Does Gender Matter In Sociology

1615 Words4 Pages

We employ a social networks perspective to answer our primary research question: does gender matter in the academic profession of sociology? Our empirical approach focuses on how the gender composition of a core group of people who provide instrumental support to scholars in the field of sociology has evolved over time. Rather than drawing attention to simply whether the presence of women is disproportionately small in the field, we seek to understand whether there are differences in the relative influence exerted by men and women within the profession of sociology- that is, we focus not on the exclusion of women but rather on how women are included in the communal process of providing feedback. In academia, where the reputation of scholars …show more content…

Both theoretical and pragmatic reasons motivated the selection of Sociology as our field of study. First, a lion’s share of the work on the under-representation of women in academic disciplines has been done in the STEM fields and not in the social sciences (Beede et al. 2011; Cheryan & Plaut, 2010; Clark, 2005; Xu, 2008). The facts that gender is a part of everyday language in sociology and that the sociological enterprise is deeply cognizant about the role of gender in social life have detracted attention away from extant gender disparities within the field. Second, a deep institutional knowledge about the players in the discipline is inevitably necessary to make sense of acknowledgment networks. This is because unlike citation networks, authors sometimes acknowledge familiar people using their monikers, and at other times they do not. Only those embedded within a particular discipline would be conversant with the use of such names in their field. Further, we chose the five aforementioned sociological journals because: (1) they ranked highly on the h-5 index (Jacobs, 2011) and the Web of Knowledge Journal of Citation Report 2012 Eigenfactor Score ; and (2) given the empirical impracticalities of analyzing all highly …show more content…

Based on the number of ties a node has, its reach to all other nodes, and its position in controlling the flow between other nodes, Freeman (1978) classified three measures of centrality: degree, closeness, and betweenness. The weighted degree of the node is the sum of the weights attached to the ties connected to a node (Barrat et al., 2004). Betweenness centrality is based on “the identification of the shortest paths, and measures the number of them that passes through a node” (Opsahl et al. 2010, p. 247). In a weighted network, the quickest path may be through nodes that are stronger and have more frequent ties than through a weak direct tie (see Opsahl et al., 2010). Closeness centrality refers to the average distance from a node to all other nodes in the network. The closeness centrality measure is somewhat limited in its applicability when there are disconnected components in our network and is restricted in its use within the giant component (see Opsahl et al, 2010). Eigenvector centrality, defined as the “weighted sum of not only direct connections but indirect connections of every length” (Bonacich, 2007, p. 555) is another important measure used in the exploration of our network that allowed us to identify individuals who are connected to other well-connected individuals. In order to measure local

Open Document