Does the End Ever Justify the Means?

679 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: In short compare and contrast the characters of Cassius and Brutus

Does the end ever really justify the means? This is a phrase that is quite common amongst readers, namely when reading a tragedy such as The Tragedy of Julius Caesar. When reading this drama, a person may sit and ponder this question for quite some time, depending on what side they agree with and how the “justice” was portrayed, and decide if it was even justice at all. My personal opinion on this question after reading Julius Caesar is that the end does justify the means, as I believe Caesar got what he deserved for being such a tyrant in Rome. The use of rhetoric that Shakespeare portrays throughout a majority of the drama can explain a lot in how a person may interpret the question “Does the end ever justify the means?” I personally was drawn to the side of agreement with the conspirators, due to the way that I interpreted the writing through Shakespeare’s use of rhetoric.
In reading The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, the use of rhetoric throughout the drama played a key role in my opinion of who was right to “justify the means”. Personally, I believe that Brutus was right in killing Caesar, since Caesar was nothing more than a tyrant to Rome. Brutus was in fact Caesar’s friend, but when Cassius came to him and opened up his eyes a bit, he soon realized that he cared more for the good of Rome. He still cared for Caesar as a great friend of his, but he wanted what he believed would be best for the Romans. This he portrayed in Caesar’s funeral oration, when he states “Any dear friend of/Caesar’s, to him I say that Brutus’ love to Caesar was/no less than his. If then that friend demand why/Brutus rose against Caesar, this is my answer: Not/that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more./Had you rather Caes...

... middle of paper ...

...sregarding the Roman Senate in order to make himself more powerful (Mark). This showed Caesar’s power hungry side, which justifies my reason for believing that Brutus was right in killing him.
Throughout a tragedy, you will almost always question yourself whether or not “the end justifies the means”. The use of rhetoric an author uses is a key tool to portray the betrayal and deception that takes place in the drama, just like in The Tragedy of Julius Caesar. It causes swaying opinions, and many times second thoughts as to whether or not the end really did justify the means. So, you need to just always sit there and ask yourself: did the end really justify the means?

Works Cited

Mark, Joshua J. Ancient History Encyclopedia. 28 April 2011. 13 May 2014.
Shakespeare. "The Tragedy of Julius Caesar." Shakespeare, William. The Tragedy Of William Shakespeare. n.d. 880.

Show More
Related

  • Brutus and Antony’s Use of Ethos, Logos, and Pathos in Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare

    1103 Words  | 3 Pages

    (877) in order to make the crowd feel complete and utter guilt for their betrayal and anger towards the conspirators who killed their beloved idol. Brutus and Antony’s use of Ethos, Logos, and Pathos throughout the novel are just examples of the everyday persuasion used around us daily, when reading the play it does look like one giant competition to see who is the most persuasive and influential character. Even in today’s economy, companies have to compete for the attention of consumers’ worldwide and politicians who argue their beliefs and views to millions of voters in order to get what they want, because the art of persuasion is just one big game. Works Cited Shakespeare, William. The.

    Read More

  • How Does Anthony Use Ethos In Julius Caesar

    809 Words  | 2 Pages

    In Shakespeare’s play, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, pathos, logos and ethos are evidently and effectively used to persuade the audience into believing Caesar was not ambitious and that he was an innocent man. Throughout the speech the citizens were easily persuaded, but Anthony’s intellectual speeches made the audience question and imagine what they have turned into. Anthony used these three rhetorical appeals to win back the citizens just like many people do today. The power of pathos, logos and ethos in a speech can change one mind in an instant and if successfully used can change a mind to be fully persuaded without confusion.

    Read More

  • Brutus is a Good Leader in William Shakespeare's Julius Caesar

    332 Words  | 1 Pages

    against what Caesar is doing but the point of killing him is to end what he is doing not to

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar and 1984

    1186 Words  | 3 Pages

    Shakespeare, William. “The Tragedy of Julius Caesar”. Elements of Literature. Ed. Deborah Appleman. 4th ed. Texas: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 2009. 843-963.

    Read More

  • Brutus was a cautious, devious, and naive man

    453 Words  | 1 Pages

    Brutus was a devious man, even though what he thought he was doing was right. Brutus told his fellow conspirators to kill Caesar “boldly, but not angerly.”(3.1.256-257) Brutus was one of Caesars right hand men, and yet Brutus kills his own friend. When Antony asks to speak at Caesars funeral, Cassius says no, but Brutus tell him that Antony will speak, but only what Brutus tells him to say. Brutus also embraces the fact that he just killed his friend, and also tells the senators who had just witnessed it to not be afraid, but to stay because ambition has paid its debt.

