Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The short bus essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The short bus essay
The children’s short story Don’t Let the Pigeon Drive the Bus by Mo Willems has many good qualities, including character and audience interaction, simplistic illustrations, and excellent examples of a dialogue- driven plot. Readers will be intrigued with this short story. The criteria chosen in critiquing this book, demonstrates how well the story interacted with the reader, and how this book succeeded in keeping the attention of its audience. A major key in the successful of Don’t Let the Pigeon Drive the Bus was the immediate interaction the bus driver had with the reader when the reader was asked to watch the bus while he was away. But the task did not end there, the number one rule was, “Whatever you do, DO NOT LET THE PIGEON DRIVE THE BUS!” (Willem). Such an easy task one may assume, but this pigeon was no ordinary pigeon. He was very manipulative and quite convincing in his strategies to get the reader to give in. One quite clever example by the author was the page where he used numerous tactics such as bribery and guilt to wheel and deal with the reader. This simple but genius script allows the reader to control the situation by obtaining the power to continuously tell the pigeon, “NO!” It engages the reader to continue reading to find out what other scheme or pleas the pigeon may come up with next. A personal …show more content…
favorite plead is when the pigeon says, “I bet your Mom would let me”, because it shows how the author applied a hint of humor to make the story interesting and relatable for any child that reads it (Willems). Throughout the book, Willems uses short, choppy language, similar to a comic strip. Every time the pigeon talks, Willems used speech bubbles that helped make the written language very playful and easy to understand. Like mentioned before, the pigeon continuously begs in an attempt to persuade us, as readers, to give him permission to drive the bus. A very unique aspect of this book was the way Willems wanted the readers to answer back and decide whether or not to give into the cunning temptation. Willems makes this book very fun to read and will have any age group laughing from the sassy and witty language. Mo Willems not only is the witty author of Don’t Let the Pigeon Drive the Bus but is also the illustrator. Willems is a well-known cartoonist, and this children’s book is a prime example of why he received success. The pictures are unlike many pictures typically seen in children’s books. Each background page is a light tan color, which helps children focus directly on the baby blue pigeon and the white speech bubbles. The simplistic pigeon sketches and speech bubbles allow the story to flow. A favorite portion of the entire book was when Willems split two pages into 8 different squares and each square had a pigeon with a different plead. Every picture of the pigeon’s expressions match perfectly with what he is saying. Willems’ decision to make the book like a comic was great because the language was simple and so was the visual aspect. Although the language was simple and the illustrations were effective, younger readers may be influenced by tantrums, disrespectful responses, negotiating out of tasks, or asserting guilt or bribery to get one’s way.
Willems’ creative way of enticing the reader also allows the reader to reenact similar behaviors. The pigeon was told “No” numerous times but he continued to manipulate the reader and after several failed attempts he experienced an out of control freak out, which is illustrated as a tantrum. The pigeon sees red and explodes into a rage and demands to drive the bus. The book’s background changes from light muted tones to a deep
saturated orange and the script flips from white speech bubbles to large bold black letters highlighted in bright yellow displaying the pigeon’s demand. What message is this portraying to younger children who are easily influenced? Is it appropriate to behave in such manner? According to the illustration it is. This shows that when one does not get their way it is appropriate to act in a similar manner. An Amazon customer review of Don’t Let the Pigeon Drive the Bus states: “A great book for masochists who love temper tantrums and want to teach their kids new ways to misbehave. The story involves a pigeon whining more and more obnoxiously as it demands to drive the bus. I experience enough whining from my kid and the LAST thing I want to do is model for her other ways in which she can refuse to take "no" for an answer and to lose her temper when she doesn't get her way. Worse, there isn't any kind of lesson at the end that that kind of behavior is totally unacceptable -- the message is that this is HILARIOUS!” -public_amazon_name (Amazon). Don’t Let the Pigeon Drive the Bus does display a tantrum showing younger readers the perspective of a parent giving the reader first hand experience of dealing with inappropriate behavior. Since the fate of the bus is in the hands of the reader it teaches the reader to follow through with the directions of the bus driver even when given a difficult task. This book successfully engages the reader and its audience with its minimalistic approach. Mo Willems’ brilliance is show cased throughout his strategic audience dialogue- driven plot.
Imagine waking up to beautiful freshwater streams and wildlife foraging through the mountainside. This is what citizens of Pigeon Forge, Tennessee get to wake up to ever day. Pigeon Forge is a small town near the border of South Carolina. It sits along the edge of the Cherokee National Forest and on the west side of Little Pigeon River. It is not only located in a beautiful area, but also a thriving area economically speaking. Overall, Pigeon Forge is a family friendly place where people can not only live in a beautiful city, but also exciting environment.
