Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Merits and demerits of fiscal policy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
One thing that I have learned about college is that you have to sometimes talk about things that make you uncomfortable or scared in order to learn. I do not think I am alone in saying that the United States’ current debt situation is terrifying. Ten trillion dollars alone is an expansive and unimaginable amount of money, and since PBS produced Ten Trillion and Counting in 2009, the national debt has grown to twenty-one trillion. As stated, the documentary was produced during the first months of former President Barack Obama’s first term and focused on former President George W. Bush’s relationship with national debt during his eight year tenure. Ten Trillion and Counting explains some of the questionable decisions that former President Bush made, especially regarding fiscal policy. …show more content…
Bush came into office in 2001, he inherited a surplus from former President Clinton and left a recession for former President Obama when he left in 2009. In President Bush’s defense, recessions are a part of the business cycle, but certain decisions that he made also did not help our financial and debt situations. According to fiscal policy, our country in 2001 was thriving and Bush should have used an contractionary policy to stabilize the economy. Bush should have increased taxes and decreased government spending; he did the exact opposite. By 2003, Bush had expanded Medicare to include prescription drugs, committed US troops to two separate wars, and introduced two tax cuts. Of course, Bush had little to no control over our wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and the terrorist attacks of 9/11 affected all aspects of the US economy due to a general fear. However, when a horrible event destabilizes the economy of a country and forces the country into two separate conflicts, the country should not spend even more and take burden off of the people that supposed to be paying for
Bridge to Freedom provides the historical documentary behind the events that served as the narrative for Selma. Instead of a drama, the viewers receive an actual documentary that shows the confrontations between the marchers and the government. Like Selma, it highlights the violence, the deaths, and the beatings, but also goes further back in time to show society’s treatment of African Americans.
This deficit has to do with having responsible leader who are willing to increase awareness and make beneficial changes in the nation. In my opinion, the federal debt is a serious threat to the US that must be politically address whenever possible. I believe that the candidates of the 2016 presidential election should make this issue one of the top priorities to discuss and to dictate a considerable amount of work to fix it. That is because the worse the federal debt is, the worse the future would be to the nation. Also, voters must be well educated about this issue in order to shape their decision in voting for the candidate that seems most powerful and confident about this problem. Solving this problem may be difficult and would take time and so much effort. Therefore, the changes and solution must be on both a national and individual levels as
Throughout the US, millions of POC students exposed to the traditional, rather outdated version of US History. Never do the textbooks explicitly mention and/ or explain the terrorizing, constant stripping down of others’ cultures and appropriating it into the dominant group of predominantly white, Anglo-Saxon and protestant. For many Mexican American students, they can’t relate to anything in the text, nor do they share an interest in the coursework provided. The way US history sets up doesn't teach and somehow excludes Indigenous backgrounds or for the most part was never taught in the classroom but, rather briefly mentioned in one or two paragraphs. Immigrants from diverse groups built this country yet their culture is consistently shown
Many argue that Reagan “enacted irresponsible tax giveaways for the rich…[starving] the federal government of revenue [which] led to unprecedented deficits.” There is no doubt that “today’s budget deficits [can] impoverish our descendants.”1
These conditions have the ability to cause recession. Now that an armistice has been reached in Korea, a recession is beginning to occur (Pach and Richardson, 54). I believe that the President’s chief concern should not be to make an immediate and fast acting restoration of the general economy. The problems of the federal deficit and the recession must wait until the more important problems are dealt with. The problem at hand is the rising rate of unemployment.
Prior to both times the Federal Reserve was highly thought of. In both the great Depression and the Great Recession the Presidents of those times increased spending to try to get the country out of the impending recession. Both Obama and Roosevelt increased the taxes in their presidency but as shown in the Great Depression high taxes are fol...
The US has been in and out of debt countless times throughout history, going as far back as the Civil War. However, debt did not become a truly relevant problem until much later, in the 1980s (Budget Deficits). Up to that point, large budget deficits were generally only allowed during wartime, but this pattern ended after the Great Depression. Roosevelt’s New Deal meant that the government spent much more than it previously did, even after the economy improved (Budget De...
