Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact of war on family
Impact of war on family
Drones used for offensive military
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Impact of war on family
This buzzing killer is the destroyer of mentalities of the human race. The drone is known as the newly improved warfare machine. Whereas, the United States of America has begun using the aircraft in the Middle East with goals of fixing the terrorism issue. By defining the importance of humane warfare instead of solely machine warfare since drones are horrendous tactics for the military, by refuting those who claim drones make warfare a safer location, by presenting case studies, statistics, visual depictions, and sound arguments, one will be persuaded that drones are inefficient resources until further proven extremely precise without technical difficulties. Notably, everyday depictions of families are seen in morbid and terrorized mentality …show more content…
states. Furthermore, a young child is shown in a prediction with the words on the wall, “Why did you kill my family?” (Source F). These children are terrified in their own homes in Yemen, Pakistan, and Afghanistan because of the continuous deaths of their own people. Evenmore, drones are like the grim reaper, who only has the intentions of the unmiraculous deaths of innocent bystanders in order to kill few humans that are targeted. Also, interviews taken through Standiford and New York University claim, “People are taken under harm beyond death and physical injury and hear drones hover twenty-four hours a day.” (Source F). Additionally, official Clive Stanford Smith, the director of human rights organization under the drone’s warfare purposes voice, “An entire region is being terrorized by the constant threat of death in the skies. The way life is collapsing kids are too terrified to go to school, adults are afraid to attend weddings, funerals, business meetings, or anything that involves gathering in groups.” (Source K). When humans are being treated like the waste in landfills a route avoiding this one will surely keep away from the derivations of the end justifying the means, especially when only the United States is majorly benefiting from the safety increases for soldiers physical beings. However, there are those who claim that drones are successful in warfare because of the mass amounts of valuable commanders in terrorist groups assassinated.
Although one must understand that people will grieve like any other human when their loved ones have reached demise, especially if wrongfully or even earlier done. The author, Jeremy Scahill, examines with a logically statement, “People who are aggrieved by attacks on their homes that forced them to go out and fight,” since the militants operating in Yemen are receiving such responses of hostility through families, thus there needs to be a reevaluation on the aerial aircraft. Above all, people from Yemen are being pushed into unimaginable thought processes as an effect as there are results concluding, “Support for Al-Qaeda in Yemen is indigenously spreading and merging with the mounting rage of powerful tribes at the United States counterterrorism policy.” (Source K). Besides, none of these families are claiming this lifestyle with open hands, but core members of the terrorist group are growing because the United States is growing with power as the Amnesty International claims, “Drone strikes can be classified as war crimes or illegal extrajudicial executions.” (Source K). When statistics represent these masses converting, whereas declared, “Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula core members grew from three hundred in 2009 when these strikes began once again to seven hundred people in 2012.” (Source K). This is around …show more content…
tripling the amount of terrifying people that the United States is attempting to destroy of the grounds of the planet. Above all, this is not anything relative to a slap in the face, but rather a slap to a living creature into the dirt side and the result is death.
In fact, this dehumanization is claimed, “Armed drones are scary because they can rain down hellfire thousands of miles away, and they even pull the trigger under the roof of a control room somewhere in the Midwest.” (Source I). When the United States deploys troops physical and mental means are taken under the consideration of death, but under this safety net for troops there is no safety from people being murdered as mental states of troops have been defined as unstable after such events of work. One must carefully see that the “BOOM” of today is the result of a “BOO” from the tomorrow of the victims killed under radical circumstances. (Source E). Additionally, the stats of these victims include, “The estimates of the secretive nature of the program has has one hundred and seventy-four civilians to one thousand four hundred and forty-seven in Pakistan, Yemen, and Somalia under the United States drone attacks.” (Source J). Let alone, these strikes are vicious and unexpected leaving not only the dangerous men in few, but also the innocents. In particular, the British Human Rights Group Reprieve has collected hideous numbers such as, “The death of one thousand one hundred and forty-seven people in Yemen and Pakistan, including the children that were attempting the top secret kill list.” (Source I). When is there a stop to the
madness when even the children are being attacked under these tense circumstances! Also, there are disapprovements held highly across the globe against these drone strikes since there is such causalities some locations like Britain, Germany, Greece, Turkey, Mexico, Czech Republic have high pols since these countries are noticing the defaults in the aerial devices. (Source G). All in all, the United States withholding drone warfare are demising human mentality and life since the damaging drones are leaping through hoops with terrorism, the destruction of families, and the deaths of young and innocent. Therefore, the people are continuously under attack by these aerial machines because of the drones inefficiency as valuable resources. In fact, the United States warfare purposes involve going against terrorism, but forget the definition that involves terrorizing the public in the Middle East. When people are capable of inhumane transactions, even for warfare there is a line to the extent of damage that should be allowed, especially from afar. Thus, imagine the buzzing of a bee that one hears as a nuisance and image the complexity of these machines being that bee, but these bees are capable of hitting missiles to the floor and ending one’s existence.
