Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Trump's inaugural speech rhetorical analysis
Donald trumps inauguration speech analysis
Analysis of president speech
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Trump's inaugural speech rhetorical analysis
Title
Thesis: Donald Trump uses facts and statistics and examples to effectively persuade his supporters that he would make the best president for this country.
Introduction
Facts and Statistics A. Homicides B. Immigration C. Trump uses facts and statistics to show that America, at this point, only has room to get better and that he is the best person to fix this nation and to make it as great as it once was. II. Examples A. Illegal immigration issues B. Hillary Clinton 's roles in previous government decisions C. Trump also uses the examples in his speech to show how Clinton has only made the country worse and that she will continue to do so if she is elected president.
Trump delivered this speech to his supporters to further prove to them that he deserves to be President of the United States. Trump used many rhetorical devices to try to convince the public that he would make a much better Hillary Clinton. Donal Trump uses facts and statistics and examples to effectively persuade his supporters that he would make the best president for this
While he used the facts and statistics to support his argument about illegal immigration, he also used examples and stories to help get his point across about the subject. He tells about the many people that have lost their lives to immigrants that have crossed the border illegally. He tells these stories to show the side of illegal immigrants that he wants people to see. He also tells these stories to appeal to people 's emotions and to upset them, whether that be by making them mad or by making them sad. When he talks about the people that were killed by the illegal immigrants he makes sure to include that he has met with the victims family 's so people will belive that he is a good man that cares about the American people. He also uses examples when he talks about Clinton 's previous experience and how he thinks she has contributed to the down fall of this country. When ever he talks about Clinton most of the time it seems that he is attacking her and her ideas. He talks about the policies and trade deals that she has been apart of, but he does not speak highly of them. He talks about how they are some of the worst political and ecomomical decisions that have ever been made. The way he speaks about her also appeals to peoples emotions because if you had never heard Hillary Clinton speak or heard her ideas and all you had to go off of you would probably be upset with her and the way she
It is spread throughout his essay, starting with the statistic he provides. The statistic states, “We are advised that in order to secure the boarders, we must deport 12 million people. Never mind who they are or where they and that it could cost up to $230 billion to do it.”(Schwarzenegger, 26) That appeals to pathos because that is a lot of money and its innocent people getting deported. Mr. Schwarzenegger uses 9/11 to his advantage also. Before 9/11 Congress assumed everyone had good intentions; after 9/11 Congress feels like they cannot assume that anymore. 9/11 is a part of pathos because it was a very traumatic event when the towns fell and, many people died. He also appeals to the family providers by using the example of the father not letting fences stop his dreams of providing for his family. Schwarzenegger also used the fact that some charities are being punished for helping immigrants.
He is asking questions and answering them about people who recommend breaking some laws and obeying some other laws.() These questions make his argument better because when he asks questions, it makes reader to think about them, and when he answers them logically, it makes reader to agree with ideas.
Bush opens his speech by acknowledging the events of September 11, and those that lost the lives of loved ones and to those that gave their life trying to save others in the buildings. He appeals to those that remain strong by saying that, “These acts of mass murder were intended to frighten our nation into chaos and retreat. But they have failed. Our country is strong.” His use of pathos helps Bush to calm and control the public in order to keep the country together. This
He implements this emotional appeal into his speech to involve all Americans—people living in the United States of America, regardless of their ethnicity, race, or culture, and to acknowledge that the American people have endured this together, and that they will continue to advance after this event with stronger resolve, stronger than ever. In addition, he implements personification to motivate and empower the American people. “Our nation, this generation, will lift a dark threat of violence from our people and our future” (Bush, 2001). “This generation”, again a synonym for the American people, with its unwavering resolve, will fight for its freedom persistently. He intimates that the future of America and of democratic freedom is in the hands of the American people; that the American people have the power to control their fate.
