Dr Hardin Lifeboat Ethics

1144 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Hardin lifeboat ethics analysis

The source of the essay is taken from the primary part of the essay, “Lifeboat Ethics: The Case against Helping the Poor”. This article was initially published in a magazine named Psychology Today in 1974. Dr. Hardin used to instruct at the University of California who was a controversial ecologist. He was known for his ruthlessly legit thoughts on human overpopulation. His writings were seen as obtuse which made him broadly criticized (Hardin). This article was actually published in Psychology Today which is a magazine written for a scholarly audience rather than for the normal reader (Wiki). At the time the article was published in September of 1974, the US was in a state of total disorder with President Nixon being denounced. The American …show more content…

Hardin appeals to Pathos suggests our survival depends on the states of mind of guarding our assets. In spite of it is true there is only so much room in a lifeboat I don't concur with Dr. Hardin's proposals. I do not believe the world has come to this point. With research and countries working together to find solutions we would be able to help many in need. Hardin appeals to the readers’ beliefs again when he refers to the idea of standing back when a nation is in a crisis and giving the nation a chance to take in the hardest way possible. The author suggests the nations won't figure out how to patch their ways and their crises will keep on growing. The last time Hardin refers to Pathos is the point at which he discusses not giving medical care to nations in trouble. The author asks if our intentions equal the results. Dr. Hardin believes that we either teach or do not help the country at all with medical help. His thoughts of standing back are a prospective I do not share. I think we can teach the country about some new medical procedure, water refinement and planting so they may figure out how to manage themselves. Ignoring the issues of the world won't make them leave, in the long run I believe the issues will achieve our shores one …show more content…

Garret Hardin was a well-educated man committed to discovering answers for saving our water sources, quality of air and good growth. With the numerical data he cites he doesn’t once list a particular reference, nor does he show a formal citing. This procedure appears to approach me to take his assertion for it, generally called speaking to Ethos. Dr. Hardin’s claim is that there is only one solution which asserts that one lifeboat with room for only a few. This thinking is fascinating as there are numerous sizes of lifeboats, the idea of making space for more rather finding stupid reason to take less is better. The author then compares the statistics of population increment in comparatively smaller countries and the amount of resources used. Dr. Hardin sincerely believed if we let the population increment go on without educating the general people to have their resources the problems won’t decrease. Dr. Harding again made a list of immigrants in US to analyze the reason of population growth to persuade that US should close doors for immigrants. His reasoning drives me to think about how possible it is whether we do continue to keep on allowing immigrants in the country means allowing our resources to be used

Show More
Related

  • Analysis Of Peter Singer And Onora O Neill's Position On Famine Relief

    1016 Words  | 3 Pages

    In order to understand why O’Neill’s position is superior to Singer’s position on famine relief, I will present information on both sides. O’Neill gives a Kantian, duty-based explanation, that focuses on people 's intentions. One of the central claims of Kantian ethics is that one must never treat a person, either oneself or another, as mere

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Outside The Solar Village One Utopian Farm

    1002 Words  | 3 Pages

    In, The Population Bomb by, Paul R Ehrlich, he explains the problem of population increase, and how there are people everywhere! The feeling of feeling over populated. He talks about how if there are more people then there is more food that needs to be produced then ate. He explains on the rich people becoming wealthier and the poor are going to be even poorer and there is going to be a starvation. Population is doubling every year and how our energy is turning into

    Read More

  • Illegal Immigrants Do NOT Harm America's Economy

    1378 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the article, Grow, et al was convinced that illegal immigration had always been the one had the most negatives comments over the last two decades. However, Grow, et al argue that unlawful settlers transpire a component of American’s economic cycle consequently of its society role. On one hand, the authors argue that illegal refugees had a major impact on the economic on the economy through its population and maintenance over the flow of the finical systems. Points are made, illegal refugees had become a market that is too larger to ignore. According to the authors, illegal refugees who are despaired to seek out for an enhanced living, will the contribute profits that are irresistible. Not only that, illegal refugees also help to paying tax for public serves. Furthermore, illegal refugees also assist lower the criminal rate. Finally. Grow, et al provide that illegal refugees dose not harm economy, but a great help to fix it.

    Read More

  • Justice vs. Reality in "Lifeboat Ethics: the Case against Helping the Poor" by Garrett Hardin

    535 Words  | 2 Pages

    Later in the essay, Hardin writes about the differences in the population growth between rich and poor nations. Poor nations multiply much more quickly than richer nations. The essay then goes on to explain what the consequences would be of setting of a national food bank. It explains that only the rich nations would be able to contribute to the food bank and the poor nations would only draw. This would only add to the problem of the poor nations as they would have no desire to save of food for themselves since they know they will be taken care of anyways. Giving poor nations food would be bad a...

    Read More

  • Maude Barlow's Water Incorporated

    841 Words  | 2 Pages

    Admittedly, 2/3 of the world’s population living with water shortages is a scary enough statistic to send a shiver up the spine. Barlow doesn’t stop there, however; she goes on to say that only 2% of the U.S. rivers and wetlands remain untouched. What does that mean for the creatures that live there? Covered that too, “37% of freshwater fish are at risk of extinction, 40% of amphibians are imperiled and 67% of freshwater mussels are extinct or vulnerable to extinction”.... ...

    Read More

  • Synthesis Essay on Indocumented Immigrants in the US

    892 Words  | 2 Pages

    Considering the ideas that both authors have brought to the table, I have concluded that in order to make progress in solving the problem of undocumented immigrants, we as a country must decide what’s best for our country. We either look at undocumented immigrants as an asset or a parasite. America is the ‘land of opportunity’ where millions of people want to live there and pursue the ‘American Dream’. We should not let people stop from achieving their dreams. But on the other hand, a quantity of immigrants leave their country because it does not have “stable democracies and free markets” that “ensure economic growth, rising standards of living and thus, lots of jobs”, because the countries of these immigrants “birth rates and native populations fall”.

