Learn. In this article students with growth mindsets cares more about their education rather than how they look. Students with fixed mindsets cared about how smart they will appear and they would reject learning opportunities because they thought intelligence would have to come naturally to them. I agree with what she says, there are only two mindsets. The reason I agree is because I was both mindsets, well now I’m only one. But before I was a fixed mindset and what I mean by that is sometimes I would feel dumb and I wouldn’t even care anymore about my studies. Till I noticed that the way I was going wasn’t going to
Results of students who received praise for intelligence: The students in this category had negative results after receiving praising. When asked afterwards if they wanted to do the same level of problems or try more challenging ones, they chose the task that would allow them to look smart and do well on. Consequently, while telling a child how smart he or she is, we are sending a message to not take risks and just look the part. Afterwards, these children were given a hard task, which they performed poorly on, and they know longer liked the problems and did not want to practice them at home. Children also felt “dumb” and when given the initial task (in which they did well), they performed significantly worse. Lastly, their opinions of intelligence reflected that it was an innate capacity as though you cannot improve.
Gladwell discusses a study done by Lewis Terman, a psychology professor at Stanford University. Based on IQ tests given to elementary school level students all around California, Terman selected the brightest students to track and analyze, These students were known as the “Termites.”
During Dweck’s research, her study shows that there are two different beliefs in mind-set (self theory): fixed mind-set and growth mind-set. Dweck states that a fixed mind-set is “static trait” in other words gifted, where as growth mind-set is intelligence that could be developed throughout the years. When a student is in grade school, it is truly difficult if a teacher does not believe in her students. After designing workshops for both teachers and students, it taught the students how to use their brain in many different ways. To find the answers Dweck followed seventh graders in New York, where she monitored the grades of the students to see whether they would improve or not. In the “Mind-Sets and Equitable Education,” it states that the growth mind-set children believe in themselves, whereas fixed mind-set try to look smart and make perfection. “The Matthew Effect” plays a huge role in the growth and fixed mind-set, by the Canadian athletes having to push themselves to get a higher level and excel creating
Many of the arguments against ability grouping is the concern for the psychological and social well being of the children involved, especially children placed in the lower-achieving ability groups. At a young age, children become more and more aware of differentiating characteristics, especially those children who are labeled as the “slower” groups, while others are labeled as the “gifted” or “accelerated” groups. Being labeled can leave children feeling discouraged. For example, if teachers are focusing more of their time and energy on the “gifted students” or the “slower students” the groups will not be getting the guided instructions that is needed for learning the content. Burns and Mason (1998) suggest that ability grouping may inadvertently create unequal learning opportunities for students. Even at the elementary level, this practice may give some students opportunities for more effective teachers, class composition, and instruction; thus giving a better chance at higher achievement. Since, students are getting the appropriate amount of time with the instructor, it has the possibility of leading to feelings of segregation. This can be difficult for young students to manage, thus causing unnecessary arguments, or a negative self-esteem, for those who are considered the “non gifted” students. Another disadvantage of ability grouping is that some believe that students will be treated differently and the teacher’s expectations will decrease for those who are put in the lower groups. Teachers may find themselves being more positive, patient with and respectful to students in higher ability groups that they are able to teach with less effort. Even if teachers do so unconsciously, they may treat students in the different groups as superior of inferior based on their groupings, leading to the perception by the students
...what they might be good at. With that, equal attention must be committed to not only to a child with the highest achievement, but to the other child with the lowest achievement as well.