Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Durkheim’s study of suicide
Durkheim and the science of sociology
Durkheim’s study of suicide
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Durkheim’s study of suicide
Durkheim and Functionalism
Durkheim looked at how the big things affected the little people in
society; the ‘top-down’ approach’.
- using systematic research
- the idea of social structure
- the idea of imperial research
He came up with the idea of SOCIAL FACTS
- these refer to social structures and cultural norms
These ‘social facts’ are independent institutions that affect the way
that people behave
Durkheim argued that sociology should study these social facts,
arguing that the belief systems, customs and institutions of society
and the facts of the social world should all be considered as things
in the same way as the objects and events of the natural world.
Durkheim sees society as not just a collection of individuals, each
acting independently. Instead members of society are directed by
collective beliefs, values and laws, by social facts which have an
existence of their own.
Durkheim splits these social facts into MATERIAL and NON-MATERIAL
social facts:
Material social facts:
structural components of society – institutions
involved with morphological components of society
Non-Material social facts:
moral and cultural components (e.g. morality, collective conscience)
There were 3 main areas that Durkheim looked at:
1 – The transition from primary to modern society
Primitive society he referred to as ‘mechanistic’ society
Modern society he referred to as ‘organic’ society
2 – Suicide
Durkheim concluded that the structure of society at any time affects
the degree of social solidarity, this measured by the number of
suicides.
3 – The idea of religion
As society modernise, there was more than one way to show collective
sentiment, and therefore religion became less important
There were 3 main things that Durkheim emphasised:
* Social Solidarity
‘We belong to a common society, based upon things such as common
culture, socialisation, basic values and norms.
* Crime
Crime is a very important and real thing as because of crime it
Ned Block in Troubles with Functionalism offers his Absent Qualia Argument. The argument provides a counter example to functionalism. The essential aspect to the functional theory of mind defines mentality in terms of its functional states of a system. The functional states of a system match states according to their inputs, outputs, and internal states. Block’s counter example argues for the possibility of two systems to have the same functional states which determines their functional equivalence. In addition to functional equivalence, the two systems have distinguishable mental states. If functionalism is as adequate account of mentality, then functional equivalence entails mental state equivalence. Block argues against the consequent of
A functionalist such as Durkheim (1858–1917) believed that deviance was an essential part of a functional society, and that by using the term deviant we were creating our own moral boundaries. Society’s reaction to an individual that crosses these moral boundaries forces people to come together, sharing the collective view of right from wrong. The consensus of these boundaries promotes self restraint and discipline within society. Durkheim theorised that the basis of social order was the shared belief in norms and values. The absence of social order would result in anomie.
On his own, Durkheim contributed a number of elements to the newly founded field. Firstly, in 1893, Durkheim published his first major work, The Division of Labor in Society. (Johnson 51) This book was groundbreaking, in that he introduced the concept of "anomie", which is the breakdown of the influence of social norms on individuals within a society. Next, in 1895, he published The Rules of Sociological Method, which was his second major work. This was a manifesto discussing what sociology is and how it ought to be taught and carried out. Then, he published his third major work, Suicide: A Study in Sociology. This was a case study that explored the differing suicide rates among Protestants and Catholics, and argued that stronger social control among Catholics results in lower suicide rates. In 1912, Durkheim published his last major work, The Elementary Forms of The Religious Life. This book analyzes religion, through the lens of a social phenomenon.
The two theoretical approaches I have chosen to compare to the study of crime are Functionalism and Marxism. I have done so, as I believe both theories are important/ significant to the study of crime and differentiate from each other. I will do this by writing a critique the advantages and disadvantages of both of the theories and thus, resulting in my own personal opinion in the conclusion.
Durkheim Emile Durkheim (1858 - 1917), believed individuals are determined by the society they live in because they share a moral reality that we have been socialised to internalise through social facts. Social facts according to Drukhiem are the “manners of acting, thinking and feeling external to the individual which are invested with a coercive power by virtue of which they exercise control over him [or her].” Social facts are external to the individual, they bind societies together because they have an emotional and moral hold on people, and are why we feel shame or guilt when we break societal convention. Durkheim was concerned with maintaining the cohesion of social structures. He was a functionalist, he believed each aspect of society contributes to society's stability and functioning as a whole.