of patriotism in his speech. He wants America to be proud even in the face of
Bush’s method of topic by topic argument along with many emotional appeals was a rather effective way of winning the audience’s support. By appealing to the emotions of the audience Bush was able to give the audience issues they could relate to as well as issues they would feel strongly about. With an emotionally involved audience Bush was able to gather a great number of supporters of his party, just as he intended in his original purpose. The further reference to the character of the people involved in the issues really paid off by drawing the crowd closer to the people working for them. With the topical structure and the appeals used, the speech was a very effective tool in gaining support for the Republican Party from the northern Arizonan audience.
immigrant discrimination. He uses good sources and a well organized argument to get his point
He mentions the very recent violence that occurred in Selma, Alabama; where African Americans were attacked by police while preparing to march to Montgomery to protest voting rights discrimination. Without mentioning this violent event that occurred a week prior, there would not be much timeliness to his argument, and it wouldn’t have been as effective. The timeliness of his argument gave the speech a lot more meaning, and it heightened the emotions of many who heard the address. He is appealing to the emotions of many American people, both Congressmen and ordinary citizens, to encourage them to support his cause. He reminds us of all of the Americans around the world that are risking their lives for our freedom.
Clinton uses pathos the moment she starts giving the speech because as a woman she can relate to every word she says and at the same time speak for those women that want to fight for their rights, “As an American I want to speak for those women” (Clinton). Clinton repeats the words “If women” followed by “will” (Clinton). This gives the audience a reason to accept her propositions. Good outcomes come with good actions.
Repeatedly Donald Trump is witnessed at the Grand Old Party Debates, press conferences and even during his Tweet expressions, displaying the very demeanor that is disturbing to many voters. As stated by columnist John Hawkins and on the Blog Website townhall.com, he characterizes the following comments as Donald Trump's best quotes. "I think the big problem this country has is being politically correct. I've been challenged by so many people, and I don't frankly have time for total political correctness. And to be honest with you, this country doesn't have time either." (Hawkins, 2015, para.
The presidential election in year 2016 has been described as both outrageous and strange. Media from all over the world has covered every debate and the reactions at the outcome have been apparent in almost every country. The choice between businessman Donald Trump, the Republican candidate, and former secretary of state Hillary Clinton, the Democratic candidate, has caused several politicians and notable people to publically endorse their personal favorite - both on social media or at formal political gatherings. An example of the latter is Michelle Obama’s speech “Remarks by the First Lady” at the 2016 Democratic National Convention.
common American people of the United States could understand. He uses historical facts and events to
As a result of extreme hard work and perseverance followed by an unmatchable drive to succeed, Donald J. Trump has earned the right to be known as a multi-billionaire, real estate icon, and President of the United States of America. Reflecting on his life, he has faced many challenges and overcame them all. To understand how he rose to success and his journey to the top of the kingpin, it is important to recognize how he saw the American dream and pursued it. Today, many recognize him as the president, but very few can fully grasp all that he has done in his life. From his start as a real estate mogul, to his impact on the media, there are many questions as to how he became so recognizable today.
Clinton’s use of several methods and techniques make his argument the most effective and conveying to his audience. In Bush’s speech, “Ending Racial Inequality”, he discusses various issues such as the gap of achievement between the rich
Donald Trump is very effective in the article because of his easy to understand language, tone, use of parallelism, and style. As a politician running for office, he has to make sure the terms he uses can be understood by the audience without a fail. If he throws in an professional word, the audience could get caught on its definition rather than the content of his speech. Throughout the whole article, there is not one word or phrase that would require prior knowledge to comprehend. Even if the content is clear, a politician must speak the words appropriately to be taken seriously by the audience. If Trump were to be comedic about the severity of guns, the public would disapprove of him and his ratings would decline. Donald Trump’s tone is serious, caring, and a mixture between angry and passionate. He has to be serious about guns, since they are a deadly weapon. In addition, there have been numerous violent school shootings and riots that have occurred recently making the subject grimmer. He adds in a sense of compassion when he brings up the idea of fixing the mental