Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Celebrity influences on society
Celebrity influences on society
Celebrity influences on society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Celebrity influences on society
One of the hottest things that exploded in the recent years was the invention of reality shows. Magazines, TV and blogs do nothing else but talk about this celebrities, most praise how they dress and how the handle daily routines. It has come to the point that some celebrities seem to have certain immunity. Why does it seem that they can get away with things that an average person will not even dare to do. Are they better than the average American, or is their behavior reasonable. What drives a celebrity to act so irresponsible to themselves and those around them.
Many celebrities have been involved in criminal acts, but the sentencing they receive is very light, it varies from traffic school, anger management or rehab. According to David Barnett the most aggressive sentencing to a celebrity was done to Martha Stewart. From when she was found guilty for insider trading, she spent five months in a minimum security prison for a federal crime. Five months is the federal minimum a judge can charge for that type of crime. Another case would be the actor Elmore "Rip" Torn who was arrested after breaking into a bank with a loaded gun while intoxicated. He was charged with burglary and possessing a firearm without a permit. Now this is nothing new, the actor has had two previous serious felonies, and he roamed the street as freely as anybody (huffingtonpost).
However that is hardly the case for the average person. Criminal prosecutors are always seeking the maximum penalty, which is good because it shows dedication. Furthermore it also sets an example by letting the law-breakers know that for every crime, there is a punishment. Every single person in this country knows that if they decide to break the law, there are going to be con...
... middle of paper ...
...rret, David. "Celebrities and the Law: Why it seems like Hollywood law-breakers are above the law" Helium. 30 Mar. 2010
Fleeman, Mike. "Khloe Kardashian Enters – and Leaves – Jail". People. 3/15.2010 .
Haggin, Daniel J. Advanced Dui Investigation: A Training And Reference Manual . Springfield, Illinois: Charles C. Thomas, 2005.
"Lohan arrested on DUI charge after crash" msnbc. 27 May. 2007. NBC 29 Mar. 2010.
"'Rip' Torn Arrested For Drunken Bank Break-in" Huffingtonpost. 30 Jan. 2010 Associated Press. 31 Mar. 2010
"Tager Law Firm". Tager Law Firm. 3/15/2010 .
This case involves the suspect being arrested for driving under the influence of alcoholic beverages in violation of CVC 23153(a)-DUI.
The shows portrays a melting pot of each character lives with money, sex, social media, and relationships unfiltered and toxic, yet irrelevant to the real –world. Another key point is the exploitation of the television world and the millions of viewers, that it’s okay sociably to exemplify deviant behaviors in real –life. Also, culturally and sociably, the reality show creates a bigger problem as the platform provided for the cast is characterized in a negative state. On the negative side, this creates the illusion to act in like manner, from the deviant behavior portrayed on
Part of that is because some people’s perspectives of celebrities allow them think as if they’re on a pedestal and are more important than the average human. When people vision these celebrities as these quintessential people it enable’s their own thoughts and opinions on the celebrity. It’s like brainwashing, these celebrities only show the media what they want, which allows them to put up a whole façade and mask who they truly are. During the O.J Simpson trial it opened more people’s minds to visualize the concept that celebrities have the ability to be just as deranged as the average person, and that we are all equal, but the only difference that’s separates us is the fact that their job is in the lime
Reality based television has a broad landscape ranging from competitive game-like shows to programs following the daily lives of a group of people. Every major network now has some form of reality programming because the genre’s shows are high in viewership and require low costs for production. The genre is appealing to viewers because it provides them with a first-hand look into the lives of everyday people, which allows them to observe social behavior that helps them determine what is appropriate or not (Tyree, 2011, p. 397). Since the majority of modern reality stars start out as unknowns, frequent viewers of reality programming believed that fame is obtainable if they appear on a popular show (Mendible, 2004). According to Mendible’s evaluation of the genre in the article Humiliation, Subjectivity, and Reality TV, people enjoy reality programs beca...
all worthy people living in a jubilant but melancholy world, why should anyone get worse penalties than another? Some may feel like celebrities should have longer jail sentences, higher tickets, and pay more money for fines. Others think that celebrities should be treated fairly like everyone else. Honestly nothing determines who a celebrity is, what actually determines who a celebrity is? Celebrities are all regular people however some receive a high amount of bad publicity plus the sentence or what they owe.
