Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Challenges of transformational leadership
Leadership styles
Challenges of transformational leadership
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Challenges of transformational leadership
Q1. Douglas’s leadership clearly is one of the major types in the style approach. What style is it?
I think Douglas leadership style is based on relationship behavior, as it is mentioned that Douglas is a strong supporter of social events outside the work. Moreover during his first year of Director he spend lot of time in developing the culture of his department which clearly shows that he was towards the relationship behavior among the employees of his department. His effort towards the sponsorship of a soccer team is also a plus point towards his leadership style. Moreover, I believe his plan of Friday Lunch and meeting with team leads in order to know their needs and how they are performing shows that Douglas was more into relationship behavior style due to which most people in the department gives positive reviews about him as a Director.
Q2. Does is it sound as if it is effective in the context of a design department at a furniture company?
To me Douglas’s effort will also be effective in design department at a furniture company. Douglas was serving as Vice President earlier and holds a reputation as a Leader at his previous company. As a Director in a new company he started with a great leadership style. Douglas leadership style focused on developing a culture of the department, his effort like holiday open house invitation to all employees which was catered by the company was considered “first class” among the employees made him successful in developing department’s culture. Moreover he introduced a new department schedule meeting so that everyone can share his or her thoughts, ideas and concerns. Unlike the previous Director who spent most of his time monitoring projects and timelines, Douglas strategy was different. Dougl...
... middle of paper ...
...ne as the reasons why this leadership style is so important to leadership research.
Transformational leadership is based on charisma designed to motivate and inspire. Transformational leaders redefine or change the status quo in order to enact a vision of a more satisfactory future state and they help followers to go beyond their own interests and consider the moral and ethical implications of their actions and goals (Avolio, 1999). This is why transformational leadership is often defined as the new leadership.
Transformational leadership is the most effective of the three styles (laissez faire, transactional, and transformational) in relation to follower effort, commitment, performance, and satisfaction (Bass, 1995). Perhaps as a result, more research has been done on transformational leadership than the other leadership styles combined. This research is based
Transformational leadership is defined as a “process whereby a person engages with others and creates a connection that raises
“..the transformational leader articulates the vision in a clear and appealing manner, explains how to attain the vision, acts confidently and optimistically, expresses confidence in the followers, emphasizes values with symbolic actions, leads by example, and empowers followers to achieve the vision (Yukl, 2002)
According to Fiedler (cited in Bolden, Gosling, Marturano & Dennison, 2003)., there is no single characteristic or trait that will create a successful leadership style. Rather, he argues that situations actually shape a general leadership style of a manager. Bolden, Gosling, Marturano and Dennison (2003) have observed that within an environment with repetitive tasks, the most effective leadership style might be a directive one, while a participative leadership style might be required in a dynamic environment. Being an effective leader means to control important specific situations. Taking into account these situations, Fiedler presented three situational components that are considered essential for an effective leadership: leader-member relations, task-structure and position power.
Transformational leadership describes a leader moving followers beyond immediate self-interests through idealized influence (charisma), inspiration motivation, intellectual stimulation, or individualized consideration. Transformational leaders are change agents. They influence the mission and objectives to make way for a brighter future for the organization. Followers are motivated to do more than is originally expected because of their feelings of trust and respect for the leader.
Transformational leadership consists of few components which are idealized influence, inspirational motivation, intellectual stimulation, individualized consideration, management by exception and contingent rewards (Ahmad et al.,
This style allowed some flexibility for the Institutes leadership to develop standards and processes coherent with the vision without Cosgrove having to micromanage every actions. Out of all of Goleman’s proposed leadership styles Affiliative truly values relationships through building relationships and communications. Both Cosgrove and Toussaint used this approach. This style in my opinion is likely intuitive by both leaders. Developing and cultivating relationship is the most important skill a leader can possess. Demoractic leadership style focuses on collaboration and consensus through team input and buy-in. ThedaCare’s Toussaint use of this style was evident in the Wisconsin Collabarative Healthcare Quality. He was able to convene and develop a consensus among eight hospital CEOs for regional quality and cost reporting, Pacesetting when used sparing in dire situations where rapid change is needed. This style can be used to establish a sense of urgency. Cosgrove used this style to move services around patient conditions as quickly as possible, for example establishing the Neurological Institute around 10 multiple disciplinary centers. He attempted to provide a seamless integration from medical
I also took the DiSC Work of Leaders Profile to analyze my style. The results indicate I fall between Steadiness and Conscientiousness, leaning more towards Steadiness which gives me the style SC. The three leadership priorities closest to my style dot of SC reveal I am humble, inclusive and deliberate. This indicates I like a work environment of collaboration assisting others in achieving their goals. People see me as calm, reliable, dependable and sensible. ...
