Drive Theory Of Social Facilitation

Social facilitation refers to the fact that we work harder in groups; The presence of others increases an already-good ability (Hogg & Cooper, 2003). Triplett (1898) was the first to find this, and determined it dynamogenic factor theory; the mere presence of another brings out a competitive instinct (Hogg & Cooper, 2003). Social Inhibition refers to the fact that we reduce our efforts in groups; perform worse at a new or poorly-learned task (Hogg & Cooper, 2003). Both Social Facilitation and Social Inhibition occur in groups and there are a few theories from the readings suggested for these effects.

Zajonc (1965), suggested that the mere presence of others was sufficient to increase drive; The Drive Theory hypothesizes the mere presence of

Sanna

Gavin, Kathy and Ken demonstrated social facilitation. If we were to apply Zanjoc (1985) Drive Theory; the mere presence of others enhances a dominate response, I could identify social facilitation from Gavin and Kathy by their performance; making suggestions and participation. Ken demonstrated social facilitation by acting as a leader in the meeting, he talked with confidence, had a positive attitude, encouraged participation, simplified the meeting, got along with his team members, asked questions, was organized, and provided positive reinforcement and support. All three were doing task alongside side each other which stimulated them to do better.

Social Inhibition. Amanda demonstrated social inhibition. It appeared she preferred to work alone as the social situation might have been too difficult for her. As noted by Gavin and Kathy; Kathy thinks, “She really needs to get it together. Why is she so nervous; Gavin thinks, “I wonder what’s gotten into her. She’s not usually this tense. Going by Gavin and Kathy’s thoughts, she very well may be experiencing Evaluation apprehension; it is the "worry" of being "'judged" that affects performance as she was didn’t participate as much, more nervous, and