This sort of behavior is constant over time. Celebrities today are posted and paraded all over TV and magazines, no matter what they do. Justin Beiber was caught drunk driving, stealing property, and many more crimes.... ... middle of paper ... ...
He was arrested for aggravated assault, and charged with shooting two off duty police officers in Atlanta in 1993, but the charges were later dropped (bomp). He was also accused of beating a limousine driver in Los Angeles and found guilty of threatening a fellow rapper with a baseball bat in Michigan. He was then found guilty of sexual abuse in 1994 and was serving up to 4 12 years in prison (bomp).
They are successful in immediately punishing the offender and they are also seen as “high in profile”. Following a sentencing, the convicted criminal is immediately escorted out of the courtroom and straight to the confinements of prison. This instant punishment keeps the convicted off the streets preventing more harm to the community. This also is a result of “high in profile”. Prison is the most severe punishment that the government can inflict on a criminal (including the death-penalty). Criminal sentencing is taken very seriously and is meant to scare lawbreakers from re-offending. However, rehabilitation does a better job in preventing
There was once a Television show name “Berretta” and the show theme song said do not do crime if you cannot do the time. That is a true saying, one that should be on every criminal mind why they are committing a crime. Sentencing a criminal for crimes for which they have been convicted of is their due punishment according to the severity of the crime committed. The Courts have for centuries punished criminals according to the belief of the society in which the crime was committed.
In addition, if someone was fallowing you, taking pictures and bullying you every day single day, you would instantly report them to the police and they would without a doubt get the stalkers arrested, and they would get a restraining order. But if a celebrity calls the cops saying that there is someone following them and harassing them, no one is willing to protect them, because they are not able to stop the paparazzi for good. It 's like all celebrities are being punished for being rich and successful. Nobody deserves
Do we as a society have the right to punish celebrities when they misbehave? Do celebrities have the right to become livid when they are focused on their immoral behavior? Do they love the media attention only when it benefits them? Before we can answer the above questions, would we, furthermore, can we live our life as a celebrity if given the opportunity? The perks of illimitable wealth, vacationing all over the world, housekeepers, chefs, being in receipt of freebies from designers, multiple homes in diverse parts of the world, chauffeurs, the finest foods, and all the other perks that come with being a celebrity?
Different methods of “dealing” with criminals are used in different societies based upon how the average citizen views criminals. For a society where a majority of the population lives in poverty, the laws may be more lax because the general population may identify more with the criminals and understand why they chose the path of crime. For societies where the general population lives in wealth, criminals may meet a harsher fate because the wealthy will most likely not be able to identify with the criminal and they will view the criminal as stealing from them personally. In using a deterrence method for dealing with criminals, the society most likely believes in more than one chance however, they believe that if a person chooses this path more
Another example; James Simpson was found not guilty in Oct of 1995, Simpson was ordered to pay the families of his ex wife and her friend, Ron Goldman 33.5 million in damaged. Twelve years later, Simpson was charged with 12 felonies, which includes armed robbery and kidnapping, he was sentenced to 33 years without parole for nine years. He will be serving in Lovelock,
Verdicts often cause a notion of justice or indifference to resonate throughout the masses, but rarely do the individuals personally involved in the situations feel that same notion following the verdict. The law tries to define what is justice for the general populous, but every person can find a penalty that they feel does not match the crime committed. Legislators choose to ignore these outliers, the few wackos
It seems as if sppome people just can’t get enough of the exploratory tabloids of their favorite celebrities, some people still take an interest in celebrities that aren't even around anymore . Throughout Americas Hollywood History the views of women actresses has changed drastically, two very good examples are Elizabeth Taylor and Lindsay Lohan.The contrast between these two women show a difference in class,culture and time. By researching actresses Elizabeth Taylor and Lindsay Lohan one would discover the tragic and destructive toll Hollywood glamor that would eventually come to overrun their lives.