The U.S budget deficit over the years has been a problem but lately the deficit has shrunk. However, what made the U.S budget deficit get to where it is today and what will it be like in the years to come. Throughout the past the U.S has operated under a deficit. This means that the U.S Spent more money than it was taking in. The cause of the excess in spending was different depending on which year. Some of the causes were war, increase in spending , and economic downturns. There were different acts passed to try and control the deficit problem. The deficit at the present time is declining. This decline is due to the improving economy, sequester, and a tax increase on high-income households. The big factor that went into the decline in the deficit for 2013 was the payment that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac made. The deficit decline in the present time may make some think the U.S could get out of debt but it has been projected that the U.S deficit will start to increase once again.
...mised to repeal tax cuts to the wealthy class, Americans who earn more than 250,000 dollars a year. During his election in 2008 happened a major financial crisis. This financial crisis of fall 2008 was a cause to the worst holiday shopping period in the past forty years. After his election his administration took time to contemplate a fiscal stimulus plan. This plan increased tax cuts, unemployment benefits spending or series of projects, aid to the state and local governments, and much more. The recession ended in June 2009, an less than ten percent of the funds had passed in February 2010.
As president, it was too difficult for Johnson to please two issues, social or military. Since Johnson tried to stay neutral and attempting to make both of them work, the United States economy suffered because spending was clearly increased. “President Lyndon,” he said. B. Johnson’s decision to finance a major war and the Great Society simultaneously, without a significant increase in taxation, launched a runaway double digit inflation and mounting federal debt that ravaged the American economy and eroded living standards from the late 1960’s to into the 1990s”(Oxford Companion 766). It is impossible to avoid economic problems with major spending increases without some tax increases.
Cox, He, Mclean, Russel, Tse, Waananen. (2011) . Charting the American Debt Crisis, New York Times- Politics
The short documentary of Len Bias was very interesting since the topic of drugs is very popular between my age group. It is so melancholy how a person could die one day to another regardless to the age group. “Lo único que tenemos seguro en esta vida es la muerte” is a spanish quote that reminds me of this topic. This quote means that the only thing that will happen for sures in life is death. Everyone is going to die in this life and no one can’t get away from it. It is misabreal how most young people feel secure of their life without fearing death. A big amount of youth make many mistakes in life such as doing drugs and drinking alcohol without fearing and taking in consideration the consequences. One mistake will not only change the person who committed the error but it will affect all it’s family. I am against
This is a critique of" Roger And Me", a documentary by Michael Moore. This is a film about a city that at one time had a great economy. The working class people lived the American dream. The majority of people in this town worked at the large GM factory. The factory is what gave these people security in their middle working class home life. Life in the city of Flint was good until Roger Smith the CEO of GM decided to close the factory. This destroyed the city. Violent crime became the highest in the nation, businesses went bankrupt, people were evicted from their rented homes. There were no jobs and no opportunity. Life was so bad that Money magazine named Flint the worst place to live in the entire nation. When news of the factory closing first broke, Michael Moore a native of flint decided to search for Roger Smith and bring him to Flint.
Veldhuis, Neil. “Beyond our means: Government debt tops $1.2-trillion and spending is still rising.” Financial Post. National Post, 16 May 2013. Web. 23 Feb. 2014.
... people are concerned about the size of the U.S. national debt. They fear that a large amount of debt harms the economy and feel that the money used to pay interest on the debt could be better spent on other uses. Some people are also concerned about the ability of future generations to pay back the debt. However, many economists argue that the size of the debt is misleading. They point out that an important measure of the severity of a nation's debt is its size as a percentage of the nation's gross domestic product. Based on this measurement, the national debt of the United States during the mid-1990s was about half the size of the U.S. debt at the end of World War II in 1945. Other economists contend that when the balance of the debt is compared between years it does not account for the effects of inflation, which makes balances from later years appear larger.