The females begin responding “stiffly” rather than “quietly”(7) as before. This adjective usage serves to support the speech even more by allowing readers to see the progression from silence to a bold rebellion in the women regarding their husbands, for “by hiding the canary Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peters are also going against their husbands” (Bee2). Indeed, this act was the major act of defiance that secured the women’s strengthened devotions to each other rather than their husbands. Peters especially undergoes a drastic transformation when she eventually joins in as “support of her fellow oppressed women” (Block B 1). When, at the climax of the story, the bird is hidden from the men in the sentimental tin box, Glaspell exhibits the tension with the selection of detail. She chooses to focus on the clammy hands of Mrs. Peters as she stuffs the tin away and the quivering voice of Mrs. Hale as she denies knowing any information about the crime. The descriptions of the seemingly miniscule and weakening objects around her house match the “quiet desperation” (Schotland 3) Foster repressed until it overflowed the night before. Considering that the adjectives show how burdensome it is for the women to conceal the evidence, it truly demonstrates how strong the relationships between them has grown based
Mary Oliver’s unique responses to the owls illustrate the complexity of nature by displaying its two sides. Mary Oliver at first enjoys owls and all they have to offer, yet she later emphasizes her fear of a similar animal. The visual imagery she uses in her descriptions
Firstly, in Anne Lamott’s Bird by Bird she uses several literary tools to craft her writing style and convey important information. Lamott’s tone is very likable and relatable. She allows for room discussion and does not give off an arrogant vibe that many published writers are prone to. She utilizes contemporary, conversational tone throughout her writing. As a result, the readers feel personally engaged, as if she is talking directly to them. Lamott even uses the word...
Updike, John. "A & P." Pigeon Feathers and Other Stories. (New York : Knopf, 1962).
Also, the author’s intention of mentioning that the bus and the passengers were departing could be to reemphasize Charley’s isolation. The author tends to list out Charley’s struggles and the events from the war to increase the effect it left on the reader, emphasizing the grief in Charley’s life. As the passage progresses, the reader learns about the child who Charley initially ignores. However, the spatial description of Charley and the boy is very metaphoric. A key scene in the passage is that of the boy on the bicycle near the gates of the graveyard....
The story “A Brutal Murder in a Public Place” by Joyce Carol Oates follows a person in an airport who hears a small bird but cannot seem to find it. Oates uses imagery and symbolism between the narrator and the bird to show how trapped and overlooked the narrator truly feels.
Erdich , Louise “The Red Convertible” 1984.Schalfel and Ridl 126 – 133. Schakel, Pete, and Jack Ridl. Eds. Approaching Literature Reading + Thinking + Writing. 3rd Ed. Boston: Bedford/ St Martin, 2011. Sprint.
Margaret Laurence 's novel A Bird in the House is a collection of independent and intertwined short stories written from Vanessa MacLeod 's point of view. As an adult looking back on her childhood, the protagonist examines how she, and essentially everyone in her life, experiences a sense of entrapment and a need to escape. Because the author begins and concludes the novel with the Brick House, the major theme of escape is shown to have developed in Vanessa as she matures through childhood and adolescence and becomes an adult.
...readers on their toes from what was going to happen next. When Colin was depressed that he had lost yet another girl he loved, Katherine nineteen, Hassan showed up to commiserate with him. However, Hassan was not there simply to sympathize with Colin, he was there on a mission. “You have a very complicated problem with a very simple solution” Hassan said (Green 11). The reader had to keep reading to see what Hassan meant about the solution to Colin’s problem. The solution ended up being a road trip.
perceive the novel in the rational of an eleven-year-old girl. One short, simple sentence is followed by another , relating each in an easy flow of thoughts. Gibbons allows this stream of thoughts to again emphasize the childish perception of life’s greatest tragedies. For example, Gibbons uses the simple diction and stream of consciousness as Ellen searches herself for the true person she is. Gibbons uses this to show the reader how Ellen is an average girl who enjoys all of the things normal children relish and to contrast the naive lucidity of the sentences to the depth of the conceptions which Ellen has such a simplistic way of explaining.
Bird usually portrays an image of bad luck that follows afterwards and in this novel, that is. the beginning of all the bad events that occur in the rest of the novel. It all started when Margaret Laurence introduced the life of Vanessa MacLeod. protagonist of the story, also known as the granddaughter of a calm and intelligent woman. I am a woman.
introduced us to the two different kinds of exposition ;( Moon & Birdboot and Simon & Mrs Drudge). Our aim for this exercise was to understand the different uses of exposition; the very easy, flowing. subtle exposition of Moon and Birdboot compared to the "in your face" comic exposition of Mrs. Drudge. To do this we first read through the text in our for, this had already been read thought to us although it became clear we had little understanding of it, by acting the scenes. we were bringing them to life, therefore increasing our understanding.
Upon learning of Armstrong’s motive, Isobel attempts to hang herself. As Isobel lies helpless on the floor, fighting for one last breath, Stephenson illustrates that Isobel’s “heels flutter almost imperceptibly” (92). Later, everyone gathers around Isobel’s dead body much like they did around the fluttering bird in the first experiment. “But this time Isobel, in her coffin, has taken the place of the bird in the air pump”(96). The fact that now a dead Isobel symbolizes the bird implies that this time the experiment has gone dreadfully wrong. The fact that the second experiment fails harbors a much more solemn consequence than if the first had failed. If the bird in the first experiment had died, tears would have been shed only until the purchase of a new bird. Not only does Armstrong sacrifice a human life in the name of science, but he symbolically diminishes all that the bird and Isobel represent. Isobel’s death implies the demise of freedom, will, and humanity.
...the last straw. As Ibsen uses animal imagery, once again, to define Nora as a dove caught in a hawk's claw, the reader realizes the irony. Nora is no longer trapped. Nora the lark is now able to spread her wings to fly. Ibsen's animal imagery proves to be a powerful means to show the character of Nora as the lark, squirrel, dove and finally, ironically, the hawk.