Don T Sherman Research Paper

677 Words2 Pages

Most people recognize General William T. Sherman (a union general) as a Civil war hero, but is he really? Personally, I don’t think that he is a war hero at all. He is held accountable for over 4 war crimes (though some believe there are more). Therefore, he is guilty by his own divulgence. Sherman was a very logical man, even from a young age, but sometimes his logic deceived him. By the time Sherman was in his mid 40’s he already had 4 war crimes under his belt. Since I’m already on the topic of war crimes, let me define it for you: an action carried out during the conduct of war that violates accepted international rules of war. Now, I know that they did not have the rules of war that we have now, but killing over 2,000 people and sending starving families away just so you can make yourself look good? Now that just isn’t right. Just imagine that you are one of the 50 families that were sent out of their hometown. Just imagine that your entire life work has just …show more content…

Hood ( a CSA general). Sherman was writing Hood to ask him to remove the 50 families somewhere else, so he didn’t have to watch them starve. Although Sherman may sound like he has a smidge of humanity left, I believe that he was attempting to hide his true intentions of just sending the families off without food to try to prove himself and how “tough” he can be. Also, to quote Sherman’s letter to hood, “ with all their movable effects, viz, clothing, trunks, reasonable furniture, bedding, &c.” (http://www.civilwarhome.com/shermanhood1.html) How can they take all of their things when Sherman burned almost all of it?! He is most definitely trying to make a cover up for himself by saying that he doesn’t want to watch him starve, but if he is sending them away to not watch them starve that means that if they did say he was going to starve them. Therefore, he was basically already going to kill 50 families almost without a second

Open Document