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar Leadership Essay

    1068 Words  | 3 Pages

    The play ends in a tragic way, as most of the main characters are assassinated or chose to die themselves. In conclusion, Caesar is a man without fear, he believes in himself which leads to his arrogance, which is shown when he ignores the omens. Brutus realizes the faults of his actions and decides that death is the only way to put himself out of his misery. Both men made crucial mistakes which ultimately led to their downfall

    Read More

  • Grievous Ambitions

    862 Words  | 2 Pages

    In William Shakespeare’s Tragedy of Julius Caesar we find that when a leader is wrongfully murdered absolute political chaos ensues. Brutus our protagonist is the poster child for the position of tragic hero, the one who starts off in such a high position and winds up with nothing, but he can only blame himself. As he and several other conspirators plot to kill Caesar for no logical reason other than lust and Caesar’s ambition. He justifies his actions through fallacies and illogical thoughts and his downfall is that he is eventually slain in the same manor as his victim. Brutus has several character flaws that he is unable to over come and this among the cunning of his political enemies leads to his downfall.

    Read More

  • Analysis of William Shakespeare's The Tragedy of Julius Caesar

    1357 Words  | 3 Pages

    Feldman, Kevin, Kevin Feldman, Sharon Vaughan, and Kate Kinsella. The Tragedy of Julius Caesar. Prentice Hall Literature. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall, 2007. 824-923. Print.

    Read More

  • Comparison of the Two Speeches in Julius Caesar

    888 Words  | 2 Pages

    In William Shakespeare's play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, two speeches are given to the people of Rome about Caesar's death. In Act 3, Scene 2 of this play Brutus and Antony both try to sway the minds of the Romans toward their views. Brutus tried to make the people believe he killed Caesar for a noble cause. Antony tried to persuade the people that the conspirators committed an act of brutality toward Caesar and were traitors. The effectiveness and ineffectiveness of both Antony's and Brutus's speech to the people are conveyed through tone and rhetorical devices.

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis of Mark Antony in Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare

    816 Words  | 2 Pages

    “Julius Caesar” by William Shakespeare is the story of the assassination of Julius Caesar. Two speeches were made after his death, one being by Mark Antony. He uses many rhetorical devices in this speech to counter the previous speech and persuade the crowd that the conspirators who killed Caesar were wrong. Rhetoric is the art of persuasion and these many devices strengthen this by making points and highlighting flaws. Antony uses many rhetorical devices, all of which are used to persuade the crowd that the conspirators are wrong and Caesar did not need to be killed.

    Read More

  • Character Motives in William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar

    1184 Words  | 3 Pages

    Throughout this play, readers see what the motives of Cassius, Brutus, and Antony drive each of them to do, and how this affects their outcomes. Though these motives did not lead to a tragic downfall for each of these characters, motives are often taken too far. They prove to be so strong that they blind characters from making educated decisions and having a sense of rationality. The many deaths in this play all started out with one person being motivated to do something, and one things leads to another. Motivation fueled by loyalty can be just as dangerous as motivation fueled by hatred. The strength of that motivation is what can really make it dangerous, and cause lives to be lost.

    Read More

  • Free Julius Caesar Essays: The Tragic Hero

    487 Words  | 1 Pages

    After the murderous confrontation, it was not too late to prevent the anger of Caesar’s allies and the citizens or, even, to avoid future civil war. But it was here that Brutus made his second and third mistakes. Marcus Brutus rose before the Roman populace and attempted to offer a justification of Caesar’s murder. His flawed judgment came when he deemed Antony trustworthy and allowed him to speak at Caesar’s funeral. Brutus naively let Antony draw the mob in his favor. No one could dare refute Antony’s impassioned pleas in behalf of Caesar.

    Read More

  • Cassius vs. Brutus in Julius Caesar

    829 Words  | 2 Pages

    Shakespeare, William. "The Tragedy of Julius Caesar." Houghton Mifflin Company. The Riverside Shakespeare. Ed. G. Blakemore Evans. Boston, 1994.

    Read More

  • The True Nobleman in Julius Caesar's Rome: Brutus

    855 Words  | 2 Pages

    Brutus was one of many Romans with noble bloodlines. Although Brutus was noble, he never used it to get ahead. There are many times when Brutus could have used the fact that he is truly noble but he didn’t. Many people argue that a noble man wouldn’t have killed Caesar. In some ways that is true, but Brutus’ case was different. A noble man would only for the good of others and that is what Brutus did. He killed Caesar because 7he was afraid of how powerful he could become. Even then he had a hard time doing it, and that is what separates Brutus from the other conspirators. Every other conspirator had little or no reason to kill Caesar. Brutus was willing to do anything for Rome. During his speech about Caesar’s murder Brutus stated “I have the same dagger for myself when it shall please my country to need my death” (III.ii.45-46). This shows how Caesar, this is my answer: not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more” (III.ii.20-22). He was too passionate about his country to let Caesar turn it into a dictatorship. Mark Antony and Octavius recognized that Brutus was the one noble roman. In his final speech mark Antony said “This was the noblest roman of them all. / All the conspirators save only he/ Did that they did i...

    Read More

  • The Analysis of Brutus

    515 Words  | 2 Pages

    In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, a play by William Shakespeare, there is a man most noble above all others. His name is Marcus Brutus. Brutus was the man responsible for the death of Caesar who was his close friend. Though Caesar had been betrayed, no one was more melancholy than Brutus himself. Brutus would not kill his best friend without cause or without reason, however. After analyzing Brutus’ participation in the conspiracy, friendship to Caesar, and his significance to the plot, the truth can finally be understood.

    Read More

More about Does the End Ever Justify the Means?

Open Document