Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
'Danger': effect of adderall use on education achievement
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
University drug tests could be the most effective method in preventing young adults from future drug addiction. According to a research conducted by the National Drug Control Policy, random drug testing in academic facilities has effectively reduced drug use from 18.5% to 11.8% among young adults (Anonymous-NDCP). This research suggests that if universities conduct drug tests, there would be a significant decrease in students who use prescription stimulants illicitly. A negative consequence associated with universities conducting drug tests for cognitive enhancers, like Adderall, is the cost-benefit ratio. Dr. Sharon Levy, a researcher from the American Academy of Pediatrics, suggests that the average price for a single drug test at a school …show more content…
Students who do not use cognitive enhancers would feel victimized for having to conduct random drug tests without probable cause. When students take a drug test, they run the risk of being penalized for possibly testing a false positive. Testing a false positive would drive students to be less motivated in their academic performance and feel criminalized for a faulty drug test. Students who do use cognitive enhancers could easily use a false positive excuse for their true positive result and retake the drug test when …show more content…
Not conducting drug tests will discredit the students who have accomplished their program without using Adderall by making them academically equal to the students who have used Adderall illicitly. This is unjust because using Adderall gives students an edge over those who do not, and these students should not be rewarded equal degrees as students who do. The students who do not use cognitive enhancers are a complete representation of their academic transcript, while the students who do use Adderall are not because they cannot academically perform the same without the using cognitive enhancers. The unfairness in using cognitive enhancers also reside when comparing how much time and effort students put in study in without Adderall versus students who do take
In “Brain Enhancement is Wrong, Right?” the point being conveyed is that using stimulants to enhance performance should not be used because stimulants are unethical. The author intends to reach out to researchers, professors, and college students as the predominant demographic. The usage of drugs to enhance abilities occurs during time when individuals have stressful tasks a head of them. The use of the stimulants depends on when the person needs to focus. Benedict Carey targeted individuals in the academic field because those are the people who are using stimulants to amplify their abilities.
It has been said that addiction is the plague of the 21st century. In an age of unprecedented life expectancy and medical breakthroughs, people are dying from both disease and overdose that are self inflicted and the cure is currently out of reach. Implementing progressive ideas such as safe injection sites have been a battle, both for caring social workers and front line emergency workers looking to minimize the health risks associated with risk taking behaviors that inevitably occur with intravenous drug use. While the addicted population currently uses considerable government funding by way of shelter services as well as prison and jail time, safe injection sites are a necessary step in the battle against drug abuse as is a major prevention
Drugs and alcohol are a big problem everywhere, but school administrators and teachers want to make sure that students are able to reach their full potential and drug use would greatly hinder that. However, according to the 2011 Youth Risk Behavior Survey 39.9% of students have tried marijuana and 70.8% of students have drank alcohol (YRBSS 2011 National Overview). If schools were to expel every student because of drug or alcohol use, there would hardly be any students left. A booklet published by the Drug Policy Alliance has research that shows that zero tolerance policies do not deter drug and alcohol use. Drug and alcohol use continues to rise in schools, and many schools do not do anything to help combat it except for harsh disciplinary procedures. Most elementary schools have drug education programs, but the same type of education does not work well with teenagers. The Drug Policy Alliance advocates for a three step process to help students instead of p...
Now is not the time for the United States federal government to decriminalize or legalize illegal drugs, including marijuana. However, nor can the government continue to do nothing about the financially, economically, and socially expensive domestic drug policy it currently follows. The United States Congress should pass legislation to remove mandatory minimum penalties from drug offenses, and the Department of Justice and the Bureau of Prisons should add in-house rehabilitation programs for its incarcerated drug offenders. These policies would increase the cost-effectiveness of current drug policy and reduce crime and drug use, and do not face the political obstacles or have the uncertain consequences of decriminalizing or legalizing drugs.
...ng drugs will have a huge impact on them and the people that they are around. When a person does drugs once, they will keep using them and eventually become addicted. Drug testing student athletes is a necessity because taking drugs affects relationships that the athlete has, drugs cause consequence that can be detrimental, and lastly taking drugs hurt the body causing the athlete to have health issues. Hence, drug testing should be done in all high schools around the country.
Some may say that drug testing students is unconstitutional because it is an “invasion of privacy”. This, however, is not true. . . “In 1995, the United States Supreme Court ruled that drug testing for high school athletes was constitutional, and some districts expanded their policies to include middle schools.” I believe allowing schools to drug test athletes was a very positive thing. For many reason, but mainly because athletes who are on drugs have a higher risk of being injured. For example a kid who is on drugs and plays a sporting event has a greater risk of their heart stopping on the field or court. “Drug tests analyze bodily samples such as urine, blood, or hair to detect the presence of legal and illegal drugs.” The most common one is urine testing. I believe urine testing is the best way for high school students, because it does not take as long as some other tests and it is not as costly as other tests. This is especially important because obviously a school does not want to spend money on anything they do not have to. Our school does randomly drug test students every once in a while but only a few of the athletes are chosen to take the test so that really is not helping ...
