Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Existence of god
Existence of god
God and the controversial existence of god
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Existence of god
Nothing in life is certain. One can never truly be sure of anything. In fact life is a constant struggle between doubt and certainty. We are constantly reminded that certainty in a future profession or dream will lead to success but this is simply not true. When we look at everything that is believed to be true, how do we know that it is true with absolute certainty? Certainty in and of itself is unobtainable. As humans beings we have doubts about everything no matter how desperately we want to believe it is true.
Doubt is what allows us to be creative which in turn leads to innovation and ingenuity. It is ingenuity which has allowed inventors like the Wright brothers to be able to construct machines which were previously thought to be impossible.
The existence of God has sparked debate for centuries and the argument has split into two separate sides: believers and nonbelievers.On one hand, one might question whether it has been scientifically proven that a higher, supreme power exists. On the other hand, just because its existence has not been proven, at least according to some circles, does it naturally follow that a supreme power does not exist? After all, many scientific concepts that used to ‘not exist’, are very much part of our current reality, such as bacteria and the concept of atoms. However, even in the very process of comparing the two sides, one is doubting, extrapolating that either could be
It can stop a person from ever trying anything because they are afraid of failing. They could spend their whole life wondering if they could achieve their dream, all the while never attempting to try. While certainty is most commonly associated with success, it can also lead to disastrous results. An example of when certainty lead to failure was when Robert E. Lee, General of the Confederate army, lost the Battle of Gettysburg during the American Civil War. His plan of taking the war North and exposing the true social fabric of the South lead to his defeat. Lee’s certainty originally came from his prior victories and his escape from Sharpsburg. However his experience had not taught him that all good things come to an end. His certainty failed him and he lost the battle and ultimately the
The controversial topic involving the existence of God has been the pinnacle of endless discourse surrounding the concept of religion in the field of philosophy. However, two arguments proclaim themselves to be the “better” way of justifying the existence of God: The Cosmological Argument and the Mystical Argument. While both arguments attempt to enforce strict modus operandi of solidified reasoning, neither prove to be a better way of explaining the existence of God. The downfall of both these arguments rests on commitment of fallacies and lack of sufficient evidence, as a result sabotaging their validity in the field of philosophy and faith.
If God did not exist, he would not be the greatest being imaginable. He is the greatest thing imaginable. Therefore, he does exist. From this argument, God’s existence is viewed. as necessary (Ayer. A. J. 1973).
It is controversial if existence is a general class that can be categorized into existence in the mind and existence in reality or if there are multiple levels of existence. It is also controversial that there are only two categories of existence, if at all it can be categorized. Hence, for a supreme being, for which, as suggested by Thomas Aquinas, it is not very clear whether humans can perceive all of its qualities, a conclusion that God does not solely exists in the mind, should not lead to a conclusion that it exists in
Stenger, Victor. J. 2007. God: The Failed Hypothesis—How Science Shows That God Does Not Exist. New York: Prometheus Books.
Bertrand Russell, a renowned analytic philosopher, argues about the existence of God in his article “Is there a God?” (1952). For most of his life Russell held the opinion that religions are meant to instill distress and helplessness into people’s minds and belief in religion is the major cause for all the deadly conflicts that have occurred in the past. In his article “Is there a God?” Russell discusses how theologians have been presenting their arguments to prove God’s existence and then gives his own reflection on their thoughts. Questioning God’s existence and giving arguments that refute such beliefs could turn into a controversial discussion and many theists, who have blind faith in God’s existence, find such arguments offensive to their beliefs. Taking the sensitive nature of this subject into account, Russell’s article does not display any offensive characteristics and the way he dealt with this issue by taking a neutral stance should be appreciated. Most of his arguments are remarkably convincing, even for theists, and make the reader think about God’s existence rationally. His way of dealing with the issue through rational means is what makes this article suitable for both theists and atheists. However, at some instances, Russell’s bias towards atheism can be observed by pointing out fallacies in his arguments.
