The Doctrines of Equity are said to be the cure for the rigidity and harshness of common law. Explain the veracity of this statement noting to use atleast five principles of equity.
Equity and Common law classify as two tributaries which meet at one end of the largest river,of law thus as definition, Equity stands as a designed set of rules that act as an appendage to the general rules of law while common law accumulates the part of English law that is imitative from custom and judicial precedent rather than statues.
In the common law legal system, laws are created by and refined by judicial formation. This implies that a ruling in a case currently pending depends on the rulings made in previous cases and affects the law to be applied in future cases. Equity doctrines, however, was developed and administered in England by the high court of chancery in the exercise of its
…show more content…
(2016). EQUITY IS A GLOSS ON COMMON LAW.. Retrieved February, 16 2018, fromhttps://instantlawblog.wordpress.com/2016/08/22/equity-is-a-gloss-on-common-law/
Dynalex. (2012, October 13). Equity and Common Law. Retrieved February, 16 2018, from https://dynalex.wordpress.com/2012/10/31/equity-and-common-law-two-separate-streams-of-law-running-in-the-same-channel/
Kennedy, K. C. (1997). Equitable Remedies and Principled Discretion: The Michigan Experience. Michigan State University College of Law Digital Commons at Michigan State University College of Law.
Kenya Law Resource Center . (n.d.). Definition of Equity. Retrieved February, 16 2018, from http://www.kenyalawresourcecenter.org/2011/07/definition-of-equity.html
Mah, C. L. (May 1, 2008 ). You are here: Home / Feature Articles / 32-5: The Law of Equity / Equitable Doctrines and Maxims Equitable Doctrines and Maxims. 32-5, Retrieved from http://www.lawnow.org.
Subrin, S. N. (1987). How Equity Conquered Common Law: The Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure In Historical Perspective. Chicago , USA:
Pagan writes a captivating story mingled with the challenges of the Eastern Shore legal system. This book gives a complete explanation backed up by research and similar cases as evidence of the ever-changing legal system. It should be a required reading for a history or law student.
Hall, Kermit L, eds. The Oxford guide to United States Supreme Court decisions New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.
Hobson, Charles F. The Great Chief Justice, John Marshall And the Rule Of Law. University Press Of Kansas: Wison Garey McWilliams & Lance Banning, 1996.
Linder, Douglas O. "Judge James E. Horton." UMKC School of Law. 1999. Web. 24 Feb. 2011.
Gunther, G. (1991). Constitutional Law. Twelfth Edition. New York: The Foundation Press, Inc. pp. 1154-1161.
Public law : Cases, materials, and commentary In Forcese C. (Ed.), . Toronto: Toronto : Emond Montgomery Publications, 2006.
"UNITED STATES v. JONES." The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. 18 Nov. 2013 .
Rehnquist, William H., Brennan, William J. "A Casebook on the Law and Society: What Rights
Moral rightness and fairness are two alternate ways of saying justice. Justice is defined in a legal dictionary on law.com as “a scheme or system of law in which every person receives his/ her/its due from the system, including all rights, both natural and legal.” There are many different opinions on the law and justice systems in America, many of which are not particularly positive. Law.com also states, one problem can be found in the attorneys, judges, and legislators, as they tend to get caught up more in the procedure than actually achieving justice for the people. While others say that our law system is not interested in finding out the truth, but more criticisms can also be seen in Herman Melville’s story, “Bartleby, the Scrivener.” Melville
Strong, F. (1986). Substatntive Due process of law: A Dichotomy of sense and Nonsense. Durham: Carolina Academic Press.
From the creation of the very first civilizations, people have been using laws for potential disputes and or other issues that they come across. With the evolution of time and the expansion of the legal system, many laws were established that did not promote justice and equality. In essence, they did not take into consideration the ethical and racial implications that these laws generated. In our days, laws of this nature are still in effect and are characterized as unjust. They can be found anywhere and can take various forms.
Oct 1993. Retrieved November 18, 2010. Vol. 79. 134 pages (Document ID: 0747-0088) Published by American Bar Association
Equity means giving every individual what he or she merits or, in more conventional terms, giving every individual his or her due. Equity and reasonableness are nearly related terms that are frequently today utilized conversely. There have, be that as it may, additionally been more unmistakable understandings of the two terms. While equity normally has been utilized with reference to a standard of rightness, decency frequently has been utilized as to a capacity to judge without reference to one 's emotions or intrigues; reasonableness has additionally been utilized to allude to the capacity to make judgments that are not excessively general but rather that are concrete and particular to a specific case. Regardless, an idea of desert is significant to both equity and decency. Case in point, are requesting what they think they merit when they are requesting that they be treated with equity and decency. At the point when individuals contrast over what they accept ought to be given, or when choices must be
A major impediment of the common is the tendency to lead to perpetuity of bad decisions once a precedent has been set. If there is no amendment and the same ruling is applied, that bad decision will be subsist and will be perpetuated. Since the common law system revolves around following antecedents, it usually takes a long while for change to occur. Unfortunately, before this change is effected, the bad decision will be upheld as long as the change does not come into effect. This is one area where the codified system of law has an advantage as it is rules based approach to law making designed to provide a comprehensive code of laws for the area in question.
The meaning of English Legal System is stated out by Cownie and Bradley in the English Legal System book . There are many sources that build up the English Law as it is today. The main sources of English Law consist of Common Law, parliamentary legislation and delegated legislation. As stated in Gary Slapper & David Kelly’s English Legal System book , there are many different interpretations of the phrase ‘source of law’ where in this book the law is made up of three main sources; where in Martin Hunt’s “A” Level Law , though there are different sources that make up the English law, these sources are differentiated in two main categories with various minor sources.