Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Governmental duties
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Governmental duties
"
The government should only have the duty to monitor the internet for 2 reasons. First, to monitor for sales of illegal items as well as illegal websites. The second is for crime prediction on social media and to prevent illegal activities. They should monitor for the first, because they need to be able to shut down the illegal black market websites selling illegal weapons or drugs. There are many of these websites in the deep web and we need to try to shut down as many as we possibly can.
To go more in depth for my first reason, which is to monitor for sale of illegal items; I believe that they should monitor for this heavily. This could even be downloading of illegal media. According to pri.org there are over a million illegal downloads in just half a day. There are billions of downloads in a month. That’s just media, there are multiple illegal items such as drugs and weapons being sold on the dark web today. To be able to put a stop to downloading of illegal movies, shows, games etc. The government needs to be able to monitor the internet to be able to find these websites and shut them down. The reason that downloading these movies, television shows, and games can be such a big deal; especially with music, is that you are stealing this media in which
…show more content…
According to digitaltrends.com, one instance occurred when a U.K man stole $130,000 worth of jewelry and fled the country. Then later returned to the U.K on a vacation under the same assumed identification and posted pictures of his trip on Facebook. The police saw the pictures and were able to track him down and detain him. So, without being able to monitor social media platforms they would have never been able to find this man and detain
...rk with us. This can have a major impact on the economy, and may eventually lead to a weakened nation overall. However, it can be argued that the United States is not acting hypocritical through mass surveillance over the internet. While there's some overlap of the issues, the existence of surveillance does not cut off the freedom of speech on the Internet."One can recognize... there is a very large difference between censorship and spying... On some level, we know that spying and espionage is going to take place. This still doesn't mean we promote censorship." (Verveer, 2013) Undoubtedly, the censorship by the agency over the internet may make users think twice about what opinions to express, but as long as no major crimes are being planned, then the agency will not really care about what is said online, and internet users are free to say whatever they would like.
The Civil Rights Movement refers to the political, social, and economical struggle of African Americans to gain full citizenship and racial equality. Although African Americans began to fight for equal rights as early as during the days of slavery, the quest for equality continues today. Historians generally agree that Civil Rights Movement began with the Montgomery bus boycott in 1955 and ended with the passing of the Voting Rights Act in 1965.
The government definitely needs to have some control of the Internet. They need to have control in order to stop criminals from using the Internet. The FBI’s position on Carnivore is outlined in Donald M. Kerr’s congressional statement made before a Senate committee that was reviewing the FBI’s Carnivore system. In a congressional statement made by Donald Kerr who is the Assistant Director of the Laboratory Division for the FBI, Kerr explains terrorists, spies, hackers, and criminals used computers and the Internet with malicious intent. Another reason the FBI feels that they need Carnivore is to combat information warfare, fraud, and other various crimes on the Internet. I believe that Carnivore will help the FBI to prevent some of the crime on the Internet. There is no way for any government to completely prevent any crime on the Internet. I rather have some government control than a lawless Internet. At least this way, I would know who would be violating my privacy.
Social media are websites or application that allow users to share information or photos. When you post information or photo on social media everyone on that website can see what you posted. People post pictures with them on vacation or out of town. This results in their house getting invaded or robbed. This is a result of personal freedom because people got on private property without permission.
The internet can be a very disturbing thing for many people. There are a lot of things on the internet that kids should not be able to view. But for some reasons kids are able to view these things. I believe that the government should step in and help with the censorship of the internet. People are but should not be able to view anything on the internet if they are under the recommended viewing age.
"In 2018 the internet is a vital part of people's everyday lives. Almost everyone has a smart phone glued to their side and is constantly surfing the web for information or using social media. Kids, teens and adults all use the internet for one reason or another. The rise of social media in recent years with websites like twitter, Instagram and Facebook has expanded internet use greatly. People use social media to share pictures and fun information about their lives. People also use the internet for endless purposes other than social media, like to read informative articles, looking up the weather, or searching for the newest viral video. The important question that has arose from this internet takeover is how much should the government monitor
The FBI should monitor what were doing. This is a point that needs emphasizing since so many people believe it’s all about their privacy. When people found out the u.s government surveillance program, granted the NSA access to data held on private citizens, they didn’t like the idea of it. I get that people would disagree with this because it is a violation of civil rights. On the other hand, by security taking this justifiable measure it will ensure the safety, therefore; the FBI should be monitoring online content when it comes to our well being.