    Read More

  • Peter Singer's Argument in Famine, Affluence and Morality

    1493 Words  | 3 Pages

    This paper explores Peter Singer’s argument, in Famine, Affluence, and Morality, that we have morally required obligations to those in need. The explanation of his argument and conclusion, if accepted, would dictate changes to our lifestyle as well as our conceptions of duty and charity, and would be particularly demanding of the affluent. In response to the central case presented by Singer, John Kekes offers his version, which he labels the and points out some objections. Revisions of the principle provide some response to the objections, but raise additional problems. Yet, in the end, the revisions provide support for Singer’s basic argument that, in some way, we ought to help those in need.

    Read More

  • Garrett Hardin's Lifeboat Ethics: The Problem Of Immigration In America

    791 Words  | 2 Pages

    “Immigration could account for all the yearly increase in population. Should we not at least ask if that is what we want (Hardin, 1974)?” Well! The audacity of Garrett Hardin’s 1974 essay, “Lifeboat Ethics: The Case against Helping the Poor” to ingeniously imply concern for illegal entry, but in all actuality supports partiality to who is advantaged to populates the United States! Thus, Immigration policies in America continuous changes reflects discriminatory processes of past and biased judgement by elected officials.

    Read More

  • Morality of Giving

    1069 Words  | 3 Pages

    How much money is one morally obligated to give to relief overseas? Many In people would say that although it is a good thing to do, one is not obligated to give anything. Other people would say that if a person has more than he needs, then he should donate a portion of what he has. Peter Singer, however, proposes a radically different view. His essay, “Famine, Affluence, and Morality,” focuses on the Bengal crisis in 1971 and claims that one is morally obligated to give as much as possible. His thesis supports the idea that “We ought to give until we reach the level of marginal utility – that is, the level at which, by giving more, I would cause as much suffering to myself or my dependents as I would relieve by my gift” (399). He says that one's obligation to give to people in need half-way around the world is just as strong as the obligation to give to one's neighbor in need. Even more than that, he says that one should keep giving until, by giving more, you would be in a worse position than the people one means to help. Singer's claim is so different than people's typical idea of morality that is it is easy to quickly dismiss it as being absurd. Saying that one should provide monetary relief to the point that you are in as bad a position as those receiving your aid seems to go against common sense. However, when the evidence he presents is considered, it is impossible not to wonder if he might be right.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Garrett Hardin's Lifeboat Ethics: The Case Against Helping The Poor

    1552 Words  | 4 Pages

    In Garrett Hardin’s “Lifeboat Ethics: The Case against Helping the Poor, Hardin argues that you should not help the poor because there are limited resources and if the poor continue to seek help they will continue to overpopulate, disrespecting all of limits. Hardin supports his argument by using the lifeboat metaphor while trying to convince the rich not to lend a helping hand to the poor. In the lifeboat metaphor Garrett Hardin uses the upper class and the lower class people to give us a visual of how the lifeboat scenario actually works. Along with the lifeboat metaphor, Hardin uses the tragedy of commons, population growth, and the Joseph and Pharaoh biblical story to persuade the readers.When reading “Lifeboat Ethics: The Case against

    Read More

  • Analyzing David Miller´s Opinion on Immigration

    2274 Words  | 5 Pages

    Fairchild H. P., 1930, ‘Immigration and the population problem’ , Annals of the American academy of Political and Social Science, New York University

    Read More

  • Illegal Immigration In The Gilded Age

    951 Words  | 2 Pages

    Among world regions, the number of unauthorized immigrants from Asia, Central America and sub-Saharan Africa rose between 2009 and 2014. The number of immigrants from Mexico has steadily declined since 2007, the first year of the Great Recession, but Mexicans remain more than half (52%) of U.S. unauthorized immigrants. ”(Jeffrey Passel). “Population growth is influenced by three factors: mortality (the death rate, which has been steadily decreasing in the U.S.), birth rates or fertility (children per woman) and net immigration (immigration minus emigration). “ (USPS).

    Read More

  • Famine Relief

    1822 Words  | 4 Pages

    In this paper, I will argue against two articles which were written against Singer’s view, and against helping the poor countries in general. I will argue against John Arthur’s article Famine Relief and the Ideal Moral Code (1974 ) ,and Garrett Hardin’s article Lifeboat Ethics: the Case Against Helping the Poor ( 1976); I will show that both articles are exaggerating the negative consequences of aiding the poor, as well as building them on false assumptions. Both Arthur and Hardin are promoting the self-interest without considering the rights of others, and without considering that giving for famine relief means giving life to many children.

    Read More

  • Blindly Obeying Authority

    1789 Words  | 4 Pages

    From an American Psychologist. Vol. 19, pp. 848-852, 1964.

    Read More

  • Ethical Code in the Article the Overcrowed Lifeboat

    1108 Words  | 3 Pages

    Ethical dilemmas create a challenge between two or more equally alternative problems requiring moral judgment. This creates both an obligation and dilemma for those involved. Living in such a globalized world with cross-cultural borders, races, and ideas; negotiating what is considered morally “right” can sometimes be very difficult. Both religion and laws have a major impact in ethical duties. What an individual may presume as right cannot be guaranteed by the government or political party. The Overcrowded Lifeboat is just one example in which all the ideas above come to play in ethical decisions.

    Read More

More about Dr Hardin Lifeboat Ethics

Open Document