Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Economic
The “revolving door”, criticisms of this practice, the effects on ethical decision-making between top executives government regulatory agencies and private industry, discussed.
Fitzroy Tate
The concept of a "revolving door" refers to governmental affairs. Divergently concerns close relationship between business and government; the practices call into question the integrity of government decisions. This practice concerns the ability of business interests to "capture" the federal government by placing business executives in leadership positions on the very governmental agencies designed to regulate the business interests. This revolving door as referenced by John Feehery (Center for Responsive Politics) is a concept that concerns the integrity
…show more content…
From this diversity created from Special Interest Group of different types. They all perused their individual interest and mandate, putting the issue of the particular industry they represent ahead of the greater good of the society. An example of which is Bloomberg Law, (2014), legal position on the Dodge v. Ford Motor Co. case, where as the Dodge motor company wanted to increase the cost of the product and limit the money invested into expansion in order to pay out a larger dividend. While Ford intent was to spread the benefits of the industrialized society to as many people as possible by which he reduced the price the cars $900 to $360 allowing as many to purchase cars. Dodge brought this issue to court but was over ruled as the court does not interfere on business matters as a rule of law. The rule of law expressly upheld that the purpose of a corporation is to make a profit for the shareholders, but a court will not interfere with decisions that come under the business judgment of directors. Dodge took ford to court to advance its special interest, the interest of financing and growing of their own business instead of taking a utilitarian …show more content…
The wealth of company grew and dominated the lives of the people consuming them, in their interaction and the uses of the product and services they provide. This kind of sphere and power manifest social and economic problems that ranged and in size, continuously perpetuated society. The government was further challenged to control, regulate and engages business with trade and commerce, encounters problems such as Homelessness, Immigration, Racism and Prejudice, General Works, Intellectual Freedom/Freedom of Speech/Censorship/Privacy, Poverty and Welfare, Violence, just to name a few. As business growth there social responsibilities take form; people, consumer, special interest intuition and society expect a particular behavior from company’s and its members. When these expectations are not meet coupled with improprietous business dealings, people are upset and business and sometimes held responsible and accountable, for example Bernard “Bernie” Madoff, a former stockbroker, investment advisor, and financier convicted of fraud. He is the former non-executive chairman of the NASDAQ stock market, convicted of operation of a Ponzi scheme that is considered to be the largest financial fraud in U.S. history. The diversity, seperation of institutions, interest groups persuing their own mandate business commitment to make profit , community, consumers, special interest groups, citizens, having expection and causes perpitual reason for business
In the Frontline documentary “The Madoff Affair”, it is revealed and painfully evident that the ability to predict, prevent, and prosecute white collar crime is flawed and highly complicated even for the government. Frontline takes a look at the first global Ponzi scheme in history and helps create a better understanding of the illegal conduct that led to the rise and fall of Bernie Madoff and those associated with his empire (Frontline, 2017). When the leadership at the top of any organization is founded on lies, secrecy, and empowered by the leaders within the industry, the corruption is deep and difficult to prosecute. The largest stock market fraud in history reinforces the need for better government regulations, enforcement of the regulations, and oversight, especially in it’s own backyard (Yang, 2014).
Henry Ford was an American industrialist and the founder of the Ford Motor Company, who stated, “business is never so healthy as when, like a chicken, it must do a certain amount of scratching around for what it gets” (Ford). In the corporate world, individual businesses control other corporations in order to improve their own systems and products. On the macroscopic scale, it is comprised of the corporate world; however, examples of monopoly from the corporate world can be translated onto the microscopic scale. The microscopic scale is primarily the community of families in this society. Families and corporations share this similar idea. Parents dictate their children’s development, and within a relationship one gender may show more power and influence on the other. For the most part, the selfish characteristic of society is the manifestation of monopolism and it raises moral and ethical issues because these acts are inconsiderate of the loved ones around them.
The pluralistic scholar David Truman notes that “the proliferation of political interest groups [is] a natural and largely benign consequence of economic development” (Kernell 2000, 429). That is, as American economic development increases, in the form of industry, trade, and technology, factions are produced in order to protect special interests. Factions have a large platform on which to find support from various political parties, committees, subcommittees, and the courts, as well as federal, state, and local governments (Kernell 2000, 429).
According with the textbook and other internet sources, Milton Friedman described in his thesis that the main goal of a business is to generate gains or profits. As a result, several business have been using such thesis as a justification for some of the decisions they made. In the case of “A Civil Action” we had the two companies contaminating the little town water with chemicals used during the elaboration of their products. The use of trichloroethylene was apparently causing some of the children of the place to developed respiratory and other cancerous diseases such as leukemia. After the death of several children, people on town began to worry about the situation and everything pointed out ...
The central inefficiency in this process is that “rent-seeking involves spending resources to influence a division of profits, instead of creating a good or service that other businesses or individuals are willing to pay an amount that exceeds the cost of producing said good or service.” It is also a fact that the vast majority of money spent on lobbying comes from corporations and trade groups, the exact types of groups that would be interested in “rent-seeking”. Research from 2014 has concluded that, “Corporations and trade associations comprise the vast majority of lobbying expenditures by interest groups — more than 84% at the federal level” The impressive sums being spent by corporations and trade associations coupled with the detrimental effects of this behavior on the economy reveal that Wheelan’s warnings about the dangers of organised interest groups are well
There was strong competition for Ford in the American small-car market from Volkswagen and several Japanese companies in the 1960’s. To fight the competition, Ford rushed its newest car the Pinto into production in much less time than is usually required to develop a car. The regular time to produce an automobile is 43 months but Ford took 25 months only (Satchi, L., 2005). Although Ford had access to a new design which would decrease the possibility of the Ford Pinto from exploding, the company chose not to implement the design, which would have cost $11 per car, even though it had done an analysis showing that the new design would result in 180 less deaths. The company defended itself on the grounds that it used the accepted risk-benefit analysis to determine if the monetary costs of making the change were greater than the societal benefit. Based on the numbers Ford used, the cost would have been $137 million versus the $49.5 million price tag put on the deaths, injuries, and car damages, and thus Ford felt justified not implementing the design change (Legget, C., 1999). This was a ground breaking decision because it failed to use the common standard of whether a harm was a result of an action on trespass or harm as a result of an action on the case (Ferguson, A., 2005).