A relationship is shared between the leader and the follower based on 4 individual styles. Instead of using just one style, successful leaders should change their leadership styles based on the maturity of the people they're leading and the details of the task. Lt Commander Ron Hunter High Systematic Style: People with the Systematic Style tend to be objective, thorough, and accurate, making them excellent problem solvers. High Considerate style: People with the Considerate Style are reliable and considerate, making them great team members. Spirited Style: Captain Frank Ramsey High Direct Style: Tend to maintain a fast pace and work single-mindedly towards goals.
Transformational leadership is one of the most popular leadership styles. According to Kendrick (2011), “Transformational leadership involves four factors: 1. idealized influence, 2. inspirational motivation, 3. intellectual stimulation, and 4. individual consideration.” These four factors make transformational leadership have an impact on followers. The goal of transformational leadership is to cause a positive change in individuals, help motivate them, and develop a leader within each individual.
The leadership style that was possessed here was autocratic leadership. Autocratic leadership involves the leader making decisions and using power to control the situation and others Kelly, P.,
2 .Analyze Roary’s leadership style. When might this style be appropriate? What might be some disadvantages of this style?
Walker Presented the five leadership styles. While making a strategic decision, if a correct management variety will not be followed then it is going to lead to failure of the decision. For that reason, the company will have to comprehend which leadership form must be used that suits the strategic decision. The trade atmosphere of today’s world is more competitive. Business enterprise should use first-rate administration and management advantage in making strategic decisions to achieve organizational objectives. An excellent leadership style is required for the agency to be successful. If proper management sort just isn't adopted the enterprise would now not be in a position to acquire its industry goals. As Gosling suggested that management has plan and methods and so they specializes in execution of the process, at the same time a leader continues human resource, it direct the employees, manage, coordinate and encourage them to execute the process with their first-class efficiency to accomplish the final mission of the
Workers typically report higher levels of job satisfaction in such environments, and the company often benefits from increased creativity. On the downside, the democratic process is slower and may not be practical in workplaces where fast decision-making is a necessity. The next leadership style is bureaucratic leadership. Bureaucratic leadership is normally used in highly regulated, administrative workplaces, where the rules are more strictly followed and a concrete hierarchy is vital. These leaders ensure people follow the rules and accomplish tasks “by the book.” Naturally, this works well in roles such as health and safety, but can also prevent innovation and creativity in more fast-paced companies. The eighth common style of leadership is charismatic leadership. There is some overlap between charismatic and transformational leadership. Both heavily rely on the positive charm and personality of the respective leader. However, charismatic leadership is typically considered less favorable because success is closely linked to the leader being present. While transformational leaders build confidence in a team that remains upon absence, the removal of a charismatic leader typically leaves the opposite effect. The ninth and final style of leadership is situational leadership. Developed by management experts Paul Hersey and Ken Blanchard in 1969,
In this paper I will look at the four major leadership styles, their characteristics, advantages, disadvantages, and in what situations a particular leadership style is desired. Additionally, I will look at my leadership style and how I acquired this style throughout my career.
Transformational leaders are needed to transform low performing organizations to acceptable to high performance. At other times, the leader is expected to move an organization from a crisis. In order to accomplish these tasks, the leader must overhaul the organization culture or subculture. This task is accomplished by nine ways of transforming others: 1. Raise others awareness. The leader makes others aware of the rewards and how to achieve them, i.e. pride in the job or financial incentives. 2. Help others look beyond self-interest. The transformational leader helps others to look at the “big picture” by describing an entire scenario, i.e. if we hire more employees to do x, we will have to make cuts in other areas. 3. Help people find self-fulfillment. The leader helps others not to focus on minor satisfactions, i.e. getting a job done before the deadline ...