Controversy has plagued America’s presence in the Middle East and America’s usage of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) contributes vastly to this controversy. Their usefulness and ability to keep allied troops out of harm’s reach is hardly disputed. However, their presence in countries that are not at war with America, such as Pakistan and Yemen, is something contested. People that see the implications of drone use are paying special attention to the civilian casualty count, world perspective, and the legality of drone operations in non-combative states. The use of drone technology in the countries of Yemen and Pakistan are having negative consequences. In a broad spectrum, unconsented drone strikes are illegal according to the laws of armed conflict, unethical, and are imposing a moral obligation upon those who use them. These issues are all of great importance and need to be addressed. Their legality is also something of great importance and begins with abiding to the Laws of Armed Conflict.
In addition, Byman argues that “drones have devastated al Qaeda and associated anti-American militant groups... and they have done so at little financial cost” (Byman 1). In the article, Byman compares the financia...
On the use of drones, NYT’s Peter M. Singer (“Do Drones Undermine Democracy?”) makes the comprehensive argument that the use of drones goes against the how wars are meant to be fought—human participation. It can be counter argued that these automatons are better in terms of expendability; personnel are not easily replaced while drones are easily replaceable. The Bush 43 strategy relied more on men, and it did yielded adverse results politically. The switch to drones presented dynamic political benefits, for which Singer argued allowed for circumvention of aggravated/emotive discourse among members of the American populace, academics and mass media. It is imperative to remember that the cost of the campaigns in Afghanistan and Iraq—increases in casualties—was detrimental to the American credibility and brought about victory to Obama in 2008 elections.
Likewise, Goodwin illustrates how the use of categorical terrorism can be seem being used by Al-Qaida during the attacks of 9/11. Nonetheless, it is evident that Al-Qaida is unusual in terms of using terrorism to influence the rise of unity rather than trying to overthrow a standing state. For the purpose of instigating a pan-Islamic revolutionary movement, Al-Qaida tries to unite all Islamic people under one state to develop umma, or Muslim community. The logic of Al-Qaida remained that if their “revolutionaries” could illicit a reaction from the powerful US state, resulting in oppression of the middle-eastern region, that Al-Qaida could, as a result, unite all Muslims to counter this suggested oppression. Although the end goal of Al-Qaida clear failed, it does suggest the organization’s attempt at implementing categorical terrorism.
Schweitzer, Y., & Shay, S. (2003). The globalization of terror: The challenge of al-qaida and the response of the international community. New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.
Firmin DeBrabander’s "Drones and the Democracy Disconnect" appeared in the September 2014 magazine The New York Times. The article in this paper shows DeBrabander aiming to convince his readers that the United States is gradually becoming a warring nation with fewer and fewer warriors and few who know the sacrifices of war. "Drones represent the new normal, and are an easy invitation to enter into and wage war indefinitely." DeBrabander tries to explain to his audience on what’s going on with the Drones and the ISIS, but fails to do so.
Indeed, as prior U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld wrote when describing the war on terror, “this will be a war like none other our nation has faced.” However, these changes bring the morality of this new face of war into question, and the justification of drone use and other modern military tactics involved in the war on terror is a subject of much debate. Focusing on U.S. involvement in Yemen from 2010-2015 as part of the war on terror, this essay will argue that, while the U.S. has met most of the criteria of jus ad bellum, the methods the U.S. has employed to counter terrorist organizations such as al Qaeda have ultimately violated the principles of just war theory, even when analyzed from the perspective of modern warfare within the framework of the current global
War can be defined as “an organized and deliberate political act by an established political authority, which must cause 1,000 or more deaths in a twelve-month period, and which requires at least two actors capable of harming each other” (253, Mingst.) This is a broad definition as war can take several different forms, categorized in various ways. Today, the United States is engaged in the War on Terror. In a post-9/11 world, terrorist attacks are even greater sources of fear to citizens, as well as massive threats to national and international security. Over the past few decades, terrorists have been successful in increasing support and achieving political aims. This poses a major security dilemma to victims, such as the United States. It is this sense of insecurity that leads to military action. Any sense of threat is likely to send a nation to arms (251-252, Mingst.) The U.S. government thus must decide as to what the best course of action would be, in protecting the nation. Over the past decade, drone use has increased exponentially for this purpose. These unmanned aerial vehicles, or drones, are often used in attempts to eliminate terrorism. While it is evident that terrorism poses massive threats to the nation, drone strikes are not conducive to a just war.