The National Drug Control Strategy was issued two years ago to reduce drug use among teenagers and adults. The success of the President’s drug policy can be measured by its results. The student drug testing approach has reduced drug use and discouraged first time users significantly. Communities have been more actively involved in anti-drug programs for youth and adults. The increase in budget for law enforcement will enhance their effectiveness in detaining drug lords and cartels.
One of the most common arguments in favor of drug testing in the workplace is to prevent occupational injuries and associated costs. There is also a concern with lost productivity due to impairment caused by illicit drug use while on the job. A study found that “the annual costs of these workplace injuries and illnesses...
“A medical dictionary defines a drug as ‘any substance that when taken into the living organism may modify one or more of its functions’” (Newton 12). However, when speaking of drug testing for abuse a person is usually thinking about illegal drugs or drugs that can alter athletic performance in sporting events. Mandatory drug testing was not allowed in public schools until June 2002 when the Supreme Court allowed for public schools to do random drug testing (Carroll 23). This decision allowed for drug testing in all schools throughout the United States not just for athletes but also students who are in any activities within the school, for example clubs and competitive events (Carroll 23). Even though drug testing is now allowed by the Supreme Court many schools do not yet have mandatory drug test policies. Mandatory drug testing for high school athletes should be required because it decreases drug use in schools, is relatively inexpensive, and can prevent drug use and or abuse that can lead to a lifelong addiction.
(Bailey, William) There ought to be an explanation behind the schools to single out competitors from alternate understudies for medication testing. The main proper purposes behind giving so as to treat competitors distinctively them medication tests would be in the event that they more inclined to utilize drugs than different understudies, they were at more serious danger of utilizing medications, the utilization of medications being more dangerous to them, or that the tests will probably return positive for competitors. It is valid in a few schools over the United States, that competitors will probably devour liquor at a weekend party, yet in the event that a pee test were taken the next week, it would come back clean. So this testing would just be an exercise in futility and cash. Understudy competitors more than likely realize that there are approach to beat a medication test so they won't dither to drink at any
Schools are drug testing students to prove their doing illegal drugs. Fifty percent of test givers say that they used illicit drugs at least once ("Drug Testing"). Even people who give tests have also taken drugs themselves. In 2013, 7.4 percent of high school reported non-medical use of prescription stimulant adderall in the past year ("Do all"). Also over 35 percent of students report using marijuana in the last year. That's why 1,000 schools around the country have implemented random draw testing ("Should Schools"). Schools are doing more and more drug testing. In 2002 the supreme court ruled that random school drug testing is constitutional, so more schools have adopted the practice of drug testing ("Should Schools"). Drug use among High School students has dropped since 2001 ("Do all"). Some students have even stopped using drugs because of drug testing at school.
If some students already use drugs, they may not be willing to give them up to participate in the activity, which could lead to activity and athletic budget cuts and an unhappy student body. Many students could be barred from participating, even a star athlete who had a scholarship to play in college, but it was the athlete’s bad choices which should have serious consequences. In turn, this argument may be supported by parents or other community members, so a drug policy may not be supported and fail to be passed by a school board. Another argument can be made that it is a violation of rights to be drug tested in able to join a sport or club. But, in reality it is a student’s right to join the sport or not, and schools are given the power by the U.S. government to implement any needed rules to keep their school safe. For example, a student gives up his freedom of speech while attending public school because he can be severely punished if he says something dangerous. In the end, a major drawback could be the effectiveness of enforcing a drug testing policy in schools. While only 14% of schools in the United States drug test their students, there has not been any major evidence in studies about the effectiveness of the policy. For some schools in Superior, Wisconsin, who have been drug testing their students since 2006, it has led to positive change (Editorial Board Star
What companies need to realize is that the money saved from drug testing surpasses the cost of implementing these test. Factoring the cost for a drug test, Cholakis and Bruce realize that urinalysis cost $150 per test. In addition, according to Cholakis and Bruce’s research, it concludes, “return on investments on an effective drug-testing program averages 100 times the cost of the program.” Analyzing these two factors, companies can realize how investing in a drug testing program can benefit financially over time.
Mandatory drug tests have proven to help teenagers reduce the use of drugs and alcohol in their daily lives. If young people get used to it when they are young, it’s proven that they would have a difficult time trying to loss their addiction to the substance. Helps the person without any criminal chargers but with all the help needed. They even have different types of drug tests to show the time period of when the person might have taken a drug recently.
High school students are leaders to younger kids and many others in their community. As a leader these student must show others what good character is like, but instead they are destroying their lives by doing drugs. In the past decade the drug use among high school students is on the rise once again. With the internet, their exposure to drugs is much greater. High school students are convinced that they are able to get away with using drugs. These drug addicts soon influence other students into doing the drugs because there isn’t a rule preventing drug use. In order to protect these student’s future, drug tests must be enforced among all students ensuring a safe environment for students to learn successfully. Allowing random drug testing in high schools will shy away students from trying these harmful drugs. The stop of drug use among high school students is crucial because drugs prevents student from learning leading them to dropping out of high school. Students that become overwhelmed by these harmful drugs will ruin their lives forever, but if steered in the right direction they can be saved.