The existence of god has been relentlessly debated with many strong arguments. This essay will primarily discuss the most prevalent arguments for and against the existence of a higher being. Although there are many strong arguments for both atheism and theism, ultimately the theist point of view is greater justified morally and logically.
Skepticisms arise when we think there is no enough reason or good reason to accept certain facts. In fact, this actually helps us to stop and think about whether what we think of as the truth is actually true or false, and this also helps us to question certain things that we take for granted. This may be a good thing but on the other side there is no guarantee that we will come up with better answers than the previous ones by constant questioning. Take the example of a child, when one talks with a very young child with full of curiosity, the child often asks a question and, even after their questions are addressed, the child still asks “why” to the answers given. The Why Conversation goes on until the person answering the questions gets annoyed or ends it with a statement that lacks explanation. Therefore, the conversation often ends when the person reaches a point where he can no longer answer the questions. As seen above, skepticism can be illustrated in the “Why Conversation.”, which substantiates the assumptions in the title. Consequently, this essay will attempt to investigate how skepticism can work as a tool to broaden or limit our knowledge.
Creation in and of itself is an indisputable example of the existence of a higher being. The very existence of our universe and the things in it proves beyond a doubt that the...
Instinctually, humans know that there is a greater power in the universe. However, there are a few who doubt such instinct, citing that logically we cannot prove such an existence. St. Thomas Aquinas, in his Summa Theologica, wrote of five proofs for the existence of God. The Summa Theologica deals with pure concepts; these proofs rely on the world of experience - what one can see around themselves. In these proofs, God will logically be proven to exist through reason, despite the refutes against them.
Many atheists have used science as a way to disapprove the existence of God. Science is not an accurate way of disapproving the existence of God(2). Scient...
Nobody wants to be wrong. It is associated with “shame, stupidity, ignorance, indolence, psychopathology, and moral degeneracy” (Schulz). Also, as people, we revel in other’s wrongness as much as we do our own accuracy, which has created an environment in which being wrong is unnerving to the point of a possible, legitimate fear. But not only is our society giving us the fear of being wrong, life is. Our existence is dependent on making accurate conclusions (Schulz). If humans couldn’t make accurate conclusions, then death would be upon each person extremely prematurely; therefore, a fear of being wrong is completely legitimate, but it is also mildly vacuous. Everyone is wrong at some point. Augustine said, “fallor ergo sum” which means “I err therefore I am” (Schulz). Being wrong is not only apart of who we are, but it also makes us into who we are. Fallibility is human and makes each person whom he or she is. It can allow us to change our worldviews, learn, and look through a “window into normal human nature”. Of course though, a sense of omniscience is seemingly the natural state of the human mind, while the opposite is generally true. Being wrong is much like death in that it happens to all and very few can accept it (Schulz). So, can one simply learn a lot and know everything to avoid being wrong? Quite the opposite is true, as Ro...
On the other hand, many well-known scientists now admit that certain discoveries tend to indicate that God rather does exist than not. The problem, I suggest, lies in certain preconceptions. If we picture God as a person, then the question comes up: where is God?
“Nothing can be known with certainty'; Is this statement true? Are you certain? In this essay I plan to show that nothing can be known with certainty, I will examine the truth and certainty of life and of humans, and prove that nothing can be known for certain.
... that can ever be certain is a philosophical idea called “Solipsism”. This theory determines that the only thing that can be known for sure is the self. I can be sure that I exist, and that I think. However, this theory also has its complications, because there can only be one solipsist. Therefore, there is no means of proving this hypothesis. I believe that different ways of knowing immensely affect our perception of truth. It appears unfathomable to be certain that anyone can see the truth, because the different ways of knowing influence our perception of what we believe to be ‘reality’. ‘Truth’ is formed in our minds. In my opinion, what is true and what is believed to be true cannot be discerned; I believe that we form a truth in our own minds, and that we consciously choose to believe in it, because we have no other way of being certain about our reality.
Many people are also afraid of the “unknown”. The unknown could refer to what might happen tomorrow...