This paper will discuss the history of the Houthis and the Yemeni government, the regional instability it causes and implications to the United States. This paper will also discuss consequences that will ensue if these issues continue to go unresolved and there is increas...
The United States Military Combined Joint Task Force – Horn of Africa (HOA) is a geographical region that encompasses the countries of Djibouti, Sudan, Ethiopia, Eritrea, Somalia, Kenya, and neighboring Yemen. Each country in the region houses many culturally unique distinctions to include groups, which comprise the HOA area of operation. Specifically one of these culturally unique groups originates out of Yemen. The country of Yemen, according to a 2004 census, has reached almost 20 million people (UNDP, 2010). Over 45% of the population lives on less than $2.00 U.S. a day (UNDP, 2010). The poverty-stricken people in Yemen have shaped a cultural group that in essence contains the majority of the Country’s population. The purpose of this thesis is to illustrate the current Yemen culture shaped by the effects of poverty on the people of Yemen. These effects span a wide array of problematic issues predicated on three major topics. The effects of poverty on the people of Yemen include severe health problems spanning a majority of the region, the decay of the Country’s political infrastructure, and the growing support of terrorist organizations in the region. The dilemmas in Yemen did not solely originate internally. Yemen is host to some 91,587 (as of 2007) refugees from Somalia (CIA, 2011). The wake of events perpetuated by the effects of poverty on the people of Yemen, left unchecked, will continue to erode with significant and lasting negative effects on the entire HOA Area of Responsibility (AOR) to include local, regional, and U.S. interests.
One of the latest and most controversial topics that has risen over the past five to ten years is whether or not drones should be used as a means of war, surveillance, and delivery systems. Common misconceptions usually lead to people’s opposition to the use of drones; which is the reason it is important for people to know the facts about how and why they are used. Wartime capabilities will provide for less casualties and more effective strikes. New delivery and surveillance systems in Africa, the United Air Emirates and the United States will cut costs and increase efficiency across the board. Rules and regulations on drones may be difficult to enforce, but will not be impossible to achieve. The use of drones as weapons of war and delivery and surveillance systems should not be dismissed because many people do not realize the real capabilities of drones and how they can be used to better the world through efficient air strikes, faster delivery times, and useful surveillance.
...only imagine how hazardous this world we live in become. Amongst countries this can become an international competition to make drones to be used as a factor. When other nations see this particular country is using some type of technology to improve their military system then they would want part of it as well. The drone practice can cause to escalate if other countries adopt to this new technology for their own reason of protection. There will be no turning back because the government of that country would take advantage of these drones to use it towards the citizens instead of using for “terrorist”. The use of these drones is definitely immoral and unethical but some may argue that the of drones as protection against “terrorist” even though as we can see it kills innocent people, creates more terrorists, causes psychological disorders, and violates privacy. (Cole)
A couple of people say that drone will increase the number of terrorist, but that will only happen if the army of the United States inhuman, incorrectly, and carelessly. It is true that if a person sees a loved one get murdered, they will want to join the opposing force, but many of them will try to seek peace, so no more people die, or get injured. To avoid the situation where a pilot miss use a drone and hurt people on purpose, they should have some sort of higher rank watching them, or they can different training courses when it comes to using
Living in the digital age where we enjoy the various fruits of latest technological tools and advancements, then at the same time we cannot escape from their hidden or apparent harms. Also, it is a fact that some gadgets supported by these technological advancements are much capable to bring destruction and disaster then construction and convenience. The same goes for the Drone Technology which since past 200 years is being used to create turbulence at the global level. It has proved to be a powerful investigator and bomber at the same time. Drones are specifically associated with military actions and the countries having used them for surveillance purposes include UK, USA, Italy, Japan, Austria, Australia etc. The list of victim counties or nations is much bigger in contrast. Some prominent victims of Drone Air Strikes include Congo, Venice, Afghanistan, and Pakistan. However, it is also an undeniable fact that the massive production and usage of Drones got multiplied in the 21st century.
The continuing war on terror has lead to a renewed national awareness and heightened desire for peace. However, images of unrest, bloodshed, and horrific acts of terror flood the media, pulling at our hearts, causing outrage against the perpetrators. Yet, in spite of society’s collective repulsion to these atrocities, similar acts of terror occur every day and go unnoticed in the nam...