"I believe that it is not a duty of the government to monitor internet content, unless there is an extreme circumstance where the public would be in danger. It is the first amendment right of the people to utilize their own free speech. This is very important, and we will always need to keep in mind what was intended when the Bill of Rights was created. When we start to limit free speech, we are hindering the speed and quality of ideas that could otherwise be spread very quickly and efficiently. Considering events such as the leaks that state that “The NSA is turning the internet into a total surveillance system”, the government is considering everyone using the internet a potential suspect, completely ignoring the fact that the people of the United States should always be considered innocent until proven guilty. If we are always on guard about having to word things the
On one hand privacy is valued but on the other privacy has to end. Mainly it ends when it comes to terrorist threats and many times pedophiles. Things that offer a danger to society, within in this context many argue that Internet surveillance is needed. The protection of innocent people outweighs the need of individual Internet privacy. Glen states in his article, “An open society, such as the United States, ironically needs to use this technology to protect itself. This truth is naturally uncomfortable for a country with a Constitution that prevents the federal government from conducting "unreasonable searches and seizures (Glenn 2012).” In the time of technology and the risk of spreading terrorism, humans cannot afford Internet privacy. As data or possible data about home born terrorist can be collected and be readily available because of technology. Then the other issue is pedophiles. Sir Iain Lobbon (2013) believes “"allows us to reveal the identities of those involved in online sexual exploitation of children.” Programs like NSA allow the surveillance to catch sex offenders. Maybe even the hope of preventing them actually damaging a child and committing offence.
The internet has been one of the most influential technological advancements of the twenty-first century. It is in millions of homes, schools, and workplaces. The internet offers not only a way of communicating with people around the world, but also a link to information, shopping, chatting, searching, and maps. This freedom to be anyone and to "go" anywhere right from the comfort of home has become a cherished item. However, there is always a down side to every up. Because of the freedom to post anything and access anything on the internet, the issue of regulation has arisen; for example, what should and should not be allowed on the internet? Who has the right to regulate this space that we cherish for its freedom?
To what extent in the U.S does the government-federal, state, and local-have the duty to monitor internet content?
However, the federal government is a different story. Because they have a little more power and authority, I feel that in certain cases it would be acceptable for them to have access to internet usage by citizens. These ‘certain cases’ must be strict so no one can abuse the system. There could be certain websites, like radical Islamic or illegal weapon sites, that should be flagged if accessed.
As can be seen, from the information presented, the need for laws and restrictions concerning internet data collection is greatly needed. Moreover, the government can search private citizens data without warrant or cause. Also, companies are not only collecting internet user data but also selling it. The companies and agencies who commit such crimes should be fined or either closed down. In closing, the privacy and security of individuals on the internet should be upheld by the United States government.
While it is possible to intercept and not allow such things on the internet on the Internet such as pornography, or material containing racist or violent content, in order to really do so the entire net would have to be controlled. An important question that has to be asked is who will do the monitoring, and what will they base their criteria on.
The Internet is ruled by no governing body and it is an open society for ideas to be developed and shared in. Unfortunately, every society has its downside and the Internet is no exception. The nature of the Internet makes policing this new domain practically impossible. During the past few years the Government has stepped in to control this form of communication. This issue of whether it is necessary to have censorship on the Internet is being argued all over the world. Censorship would damage the freelance atmosphere on the Internet where freedom to express ideas is what most of us enjoy so much. If the Government steps and ceases control of the Internet it wouldn’t be any different than Communism or even Dictatorship. Therefore our Government should not encourage censorship. To underst...