...the rise of the American public being able to voice there specific opinion about a topic. The rise in the number of interest groups has caused a definite effect on the public interest, and given more power to some groups. Big business has been the most successful at using interest groups to their advantage, however, in the changing political structure other organization will gain prominence and be able to, like big business, get their own view passed into law. The opinion of these groups may or may not be the opinion of the average American voter, but the use of interest groups gives everyone the chance to get the maximum political influence for their dollar.
In this essay, I will be examining the financial events surrounding Bernie Madoff, and the events surrounding Enron. Bernie Madoff, “a former American stock broker, investment advisor, non-executive chairman of the NASDAQ stock market, and the admitted operator of what has been described as the largest Ponzi scheme in the history of the world”. Bernard Madoff, 2011, para. 78. 1) Bernie was able to convince investors to give him large sums of money with the promise that they would receive between eight percent and twelve percent return a year.... ...
Milton Friedman presents a compelling argument in “The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase Profits” by arguing that businesses need to focus only on increasing their profits and integrating social responsibility will only hurt them as a company. Since “only people can have responsibilities” (Friedman 52), Friedman argues that businesses as a whole do not have any type of real responsibilities because there is not a singular person for these responsibilities to fall on. Corporate executives are people as well and may feel they have social responsibilities to society but these “are the social responsibilities of individuals, not of business” (51). In terms of corporations, the businessmen are the ones that hold the responsibility of the company. Friedman argues that the only responsibility these managers hold is to those who own the corporation, the shareholders. If the individuals themselves want to contribute to social responsibility they must do it with their own money in their personal lives, but they should not use social responsibility in
Jordan Belfort is the notorious 1990’s stockbroker who saw himself earning fifty million dollars a year operating a penny stock boiler room from his Stratton Oakmont, Inc. brokerage firm. Corrupted by drugs, money, and sex, he went from being an innocent twenty – two year old on the fringe of a new life to manipulating the system in his infamous “pump and dump” scheme. As a stock swindler, he would motivate his young brokers through insane presentations to rile them up as they defrauded investors with duplicitous stock sales. Toward the end of this debauchery tale he was convicted for securities fraud and money laundering for which he was sentenced to twenty – two months in prison as well as recompensing two – hundred million in restitution to any swindled stock buyers of his brokerage firm. Though his lavish spending and berserk party lifestyle was consumed by excessive greed, he displayed both positive and negative aspects of business communications.
There are many techniques lobbyist use to influence lawmakers. These techniques include rallying, bribing, pursuing and using personal relationships (Champagne et al. 186-188). A big technique for a lobbyist is the revolving door. The “revolving door” is a term used to describe a situation in where a former politician uses his personal and political
It is known that corporations play a large part in making the world go around. Many times we read, hear or see stories on companies and why something was done a certain way. The film “The Corporation” has given a whole new insight to not only how businesses operate but what motivates them and their decisions that they make to keep their businesses thriving.
The problem that was investigated consisted of a question that Milton Friedman posed in one of his articles, which was featured in The New York Times Magazine in 1970. The question was, “What does it mean to say that “business” has responsibilities” (Friedman, 2007, p. 173)? Friedman (1970) elaborated on how businesses cannot have assigned responsibilities. Furthermore, he described how groups or individuals should be the only ones that can hold responsibilities, not businesses. He stated that associating responsibilities with the word business is too ambiguous. I will examine three discussion questions and three compare and contrast questions which Jennings (2009) posed in a case study that is related to Friedman’s (1970) article “The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits”.
When the problem became serious two main views formed: the “narrow” view and the “broader” view, based on different ideas. The “narrow” view is based on the proposition that corporations have no social responsibility and they have only one main purpose, to make a profit (Friedman, 1970). So corporations should remain socially independent and all conflicts must be solved through the individual responsibility concept. On the contrary the “broader” view states that corporations have social obligations as all existing participants of market, persons and entities are tied together and are mutually dependent. So corporations cannot ignore some serious events or problems, which take place, and must help society, as profit is not their single purpose.
In the current time of growth and progression, individuals should know that how a business not only flourish but sustain itself. Making profit is one of the main targets of every corporates but it must not be the only one. When an individual builds a company in order to do business, they should be well aware of their contribution towards the society as well as their business and employees in it. It is total strategy of all. We should be able to realize every increment contributes of it. One of the major factors that affect a business is how well it participates in Corporate Social Responsibility. According to (Werther & Chandler, 2006) corporate social responsibility (CSR) refers to a business practice that involves participating in initiatives that benefits the society. In authenticity, there is a whole lot to argue about it. There are no major guidelines that decides either a business is participating in Corporate Social Responsibility; what might be considered a Business practicing CSR to some, can still not be accepted for it by others. CSR may be restrained a term which his highly flexible. This paper will discuss about Corporate Social Responsibility and its