Durkheim describes social facts as anyway of acting, thinking and feeling external to the individual and something that can be measured whether fixed or not (Johnson). Examples of social facts according to Durkheim were social institutions, such as kinship and marriage, political organizations and all other institutions of society that require that we take them into account in our everyday interactions with other members of our societies (Coser). Deviating from the norms
Everyone goes through stages of life and everyone goes through them differently, there are some people that will go through life and not have any problems. While there are some people who will go through life and then will get a disease that will slowly kill them. Does getting a disease in old age make it harder for a person to live the rest of their life out? The functionalist perspective would best explain the expected outcomes, because it tries to help out society and make sure there is some stability.
Durkheim was concerned with studying and observing the ways in which society functioned. His work began with the idea of the collective conscious, which are the general emotions and opinions that are shared by a society and which shape likeminded ideas as to how the society will operate (Desfor Edles and Appelrouth 2010:100-01). Durkheim thus suggested that the collective ideas shared by a community are what keeps injustices from continuing or what allows them to remain.
Durkheim’s thesis in regards to social solidarity, based upon his views, which explain individuals influenced by social facts. The social facts he outlined and referred to as a “thing” (Ritzer, p 185) are the languages spoken, buildings, and ethics. Durkheim viewed social facts being outside of the individual but yet powerful in shaping the individual. Social facts defined as material and nonmaterial. Material social facts visible such as buildings, while nonmaterial social facts difficult to see but as a society we know they exist. The nonmaterial social facts are customs, cultures and norms for any given society (Ritzer, p 188). Social facts according to Durkheim, required research. Durkheim believed studying the nonmaterial social facts as being the most significant and at the heart of his theory (Ritzer, p 188).
When it comes to the state, for example, it regulates the brain, achieving restorative justice and solidarity over the body. This ensures that social inequality is based primarily on merit. In the state of moral and dynamic density, individualism and rationality rise above “collective consciousness” and religion. However, for Durkheim, despite great cohesion, there are many pathological phenomena, such as anomie and some economic conflicts too. However, these are only temporary.
Durkheim is a key figure in understanding religion from a functionalist perspective. He believes that social order and stability can only exist if people are integrated into society by value consensus. Religion is seen as an important institution for achieving these functions as it sets a moral code for
Ø In particular with Durkheim’s work, it is too optimistic and maintains the idea of social solidarity as the main theme, and simply believes pathologies can be solved through simple social reform, ignoring any problems or conflict and the affects. Ø Marxists argue that the modern family is organised to support and benefit the ruling class and the capitalist economy, rather than benefiting all of society. In particular, they accuse functionalists for ignoring the fact that power is not equally distributed in society. Some groups have more wealth and power than others and may be able to impose their norms and values as less powerful groups.
Talcott Parsons have some of the same views of sociology as Durkheim, he believed that social life is categorized by social cooperation. Parsons also believed that commitment to common values maintains or...
Both ideas which had been differently well developed by Comte and Saint-Simon. Durkheim's holism approach said that sociology should focus on and study large social operations and cultures. He used functionalism, an approach of studying social and cultural phenomena as a set of interdependent parts, to find out the roles these institutions and processes play in keeping social order. Because of this importance in large social processes and institutions, Durkheim's sociology can be described as macro-sociological as compared to a micro-sociological, which takes it's starting point at the individual. Durkheim's main purpose was to give sociology a professional and scientific standing like other traditional social sciences. In order to do this, Durkheim argued that it was essential to clearly state the domain or area of study for sociology. He said that sociology's concern was with the social. This section of the social should be separated from the area of psychological and the individual.
The goal of functionalism, with regards to religion, is to analyze religion and explain its purpose by showing what role it plays for humans within society. Sigmund Freud, Emile Durkheim, and Karl Marx were all functionalist who developed theories as to why religion was such a major part of their society. Their views are very different from the two theorists E.B. Tylor and James Frazer, as they believed humans were using religion to try and explain the unknowns in the world. Though all three of the men took a fundamentalist approach to religion, their theories to explain religion have some major differences between them. Sigmund Freud, who is predominately known for his work in psychology, tried to explain religion by saying it is merely an illusion. Emile Durkheim, also known as the father of sociology, claimed that religion is the result of societies need for group cohesion. The final functionalist is Karl Marx who in his famous quote stated religion, “…is the opium of the people.” While all three functionalists have reasonable theories on the explanation of religion’s prominent role within society, Karl Marx’s theory that religion is a tool used to keep the proletariat from protesting against their already miserable lives, is superior to both Freud’s and Durkheim’s theories as they fail to hold consistent with societies views over time. Marx’s theory will hold true until there is no longer scarcity in society.